Technical Brief

Estimation of the Balance-Keeping Control Law Applied by a Human Being Upon a Sudden Sagittal Tilt Perturbation

[+] Author and Article Information
Nurdan Bilgin

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Ondokuz Mayıs University,
Samsun 55200, Turkey
e-mail: nurdan.bilgin@omu.edu.tr

M. Kemal Özgören

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Middle East Technical University,
Ankara 06800, Turkey
e-mail: ozgoren@metu.edu.tr

Manuscript received August 16, 2018; final manuscript received January 15, 2019; published online February 13, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Anton E. Bowden.

J Biomech Eng 141(4), 044502 (Feb 13, 2019) (7 pages) Paper No: BIO-18-1373; doi: 10.1115/1.4042683 History: Received August 16, 2018; Revised January 15, 2019

This study aims to estimate the control law employed by the central nervous system (CNS) to keep a person in balance after a sudden disturbance. For this aim, several experiments were carried out, in which the subjects were perturbed sagittally by using a single-axis tilt-platform and their motions were recorded with appropriate sensors. The analysis of the experimental results leads to the contribution of this paper as a conjecture that the CNS commands the muscular actuators of the joints according to an adaptive proportional-derivative (PD) control law such that its gains and set points are updated continuously. This conjecture is accompanied with an assumption that the CNS is able to acquire perfect and almost instantaneous position and velocity feedback by means of a fusion of the signals coming from the proprioceptive, somatosensory, and vestibular systems. In order to verify the conjectured control law, an approximate biomechanical model was developed and several simulations were carried out to imitate the experimentally observed motions. The time variations of the set points and the control gains were estimated out of the experimental data. The simulated motions were observed to be considerably close to the experimental motions. Thus, the conjectured control law is validated. However, the experiments also indicate that the mentioned adaptation scheme is quite variable even for the same subject tested repeatedly with the same perturbation. In other words, this experimental study also leads to the implication that the way the CNS updates the control parameters is not quite predictable.

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Horak, F. B. , and Nashner, L. M. , 1986, “Central Programming of Postural Movements: Adaptation to Altered Support-Surface Configurations,” J. Neurophysiol., 55(6), pp. 1369–1381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
McIntyre, J. , and Bizzi, E. , 1993, “Servo Hypotheses for the Biological Control of Movement,” J. Motor Behav., 25(3), pp. 193–202. [CrossRef]
Kim, S. , Atkeson, C. G. , and Park, S. , 2012, “Perturbation-Dependent Selection of Postural Feedback Gain and Its Scaling,” J. Biomech., 45(8), pp. 1379–1386. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Küng, U. M. , Horlings, C. , Honegger, F. , Duysens, J. , and Allum, J. , 2009, “Control of Roll and Pitch Motion During Multi-Directional Balance Perturbations,” Exp. Brain Res., 194(4), pp. 631–645. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Runge, C. , Shupert, C. , Horak, F. , and Zajac, F. , 1999, “Ankle and Hip Postural Strategies Defined by Joint Torques,” Gait Posture, 10(2), pp. 161–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Peterka, R. J. , 2003, “Simplifying the Complexities of Maintaining Balance,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., 22(2), pp. 63–68. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Park, S. , Horak, F. B. , and Kuo, A. D. , 2004, “Postural Feedback Responses Scale With Biomechanical Constraints in Human Standing,” Exp. Brain Res., 154(4), pp. 417–427. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kuo, A. D. , 2005, “An Optimal State Estimation Model of Sensory Integration in Human Postural Balance,” J. Neural Eng., 2(3), p. S235. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Li, Y. , Levine, W. S. , and Loeb, G. E. , 2012, “A Two-Joint Human Posture Control Model With Realistic Neural Delays,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 20(5), pp. 738–748. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. , and Solla, S. A. , 2008, “Models of Motor Control,” The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology, R. Sun , ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.
Gomi, H. , and Kawato, M. , 1996, “Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement,” Science, 272(5258), pp. 117–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Horak, F. B. , 1996, “Adaptation of Automatic Postural Responses,” Proceedings Acquisition of Motor Behavior in Vertebrates, J. R. Bloedel , T. J. Ebner , and S. P. Wise , eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 57–85.
Kuo, A. D. , and Zajac, F. E. , 1993, “Human Standing Posture: Multi-Joint Movement Strategies Based on Biomechanical Constraints,” Progress in Brain Research, J. H. J. Allum, D. J. Allum-Mecklenburg, F. P. Harris, R. Probst, eds., Vol. 97, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 349–358.
Bilgin, N. , 2015, “Investigation of Control of Human Balance-Recovery Reactions,” Ph.D. thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12619450/index.pdf
Zatsiorsky, V. M. , and Seluyanov, V. N. , 1983, “The Mass and Inertia Characteristics of the Main Segments of the Human Body,” Biomech., V-IIIB, pp. 1152–1159.
Winter, D. A. , 2009, Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
van der Kooij, H. , Jacobs, R. , Koopman, B. , and Grootenboer, H. , 1999, “A Multisensory Integration Model of Human Stance Control,” Biol. Cybern., 80(5), pp. 299–308. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Horak, F. B. , 2009, “Postural Control,” Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Springer, Berlin, pp. 3212–3219.
Jeka, J. , and Kiemel, T. , 2009, “Modeling of Human Postural Control,” Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, M. Binder , N. Hirokawa , and U. Windhorst , eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 2381–2384.
Jiang, J. , and Zhang, Y. , 2004, “A Revisit to Block and Recursive Least Squares for Parameter Estimation,” Comput. Electr. Eng., 30(5), pp. 403–416. [CrossRef]
Haugen, F. , 2010, Advanced Dynamics and Control, TechTeach, Skien, Norway.
Tang, K. S. , Honegger, F. , and Allum, J. H. J. , 2012, “Movement Patterns Underlying First Trial Responses in Human Balance Corrections,” Neuroscience, 225, pp. 140–151. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Biomechanical model of a human being as a 3DOF inverted pendulum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of the experimental and simulated balance-recovery responses of subject 1 in the forward and backward trials

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of the experimental and simulated balance-recovery responses of subject 2 in the forward and backward trials

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Time-scheduled characteristics of the control parameters for the first forward trial of subject 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Time-varying control gains obtained for subject 1 in all the trials with forward perturbation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of the average control gains obtained for subjects 1 and 2 in the trials with forward perturbation



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In