Technical Briefs

Viscoelastic Properties of the P17 and Adult Rat Brain From Indentation in the Coronal Plane

[+] Author and Article Information
Benjamin S. Elkin

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Columbia University,
New York, NY 10027;
MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists,
Mississauga, ON L4Z 1S6, Canada
e-mail: ben.elkin@meaforensic.com

Barclay Morrison

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
e-mail: bm2119@columbia.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Bioengineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. Manuscript received February 14, 2013; final manuscript received August 13, 2013; accepted manuscript posted September 12, 2013; published online October 1, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Guy M. Genin.

J Biomech Eng 135(11), 114507 (Oct 01, 2013) (5 pages) Paper No: BIO-13-1082; doi: 10.1115/1.4025386 History: Received February 14, 2013; Revised August 13, 2013; Accepted September 12, 2013

This technical brief serves as an update to our previous work characterizing the region-dependence of viscoelastic mechanical properties of the P17 and adult rat brain in the coronal plane (Elkin et al., 2011, “A Detailed Viscoelastic Characterization of the P17 and Adult Rat Brain,” J. Neurotrauma, 28, pp. 2235–2244.). Here, modifications to the microindentation device provided for the reliable measurement of load during the ramp portion of load relaxation microindentation tests. In addition, a correction factor for finite sample thickness was incorporated to more accurately assess the intrinsic mechanical properties of the tissue.The shear relaxation modulus was significantly dependent on the anatomic region and developmental age, with a general increase in stiffness with age and increased stiffness in the hippocampal and cortical regions compared with the white matter and cerebellar regions of the brain. The shear modulus ranged from ∼0.2 kPa to ∼2.6 kPa depending on region, age, and time scale. Best-fit Prony series parameters from least squares fitting to the indentation data from each region are reported, which describe the shear relaxation behavior for each anatomic region within each age group at both short (<10 ms) and long (∼20 s) time scales. These data will be useful for improving the biofidelity of finite element models of rat brain deformation at short time scales, such as models of traumatic brain injury.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Xiong, Y., Mahmood, A., and Chopp, M., 2013, “Animal Models of Traumatic Brain Injury,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 14, pp. 128–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Li, Y., Zhang, L., Kallakuri, S., Zhou, R., and Cavanaugh, J. M., 2011, “Quantitative Relationship Between Axonal Injury and Mechanical Response in a Rodent Head Impact Acceleration Model,” J. Neurotrauma, 28, pp. 1767–1782. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Takhounts, E. G., Ridella, S. A., Hasija, V., Tannous, R. E., Campbell, J. Q., Malone, D., and Duma, S., 2008, “Investigation of Traumatic Brain Injuries Using the Next Generation of Simulated Injury Monitor (SIMon) Finite Element Head Model,” Stapp Car Crash J., 52, pp. 1–31. Available at: http://www.simbex.com/BRP/links/Takhouts_EG_2008_InvestigationOfTraumaticBrainInjuriesUsingNextGenSIMon_StappCCJ.pdf [PubMed]
Mao, H., Guan, F., Han, X., and Yang, K. H., 2011, “Strain-Based Regional Traumatic Brain Injury Intensity in Controlled Cortical Impact: A Systematic Numerical Analysis,” J. Neurotrauma, 28, pp. 2263–2276. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Elkin, B. S., Azeloglu, E. U., Costa, K. D., and Morrison, B.III, 2007, “Mechanical Heterogeneity of the Rat Hippocampus Measured by Atomic Force Microscope Indentation,” J. Neurotrauma, 24, pp. 812–822. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Elkin, B. S., Ilankovan, A., and Morrison, B.III, 2010, “Age-Dependent Regional Mechanical Properties of the Rat Hippocampus and Cortex,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 132(1), p. 011010. [CrossRef]
Gefen, A., Gefen, N., Zhu, Q., Raghupathi, R., and Margulies, S. S., 2003, “Age-Dependent Changes in Material Properties of the Brain and Braincase of the Rat,” J. Neurotrauma, 20, pp. 1163–1177. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Elias, P. Z., and Spector, M., 2012, “Viscoelastic Characterization of Rat Cerebral Cortex and Type I Collagen Scaffolds for Central Nervous System Tissue Engineering,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 12, pp. 63–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vappou, J., Breton, E., Choquet, P., Willinger, R., Goetz, C., and Constantinesco, A., 2007, “Magnetic Resonance Elastography Compared With Rotational Rheometry for in Vitro Brain Tissue Viscoelasticity Measurement,” MAGMA (N.Y.), 20, pp. 273–278. [CrossRef]
