Five methods are outlined in this paper for determining the screw parameters of the instantaneous motion of rigid bodies from given velocity and position data of three noncollinear points. The five methods are compared on the basis of their computational efficiency and accuracy. It is found that the method based on vector algebra is much more efficient computationally than any of the other four methods, but has some limitations of applicability. In terms of accuracy, the methods are equivalent when working with exact data. It is recommended that the method based on vector algebra be used for computing screw parameters from position and velocity data when this computation is performed frequently, as in the case of trajectory planning for robotics application. But method hopping be employed where inexact data are used, employing the method which gives the best speed/accuracy combination.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 1990
Research Papers
Comparison of Methods for Determining Screw Parameters of Infinitesimal Rigid Body Motion From Position and Velocity Data
R. G. Fenton,
R. G. Fenton
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Laboratory, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
R. A. Willgoss
R. A. Willgoss
School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, The University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
R. G. Fenton
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Laboratory, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
R. A. Willgoss
School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, The University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Dec 1990, 112(4): 711-716 (6 pages)
Published Online: December 1, 1990
Article history
Received:
November 1, 1987
Revised:
July 1, 1989
Online:
March 17, 2008
Citation
Fenton, R. G., and Willgoss, R. A. (December 1, 1990). "Comparison of Methods for Determining Screw Parameters of Infinitesimal Rigid Body Motion From Position and Velocity Data." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. December 1990; 112(4): 711–716. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2896199
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Reinforcement Learning-Based Tracking Control for Two Time-Scale Looper Hydraulic Servo Systems
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (November 2023)
A Load Control Strategy for Stable Operation of Free-Piston Electromechanical Hybrid Power System
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (November 2023)
A Distributed Multiparticle Precise Stopping Control Model Based on the Distributed Model Predictive Control Algorithm for High-Speed Trains
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (November 2023)
Performance of Position, Force, and Impedance Controllers for a Pneumatic Cylinder Ankle Exoskeleton
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (November 2023)
Related Articles
Mobility Analysis of Flexure Mechanisms via Screw Algebra
J. Mechanisms Robotics (November,2011)
Rigid Body Motion Characteristics and Unified Instantaneous Motion Representation of Points, Lines, and Planes
J. Mech. Des (July,2004)
Variable Degree-of-Freedom Spatial Mechanisms Composed of Four Circular Translation Joints
J. Mechanisms Robotics (June,2021)
On the Scalar and Dual Formulations of the Curvature Theory of Line Trajectories
J. Mech., Trans., and Automation (March,1987)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Numerical Computation of Singular Points on Algebraic Surfaces
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)
Feedback-Aided Minimum Joint Motion
Robot Manipulator Redundancy Resolution
Propeller Cavitation Noise Radiated from Single and Twin-Screw Cargo Liners: CFD Prediction and Full Scale Validation
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)