Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a drug delivery technique used to target specific regions of the central nervous system (CNS) for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and cancer while bypassing the blood–brain barrier (BBB). The application of CED is limited by low volumetric flow rate infusions in order to prevent the possibility of backflow. Consequently, a small convective flow produces poor drug distribution inside the treatment region, which can render CED treatment ineffective. Novel catheter designs and CED protocols are needed in order to improve the drug distribution inside the treatment region and prevent backflow. In order to develop novel backflow-free catheter designs, the impact of the micro-fluid injection into deformable porous media was investigated experimentally as well as numerically. Fluid injection into the porous media has a considerable effect on local transport properties such as porosity and hydraulic conductivity because of the local media deformation. These phenomena not only alter the bulk flow velocity distribution of the micro-fluid flow due to the changing porosity, but significantly modify the flow direction, and even the volumetric flow distribution, due to induced local hydraulic conductivity anisotropy. These findings help us to design backflow-free catheters with safe volumetric flow rates up to 10 μl/min. A first catheter design reduces porous media deformation in order to improve catheter performance and control an agent volumetric distribution. A second design prevents the backflow by reducing the porosity and hydraulic conductivity along a catheter’s shaft. A third synergistic catheter design is a combination of two previous designs. Novel channel-inducing and dual-action catheters, as well as a synergistic catheter, were successfully tested without the occurrence of backflow and are recommended for future animal experiments.

References

1.
Bobo
,
R. H.
,
Laske
,
D. W.
,
Akbasak
,
A.
,
Morrison
,
P. F.
,
Dedrick
,
R. L.
, and
Oldfield
,
E. H.
, 1994, “
Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Macromolecules in the Brain
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
,
91
(
6
), pp.
2076
2080
.
2.
Rosenberg
,
G. A.
,
Kyner
,
W. T.
, and
Estrada
,
E.
, 1980, “
Bulk Flow of Brain Interstitial Fluid Under Normal and Hyperosmolar Conditions
,”
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.
,
238
(
1
), pp.
F42
F49
.
3.
Hall
,
W. A.
,
Rustamzadeh
,
E.
, and
Asher
,
A. L.
, 2003, “
Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Clinical Trials
,”
Neurosurg. Focus
,
14
(
2
), p.
e2
.
4.
Kunwar
,
S.
, 2003, “
Convection Enhanced Delivery of Il13-Pe38qqr for Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Glioma: Presentation of Interim Findings from Ongoing Phase 1 Studies
,”
Acta Neurochir.
,
88
, pp.
105
111
.
5.
Ivanchenko
,
O.
,
Sindhwani
,
N.
, and
Linninger
,
A. A.
, 2010, “
Experimental Techniques for Studying Poroelasticity in Brain Phantom Gels Under High Flow Micro-Infusion
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
132
(
5
), p.
051008
.
6.
Li
,
C.
,
Borja
,
R. I.
, and
Regueiro
,
R. A.
, 2004, “
Dynamics of Porous Media at Finite Strain
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
193
(
36–38
), pp.
3837
3870
.
7.
Boer
,
R. D.
, 1996, “
Highlights in the Historical Development of the Porous Media Theory: Toward a Consistent Macroscopic Theory
,”
Appl. Mech. Rev.
,
49
(
4
), pp.
201
262
.
8.
Prévost
,
J. H.
, 1980, “
Mechanics of Continuous Porous Media
,”
Int. J. Eng. Sci.
,
18
(
6
), pp.
787
800
.
9.
Wang
,
H. F.
, 2000,
Theory of Linear Poroelasticity with Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology
(Princeton Series in Geophysics),
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
.
10.
Bowen
,
R. M.
, 1982, “
Compressible Porous Media Models by Use of the Theory of Mixtures
,”
Int. J. Eng. Sci.
,
20
(
6
), pp.
697
735
.
11.
Morrison
,
P. F.
,
Chen
,
M. Y.
,
Chadwick
,
R. S.
,
Lonser
,
R. R.
, and
Oldfield
,
E. H.
, 1999, “
Focal Delivery During Direct Infusion to Brain: Role of Flow Rate, Catheter Diameter, and Tissue Mechanics
,”
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.
,
277
(
4
), pp.
R1218
R1229
.
12.
Zhi-Jian
,
C.
,
Broaddus
,
W. C.
,
Viswanathan
,
R. R.
,
Raghavan
,
R.
, and
Gillies
,
G. T.
, 2002, “
Intraparenchymal Drug Delivery Via Positive-Pressure Infusion: Experimental and Modeling Studies of Poroelasticity in Brain Phantom Gels
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
,
49
(
2
), pp.
85
96
.
13.
Bidros
,
D. S.
,
Liu
,
J. K.
, and
Vogelbaum
,
M. A.
, 2010, “
Future of Convection-Enhanced Delivery in the Treatment of Brain Tumors
,”
Future Oncol.
,
6
(
1
), pp.
117
125
.
14.
Date
,
A. W.
, 2005,
Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
.
15.
Neeves
,
K. B.
,
Lo
,
C. T.
,
Foley
,
C. P.
,
Saltzman
,
W. M.
, and
Olbricht
,
W. L.
, 2006, “
Fabrication and Characterization of Microfluidic Probes for Convection Enhanced Drug Delivery
,”
J. Controlled Release
,
111
(
3
), pp.
252
262
.
16.
Krauze
,
M. T.
,
Saito
,
R.
,
Noble
,
C.
,
Tamas
,
M.
,
Bringas
,
J.
,
Park
,
J. W.
,
Berger
,
M. S.
, and
Bankiewicz
,
K.
, 2005, “
Reflux-Free Cannula for Convection-Enhanced High-Speed Delivery of Therapeutic Agents
,”
J. Neurosurg.
,
103
(
5
), pp.
923
929
.
17.
Oh
,
S.
,
Odland
,
R.
,
Wilson
,
S. R.
,
Kroeger
,
K. M.
,
Liu
,
C.
,
Lowenstein
,
P. R.
,
Castro
,
M. G.
,
Hall
,
W. A.
, and
Ohlfest
,
J. R.
, 2007, “
Improved Distribution of Small Molecules and Viral Vectors in the Murine Brain Using a Hollow Fiber Catheter
,”
J. Neurosurg.
,
107
(
3
), pp.
568
577
.
18.
Fluent Inc., 2007.
19.
Chen
,
Z.-J.
,
Gillies
,
G. T.
,
Broaddus
,
W. C.
,
Prabhu
,
S. S.
,
Fillmore
,
H.
,
Mitchell
,
R. M.
,
Corwin
,
F. D.
, and
Fatouros
,
P. P.
, 2004, “
A Realistic Brain Tissue Phantom for Intraparenchymal Infusion Studies
,”
J. Neurosurg.
,
101
(
2
), pp.
314
322
.
20.
Hall
,
C. W.
, 2000,
Laws and Models: Science, Engineering, and Technology
,
CRC
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
You do not currently have access to this content.