Vappou, J., Breton, E., Choquet, P., Willinger, R., and Constantinesco, A., 2008, “Assessment of in Vivo and Post-Mortem Mechanical Behavior of Brain Tissue Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography,” J. Biomech., 41, pp. 2954–2959. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Christ, A. F., Franze, K., Gautier, H., Moshayedi, P., Fawcett, J., Franklin, R. J. M., Karadottir, R. T., and Guck, J., 2010, “Mechanical Difference Between White and Gray Matter in the Rat Cerebellum Measured by Scanning Force Microscopy,” J. Biomech., 43, pp. 2986–2992. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lee, S. J., Sun, J., Flint, J. J., Guo, S., Xie, H. K., King, M. A., and Sarntinoranont, M., 2011, “Optically Based-Indentation Technique for Acute Rat Brain Tissue Slices and Thin Biomaterials,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B: Appl. Biomater., 97, pp. 84–95. [CrossRef]
Shulyakov, A. V., Cenkowski, S. S., Buist, R. J., and Del Bigio, M. R., 2011, “Age-Dependence of Intracranial Viscoelastic Properties in Living Rats,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 4, pp. 484–497. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Clayton, E. H., Garbow, J. R., and Bayly, P. V., 2011, “Frequency-Dependent Viscoelastic Parameters of Mouse Brain Tissue Estimated by MR Elastography,” Phys. Med. Biol., 56, pp. 2391–2406. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cheng, L., Xia, X., Yu, W., Scriven, L. E., and Gerberich, W.W., 2000, “Flat-Punch Indentation of Viscoelastic Material,” J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys., 38, pp. 10–22. [CrossRef]
Zamir, E. A., and Taber, L.A., 2004, “On the Effects of Residual Stress in Microindentation Tests of Soft Tissue Structures,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 126(2), pp. 276–283. [CrossRef]
Elkin, B. S., Ilankovan, A. I., and Morrison, B.III, 2011, “A Detailed Viscoelastic Characterization of the P17 and Adult Rat Brain,” J. Neurotrauma, 28, pp. 2235–2244. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Finan, J. D., Elkin, B. S., Pearson, E. M., Kalbian, I. L., and Morrison, B.III, 2012, “Viscoelastic Properties of the Rat Brain in the Sagittal Plane: Effects of Anatomical Structure and Age,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 40, pp. 70–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Finan, J. D., Pearson, E. M., and Morrison, B.III, 2012, “Viscoelastic Properties of the Rat Brain in the Horizontal Plane,” Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, Paper No. IRC-12-57.
Elkin, B. S., Ilankovan, A., and Morrison, B.III, 2011, “Dynamic, Regional Mechanical Properties of the Porcine Brain: Indentation in the Coronal Plane,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 133(7), p. 071009. [CrossRef]
Hayes, W. C., Herrmann, G., Mockros, L. F., and Keer, L. M.1972, “A Mathematical Analysis for Indentation Tests of Articular Cartilage,” J. Biomech, 5, pp. 541–551. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Radok, J. R. M., and Lee, E. H., 1960, “The Contact Problem for Viscoelastic Bodies,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 27(3), pp. 438–444. [CrossRef]
Allen, M. P., 1997, “Testing Hypotheses in Nested Regression Models,” Understanding Regression Analysis, Plenum, New York, pp. 113–115.
Massey, F. J., 1951, “The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 46, pp. 68–78. [CrossRef]
Bonferroni, C. E., 1935, “Il Calcolo Delle Assicurazioni su Gruppi di Teste,” Tipografia del Senato, Studi in Onore del Professore Salvatore Ortu Carboni, Bardi, Rome, Italy, pp. 13–60.
Sakai, M., 2002, “Time-Dependent Viscoelastic Relation Between Load and Penetration for an Axisymmetric Indenter,” Philos. Mag. A, 82, pp. 1841–1849. [CrossRef]
Arbogast, K. B., and Margulies, S. S., 1999, “A Fiber-Reinforced Composite Model of the Viscoelastic Behavior of the Brainstem in Shear,” J. Biomech., 32, pp. 865–870. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cater, H. L., Sundstrom, L. E., and Morrison, B.III, 2006, “Temporal Development of Hippocampal Cell Death is Dependent on Tissue Strain but not Strain Rate,” J. Biomech., 39, pp. 2810–2818. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Elkin, B. S., and Morrison, B.III, 2007, “Region-Specific Tolerance Criteria for the Living Brain,” Stapp Car Crash J., 51, pp. 127–138. Available at: http://papers.sae.org/2007-22-0005/ [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Example of experimental stress-relaxation load traces for three regions of the adult rat brain over the first 0.5 s (in gray) demonstrating the range of stiffness encountered along with calculated loads using the Prony series fits for each individual load curve (indicated in the legend). The inset shows the indenter displacement into the tissue as a function of time (equivalent to the indentation depth).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Average shear modulus at 10 ms (G10ms), 50 ms (G50ms), and 20 s (G20 s) after the start of indentation calculated from Prony series fits from each curve within each region of interest in the (a) P17 (n = 4–16 indentations per region), and (b) adult (n = 6–14 indentations per region) rat brain and the results of the post hoc tests on each region for (c) P17, and (d) adult rat (error bars represent standard error of the mean; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Prony series model fits for all regions of the (a) P17, and (b) adult rat brain. The inset shows the Kolmogorov–Smirnov comparisons of the Prony series fits for each region (*, p < 0.05).



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In