A new class of structural damping treatments is introduced. This class is the electro-magnetic damping treatment (EMDT) which relies in its operation on a viscoelastic damping layer sandwiched between two magnetic layers. Interaction between the magnets generates magnetic forces that enhance the compressional damping mechanism of the viscoelastic layer. With proper tuning of the magnetic forces, in response to the structural vibration, undesirable resonances and catastrophic failures can be avoided. The fundamentals and the underlying phenomena associated with the EMDT are investigated theoretically and experimentally. A finite element model is developed to describe the interaction between the dynamics of flexible beams, the viscoelastic damping layer and the magnetic layers. The validity of the developed finite element model is checked experimentally using aluminum beams treated with EMDT patches. The beam/EMDT system is subjected to sinusoidal excitations and its multi-mode response is monitored when the magnetic layers are activated or not. Several control strategies are considered to activate the magnetic layers including simple PD controllers. The performance of the uncontrolled and controlled system is determined at various operating conditions. Attenuation of 49.4 percent is obtained for the amplitude of first mode of vibration (5.2 Hz) with control voltage of 0.2 volts. The attenuation increases to 72.56 percent for the second mode of vibration (28.6 Hz) with a control voltage of 1.68 volts. Comparisons with conventional Passive Constrained Layer Damping (PCLD) treatments emphasize the potential of the EMDT treatment as an effective means for controlling structural vibrations. [S0739-3717(00)00603-6]

1.
Orsagh
,
R.
, and
Ghoneim
,
H.
,
1999
, “
Experimental Investigation of Electromechanical Surface Damping
,”
Smart Mater. Struct. Conf. Pass. Damp.
,
3672
, pp.
234
241
.
2.
Baz
,
A.
, and
Ro
,
J.
, March
1994
, “
The Concept and Performance of Active Constrained Layer Damping Treatments
,”
Sound Vib. Mag.
,
28
, No.
3
, pp.
18
21
.
3.
Baz, A., 1996, “Active Constrained Layer Damping,” U.S. Patent #5,485,053, Jan.
4.
Arafa, M., and Baz, A., 2000, “Energy Dissipation Characteristics of Active Piezoelectric Damping Composites,” J. Compos. Eng., Part B.
5.
Shields
,
W.
,
Ro
,
J.
, and
Baz
,
A.
,
1998
, “
Control of Sound Radiation from a Plate into an Acoustic Cavity Using Active Piezoelectric Damping Composites
,”
J. Smart Mater. Struct.
,
7
, pp.
1
11
.
6.
Ebrahim, A., and Baz, A., March 1998, “Vibration Control of Plates Using Magnetic Constrained Layer Damping Treatments,” 5th Conference On Smart Structures & Materials, Vol. 3327, pp. 138–158, San Diego, CA.
7.
Baz, A., 1997, “Magnetic Constrained Layer Damping,” Eleventh Symposium on Structural Dynamics & Control, Blacksburg, VA, pp. 333–343, May 12–14.
8.
Ruzzene, M., Oh, J., and Baz, A., 2000, “Finite Element Modeling of Magnetic Constrained Layer Damping,” J. Sound Vib. (to appear).
9.
Douglas
,
B.
, and
Yang
,
J.
,
1978
, “
Transverse Compressional Damping in the vibratory response of Elastic-Viscoelastic-Elastic Beams
,”
AIAA J.
,
20
, No.
9
, pp.
1284
1290
.
10.
Douglas
,
B.
,
1986
, “
Compressional Damping in Three-Layer Beams Incorporating Nearly Incompressible Visco-elastic Cores
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
104
, No.
2
, pp.
343
347
.
11.
Sylwyn
,
O.
,
1987
, “
Shear And Compressional Damping Effects of Constrained Layered Beam
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
118
, No.
1
, pp.
35
45
.
12.
Moon, F., 1984, Magneto-Solid Mechanics, Wiley, New York.
13.
Kamminga
,
W.
,
1975
, “
Finite-Element Solution for Devices with Permanent Magnets
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
,
8
, pp.
841
855
.
14.
Miya
,
K.
,
Hara
,
K.
, and
Tabata
,
Y.
,
1975
, “
Finite Element Analysis of Experiment on Dynamic Behavior of Cylinder Due to Electromagnetic Force
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
59
, pp.
401
410
.
15.
Brown, W. F., 1966, Magnetoelastic Interactions, Springer-Verlag, New York.
16.
Golla
,
D.
, and
Hughes
,
P.
,
1985
, “
Dynamics of Viscoelastic Structures-A Time Domain Finite Element Formulation
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
52
, pp.
897
906
.
You do not currently have access to this content.