This article proposes a systematic method for the optimal design of sensor locations for an automated Coordinate Checking Fixture (CCF). The fixture can be employed for making at-machine assessments of the dimensional accuracy of manufactured components. Coordinate measurements obtained by the sensors built into the fixture can be utilized in estimating geometric parameters of a manufactured part. Two important issues that arise in the design of a CCF are the optimal number of sensors to be used and the best locations for each sensor. The proposed method uses statistical analyses of the Fisher information matrix and the prediction matrix to obtain an optimal set of sensors from an initial candidate set. Sensors are placed at locations that maximize the determinant of the Fisher information matrix for best parameter estimation, while the sensor of the least contribution to the measurement objective is iteratively eliminated. With the benefit of physical insight, the design procedure results in a balanced decision for the optimal placement of sensors. The developed method also addresses the problem of selection of part locators for part localization in the CCF. Examples are provided for illustration of the developed procedure for automotive space frame extrusion parts.

1.
Asada
H.
, and
By
A. B.
,
1985
, “
Kinematics Analysis of Workpart Fixturing for Flexible Assembly with Automatically Reconfigurable Fixtures
,”
IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation
,
RA-1
(
2
), pp.
86
93
.
2.
Ashley, S., 1994, “Building an Aluminum Car,” Mechanical Engineering, pp. 65–68.
3.
Bates, D. M., and Watts, D. G., 1988, Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications, Wiley, New York.
4.
Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R., 1987, Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, John Wiley, New York.
5.
Brost, R. C., and Goldberg, K. Y., 1994, “A Complete Algorithm for Designing Modular Fixtures for Polygonal Parts,” Technical Report SAND93-2028, Sandia National Laboratories.
6.
Chatterjee, S., and Hadi, A. S., 1988, Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Regression, Wiley, New York.
7.
Choi, W., 1996, Computational Analysis of Three Dimensional Measurement Data, Ph.d. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
8.
Chou
Y.-C.
,
Chandru
V.
, and
Barash
M. M.
,
1989
, “
A Mathematical Approach to Automated Configuration of Machining Fixtures: Analysis and Synthesis
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
111
, pp.
299
306
.
9.
Cowan
C. K.
, and
Kovesi
P. D.
,
1988
, “
Automatic Sensor Placement for Vision Task Requirements
,”
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, Vol.
10
, pp.
407
416
.
10.
DeMeter
E. C.
,
1994
, “
Restraint Analysis of Fixtures Which Rely on Surface Contact
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
116
, No.
2
, pp.
207
215
.
11.
Etesami
F.
,
1988
, “
Tolerance Verification through Manufactured Part Modeling
,”
ASME Journal of Manufacturing Systems
, Vol.
7
, No.
3
, pp.
223
232
.
12.
Fadale
T. D.
,
Nenarokomov
A. V.
, and
Emery
A. F.
,
1995
, “
Two approaches to Optimal Sensor Locations
,”
ASME Journal of Heat Transfer
, Vol.
117
, pp.
373
379
.
13.
Fedorov, V. V., 1972, Theory of Optimal Experiments, Academic Press, New York.
14.
Gupta, S., 1997, Manufactured Part Modeling for Automotive Spaceframe Extrusions, Ph.d. thesis, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD.
15.
Hoaglin
D. C.
, and
Welsch
R. E.
,
1978
, “
The Hat Matrix in Regression and Anova
,”
The American Statistician
, Vol.
32
, No.
1
, pp.
17
22
.
16.
Kammer
D. C.
,
1991
, “
Sensor Placement for On-orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures
,”
Journal of Guidance
, Vol.
14
, No.
2
, pp.
251
259
.
17.
Kammer
D. C.
,
1992
, “
Effects of Noise on Sensor Placement for On-orbit Modal Identification of Large Space Structures
,”
ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
, Vol.
114
, pp.
436
443
.
18.
Khan, A., Ceglarek, D., Shi, J., and Ni, J., 1995, “An Optimal Sensor Location Methodology for Fixture Fault Diagnosis,” ASME JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, pp. 1165–1176, MED-Vol. 2-2/MH-Vol. 3-2.
19.
Nagarkar, S. R., 1997, Locator and Sensor Placement in Automated Coordinate Checking Fixtures, Master’s thesis, University of Maryland, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College Park, Maryland 20742.
20.
Powell, M. J. D., 1992, “A Direct Search Optimization Method that Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation,” Numerical Analysis Reports, University of Cambridge. DAMTP 1992/NA5.
21.
Sahoo
K. C.
, and
Menq
C.-H.
,
1991
, “
Localization of 3-d Objects Having Complex Sculptured Surfaces Using Tactile Sensing and Surface Description
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
113
, pp.
85
92
.
22.
Stelson, K. A., and Lou, H., 1995, “Tolerance Analysis of Three-dimensional Tube Bending: Worst Case and Statistical Methods,” Transactions of NAMRI/SME 23, pp. 293–298.
23.
Trinkle, J. C., 1986, “Planning Frictionless, Self-adjusting, Enveloping Grasps,” Proceedings of Japan-U.S.A. Symposium on Flexible Automation, Osaka, Japan, pp. 401–404.
24.
Wang, Y., and Nagarkar, S., 1997, “Optimal Sensor Location Design in Automated Coordinate Checking Fixtures,” Proceedings of 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, Marina del Rey, CA, pp. 140–145.
25.
Wang
Y.
,
Gupta
S.
,
Hulting
F.
, and
Fussell
P.
,
1995
, “
Manufactured Part Modeling for Characterization of Geometric Errors of Aluminium Automotive Space-Frames
,”
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
, Vol.
2
, pp.
1051
1063
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.