Abstract

A lack of reliable experimental data on transonic blade flutter in real turbomachines hampers the further improvement of computational design predictions for off-design operation regimes of newly-built machines. Acquiring unsteady pressure distribution on blades in real turbomachines already in operation is practically impossible. The goal of this work is to explore if an approximate unsteady pressure distribution can be created experimentally in a simple aerodynamic tunnel by composing a sequence of blade surface steady pressures acquired for gradually varying blade incidence angle offsets. An essential condition for such an approximation is the assumption that the dynamic pressure component induced by the blade motion is substantially smaller than the flow pattern changes caused by the variation of interblade channel geometry. The methodology is proposed for blade sections with prevailing two-dimensional flow. A dedicated test facility, called the blade flutter module (BFM), has been built and used for this purpose. The BFM is a linear cascade consisting of five transonic airfoils that can be operated either in a static or a dynamic regime. For the dynamic operation, any of the blades can be forcedly and independently oscillated at frequencies of up to 400 Hz with a maximum angular amplitude of 3 deg. The obtained results confirm that within the range of the test conditions, the proposed compounded quasi-dynamic approach exhibits similar characteristics to dynamically acquired unsteady blade pressures. This is true for a test range of a maximum inlet Mach number of 1.09, maximum blade oscillating frequency of 100 Hz, and measurement of unsteady pressure distribution on a blade suction surface. The corresponding blade chord based reduced frequency is 0.21.

References

1.
Keith
,
T. G.
, and
Shrivastava
,
R.
,
2002
,
Active Control Analysis for Aeroelastic Instabilities in Turbomachines
,” NASA Report NCC3-774.
2.
Boldman
,
D. R.
, and
Buggele
,
A. E.
,
1978
, “
Wind Tunnel Tests of a Blade Subjected to Mid-Chord Torsional Oscillations at High Subsonic Stall Flutter Conditions
,” NASA TM-78998.
3.
Bölcs
,
A.
,
1983
, “
A Test Facility for the Investigation of Steady and Unsteady Transonic Flows in Annual Cascades
,” ASME Paper No. 83-GT-34.
4.
Vogt
,
D. M.
, and
Fransson
,
T. H.
,
2002
, “
A New Turbine Cascade for Aeromechanical Testing
,”
Paper at the 16th Symposium on Measuring Techniques in Transonic and Supersonic Flows in Cascades and Turbomachines
,
Cambridge, UK
,
Sept. 23–24
.
5.
Fransson
,
T. H.
, and
Vogt
,
D. M.
,
2003
, “
A New Facility for Investigating Flutter in Axial Turbomachines
,”
Paper at the 8th National Turbine Engine High Cycle Fatigue Conference
,
Monterey, CA.
,
Apr. 14–16
.
6.
Keerthi
,
M. C.
,
Shubham
,
S.
, and
Kushari
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Aerodynamic Influence of Oscillating Adjacent Airfoils in a Linear Compressor Cascade
,”
AIAA J.
,
51
(
12
), pp.
4113
4126
.
7.
Shaw
,
L. M.
,
Boldman
,
D. R.
,
Buggele
,
A. E.
, and
Buffum
,
D. H.
,
1986
, “
Unsteady Pressure Measurements on a Biconvex Airfoil in a Transonic Oscillating Cascade
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
108
(
1
), pp.
53
59
.
8.
Buffum
,
D. H.
, and
Fleeter
,
S.
,
1990
, “
Aerodynamic of a Linear Oscillating Cascade
,” NASA TM-103250.
9.
Buffum
,
D. H.
,
Capece
,
V. R.
,
King
,
A. J.
, and
El-Aini
,
Y. M.
,
1996
, “
Oscillating Cascade Aero-Dynamics at Large Mean Incidence
,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-339, NASA TM-107247.
10.
Lepicovsky
,
J.
,
McFarland
,
E. R.
,
Capece
,
V. R.
, and
Senyitko
,
R. G.
,
2002
, “
Methodology of Blade Unsteady Pressure Measurement in the NASA Transonic Flutter Cascade
,” NASA TM-2002-211894.
11.
Hollenbach
,
R.
,
Kielb
,
R.
, and
Hall
,
K.
,
2022
, “
Unsteady Pressure Analysis of an Oscillating Airfoil Exhibiting Nonsynchronous Vibrations as Applied to Turbomachinery
,”
2022 AIAA SciTech Forum
,
San Diego, CA
, Paper No. AIAA2021_3603748.
12.
Fransson
,
T. H.
,
2016
, “
Aeroelasticity in Axial-Flow Turbomachines
,” CompEdu HTP/S5/B1/C6.
13.
Schreiber
,
H. A.
, and
Starken
,
H.
,
1984
, “
Experimental Cascade Analysis of a Transonic Compressor Rotor Blade Section
,”
J. Eng. Gas Power
,
106
(
2
), pp.
288
294
.
14.
Lepicovsky
,
J.
,
McFarland
,
E. R.
,
Chima
,
R. V.
, and
Wood
,
J. R.
,
2001
, “
On Flowfield Periodicity in the NASA Transonic Flutter Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
123
(
3
), pp.
501
550
.
15.
Lepicovsky
,
J.
,
Šimurda
,
D.
,
Šidlof
,
P.
, and
Luxa
,
M.
,
2022
, “
Exploratory Experiments for Simple Approximation of Blade Flutter Aerodynamic Loading Function
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2022
, Paper No. GT2022-83351.
16.
Lepicovsky
,
J.
,
McFarland
,
E. R.
,
Chima
,
R. V.
,
Capece
,
V. R.
, and
Hayden
,
J.
,
2002
, “
Intermittent Flow Regimes in a Transonic Fan Airfoil Cascade
,” NASA/TM 2002-211375.
17.
Lepicovsky
,
J.
,
2005
, “
Effects of Transducer Installation on Unsteady Pressure Measurements on Oscillating Blades
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2005-6900.
18.
Vlček
,
V.
,
Horáček
,
J.
,
Luxa
,
M.
, and
Veselý
,
J.
,
2008
, “Visualization of Unsteady Flow Around a Vibrating Airfoil,”
Flow-Induced Vibration
,
I
Zolotarev
, and
J
Horacek
, eds.,
Institute of Thermomechanics
,
Prague
, pp.
531
536
.
19.
Lepicovsky
,
J.
,
Šidlof
,
P.
,
Šimurda
,
D.
,
Štěpán
,
M.
, and
Luxa
,
D.
,
2020
, “
New Test Facility for Forced Blade Flutter Research
,”
International Conference on Power System PSE 2020
,
Pilsen, Czech Republic
,
Sept. 14–16
.
20.
Ott
,
P.
,
Norryd
,
M.
, and
Bolcs
,
A.
,
1998
, “
The Influence of Tailboard on Unsteady Measurements in a Linear Cascade
,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-572.
You do not currently have access to this content.