An important part of many engineering design projects is to specify the amount of variability permitted in critical characteristics of materials, components, and assembly. Different formulae have been suggested for relating input and output specifications. This article reviews the four basic tolerancing formulae that have appeared in the literature and shows that each solves a slightly different problem. In particular, optimal tolerances are based on costs and the probability distributions of input characteristics. Examples of alternative cost-distribution models are provided that support the use of each of the four basic formulae as well as a solution not related to any of these formulae. This establishes that optimal tolerancing is influenced by issues not explicitly considered in the traditional debate over worst-case vs. statistical tolerancing. The approach here differs from previous optimal tolerancing studies in two respects. First, earlier work optimized the allocation of tolerances to components to achieve a given assembly tolerance, while we seek global optima. Second, earlier studies advocated an author’s favorite model, while we explore the relative domains of applicability of alternative formulae.
Issue Section:
Research Papers
1.
Altschul
R. E.
Scholz
F. W.
1994
, “Case Study in Statistical Tolerancing
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 7
, pp. 52
–56
.2.
Bender, A., Jr., 1962, “Benderizing Tolerances,” Graphic Science (Dec), pp. 17–21.
3.
Bisgaard
S.
1997
, “Designing Experiments for Tolerancing Assembled Products
,” Technometrics
, Vol. 39
, No. 2
, pp. 142
–161
.4.
Bisgaard
S.
Graves
S. B.
1997
, “A Negative Process Capability Index from Assembling Good Components? A Problem in Statistical Tolerancing
,” Quality Engineering
, Vol. 10
, No. 2
, pp. 409
–414
.5.
Bisgaard
S.
Hunter
W. G.
Pallesen
L.
1984
, “The Economic Selection of Quantity of Manufactured Product
,” Technometrics
, 26
, pp. 9
–18
.6.
Bjo̸rke, O̸, 1989, Computer-Aided Tolerancing (2nd ed.), ASME.
7.
Chase
K. W.
Greenwood
W. H.
1988
, “Design Issues in Mechanical Tolerance Analysis
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 1
, No. 1
, pp. 50
–59
.8.
Chase
W. W.
Greenwood
W. H.
Loosli
B. G.
Hauglund
L. F.
1990
, “Least Cost Tolerance Allocation for Mechanical Assemblies with Automated Process Selection
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 3
, No. 1
, pp. 49
–59
.9.
DeGroot, M. H., 1970, Optimal Statistical Decisions, McGraw-Hill.
10.
Dresner, T. L., and Barkan, P., 1993, “Optimal Tolerance Allocation for Tolerance Stack-Up,” Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 65–2, ASME, pp. 167–174.
11.
Easterling
R. G.
Johnson
M. E.
Bement
T. R.
Nachtsheim
C. J.
1991
, “Statistical Tolerancing Based on Consumers Risk Considerations
,” Journal of Quality Technology
, Vol. 23
, No. 1
, pp. 1
–11
.12.
Gerth
R. J.
1994
, “A Spreadsheet Approach to Minimum Cost Tolerancing for Rocket Engines
,” Computers in Industrial Engineering
, Vol. 22
, pp. 549
–552
.13.
Gilson, J., 1951, A New Approach to Engineering Tolerances, London, The Machinery Publishing Co.
14.
Graves, S. B., 1997, “How to Reduce Costs Using a Tolerance Analysis Formula Tailored to Your Organization,” Report 157, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement.
15.
Graves, S. B., and Bisgaard, S., 1997, “Five Ways Statistical Tolerancing Can Fail, and What to Do about Them,” Report 159, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement.
16.
Greenwood
W. H.
Chase
K. W.
1987
, “A New Tolerance Analysis Method for Designers and Manufacturers
,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol. 109
, May, pp. 112
–116
.17.
Grubbs
F. E.
Coon
H. J.
1954
, “On Setting Test Limits Relative to Specification Limits
,” Industrial Quality Control
, Vol. 10
, No. 5
, March, pp. 15
–20
.18.
Harry, M. J., 1992, “The Vision of Six Sigma Quality: Producibility Measurement and Analysis,” in Tipnis (1992b), pp. 41–64.
19.
He
J. R.
1991
, “Tolerancing for Manufacturing via Cost Minimization
,” International Journal of Machine Tools Manufacture
, Vol. 34
, No. 4
, pp. 455
–470
.20.
Jeang, A., 1995, “Economic Tolerance Design for Quality,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 11, pp. 113–123.
21.
Juran, J. M., 1962, Quality Control Handbook (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill.
22.
