Research Papers

Computational Analysis of Microstructure of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene for Total Joint Replacement

[+] Author and Article Information
Kelly M. Seymour

e-mail: seymourk@etown.edu

Sara A. Atwood

e-mail: atwoods@etown.edu
Elizabethtown College,
One Alpha Drive,
Elizabethtown, PA 17022

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Bioengineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 18, 2012; final manuscript received December 30, 2012; accepted manuscript posted January 9, 2013; published online February 7, 2013. Editor: Beth Winkelstein.

J Biomech Eng 135(2), 021017 (Feb 07, 2013) (6 pages) Paper No: BIO-12-1416; doi: 10.1115/1.4023321 History: Received September 18, 2012; Revised December 30, 2012; Accepted January 09, 2013

Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE, or ultra high), a frequently used material in orthopedic joint replacements, is often the cause of joint failure due to wear, fatigue, or fracture. These mechanical failures have been related to ultra high's strength and stiffness, and ultimately to the underlying microstructure, in previous experimental studies. Ultra high's semicrystalline microstructure consists of about 50% crystalline lamellae and 50% amorphous regions. Through common processing treatments, lamellar percentage and size can be altered, producing a range of mechanical responses. However, in the orthopedic field the basic material properties of the two microstructural phases are not typically studied independently, and their manipulation is not computationally optimized to produce desired mechanical properties. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to: (1) develop a 2D linear elastic finite element model of actual ultra high microstructure and fit the mechanical properties of the microstructural phases to experimental data and (2) systematically alter the dimensions of lamellae in the model to begin to explore optimizing the bulk stiffness while decreasing localized stress. The results show that a 2D finite element model can be built from a scanning electron micrograph of real ultra high lamellar microstructure, and that linear elastic constants can be fit to experimental results from those same ultra high formulations. Upon altering idealized lamellae dimensions, we found that bulk stiffness decreases as the width and length of lamellae increase. We also found that maximum localized Von Mises stress increases as the width of the lamellae decrease and as the length and aspect ratio of the lamellae increase. Our approach of combining finite element modeling based on scanning electron micrographs with experimental results from those same ultra high formulations and then using the models to computationally alter microstructural dimensions and properties could advance our understanding of how microstructure affects bulk mechanical properties. This advanced understanding could allow for the engineering of next-generation ultra high microstructures to optimize mechanical behavior and increase device longevity.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Kurtz, S., Mowat, F., Ong, K., Chan, N., Lau, E., and Halpern, M., 2005, “Prevalence of Primary and Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 1990 Through 2002,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 87(7), pp. 1487–1497. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kurtz, S., Ong, K., Lau, E., Mowat, F., and Halpern, M., 2007a, “Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 2005 to 2030,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 89(4), pp. 780–785. [CrossRef]
Kurtz, S. M., Ong, K. L., Schmier, J., Mowat, F., Saleh, K., Dybvik, E., Kärrholm, J., Garellick, G., Havelin, L. I., Furnes, O., Malchau, H., and Lau, E., 2007b, “Future Clinical and Economic Impact of Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 89(3), pp. 144–151. [CrossRef]
Ong, K. L., Mowat, F. S., Chan, N., Lau, E., Halpern, M. T., and Kurt, S. M., 2006, “Economic Burden of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Enrollees,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 446, pp. 22–28. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bozic, K. J., Kurtz, S. M., Lau, E., Ong, K., Vail, T. P., and BerryD. J., 2009, “The Epidemiology of Bearing Surface Usage in Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 91(7), pp. 1614–1620. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Furmanski, J., Anderson, M., Bal, S., Greenwald, A. S., Halley, D., Penenberg, B., Ries, M. D., and Pruitt, L. A., 2009, “Clinical Fracture of Cross-Linked UHMWPE Acetabular Liners,” Biomaterials, 30(29), pp. 5572–5582. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ries, M. D., and Pruitt, L., 2005, “Effect of Cross-Linking on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 440, pp. 149–156. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Atwood, S. A., Van Citters, D. W., Patten, E. W., Furmanski, J., Ries, M. D., and Pruitt, L. A., 2010, “Tradeoffs Amongst Fatigue, Wear, and Oxidation Resistance of Cross-Linked Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat., 4(11), pp. 1033–1045. [CrossRef]
