This paper reports an investigation of the use of off-axis carbon fibers in the all-carbon spar cap of a 37-m wind turbine rotor blade to induce twist-flap coupling. Many studies have been published on the structure of wind turbine rotor blades incorporating off-axis fibers; none has studied optimizing the blade structure simultaneously considering the angle of off-axis material, the fraction of off-axis material, constraints on cross-fiber and in-plane shear strength, constraints on tip deflection, and blade cost. A parametric study has been conducted varying the angle of off-axis fibers from 5° to 25° and varying the volume fraction of off-axis fibers in the spar cap from 10% to 90%. In all configurations, the remainder of the spar cap material is 0° carbon fiber. The spar cap thickness has been adjusted in each blade to simultaneously minimize the weight of carbon material, and hence the blade cost, while satisfying constraints on carbon fiber strain and tip deflection. The study also examines the cross-fiber strain and stress and the in-plane shear stress in the 0° and off-axis carbon layers. The conclusion of this study is that the optimal angle for most cost-effectively achieving twist-flap coupling—considering constraints on fiber strain, cross-fiber strength, in-plane shear strength, and tip deflection—is closer to 7.5° than the 20° that has frequently been reported by prior researchers. As much as 90% of the spar cap carbon fibers can be rotated to 7.5° off-axis before in-plane shear strength is exceeded.

1.
Lobitz
,
D. W.
,
Veers
,
P. S.
,
Eisler
,
G. R.
,
Laino
,
D. J.
,
Migliore
,
P. G.
, and
Bir
,
G.
, 2001, “
The Use of Twist-Coupled Blades to Enhance the Performance of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines
,” SAND2001-1003,
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM.
2.
Karaolis
,
N. M.
,
Mussgrove
,
P. J.
, and
Jeronimidis
,
G.
, 1988, “
Active and Passive Aeroelastic Power Control Using Asymmetric Fiber Reinforced Laminates for Wind Turbine Blades
,”
Proceedings of the 10th British Wind Energy Conference
,
D. J.
Milbrow
, ed.,
British Wind Energy Association
, London.
3.
Kooijman
,
H.-J. T.
, 1996, “
Bending-Torsion Coupling of a Wind Turbine Rotor Blade
,” ECN-I-96-060,
Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN
, Petten, The Netherlands.
4.
Ong
,
C. H.
, and
Tsai
,
S. W.
, 1999, “
Design, Manufacture and Testing of a Bend-Twist D-Spar
,” SAND99-1324,
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM.
5.
Ashwill
,
T.
,
Veers
,
P.
,
Locke
,
J.
,
Contreras
,
I.
,
Griffin
,
D.
, and
Zuteck
,
M.
, 2002, “
Concepts for Adaptive Wind Turbine Blades
,” AIAA-2002-0028,
A Collection of the 2002 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Technical Papers at the 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, New York, pp.
56
69
.
6.
Locke
,
J. E.
, and
Valencia
,
U.
, 2004, “
Design Studies for Twist-Bend Coupled Wind Turbine Blades
,” SAND2004-0522,
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM.
7.
Griffin
,
D.
, 2002, “
Evaluation of Design Concepts for Adaptive Wind Turbine Blades
,” SAND2002-2424,
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM.
8.
Wetzel
,
K.
, and
Locke
,
J.
, 2004, “
Uncoupled and Twist-Bend Coupled Carbon-Glass Blades for the LIST Turbine
,” AIAA-2004-0170,
A Collection of the 2004 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Technical Papers at the 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, New York, pp.
13
23
.
9.
Griffin
,
D.
,
Zuteck
,
M.
,
Berry
,
D.
, and
Ashwill
,
T.
, 2004, “
Development of Prototype Carbon-Fiberglass Wind Turbine Blades: Conventional and Twist-Coupled Designs
,” AIAA-2004-0169,
A Collection of the 2004 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Technical Papers at the 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, New York, pp.
1
12
.
10.
Wind Turbine Generator Systems, Part 1: Safety Requirements
,” 1998, IEC Standard 61400-1,
International Electrotechnical Commission
, Geneva.
11.
Regulations for the Certification of Wind Energy Conversion Systems
,” 1999,
Germanischer Lloyd
, Hamburg.
12.
Wetzel
,
K.
, 2004, “
Large and Small Blades: Design and Manufacturing–Twist-Flap Coupling
,”
SNL’s Wind Turbine Blade Workshop, Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM.
13.
ANSYS 8.1
, 2004,
ANSYS, Inc.
, Canonsburg, PA.
14.
Hermann
,
T.
, and
Locke
,
J.
2005, “
Failure Analysis of Anisotropic Laminate Composites Utilizing Commercial FEA Software
,” AIAA-2005-0975,
A Collection of the 2005 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Technical Papers at the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, New York, pp.
370
381
.
15.
Selig
,
M. S.
, and
Wetzel
,
K. K.
, 2003, Airfoil Configuration for Wind Turbine, U.S. Patent 6,503,058.
16.
Griffin
,
D.
, and
Ashwill
,
T.
, 2003, “
Alternative Composite Materials for Megawatt-Scale Wind Turbine Blades: Design Considerations and Recommended Testing
,” AIAA-2003-0696,
A Collection of the 2003 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Technical Papers at the 41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, New York, pp.
191
201
.
You do not currently have access to this content.