Technical Brief

Right–Left Differences in Knee Extension Stiffness for the Normal Rat Knee: In Vitro Measurements Using a New Testing Apparatus

[+] Author and Article Information
Keith L. Markolf

Biomechanics Research Section,
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA,
UCLA Rehabilitation Center,
Room 21-67,
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1759
e-mail: kmarkolf@mednet.ucla.edu

Denis Evseenko, Frank Petrigliano

Biomechanics Research Section,
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA,
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1759

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received July 23, 2015; final manuscript received January 5, 2016; published online February 23, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Tammy L. Haut Donahue.

J Biomech Eng 138(4), 044501 (Feb 23, 2016) (4 pages) Paper No: BIO-15-1368; doi: 10.1115/1.4032693 History: Received July 23, 2015; Revised January 05, 2016

Knee stiffness following joint injury or immobilization is a common clinical problem, and the rat has been used as a model for studies related to joint stiffness and limitation of motion. Knee stiffness measurements have been reported for the anesthetized rat, but it is difficult to separate the contributions of muscular and ligamentous restraints to the recorded values. in vitro testing of isolated rat knees devoid of musculature allows measurement of joint structural properties alone. In order to measure the effects of therapeutic or surgical interventions designed to alter joint stiffness, the opposite extremity is often used as a control. However, right–left stiffness differences for the normal rat knee have not been reported in the literature. If stiffness changes observed for a treatment group are within the normal right–left variation, validity of the results could be questioned. The objectives of this study were to utilize a new testing apparatus to measure right–left stiffness differences during knee extension in a population of normal rat knees and to document repeatability of the stiffness measurements on successive testing days. Moment versus rotation curves were recorded for 15 right–left pairs of normal rat knees on three consecutive days, with overnight specimen storage in a refrigerator. Each knee was subjected to ten loading–unloading cycles, with the last loading curve used for analysis. Angular rotation (AR), defined here as the change in flexion–extension angle from a specified applied joint moment, is commonly used as a measure of overall joint stiffness. For these tests, ARs were measured from the recorded test curves with a maximum applied extension moment of 100 g cm. Mean rotations for testing days 2 and 3 were 0.81–1.25 deg lower (p < 0.001) than for day 1, but were not significantly different from each other. For each testing day, mean rotations for right knees were 1.12–1.30 deg greater (p < 0.001) than left knees. These right–left stiffness differences should be considered when interpreting the results of knee treatment studies designed to alter knee stiffness when using the opposite extremity as a control.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Topics: Testing , Stiffness , Knee , Rotation
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Magit, D. , Wolff, A. , Sutton, K. , and Medvecky, M. J. , 2007, “ Arthrofibrosis of the Knee,” J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg., 15(11), pp. 682–694. [PubMed]
Mayr, H. O. , Weig, T. G. , and Plitz, W. , 2004, “ Arthrofibrosis Following ACL Reconstruction—Reasons and Outcome,” Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 124(8), pp. 518–522. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shelbourne, K. D. , and Johnson, G. E. , 1994, “ Outpatient Surgical Management of Arthrofibrosis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery,” Am. J. Sports Med., 22(2), pp. 192–197. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Parikh, S. N. , Nathan, S. T. , Wall, E. J. , and Eismann, E. A. , 2013, “ Complications of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Young Patients,” Am. J. Sports Med., 41(5), pp. 1030–1038. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tjoumakaris, F. P. , Tucker, B. C. , Post, Z. , Pepe, M. D. , Orozco, F. , and Ong, A. C. , 2014, “ Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions for the Stiff Total Knee: Results After Failed Manipulation,” Orthopedics, 37(5), pp. e482–487. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cosgarea, A. J. , DeHaven, K. E. , and Lovelock, J. E. , 1994, “ The Surgical Treatment of Arthrofibrosis of the Knee,” Am. J. Sports Med., 22(2), pp. 184–191. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kim, D. H. , Gill, T. J. , and Millett, P. J. , 2004, “ Arthroscopic Treatment of the Arthrofibrotic Knee,” Arthroscopy, 20(Suppl. 2), pp. 187–194. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Paulos, L. E. , Rosenberg, T. D. , Drawbert, J. , Manning, J. , and Abbott, P. , 1987, “ Infrapatellar Contracture Syndrome: An Unrecognized Cause of Knee Stiffness With Patella Entrapment and Patella Infera,” Am. J. Sports Med., 15(4), pp. 331–341. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Steadman, J. R. , Dragoo, J. L. , Hines, S. L. , and Briggs, K. K. , 2008, “ Arthroscopic Release for Symptomatic Scarring of the Anterior Interval of the Knee,” Am. J. Sports Med., 36(9), pp. 1763–1769. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stasiak, M. E. , Wiznia, D. , Alzoobaee, S. , Ciccotti, M. C. , Imhauser, C. W. , Voigt, C. , Torzilli, P. A. , Deng, X. H. , and Rodeo, S. A. , 2012, “ A Novel Device to Apply Controlled Flexion and Extension to the Rat Knee Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 134(4), p. 041008. [CrossRef]
Gu, X. I. , Leong, D. J. , Guzman, F. , Mahamud, R. , Li, Y. H. , Majeska, R. J. , Schaffler, M. B. , Sun, H. B. , and Cardoso, L. , 2010, “ Development and Validation of a Motion and Loading System for a Rat Knee Joint In Vivo,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 38(3), pp. 621–631. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Trudel, G. , and Uhthoff, H. K. , 2000, “ Contractures Secondary to Immobility: Is the Restriction Articular or Muscular? An Experimental Longitudinal Study in the Rat Knee,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 81(1), pp. 6–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Trudel, G. , Zhou, J. , Uhthoff, H. K. , and Laneuville, O. , 2008, “ Four Weeks of Mobility After 8 Weeks of Immobility Fails to Restore Normal Motion: A Preliminary Study,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 466(5), pp. 1239–1244. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Moriyama, H. , Tobimatsu, Y. , Ozawa, J. , Kito, N. , and Tanaka, R. , 2013, “ Amount of Torque and Duration of Stretching Affects Correction of Knee Contracture in a Rat Model of Spinal Cord Injury,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 471(11), pp. 3626–3636. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Trudel, G. , O'Neill, P. A. , and Goudreau, L. A. , 2000, “ A Mechanical Arthrometer to Measure Knee Joint Contracture in Rats,” IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., 8(1), pp. 149–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Moon, D. K. , Woo, S. L. , Takakura, Y. , Gabriel, M. T. , and Abramowitch, S. D. , 2006, “ The Effects of Refreezing on the Viscoelastic and Tensile Properties of Ligaments,” J. Biomech., 39(6), pp. 1153–1157. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jung, H. J. , Vangipuram, G. , Fisher, M. B. , Yang, G. , Hsu, S. , Bianchi, J. , Ronholdt, C. , and Woo, S. L. , 2011, “ The Effects of Multiple Freeze-Thaw Cycles on the Biomechanical Properties of the Human Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allograft,” J. Orthop. Res., 29(8), pp. 1193–1198. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fox, K. M. , Kimura, S. , Plato, C. C. , and Kitagawa, T. , 1995, “ Bilateral Asymmetry in Bone Weight at Various Skeletal Sites of the Rat,” Anat. Rec., 241(2), pp. 284–287. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The test apparatus used to record moment versus rotation response curves during extension of a cadaveric rat knee

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Raw data recoded for sample rat knee, showing ten successive loading curves for knee extension

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Right–left scatter plots for testing days 1–3. The unity line represents the ideal situation, where knee extension angles for right knees and left knees are equal. The linear regression lines of data for all the testing days are shown.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In