0
research-article

Assessment of Head Kinematics for Bare Head and Helmeted Impacts Comparing an ATD and a Detailed Head and Neck Model with Active Musculature

[+] Author and Article Information
David Bruneau

Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
dbruneau@uwaterloo.ca

Duane Cronin

Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
duane.cronin@uwaterloo.ca

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4043667 History: Received December 04, 2018; Revised April 22, 2019

Abstract

It has been proposed that neck muscle activation may play a role in head response resulting from impacts in American Football. The importance of neck stiffness and active musculature in the standard Linear Impactor Helmet Test was assessed using a detailed head and neck finite element (FE) model from a current Human Body Model (HBM) compared to a validated Hybrid III head and neck FE model. The models were assessed for bare-head and helmeted impacts at three speeds (5.5, 7.4, 9.3 m/s) and three impact orientations. The HBM head and neck was assessed without muscle activation, and with a high level of muscle activation representing a braced condition. The HBM and Hybrid III had an average cross-correlation rating of 0.89 for acceleration in the primary impact direction, indicating excellent correspondence regardless of muscle activation. Differences were identified in the axial head acceleration, attributed to axial neck stiffness (correlation rating of 0.45), but did not have a large effect on the overall head response using existing head response metrics (HIC, BrIC, HIP). Although responses that develop over longer durations following the impact differed slightly, such as the moment at the base of the neck, this occurred later in time and therefore did not considerably affect the short-term head kinematics in the primary impact direction. Though muscle activation did not play a strong role in the head response for the test configurations considered, muscle activation may play a role in longer duration events.

Copyright (c) 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In