Abstract

Computer-aided design (CAD) is a standard design tool used in engineering practice and by students. CAD has become increasingly analytic and inventive in incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to design, e.g., generative design (GD), to help expand designers' divergent thinking. However, generative design technologies are relatively new, we know little about generative design thinking in students. This research aims to advance our understanding of the relationship between aspects of generative design thinking and traditional design thinking. This study was set in an introductory graphics and design course where student designers used Fusion 360 to optimize a bicycle wheel frame. We collected the following data from the sample: divergent and convergent psychological tests and an open-ended response to a generative design prompt (called the generative design reasoning elicitation problem). A Spearman's rank correlation showed no statistically significant relationship between generative design reasoning and divergent thinking. However, an analysis of variance found a significant difference in generative design reasoning and convergent thinking between groups with moderate GD reasoning and low GD reasoning. This study shows that new computational tools might present the same challenges to beginning designers as conventional tools. Instructors should be aware of informed design practices and encourage students to grow into informed designers by introducing them to new technology, such as generative design.

Issue Section:
Design Theory and Methodology
Keywords:
computer-aided design, creativity and concept generations, design education, generative design
Topics:
Design, Generative design, Students

References

1.
Crismond
,
D. P.
, and
Adams
,
R. S.
,
2012
, “
The Informed Design Teaching & Learning Matrix
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
101
(
4
), pp.
738
–
797
.
2.
Daly
,
S. R.
,
Adams
,
R. S.
, and
Bodner
,
G. M.
,
2012
, “
What Does It Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals' Experiences
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
101
(
2
), pp.
187
–
219
.
3.
Dym
,
C. L.
,
Agogino
,
A. M.
,
Eris
,
O.
,
Frey
,
D. D.
, and
Leifer
,
L. J.
,
2005
, “
Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
94
(
1
), pp.
103
–
120
.
4.
Pucha
,
R. V.
, and
Utschig
,
T. T.
,
2012
, “
Learning-Centered Instruction of Engineering Graphics for Freshman Engineering Students
,”
J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res.
,
13
(
4
), p.
24
.
5.
Leake
,
J. M.
,
Goldstein
,
M. H.
, and
Borgerson
,
J. L.
,
2022
,
Engineering Design Graphics: Sketching, Modeling, and Visualization
,
John Wiley and Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
6.
Mountstephens
,
J.
, and
Teo
,
J.
,
2020
, “
Progress and Challenges in Generative Product Design: A Review of Systems
,”
Computers
,
9
(
4
), p.
80
.
7.
Duffy
,
A.
,
Hay
,
L.
,
Grealy
,
M.
, and
Vuletic
,
T.
,
2019
, “
ImagineD: A Vision for Cognitive Driven Creative Design
,”
30th Anniversary Heron Island Conference on Computational and Cognitive Models of Creativity
,
Heron Island, Queensland, Australia
.
8.
Hay
,
L.
,
Cash
,
P.
, and
McKilligan
,
S.
,
2020
, “
The Future of Design Cognition Analysis
,”
Des. Sci.
,
6
, p.
e20
.
9.
Saadi
,
J. I.
, and
Yang
,
M. C.
,
2023
, “
Generative Design: Reframing the Role of the Designer in Early-Stage Design Process
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
145
(
4
), p.
041411
.
10.
Demirel
,
H. O.
,
Goldstein
,
M. H.
,
Li
,
X.
, and
Sha
,
Z.
,
2023
, “
Human-Centered Generative Design Framework: An Early Design Framework to Support Concept Creation and Evaluation
,”
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.
, pp.
1
–
12
.
11.
Morse
,
J. M.
,
2003
, “Principles of Mixed Methods,”
Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
,
A.
Tashakkori
 and
C.
Teddlie
, eds.,
Sage Publications, Inc.
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
, Vol.
189
.
12.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)
, 2021, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021–2022,” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/.
13.
European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education
, “EUR–ACE Framework Standards and Guidelines,” https://www.enaee.eu/eur-ace-system/standards-and-guidelines/#standards-and-guidelines-for-accreditation-of-engineering-programmes.
14.
Simon
,
H. A.
,
1988
, “
The Science of Design: Creating the Artificial
,”
Des. Issues
,
4
(
1/2
), pp.
67
–
82
.
15.
Ye
,
X.
,
Peng
,
W.
,
Chen
,
Z.
, and
Cai
,
Y.-Y.
