Abstract

This article presents an investigation of a newly discovered motion instability phenomenon for floating wind turbines, first observed in numerical aero-hydro-servo-elastic simulations. The source of instability is identified as antisymmetric aerodynamic stiffness coupling terms in roll and yaw caused by the turbine thrust force. Analytical expressions for the roll–yaw and yaw–roll stiffness coupling terms are derived, using the actuator disk analogy of the rotor plane. It is demonstrated that a two degrees-of-freedom linear equation of motion without explicit external forcing qualitatively captures the instability. Based on this model, an analytical stability criteria is derived. An intuitive physical explanation of the phenomena is provided, considering the energy flow of the system. An important finding is that dissipative forces, in the form of aerodynamic and hydrodynamic damping, are needed to fully explain the observed instability. It is demonstrated, counterintuitively, that increased damping in yaw reduces the stability margin. This is explained by the fact that dissipative forces result in a phase difference between the harmonic roll and yaw motion in the coupled roll–yaw modes.

References

1.
Nielsen
,
F. G.
,
Hanson
,
T. D.
, and
Skaare
,
B.
,
2006
, “
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
,
Trondheim, Norway
,
June 25–30
, pp.
671
679
.
2.
Skaare
,
B.
,
Nielsen
,
F. G.
,
Hanson
,
T. D.
,
Yttervik
,
R.
,
Havmøller
,
O.
, and
Rekdal
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Analysis of Measurements and Simulations From the Hywind Demo Floating Wind Turbine
,”
Wind Energy
,
18
(
6
), pp.
1105
1122
.
3.
Jonkman
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Influence of Control on the Pitch Damping of a Floating Wind Turbine
,”
46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, NV
,
Jan. 7–10
, p.
1306
.
4.
Haslum
,
H.
,
Marley
,
M.
,
Navalkar
,
S.
,
Skaare
,
B.
,
Maljaars
,
N.
, and
Andersen
,
H.
,
2020
, “
Aerodynamic Roll-Yaw Instabilities of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2020 39th International Conference on Ocean
,
Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2020
.
5.
Wright
,
C.
,
2015
,
Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads
,
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
,
New York
.
6.
Bir
,
G.
, and
Jonkman
,
J.
,
2007
, “
Aeroelastic Instabilities of Large Offshore and Onshore Wind Turbines
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
75
, p.
012069
.
7.
Jonkman
,
J.
, and
Buhl
,
M., Jr.
,
2007
, “
Loads Analysis of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Using Fully Coupled Simulation
,”
WindPower 2007 Conference Exhibition
,
Los Angeles, CA
,
June 3–6
.
8.
Bachynski
,
E. E.
,
Etemaddar
,
M.
,
Kvittem
,
M. I.
,
Luan
,
C.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2013
, “
Dynamic Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines During Pitch Actuator Fault, Grid Loss, and Shutdown
,”
DeepWind'2013 Energy Procedia
,
Trondheim, Norway
,
Jan. 24–25
, pp.
210
222
.
9.
Haslum
,
H.
, and
Faltinsen
,
O. M.
,
1999
, “
Alternative Shape of Spar Platforms for Use in Hostile Areas
,”
Offshore Technology Conference Proceedings
, OTC-10953.
10.
Haslum
,
H. A.
,
2000
, “
Simplified Methods Applied to Nonlinear Motion of Spar Platforms
,”
Doctoral thesis
,
NTNU
.
11.
Skaare
,
B.
,
2017
, “
Development of the Hywind Concept
,”
ASME 2017 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Trondheim, Norway
,
June 25–30
, p. V009T12A050.
12.
Hoen
,
C.
,
2005
, “
An Engineering Interpretation of the Complex Eigensolution of Linear Dynamic Systems
,”
IMAC XXIII
, Orlando, FL, Jan. 31–Feb. 3.
13.
Chen
,
C.-T.
,
1998
,
Linear System Theory and Design
,
Oxford University Press, Inc
.
14.
Faltinsen
,
O.
,
1993
,
Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures
, Vol.
1
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
15.
Burton
,
T.
,
Jenkins
,
N.
, and
Bossányi
,
E.
,
2011
,
Wind Energy Handbook
,
John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
,
New York
.
16.
Engebretsen
,
E.
,
Haslum
,
H.
, and
Aagaard
,
O.
,
2020
, “
Distributed Potential Theory and Its Application for Spar-Type Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2020 39th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2020
.
17.
Fujiwara
,
H.
,
Tsubogo
,
T.
, and
Nihei
,
Y. E. A.
,
2011
, “
Gyro Effect of Rotating Blades on the Floatingwind Turbine Platform Inwaves
,”
The Twenty-first International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
,
International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers
.
18.
Rubak
,
R.
, and
Petersen
,
J.
,
2005
, “
Monopile as Part of Aeroelastic Wind Turbine Simulation Code
,”
Proceedings of Copenhagen Offshore Wind Denmark
.
19.
Orcina
,
2021
, “
Documentation for OrcaFlex 11.1d
,” https://www.orcina.com/webhelp/OrcaFlex/https://www.orcina.com/webhelp/OrcaFlex/
20.
Arramounet
,
V.
,
Winter
,
C. d.
,
Maljaars
,
N.
,
Girardin
,
S.
, and
Robic
,
H.
,
2019
, “
Development of Coupling Module Between Bhawc Aeroelastic Software and Orcaflex for Coupled Dynamic Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines
,”
Journal of Physics: Conference Series of 16th Deep Sea Offshore Wind R&D Conference
,”
EERA DeepWind 2019
.
21.
Ormberg
,
H.
,
Passano
,
E.
, and
Luxcey
,
N.
,
2011
, “
Global Analysis of a Floating Wind Turbine Using an Aero-Hydro-Elastic Model: Part 1—Code Development and Case Study
,”
ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
June 19–24
, pp.
837
847
.
You do not currently have access to this content.