When using optical motion capture systems, increasing the number of cameras improves the visibility. However, the software used to deal with the information fusion from multiple cameras may compromise the accuracy of the system due to camera dropout, which can vary with time. In cadaver studies of radial head motion, increasing the number of cameras used by the motion capture system seemed to decrease the accuracy of the measurements. This study investigates the cause. The hypothesis was that errors in position can be induced when markers are obscured from and then restored to a camera’s viewable range, as can happen in biomechanical studies. Accuracy studies quantified the capabilities of the motion capture system with precision translation and rotation movements. To illustrate the effect that abrupt perceived changes in a marker’s position can have on the calculation of radial head travel, simulated motion experiments were performed. In these studies, random noise was added to simulated data, which obscured the resultant path of motion. Finally, camera-blocking experiments were performed in which precise movements were measured with a six-camera Vicon system and the errors between the actual and perceived motion were computed. During measurement, cameras were selectively blocked and restored to view. The maximum errors in translation and rotation were 3.7 mm and 0.837 deg, respectively. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVAs) confirmed that the camera-blocking influenced the results. Taken together, these results indicate that camera-switching can affect the observation of fine movements using a motion analysis system with a large number of cameras. One solution is to offer opportunity for user interaction in the software to choose the cameras used for each instant of time.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: mcmiller@wpahs.org
Article navigation
January 2009
Technical Briefs
Effects of Camera Switching on Fine Accuracy in a Motion Capture System
Laurel Kuxhaus,
Laurel Kuxhaus
Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; Orthopaedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Allegheny General Hospital
, Pittsburgh, PA 15212
Search for other works by this author on:
Patrick J. Schimoler,
Patrick J. Schimoler
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory,
Allegheny General Hospital
, Pittsburgh, PA 15212; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15261
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeffrey S. Vipperman,
Jeffrey S. Vipperman
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15261
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Carl Miller
Mark Carl Miller
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Department of Bioengineering,
e-mail: mcmiller@wpahs.org
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; Orthopaedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Allegheny General Hospital
, Pittsburgh, PA 15212
Search for other works by this author on:
Laurel Kuxhaus
Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; Orthopaedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Allegheny General Hospital
, Pittsburgh, PA 15212
Patrick J. Schimoler
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory,
Allegheny General Hospital
, Pittsburgh, PA 15212; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15261
Jeffrey S. Vipperman
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15261
Mark Carl Miller
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; Orthopaedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Allegheny General Hospital
, Pittsburgh, PA 15212e-mail: mcmiller@wpahs.org
J Biomech Eng. Jan 2009, 131(1): 014502 (6 pages)
Published Online: November 21, 2008
Article history
Received:
July 19, 2007
Revised:
August 26, 2008
Published:
November 21, 2008
Citation
Kuxhaus, L., Schimoler, P. J., Vipperman, J. S., and Miller, M. C. (November 21, 2008). "Effects of Camera Switching on Fine Accuracy in a Motion Capture System." ASME. J Biomech Eng. January 2009; 131(1): 014502. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3002910
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Simulating the Growth of TATA-Box Binding Protein-Associated Factor 15 Inclusions in Neuron Soma
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Effect of Structure and Wearing Modes on the Protective Performance of Industrial Safety Helmet
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Sex-Based Differences and Asymmetry in Hip Kinematics During Unilateral Extension From Deep Hip Flexion
J Biomech Eng (December 2024)
Related Articles
A Measurement Device for Rotational Stiffness of the Eye
J. Med. Devices (June,2008)
A Continuous Method to Compute Model Parameters for Soft Biological Materials
J Biomech Eng (July,2011)
Ambulatory Device for Urinary Incontinence Detection in Female Athletes
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
Linear and Angular Head Acceleration Measurements in Collegiate Football
J Biomech Eng (June,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Vibration Analysis of the Seated Human Body in Vertical Direction
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)
Conclusions and Future Trends
Basic Principles and Potential Applications of Holographic Microwave Imaging
Introduction and Scope
High Frequency Piezo-Composite Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer Array Technology for Biomedical Imaging