,
2004
, “
Today's Students, Tomorrow's Engineers: An Industrial Perspective on CAD Education
,”
Comput. Des.
,
36
(
14
), pp.
1451
–
1460
.
16.
Sorby
,
S. A.
,
2009
, “
Educational Research in Developing 3-D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
,
31
(
3
), pp.
459
–
480
.
17.
Brink
,
H.
,
Kilbrink
,
N.
, and
Gericke
,
N.
,
2023
, “
Teach to Use CAD or Through Using CAD: An Interview Study With Technology Teachers
,”
Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.
,
33
(
3
), pp.
957
–
979
.
18.
Robertson
,
B.
, and
Radcliffe
,
D.
,
2006
, “
The Role of Software Tools in Influencing Creative Problem Solving in Engineering Design and Education
,”
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Philadelphia, PA
,
Sept. 10–13
, pp.
999
–
1007
.
19.
Sreekanth
,
A. P.
, and
Viswanathan
,
V. K.
,
2019
, “
A Study on the Role of Computer-Aided Design in Design Creativity and Education
,”
Eng. Des. Graph. J.
,
83
.
20.
Karabiyik
,
T.
,
Magana
,
A. J.
,
Parsons
,
P.
, and
Seah
,
Y. Y.
,
2023
, “
Pedagogical Approaches for Eliciting Students' Design Thinking Strategies: Tell-and-Practice vs. Contrasting Cases
,”
Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.
,
33
(
3
), pp.
1087
–
1119
.
21.
Froyd
,
J. E.
, and
Ohland
,
M. W.
,
2005
, “
Integrated Engineering Curricula
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
94
(
1
), pp.
147
–
164
.
22.
Taleyarkhan
,
M.
,
Dasgupta
,
C.
,
Garcia
,
J. M.
, and
Magana
,
A. J.
,
2018
, “
Investigating the Impact of Using a CAD Simulation Tool on Students' Learning of Design Thinking
,”
J. Sci. Educ. Technol.
,
27
(
4
), pp.
334
–
347
.
23.
Robertson
,
B. F.
,
Walther
,
J.
, and
Radcliffe
,
D. F.
,
2007
, “
Creativity and the Use of CAD Tools: Lessons for Engineering Design Education From Industry
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
129
(
7
), pp.
753
–
760
.
24.
Walther
,
J.
, and
Radcliffe
,
D.
,
2006
, “
Engineering Education: Targeted Learning Outcomes or Accidental Competencies?
,”
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
,
Chicago, IL
,
June 4–7
, pp.
11
–
557
.
25.
Lawson
,
B.
,
2002
, “
CAD and Creativity: Does the Computer Really Help?
,”
Leonardo
,
35
(
3
), pp.
327
–
331
.
26.
Sanders
,
E. A.
,
Goldstein
,
M. H.
, and
Hess
,
J.
,
2023
, “
Instructional Characteristics That Promote and Inhibit More Comprehensive Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design
,”
Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.
, (in press).
27.
Smetana
,
L. K.
, and
Bell
,
R. L.
,
2012
, “
Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A Critical Review of the Literature
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
,
34
(
9
), pp.
1337
–
1370
.
28.
McKnight
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Generative Design: What It Is? How Is It Being Used? Why It's a Game Changer
,”
KnE Eng.
,
2
(
2
), pp.
176
–
181
.
29.
Sigmund
,
O.
, and
Maute
,
K.
,
2013
, “
Topology Optimization Approaches: A Comparative Review
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
,
48
(
6
), pp.
1031
–
1055
.
30.
Wang
,
Z.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
, and
Bernard
,
A.
,
2021
, “
A Constructive Solid Geometry-Based Generative Design Method for Additive Manufacturing
,”
Addit. Manuf.
,
41
, p.
101952
.
31.
Krish
,
S.
,
2011
, “
A Practical Generative Design Method
,”
Comput. Des.
,
43
(
1
), pp.
88
–
100
.
32.
Hay
,
L.
,
Duffy
,
A. H. B.
,
McTeague
,
C.
,
Pidgeon
,
L. M.
,
Vuletic
,
T.
, and
Grealy
,
M.
,
2017
, “
A Systematic Review of Protocol Studies on Conceptual Design Cognition: Design as Search and Exploration
,”
Des. Sci.
,
3
, p.
e10
.
33.
Cross
,
N.
