The characteristics of multiple tuned-mass-dampers (MTMDs) attached to a single-degree-of-freedom primary system have been examined by many researchers. Several papers have included some parameter optimization, all based on restrictive assumptions. In this paper, we propose an efficient numerical algorithm to directly optimize the stiffness and damping of each of the tuned-mass dampers (TMDs) in such a system. We formulate the parameter optimization as a decentralized H2 control problem where the block-diagonal feedback gain matrix is composed of the stiffness and damping coefficients of the TMDs. The gradient of the root-mean-square response with respect to the design parameters is evaluated explicitly, and the optimization can be carried out efficiently. The effects of the mass distribution, number of dampers, total mass ratio, and uncertainties in system parameters are studied. Numerical results indicate that the optimal designs have neither uniformly spaced tuning frequencies nor identical damping coefficients, and that optimization of the individual parameters in the MTMD system yields a substantial improvement in performance. We also find that the distribution of mass among the TMDs has little impact on the performance of the system provided that the stiffness and damping can be individually optimized.

Keywords:
damping, vibrations, vibration control, mean square error methods
Topics:
Dampers, Damping, Optimization, Stiffness, Design
1.
Den Hartog, J. P., 1947, Mechanical Vibration, McGraw–Hill, New York.
2.
Sun
,
J. Q.
,
Jolly
,
M. R.
, and
Norris
,
M. A.
,
1995
, “
Passive, Adaptive and Active Tuned Vibration Absorbers—A Survey
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
117
, pp.
234
–
242
.
3.
Asani
,
T.
,
Nishihara
,
O.
, and
Baz
,
A. M.
,
2002
, “
Analytical Solutions to H∞ and H2 Optimization of Dynamic Vibration Absorber Attached to Damped Linear Systems
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
124
(
2
), pp.
67
–
78
.
4.
Warburton
,
G. B.
,
1981
, “
Optimum Absorber Parameters for Minimizing Vibration Response
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
9
(
3
), pp.
251
–
262
.
5.
Kitis
,
L.
,
Wang
,
B. P.
, and
Pilkey
,
W. D.
,
1983
, “
Vibration Reduction Over a Frequency Range
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
89
(
4
), pp.
559
–
569
.
6.
Zuo, L., and Nayfeh, S., 2002, “Design of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Tuned-Mass Dampers: A Minimax Approach,” Proc. 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA 2002–1283.
7.
Zuo
,
L.
, and
Nayfeh
,
S.
,
2004
, “
Minimax Optimization of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Tuned-Mass Dampers
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
272
, pp.
893
–
908
.
8.
Zuo, L., 2002, “Optimal Control With Structure Constraints and Its Application to the Design of Passive Mechanical Systems,” M.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
9.
Zuo, L., and Nayfeh, S., 2003, “The Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Tuned-Mass Damper for Suppression of Single-Mode Vibration Under Random and Harmonic Excitation,” Proc. of ASME 2003 Design Engineering Technical Conference, DETC2003/Vib48550, ASME, New York.
10.
Xu
,
K.
, and
Igusa
,
T.
,
1992
, “
Dynamic Characteristics of Multiple Substructures With Closely Spaced Frequencies
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
21
(
12
), pp.
1059
–
1070
.
11.
Yamaguchi
,
H.
, and
Harnpornchai
,
N.
,
1993
, “
Fundamental Characteristics of Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers for Suppressing Harmonically Forced Oscillations
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
22
(
1
), pp.
51
–
62
.
12.
Abe
,
M.
, and
Fujino
,
Y.
,
1994
, “
Dynamic Characterization of Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers and Some Design Formulas
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
23
(
8
), pp.
813
–
835
.
13.
Kareem
,
A.
, and
Kline
,
S.
,
1995
, “
Performance of Multiple Mass Dampers Under Random Loading
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
,
121
(
2
), pp.
348
–
361
.
14.
Strasberg
,
M.
, and
Feit
,
D.
,
1996
, “
Vibration Damping of Large Structures Induced by Attached Small Resonant Structures
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
99
(
1
), pp.
335
–
344
.
15.
Park
,
J.
, and
Reed
,
D.
,
2001
, “
Analysis of Uniformly and Linearly Distributed Mass Dampers Under Harmonic and Earthquake Excitation
,”
Eng. Struct.
,
23
(
7
), pp.
802
–
814
.
16.
Igusa
,
T.
, and
Xu
,
K.
,
1994
, “
Vibration Control Using Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
175
(
4
), pp.
491
–
503
.
17.
Joshi
,
A.
, and
Jangid
,
R.
,
1997
, “
Optimum Parameters of Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers for Based-Excited Damped Systems
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
202
(
5
), pp.
657
–
667
.
18.
Jangid
,
R.
,
1999
, “
Optimum Multiple Tuned-Mass-Dampers for Based-Excited Undamped Systems
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
28
(
9
), pp.
1041
–
1049
.
19.
Li
,
C.
,
2000
, “
Performance of Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers for Attenuating Undersirable Oscillations of the Structures Under the Ground Acceleration
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
29
(
9
), pp.
1405
–
1421
.
20.
Li
,
C.
,
2002
, “
Optimum Multiple Tuned-Mass-Dampers for Structures Under the Ground Acceleration Based on DDMF and ADMF
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
31
(
4
), pp.
897
–
919
.
21.
Zuo, L., and Nayfeh, S. A., 2002, “Design of Passive Mechanical Systems Via Decentralized Control Techniques,” Proc. 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA 2002-1282.
22.
Zhou, K., Doyle, J. C., and Glover, K., 1995, Robust and Optimal Control, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
23.
Graham, A., 1981, Kronecker Products and Matrix Calculus: With Applications, Wiley, New York.
24.
Bertsekas, D. P., 1995, Nonlinear Programming, Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.