A shape annealing approach to truss topology design is presented that considers the tradeoff between the mass of the structure and the grouping of members, where all members of a group are given the same size. The problem of optimal grouping involves finding a structural design with an optimal number of groups and the optimal sizes for each group. In this paper cross-sectional area is considered as the measure of group size. Designs incorporating multiple members with the same cross-sectional area are advantageous when considering the cost of purchasing and fabricating materials. The shape annealing method is used as an approach to solve this problem by incorporating a method for dynamic grouping of members based on cross-sectional area that creates a tradeoff between mass and the number of groups through a weighted objective function that includes a group penalty function. This method is demonstrated on transmission tower and general truss problems.
Issue Section:
Research Papers
1.
Bendsoe
M. P.
Kikuchi
N.
1988
, “Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design Using Homogenization Method
,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
, Vol. 71
, pp. 197
–224
.2.
Billington, D. P., 1983, The Tower and the Bridge: The New Art of Structural Engineering, Basic Books, Inc., New York.
3.
Bremicker, M., Chirehdast, M., Kikuchi, M., and Papalambros, P. Y., 1991, “Integrated Topology and Shape Optimization in Structural Design,” Mechanics of Structures and Machines Int. J., Vol. 19, No. 4.
4.
Cagan
J.
Mitchell
W. J.
1993
, “Optimally Directed Shape Generation by Shape Annealing
,” Environment and Planning B
, Vol. 20
, pp. 5
–12
.5.
Chapman
C.
Saitou
K.
Jakiela
M. J.
1994
, “Genetic Algorithms as an Approach to-Configuration and Topology Design
,” ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol. 116
, pp. 1005
–1012
.6.
Diaz
A. R.
Belding
B.
1993
, “On Optimum Truss Layout by a Homogenization Method
,” ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol. 115
, pp. 367
–373
.7.
Dorn
W. S.
Gomory
R. E.
Greenberg
H. J.
1964
, “Automatic Design of Optimal Structures
,” Journal de Me`canique
, Vol. 3
(1
), pp. 25
–52
.8.
Ghattas, O. N., and Grossman, I. E., 1991, “A MINLP and MLP Strategies For Discrete Sizing Structural Optimization Problems,” Proceedings of the ASCE Tenth Conference on Electronic Computations, Dayton, Ohio, May 1991, pp. 197–204.
9.
Gobat, J. I., and Atkinson, D., 1994, “FElt: User’s Guide and Reference Manual,” Computer Science Technical Report CS94-376, University of California, San Diego.
10.
Grierson
D. E.
Pak
W. H.
1993
, “Optimal Sizing, Geometrical and Topological Design Using a Genetic Algorithm
,” Structural Optimization
, Vol. 6
, pp. 151
–159
.11.
Hemp, W. S., 1973, Optimum Structures, Claredon, Oxford.
12.
Kirkpatrick
S.
Gelatt
C. D.
Vecchi
M. P.
1983
, “Optimization by Simulated Annealing
,” Science
, Vol. 220:4598
, pp. 671
–679
.13.
Kirsch
U.
1989
, “Optimal Topologies of Structures
,” Applied Mechanics Reviews
, Vol. 42
, No. 8
, pp. 223
–238
.14.
Michell
A. G. M.
1904
, “The Limits of Economy of Materials in Frame Structures
,” Philosophical Magazine
, S.6, Vol. 8
, No. 47
, pp. 589
–597
.15.
Ochotta, E. S., 1994, “Synthesis of High-Performance Analog Cells in ASTRX/OBLX,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Research Report No. CMUCAD-94-17, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
16.
Pedersen, P., 1992, “Topology Optimization of Three Dimensional Trusses,” Topology Design of Structures, NATO ASI Series—NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Sesimbra, Portugal, June 20–26, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordredht, pp. 19–30.
17.
Reddy
G.
Cagan
J.
1995
, “An Improved Shape Annealing Algorithm for Truss Topology Generation
,” ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol. 117
, No. 2(A)
, pp. 315
–321
.18.
Shea, K., Cagan, J., and Fenves, S. J., 1995, “A Shape Annealing Approach to Optimal Truss Design with Dynamic Grouping of Members,” DE-Vol. 82, 1995 Design Engineering Technical Conferences (21st Design Automation Conference), ASME, Vol. 1, pp. 377–384.
19.
Spillers, W., 1985, “Shape Optimization of Structures,” Design Optimization, Academic Press Inc., Orlando, pp. 41–70.
20.
Stiny
G.
1980
, “Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars
,” Environment and Planning B
, Vol. 7
, pp. 343
–351
.21.
Swartz, W., and Sechen, C., 1990, “New Algorithms for the Placement and Routing of Macro Cells,” IEEE Proceedings: Cat No. 90CH2924-9, IEEE Conference on Computer-Aided Design, Santa Clara, CA, November 11–15, pp. 336–339.
22.
Vanderplaats
G. N.
Moses
F.
1972
, “Automated Design of Truses for Optimum Geometry
,” Journal of the Structural Division
, Vol. ST3
, pp. 671
–689
.23.
Vanderplaats, G. N., and Thanedar, P. B., 1991, “A Survey of Discrete Variable Optimization for Structural Design,” Proceedings of the ASCE Tenth Conference on Electronic Computations, Dayton, Ohio, May 1991, pp. 173–180.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1997
by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.