Medel, F. J., Peña, P., Cegoñino, J., Gomez-Barrena, E., and Puertolas, J. A., 2007, “Comparative Fatigue Behavior and Toughness of Remelted and Annealed Highly Crosslinked Polyethylenes,” J. Biomed. Mater. B, 83(2), pp. 380–390. [CrossRef]
Simis, K. S., Bistolfi, A., Bellare, A., and PruittL. A., 2006, “The Combined Effects of Crosslinking and High Crystallinity on the Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene,” Biomaterials, 27(9), pp. 1688–1694. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Edidin, A. A., Pruitt, L., and Jewett C. W., Crane, D. J., Roberts, D., and Kurtz, S. M., 1999, “Plasticity-Induced Damage Layer is a Precursor to Wear in Radiation-Cross-Linked UHMWPE Acetabular Components for Total Hip Replacement,” J. Arthroplasty, 14(5), pp. 616–627. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kurtz, S. M., Foulds, J. R., Jewett, C. W., Srivastav, S., and Edidin, A. A., 1997, “Validation of a Small Punch Testing Technique to Characterize the Mechanical Behaviour of Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene,” Biomaterials, 18(24), pp. 1659–1663. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Saikko, V., and Ahlroos, T., 2000, “Wear Simulation of UHMWPE for Total Hip Replacement With a Multidirectional Motion Pin-on-Disk Device: Effects of Counterface Material, Contact Area, and Lubricant,” J. Biomed. Mat. Res., 49(2), pp. 147–154. [CrossRef]
Van Citters, D. W., Kennedy, F. E., and CollierJ. P., 2007, “Rolling Sliding Wear of UHMWPE for Knee Bearing Applications,” Wear, 263, pp. 1087–1094. [CrossRef]
Baker, D. A., Bellare, A., and Pruitt, L., 2003, “The Effects of Degree of Crosslinking on the Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation Resistance of Orthopedic Grade Polyethylene,” J. Biomed. Mat. A, 66, pp. 146–154. [CrossRef]
Essner, A., Schmidig, G., and Wang, A., 2005, “The Clinical Relevance of Hip Joint Simulator Testing: In Vitro and In Vivo Comparisons,” Wear, 259, pp. 882–886. [CrossRef]
Muratoglu, O. K., Bragdon, C. R., Jasty, M., O'Connor, D. O., Von Knoch, R. S., and Harris, W. H., 2004, “Knee-Simulator Testing of Conventional and Cross-Linked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts,” J. Arthroplasty, 19(7), pp. 887–897. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sutula, L. C., Collier, J. P., Saum, K. A., Currier, B. H., Currier, J. H., Sanford, W. M., Mayor, M. B., Wooding, R. E., Sperling, D. K., Williams, I. R., Kasprzak, D. J., and Surprenant, V. A., 1995, “Impact of Sterilization on Clinical Performance of Polyethylene in the Hip,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 319, pp. 28–40. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Collier, J. P., Bargmann, L. S., Currier, B. H., Mayor, M. B., Currier, J. H., and Bargmann, B. C., 1998, “An Analysis of Hylamer and Polyethylene Bearings From Retrieved Acetabular Components,” Orthopedics, 21(8), pp. 865–871. [PubMed]
Currier, B. H., Currier, J. H., Mayor, M. B., Lyford, K. A., Collier, J. P., and Van Citters, D. W., 2007, “Evaluation of Oxidation and Fatigue Damage of Retrieved Crossfire Polyethylene Acetabular Cups,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 89, pp. 2023–2029. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tai TeWu, 1966, “The Effect of Inclusion Shape on the Elastic Moduli of a Two-Phase Material,” Int. J. Solid. Struct., 2(1), pp. 1–8. [CrossRef]
Ahmed, S., and Jones, F. R., 1990, “A Review of Particulate Reinforcement Theories for Polymer Composites,” J. Mat. Sci., 25(12), pp. 4933–4942. [CrossRef]
Lee, B. J., Parks, D. M., and Ahzi, S., 1993, “Micromechanical Modeling of Large Plastic Deformation and Texture Evolution in Semi-Crystalline Polymers,” J. Mech. Phy. Solids, 41(10), pp. 1651–1687. [CrossRef]
Bédoui, F., Diani, J., Régnier, G., and Seiler, W., 2006, “Micromechanical Modeling of Isotropic Elastic Behavior of Semicrystalline Polymers,” Acta Mater., 54(6), pp. 1513–1523. [CrossRef]
van Dommelen, J. A. W., Parks, D. M., Boyce, M. C., Brekelmans, W. A. M., and Baaijens, F. P. T., 2003, “Micromechanical Modeling of the Elasto-Viscoplastic Behavior of Semi-Crystalline Polymers,” J. Mech. Phy. Solids, 51(3), pp. 519–541. [CrossRef]
