In this paper, a nonlinear fault detection and isolation (FDI) scheme that is based on the concept of multiple model approach is proposed for jet engines. A modular and a hierarchical architecture is proposed which enables the detection and isolation of both single as well as concurrent permanent faults in the engine. A set of nonlinear models of the jet engine in which compressor and turbine maps are used for performance calculations corresponding to various operating modes of the engine (namely, healthy and different fault modes) is obtained. Using the multiple model approach, the probabilities corresponding to the engine modes of operation are first generated. The current operating mode of the system is then detected based on evaluating the maximum probability criteria. The performance of our proposed multiple model FDI scheme is evaluated by implementing both the extended Kalman filter and the unscented Kalman filter as detection filters. Simulation results presented demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed multiple model FDI algorithm for both structural and actuator faults in the jet engine.

References

1.
Yedavalli
,
R.
, (2007), β€œ
Robust Estimation and Fault Diagnostics for Aircraft Engines With Uncertain Model Data
,”
Proceedings of the American Control Conference
, ACC’07, New York, NY, USA, July 11–13, pp.
2822
–
2827
.
2.
Gertler
,
J.
, 1993, β€œ
Model Based Fault Diagnosis
,”
Control Theory Adv. Technol.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
259
–
285
.
3.
Frank
,
P. M.
, 1990, β€œ
Fault Diagnosis in Dynamics Systems Using Analytical and Knowledge-Based Redundancyβ€”A Survey
,”
Automatica
,
26
(
3
), pp.
459
–
474
.
4.
Litt
,
J. S.
,
Simon
,
D. L.
, and
Garg
,
S.
, 2004, β€œ
A Survey of Intelligent Control and Health Management Technologies for Aircraft Propulsion Systems
,”
J. Aerosp. Comput., Inf. Comun.
,
1
(
12
), pp.
543
–
563
.
5.
Urban
,
L. A.
, 1972, β€œ
Modelling Methods for Improving Robustness in Fault Diagnosis of Jet Engine System
,”
Proceedings of the 8th ASME Joint Propulsion Specialist Conference
, New Orleans, LA, USA,
ASME
,
New York
.
6.
Volponi
,
A. J.
, 2003, β€œ
Foundations of Gas Path Analysis
,”
Gas Turbine Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis
,
C. H.
Sieverding
and
K.
Mathioudakis
, eds.,
von Karman Institute
,
Belgium
.
7.
Garcia
,
E. A.
, and
Frank
,
P. M.
, 1997, β€œ
Deterministic Nonlinear Observer-Based Approaches to Fault Diagnosis: A Survey
,”
Control Eng. Pract.
,
5
(
5
), pp.
663
–
670
.
8.
Depersis
,
C.
, and
Isidori
,
A.
, 2001, β€œ
A Geometric Approach to Nonlinear Fault Detection and Isolation
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
,
46
(
6
), pp.
853
–
865
.
9.
Xu
,
A.
, and
Zhang
,
Q.
, 2004, β€œ
Nonlinear System Fault Diagnosis Based on Adaptive Estimation
,”
Automatica
,
40
(
7
), pp.
1181
–
1193
.
10.
Maybeck
,
P.
, 1999, β€œ
Multiple Model Adaptive Algorithms for Detecting and Compensating Sensor and Actuator/Surface Failures in Aircraft Flight Control Systems
,”
Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control
,
9
, pp.
1051
–
1070
.
11.
Menke
,
T.
, and
Maybeck
,
P.
, 1995, β€œ
Sensor/Actuator Failure Detection in the Vista F-I6 by Multiple Model Adaptive Estimation
,”
IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.
,
31
(
4
), pp.
1218
βˆ’
1229
.
12.
Zhan
,
Y.
, and
Jiang
,
J
., 1999, β€œ
An Interacting Multiple-Model Based Fault Detection, Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control Approach
,”
Proceedings of the.38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
, Phoenix, AZ, USA, December 7–10,
IEEE
,
New York
, pp.
3593
–
3598
.
13.
Yen
,
G. G.
and
Ho
,
L.
, 2003, β€œ
Online Multiple-Model-Based Fault Diagnosis and Accommodation
”.
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
,
50
(
2
), pp.
296
–
312
.
14.
Patton
,
R.
,
Lopez Toribio
,
C.
