Initial imperfections have long been acknowledged as having an effect on the behavior of shell structures, affecting both the global and local behavior. Yet, despite their significance, initial imperfections are rarely included in analytical models for pipelines. This is usually because of the complicated nature of initial imperfections, the difficulty in measuring them, and the small amount of available literature that describes their geometry. Some recent investigations at the University of Alberta in Edmonton have focused on the effect of initial imperfections on the behavior of segments of line pipe. Imperfections measured across the inside surface of pipe test specimens were incorporated into a finite element model that was developed to predict the experimental behavior of the specimens tested under combined loads of internal pressure, axial load and bending moment. Test-to-predicted ratios for the load carrying capacity of the test specimens had a mean value of 1.035 with a coefficient of variation of 0.047. The improvements in the accuracy of the finite element analysis models that include the initial imperfection pattern indicate their importance in modeling the experimental behavior. Once the importance of initial imperfections was established, idealized patterns were developed to simplify numerical modeling. This paper presents the results of different patterns investigated for both plain and girth-welded segments of line pipe and provides recommended simplified assumed initial imperfection patterns.

1.
Dinovitzer
,
A. S.
, and
Smith
,
R. J.
, 1998, “
Strain-Based Pipeline Design Criteria Review
,”
Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference—1998
, Calgary, Alberta, June 7–11,
ASME
,
New York
, Vol.
2
, pp.
763
770
.
2.
Bushnell
,
D.
, 1981, “
Buckling of Shells—Pitfall for Designers
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
19
(
9
), pp.
1183
1226
.
3.
Dinovitzer
,
A. S.
,
Lazor
,
R. B.
,
Walker
,
R.
, and
Bayley
,
C.
, 1999, “
A Pipeline Dent Assessment Model
,”
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on OMAE
, St. John’s Newfoundland, June 11–16,
ASME
,
New York
, Paper No. OMAE/PIPE-5041.
4.
Canadian Standards Association
, 1996, “
Z662-96 Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems
,”
Canadian Standards Association
, Etobicoke, Ontario.
5.
Mohareb
,
M. E.
,
Kulak
,
G. L.
,
Elwi
,
A. E.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
, 2001, “
Testing and Analysis of Steel Pipe Segments
,”
J. Transp. Eng.
0733-947X,
127
(
5
), pp.
408
417
.
6.
Yoosef-Ghodsi
,
N.
,
Kulak
,
G. L.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
, 1995, “
Some Test Results for Wrinkling of Girth-Welded Line Pipe
,”
Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on OMAE
, Vol. V-Pipeline Technology, Copenhagen, June 18–22,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
379
388
.
7.
Souza
,
L. T.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
, 1996, “
Analysis for Wrinkling Behaviour of Girth-Welded Line Pipe
,”
Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference
, Calgary, Alberta, June, ASME, New York, Vol.
2
, pp.
835
844
.
8.
Dorey
,
A. B.
,
Cheng
,
J. J. R.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
, 2001, “
Critical Buckling Strains in Energy Pipelines
,” Structural Engineering Report 237, Dept. of Civil and Env. Engineering,
University of Alberta
, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
9.
Del Col
,
P. R.
,
Grondin
,
G. Y.
,
Cheng
,
J. J. R.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
, 1998, “
Behaviour of Large Diameter Line Pipe Under Combined Loads
,” Structural Engineering Report No. 224, Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Alberta
, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
10.
Hauch
,
S.
, and
Bai
,
Y.
, 1999, “
Bending Moment Capacity of Pipes
,”
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on OMAE
, St. John’s Newfoundland, July 11–16,
ASME
,
New York
. Paper No. OMAE99/PIPE-5033.
11.
Mohareb
,
M. E.
,
Elwi
,
A. E.
,
Kulak
,
G. L.
, and
Murray
,
D. W.
, 1994, “
Deformational Behaviour of Line Pipe
,” Structural Engineering Report No. 202, Department of Civil engineering,
University of Alberta
, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
12.
Dorey
,
A. B.
,
Murray
,
D. W.
, and
Cheng
,
J. J. R.
, 2000, “
An Experimental Comparison of Critical Buckling Strain Criteria
,”
Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference
, Calgary, Alberta, Oct. 1–5. ASME, New York, pp.
71
77
, Paper IPC00–0157.
13.
Dorey
,
A. B.
,
Murray
,
D. W.
,
Cheng
,
J. J. R.
,
Grondin
,
G. Y.
, and
Zhou
,
Z. J.
, 1999, “
Testing and Experimental Results for NPS30 Line Pipe Under Combined Loads
,”
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on OMAE
, St. John’s Newfoundland, July 11–16,
ASME
,
New York
, Paper No. OMAE99/PIPE-5022.
14.
Dorey
,
A. B.
,
Murray
,
D. W.
, and
Cheng
,
J. J. R.
, “
A Comparison of Experimental and FEA Results for Segments of Line Pipe Under Combined Loads
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
, in press.
15.
Rockware, Inc.
, 1988a,
MacGRIDZO/Version 2—Geological Software for Microcomputers
(software package), Rockware Inc., Wheat Ridge, CO.
16.
Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorenson, Inc.
, 1997,
ABAQUS/Standard Version 5.7-1 software package
, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorenson Inc., Pawtucket, RI.
17.
Hu
,
Shou-Zon
, 1991, “
An Analytical Investigation of the Compressive Behaviour of Fabricated Steel Tubes
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario.
You do not currently have access to this content.