van Dommelen, J. A. W., Schrauwen, B. A. G., Van Breemen, L. C. A., and Govaert, L. E., 2004, “Micromechanical Modeling of the Tensile Behavior of Oriented Polyethylene,” J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys., 42, pp. 2983–2994. [CrossRef]
van Dommelen, J. A. W., Brekelmans, W. A. M., and Baaijens, F. P. T., 2003, “Micromechanical Modeling of Particle-Toughening of Polymers by Locally Induced Anisotropy,” Mech. Mat., 35(9), pp. 845–863. [CrossRef]
Lin, L., and Argon, A. S., 1994, “Structure and Plastic Deformation of Polyethylene,” J. Mat. Sci., 29, pp. 294–323. [CrossRef]
Farrar, D. F., and Brain, A. A., 1997, “The Microstructure of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Used in Total Joint Replacements,” Biomaterials, 18(24), pp. 1677–1685. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bergstrom, J., Kurtz, S., Rimnac, C., and Edidin, A., 2002, “Constitutive Modeling of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Under Large-Deformation and Cyclic Loading Conditions,” Biomaterials, 23, pp. 2329–2343. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bergstrom, J., Rimnac, C., and Kurtz, S., 2003, “Prediction of Multiaxial Mechanical Behavior for Conventional and Highly Crosslinked UHMWPE Using a Hybrid Constitutive Model,” Biomaterials, 24, pp. 1365–1380. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bergstrom, J., Rimnac, C., and Kurtz, S., 2004, “An Augmented Hybrid Constitutive Model for Simulation of Unloading and Cyclic Loading Behavior of Conventional and Highly Crosslinked UHMWPE,” Biomaterials, 25, pp. 2171–2178. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bergstrom, J. S., and Bischoff, J. E., 2010, “An Advanced Thermomechanical Constitutive Model for UHMWPE,” Int. J. Struct. Change Solid., 2, pp. 31–39.
Olley, R., and Basset, D., 1977, “Molecular-Conformations in Polyethylene After Recrystallization or Annealing at High Pressures,” J. Polym. Sci. B, 15(6), pp. 1011–1027. [CrossRef]
Shi, W., Dong, H., and Bell, T., 2000, “Tribological Behaviour and Microscopic Wear Mechanisms of UHMWPE Sliding Against Thermal Oxidation-Treated Ti6Al4V,” Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 291(1–2), pp. 27–36. [CrossRef]
Keller, T. F., Engelhardt, H., Adam, P., Galetz, M. C., Glatzel, U., and Jandt, K. D., 2011, “Near-Surface Microstructural Reorganization of UHMWPE Under Cyclic Load—A Pilot Study,” Adv. Eng. Mater., 13, pp. 476–482. [CrossRef]
Mizrahi, J., Silva, M. J., Keaveny, T. M., Edwards, W. T., and Hayes, W. C., 1993, “Finite-Element Stress Analysis of the Normal and Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebral Body,” Spine, 18, pp. 2088–2096. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Silva, M. J., Keaveny, T. M., and Hayes, W. C., 1998, “Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Analysis Predicts Failure Loads and Fracture Patterns for Vertebral Sections,” J. Ortho. Res., 16, pp. 300–308. [CrossRef]
Niebur, G. L., Feldstein, M. J., Yuen, J. C., Chen, T. J., and Keaveny, T. M., 2000, “High-Resolution Finite Element Models With Tissue Strength Asymmetry Accurately Predict Failure of Trabecular Bone,” J. Biomech., 33, pp. 1575–1583. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, X., Sanyal, A., Cawthon, P. M., Palermo, L., Jekir, M., Christensen, J., Ensrud, K. E., Cummings, S. R., Orwoll, E., Black, D. M., and Keaveny, T. M., 2012, “Prediction of New Clinical Vertebral Fractures in Elderly Men Using Finite Element Analysis of CT Scans,” J. Bone Mineral Res., 27(4), pp. 808–816. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Models of varying lamellar length and width with consistent random orientation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Evolution from scanning electron micrograph of actual material microstructure to idealized finite element model. The original image taken from a scanning electron micrograph of an actual sample of ultra high. (a) Was filtered to obtain a cross-sectional representation of the ultra high; (b), with the white areas representing the amorphous material and the black areas representing the lamellar material. Using this filtered image, an idealized model of the internal structure of the ultra high was created (c). The same lamella is circled in all images for reference.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Von Mises stress distribution over a range of lamellar sizes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

For the idealized and varied size models: stiffness (left column) and maximum localized stress (right column) with respect to various lamellar properties (lamellar width: first row, lamellar length: second row, lamellar aspect ratio: third row, and lamellar percent: fourth row)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In