Kotz, S., and Johnson, N. L., 1993, Process Capability Indices, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
23.
Krishnaswami, M., and Mayne, R. W., 1994, “Optimizing Tolerance Allocation Based on Manufacturing Cost and Quality Loss,” Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 69-1, ASME, pp. 211–217.
24.
Liggett, J. V., 1993, Dimensional Variation Management Handbook, Prentice Hall.
25.
Mansoor
E. M.
1963
, “The Application of Probability to Tolerances Used in Engineering Designs
,” (with discussion), Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers
, Vol. 178
(Pt. 1, No. 1
), pp. 29
–51
.26.
Melloy
B. J.
1991
, “Determining the Optimal Process Mean and Screening Limits for Packages Subject to Compliance Testing
,” Journal of Quality Technology
, Vol. 23
, pp. 318
–323
.27.
Parritt, S. W., 1994, A Theory of One-Dimensional Tolerancing for Assembly, unpublished PhD dissertation, Cornell U.
28.
Peat, A. P., 1968, Cost Reduction Charts for Designers and Production Engineers, Brighton, UK, The Machinery Publishing Co.
29.
Roy
U.
Liu
C. R.
Woo
T. C.
1991
, “Review of Dimensioning and Tolerancing: Representation and Processing
,” Computer-Aided Design
, Vol. 23
, No. 7
, pp. 466
–483
.30.
Ru¨denberg
R.
1929
, “Die Beurteilung elektrischer Maschinen und Apparate durch Toleranzen auf Grand statistischer Methoden
,” Zeitschrift fur angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
, Vol. 9
(August) pp. 318
–334
;reprinted in H. C. Plaut (1930). Fabrikationskontrolle auf Grund statistischer Methoden, Berlin, VDI-Verlag, pp. 40–56.31.
Schmidt
R. L.
Pfeifer
P. E.
1991
, “Economic Selection of the Mean and Upper Limit for a Canning Problem with Limited Capacity
,” Journal of Quality Technology
, Vol. 23
, pp. 312
–317
.32.
Scholz, F. W., 1996, “Hole Pinning Clearance,” ISSTECH-96-028, Boeing, Seattle, WA.
33.
Shawki, G. S. A., 1963, discussion in Mansoor (1963).
34.
So¨derberg, R., 1993, “Tolerance Allocation Considering Customer and Manufacturer Objectives,” Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 65-2, ASME, pp. 149–157.
35.
So¨derberg, R., 1994, “Robust Design by Tolerance Allocation Considering Quality and Manufacturing Cost,” Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 69–1, ASME, pp. 219–226.
36.
So¨derberg, R., (1995), “Optimal Tolerance Band and Manufacturing Target for Monotonic Loss Functions with Functional Limits,” Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 82, ASME, pp. 345–352.
37.
Srinivasan
V.
Voelcker
H.
1993
, “Guest Editors’ Introduction
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 6
, No. 4
, pp. 255
–257
.38.
Taguchi, G., 1986, Introduction to Quality Engineering, Tokyo, Asian Productivity Organization.
39.
Taylor, W. A., 1997, “Process Tolerancing: A Solution to the Dilemma of Worst-Case versus Statistical Tolerancing,” Libertyville, IL, Taylor Enterprises; www.variation.com.
40.
Tipnis, V. A., 1990, Research Needs and Technological Opportunities in Mechanical Tolerancing, ASME.
41.
Tipnis, V. A., 1992a, “Tolerance and Deviation Information,” pp. 5–24 in Tipnis (1992b).
42.
Tipnis, V. A., ed., 1992b, Tolerance and Deviation Information, ASME.
43.
Voelcker
H.
1993
, “A Current Perspective on Tolerancing and Metrology
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 6
, No. 4
, pp. 258
–268
.44.
Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O., 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed. Princeton University Press.
45.
Wu
Z.
ElMaraghy
W. H.
ElMaraghy
H. A.
1988
, “Evaluation of Cost-Tolerance Algorithms for Design Tolerance Analysis and Synthesis
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 1
, No. 3
, pp. 168
–179
.46.
Xue, D., and Dong, Z., 1993, “Automated Concurrent Design Based on Combined Feature, Tolerance, Production Process and Cost Models,” Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 65–2, ASME, pp. 199–210.
47.
Zhang
C.
Wang
H. P.
Li
J. K.
1992
, “Simultaneous Optimization of Design and Manufacturing—Tolerances with Process (Machine) Selection
,” Annals of the CIRP
, Vol. 41
, No. 1
, pp. 569
–572
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1999
by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.