,
1982
, “
Designerly Ways of Knowing
,”
Des. Stud.
,
3
(
4
), pp.
221
–
227
.
34.
Guilford
,
J. P.
,
1956
, “
The Structure of Intellect
,”
Psychol. Bull.
,
53
(
4
), pp.
267
–
293
.
35.
Runco
,
M. A.
, and
Jaeger
,
G. J.
,
2012
, “
The Standard Definition of Creativity
,”
Creat. Res. J.
,
24
(
1
), pp.
92
–
96
.
36.
Acar
,
S.
, and
Runco
,
M. A.
,
2019
, “
Divergent Thinking: New Methods, Recent Research, and Extended Theory
,”
Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts
,
13
(
2
), pp.
153
–
158
.
37.
Shah
,
J. J.
,
Smith
,
S. M.
, and
Vargas-Hernandez
,
N.
,
2003
, “
Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness
,”
Des. Stud.
,
24
(
2
), pp.
111
–
134
.
38.
Li
,
X.
,
Wang
,
Y.
, and
Sha
,
Z.
,
2023
, “
Deep Learning Methods of Cross-Modal Tasks for Conceptual Design of Product Shapes: A Review
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
145
(
4
), p. 041401.
39.
Cropley
,
A.
,
2006
, “
In Praise of Convergent Thinking
,”
Creat. Res. J.
,
18
(
3
), pp.
391
–
404
.
40.
Zabelina
,
D. L.
, and
Silvia
,
P. J.
,
2020
, “
Percolating Ideas: The Effects of Caffeine on Creative Thinking and Problem Solving
,”
Conscious. Cogn.
,
79
, p.
102899
.
41.
Goldschmidt
,
G.
,
2016
, “
Linkographic Evidence for Concurrent Divergent and Convergent Thinking in Creative Design
,”
Creat. Res. J.
,
28
(
2
), pp.
115
–
122
.
42.
Akin
,
Ö
, and
Akin
,
C.
,
1996
, “
Frames of Reference in Architectural Design: Analysing the Hyperacclamation (Aha-!)
,”
Des. Stud.
,
17
(
4
), pp.
341
–
361
.
43.
Guilford
,
J. P.
,
1967
, “
Creativity: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
,”
J. Creat. Behav.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
3
–
14
.
44.
Ludmer
,
R.
,
Dudai
,
Y.
, and
Rubin
,
N.
,
2011
, “
Uncovering Camouflage: Amygdala Activation Predicts Long-Term Memory of Induced Perceptual Insight
,”
Neuron
,
69
(
5
), pp.
1002
–
1014
.
45.
Goldstein
,
M. H.
,
Sommer
,
J.
,
Buswell
,
N. T.
,
Li
,
X.
,
Sha
,
Z.
, and
Demirel
,
H. O.
,
2021
, “
Uncovering Generative Design Rationale in the Undergraduate Classroom
,”
2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)
,
Lincoln, NE
,
Oct. 13–16
,
IEEE
, pp.
1
–
6
.
46.
Beaty
,
R. E.
, and
Johnson
,
D. R.
,
2021
, “
Automating Creativity Assessment With SemDis: An Open Platform for Computing Semantic Distance
,”
Behav. Res. Methods
,
53
(
2
), pp.
757
–
780
.
47.
Wrigley
,
C.
, and
Straker
,
K.
,
2017
, “
Design Thinking Pedagogy: The Educational Design Ladder
,”
Innov. Educ. Teach. Int.
,
54
(
4
), pp.
374
–
385
.
48.
Jang
,
J.
, and
Schunn
,
C. D.
,
2012
, “
Physical Design Tools Support and Hinder Innovative Engineering Design
.”
49.
Purzer
,
Ş
,
Goldstein
,
M. H.
,
Adams
,
R. S.
,
Xie
,
C.
, and
Nourian
,
S.
,
2015
, “
An Exploratory Study of Informed Engineering Design Behaviors Associated With Scientific Explanations
,”
Int. J. STEM Educ.
,
2
(
1
), pp.
1
–
12
.
50.
McKenna
,
A. F.
,
2007
, “
An Investigation of Adaptive Expertise and Transfer of Design Process Knowledge
.
51.
Sanders
,
E. A.
,
Goldstein
,
M. H.
, and
Hess
,
J. L.
,
2021
, “
Assessing Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design Via Student Reflections
,”
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
,
Virtual
.
Copyright © 2024 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.