This paper focuses on modeling the dynamics of a yoyo—a popular toy, which presents a challenging task for robotic control. A dynamic two-degree-of-freedom (DOF) model of the yoyo with a unilateral constraint is first proposed. The flight of the yoyo is naturally split into four phases, namely, a free-motion phase, a constrained-motion phase, a bottom phase, and a transition phase. It is shown that the energy loss is mainly due to a sequence of collisions that occur between the yoyo and the string during the bottom and transition phases. The dynamics in the bottom and transition phases is simplified by a single impulsive effect with an equivalent restitution coefficient, which depends only on the mass, inertia and axle radius of the yoyo. The resulting one-DOF model captures the energy loss while greatly simplifying the dynamic model, and thus facilitating the analysis and design of yoyo control. Both models are verified by experiments conducted on three different yoyos.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
robots, dynamics, games of skill
Topics:
Collisions (Physics), Dynamics (Mechanics), Energy dissipation, String, Trajectories (Physics), Rotation
1.
Andersson, R. L., 1988, A Robot Ping-Pong Player: Experiment in Real Time Intelligent Control, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2.
Sakaguchi, T., and Miyazaki, F., 1993, “Dynamic Manipulation of Ball-in-Cup Game,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA, Vol. 3, pp. 925–930.
3.
Buehler, M., and Koditschek, D. E., 1990, “From Stable to Chaotic Juggling: Theory, Simulation, and Experiments,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, Ohio, Vol. 3, pp. 1976–1981.
4.
Buehler
,
M.
,
Koditschek
,
D. E.
, and
Kindlmann
,
P. J.
1990
, “
A Family of Robot Control Strategies for Intermittent Dynamical Environments
,”
IEEE Control Syst. Mag.
,
10
(
2
) pp.
16
–
22
.
5.
Buehler
,
M.
,
Koditschek
,
D. E.
, and
Kindlmann
,
P. J.
1994
, “
Planning and Control of Robotic Juggling and Catching Tasks
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
13
, (
2
) pp.
101
–
118
.
6.
Rizzi, A. A., and Koditschek, D. E., 1992, “Progress in Spatial Robot Juggling,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, Vol. 1, pp. 775–780.
7.
Rizzi, A. A., and Koditschek, D. E., 1993, “Further Progress in Robot Juggling: The Spatial Two-Juggle,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA, Vol. 3, pp. 919–924.
8.
Rizzi, A. A., and Koditschek, D. E., 1994, “Further Progress in Robot Juggling: Solvable Mirror Laws,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, Vol. 4, pp. 2935–2940.
9.
Hashimoto, K., and Noritsugu, T., 1996, “Modeling and Control of Robot Yoyo with Visual Feedback,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, Vol. 3, pp. 2650–2655.
10.
Kurosu
,
S.
,
1978
, “
Dynamics of a Human-Operated Dynamical System (Yoyo Control System)
,”
Transactions SICE (in Japanese)
14
(
3
), pp.
277
–
282
.
11.
Brogliato, B., 1996, Non-Smooth Impact Mechanics—Models, Dynamics and Control, LNCIS 220, Springer-Verlag, New York.
12.
Brach, R. M., 1991, Mechanical Impact Dynamics, John Wiley, Canada.
13.
Brogliato
,
B.
,
Niculescu
,
S. I.
, and
Orhant
,
P.
,
1997
, “
On the Control of Finite-Dimensional Mechanical Systems with Unilateral Constraints
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
,
42
(
2
), pp.
200
–
215
.
14.
van der Schaft
,
A. J.
, and
Schumacher
,
J. M.
,
1996
, “
The Complementary-Slackness Class of Hybrid Systems
,”
Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems
,
9
(
3
), pp.
266
–
301
.
15.
Jin, H. L., 2000, “Modeling and Control of a Robotic Yoyo,” Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, Doctoral Research Proposal.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.