, and
Simani
,
S.
, 2001. β€œ
Robust Fault Diagnosis in a Chemical Process Using Multiple-Model Approach
,”
Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
, Orlando, FL, USA, December 4–7,
IEEE
,
New York
, pp.
149
–
154
.
15.
Kobayashi
,
T.
, and
Simon
,
D. L.
, 2003, β€œ
Application of a Bank of Kalman Filters for Aircraft Engine Fault Diagnostics
,”
ASME Conference Proceeding
, Turbo Expo 2003, Atlanta, GA, USA, June 16–19,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
461
–
470
.
16.
Kobayashi
,
T.
, and
Simon
,
D. L.
, 2007, β€œ
Hybrid Kalman Filter Approach for Aircraft Engine in-Flight Diagnostics: Sensor Fault Detection Case
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
129
(
3
), pp.
746
–
754
.
17.
Simon
,
D.
, 2008, β€œ
A Comparison of Filtering Approaches for Aircraft Engine Health Estimation
,”
Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
,
12
(
4
), pp.
276
–
284
.
18.
Meskin
,
N.
,
Naderi
,
E.
, and
Khorasani
,
K.
, 2010, β€œ
Fault Diagnosis of Jet Engines by Using a Multiple Model-Based Approach
,”
ASME Conference Proceedings
, Turbo Expo 2010, Glasgow, Scotland, June 14–18,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
319
–
329
.
19.
Wan
,
E. A.
, and
Merwe
,
R. V. D.
, 2000, β€œ
The Unscented Kalman Filter for Nonlinear Estimation
,”
Proceedings of the Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium
, Lake Louise, Alberta, Canada, October 1–4,
IEEE
,
New York, NY
, pp.
153
–
158
.
20.
Eide
,
P.
, and
Maybeck
,
P.
, 1996, β€œ
An MMAE Failure Detection System for the F-16
,”
IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag.
,
32
(
3
), pp.
1125
–
1136
.
21.
Camporeale
,
S. M.
,
Fortunato
,
B.
, and
Mastrovito
,
M.
, 2006, β€œ
A Modular Code for Real Time Dynamic Simulation of Gas Turbines in SIMULINK
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
128
, pp.
506
–
517
.
22.
Panov
,
V.
, 2009, β€œ
Gasturbolib: Simulink library for gas turbine engine modeling
,”
ASME Conference Proceedings
, Turbo Expo 2009, June 8–12, Orlando, FL, USA,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
555
–
565
.
23.
Merrington
,
G. L.
, 1994, β€œ
Fault Diagnosis in Gas Turbines Using a Model-Based Technique
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
116
(
2
), pp.
374
–
380
.
24.
Visser
,
W. P. J.
,
Kogenhop
,
O.
, and
Oostveen
,
M.
, 2006, β€œ
A Generic Approach for Gas Turbine Adaptive Modeling
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
128
(
1
), pp.
13
–
19
.
25.
Mohammadi
,
R.
,
Naderi
,
E.
,
Khorasani
,
K.
, and
Hashtrudi-Zad
,
S.
, 2010, β€œ
Fault Diagnosis of Gas Turbine Engines by Using Dynamic Neural Networks
,”
ASME Conference Proceedings
, Turbo Expo 2010, Glasgow, Scotland, June 14–18,
ASME
,
New York
, pp.
365
–
376
.
26.
Volponi
,
A. J.
, 2003,β€œ
Extending Gas Path Analysis Coverage for Other Fault Conditions
,”.
Gas Turbine Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis
,
C. H.
Sieverding
and
K.
Mathioudakis
, eds.,
von Karman Isntitute
,
Belgium
.
27.
Mathioudakis
,
K.
,
Romessis
,
C.
, and
Stamatis
,
A.
, 2003, β€œ
Probabilistic Methods for Gas Turbine Fault Diagnostics
,”
Gas Turbine Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis
,
C. H.
Sieverding
and
K.
Mathioudakis
, eds.,
von Karman Isntitute
,
Belgium
.
28.
Kandepu
,
R.
,
Foss
,
B.
, and
Imsland
,
L.
, 2008, β€œ
Applying the Unscented Kalman Filter for Nonlinear State Estimation
,”
J. Process Control
,
18
(
7–8
), pp.
753
–
768
.
You do not currently have access to this content.