This paper explores two optimization strategies; the gradient search and proportional control methods, for determining the initial sheet thickness of superplastic forming to ensure final desired part thickness. A hemispherical dome model was involved in the testing of both optimization methods. Also, a three-dimensional rectangular box model was optimized by the proportional control method. The gradient search technique is shown to be acceptable in terms of the optimized thickness obtained, but displays poor convergence rates. The proportional control approach presented is easy to be implemented, and yields not only more accurate sheet thickness, but much higher convergence speeds that makes such optimization possible on complex geometric models. [S1087-1357(00)01001-7]

1.
Hamilton, C., and Ghosh, A., 1988, Superplastic Sheet Forming. In Forming and Forging, ASM Handbook, Vol. 14, ASM International, Metals Park, OH 44073.
2.
Pilling, J., and Ridley, N., 1989, Superplasticity in Crystalline Solids, The Institute of Metals, London, UK.
3.
Cheng
,
J.-H.
,
1994
, “
A Procedure for Designing Initial Thickness Variation for Superplastic Free Inflation
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
36
, pp.
981
1000
.
4.
ABAQUS/Standard Example Problems Manual, 1996, 5.5 edition, Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorenson Inc.
5.
Wilde, D., 1964, Optimum Seeking Methods, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
6.
Beveridge, G., and Schechter, R., 1970, Optimization: Theory and Practice, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York City, NY.
You do not currently have access to this content.