Research Papers

Incomplete Restoration of Homeostatic Shear Stress Within Arteriovenous Fistulae

[+] Author and Article Information
Patrick M. McGah

Research Assistant
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Washington,
Stevens Way, Box 352600,
Seattle, WA 98195
e-mail: pmcgah@uw.edu

Daniel F. Leotta

Research Engineer
Applied Physics Laboratory,
Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound,
University of Washington,
Box 355640,
Seattle, WA 98195

Kirk W. Beach

Professor Emeritus

R. Eugene Zierler

Department of Surgery,
Division of Vascular Surgery,
University of Washington,
Box 356410,
Seattle, WA 98195

Alberto Aliseda

Associate Professor
University of Washington,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stevens Way, Box 352600,
Seattle, WA 98195

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Bioengineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. Manuscript received April 18, 2012; final manuscript received November 7, 2012; accepted manuscript posted December 8, 2012; published online December 27, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Fotis Sotiropoulos.

J Biomech Eng 135(1), 011005 (Dec 27, 2012) (9 pages) Paper No: BIO-12-1149; doi: 10.1115/1.4023133 History: Received April 18, 2012; Revised November 07, 2012; Accepted December 08, 2012

Arteriovenous fistulae are surgically created to provide adequate access for dialysis patients suffering from end-stage renal disease. It has long been hypothesized that the rapid blood vessel remodeling occurring after fistula creation is, in part, a process to restore the mechanical stresses to some preferred level, i.e., mechanical homeostasis. We present computational hemodynamic simulations in four patient-specific models of mature arteriovenous fistulae reconstructed from 3D ultrasound scans. Our results suggest that these mature fistulae have remodeled to return to ‘‘normal’’ shear stresses away from the anastomoses: about 1.0 Pa in the outflow veins and about 2.5 Pa in the inflow arteries. Large parts of the anastomoses were found to be under very high shear stresses >15 Pa, over most of the cardiac cycle. These results suggest that the remodeling process works toward restoring mechanical homeostasis in the fistulae, but that the process is limited or incomplete, even in mature fistulae, as evidenced by the elevated shear at or near the anastomoses. Based on the long term clinical viability of these dialysis accesses, we hypothesize that the elevated nonhomeostatic shear stresses in some portions of the vessels were not detrimental to fistula patency.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


U.S. Renal Data System, 2011, “USRDS 2011 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage-Renal-Disease in the United States,” Technical Report, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD.
Tordoir, J. H. M., Rooyens, P., Dammers, R., van der Sande, F. M., de Haan, M., and Yo, T. I., 2003, “Prospective Evaluation of Failure Modes in Autogenous Radiocephalic Wrist Access for Hemodialysis,” Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 18, pp. 378–383. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gibson, K. D., Gilen, D. L., Caps, M. T., Kohler, T. R., Sherrard, D. J., and Stehman-Breen, C. O., 2001, “Vascular Access Survival and Incidence of Revisions: A Comparison of Prosthetic Grafts, Simple Autogenous Fisulas, and Venous Transposition Fistulas From the United States Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study,” J. Vasc. Surg., 34(4), pp. 694–700. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lauvao, L. S., Ihnat, D. M., Goshima, K. R., Chavez, L., Gruessner, A. C., and Mills, J. L., Sr., 2009, “Vein Diameter is the Major Predictor of Fistula Maturation,” J. Vasc. Surg., 49, pp. 1499–14504. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Corpataux, J. M., Haesler, E., Silacci, P., Res, H. B., and Hayoz, D., 2002, “Low-Pressure Environment and Remodelling of the Forearm Vein in Brescia-Cimino Haemodialysis Access,” Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 17, pp. 1057–1062. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kamiya, A. and Togawa, T., 1980, “Adaptive Regulation of Wall Shear Stress to Flow Change in the Canine Carotid Artery,” Am. J. Physiol., 239(1), pp. H14–H21. [PubMed]
Zarins, C. K., Zatina, M. A., Giddens, D. P., Ku, D. N., and Glagov, S., 1987, “Shear Stress Regulation of Artery Lumen Diameter in Experimental Atherogenesis,” J. Vasc. Surg., 5, pp. 413–420. [PubMed]
Girerd, X., London, G., Boutouyrie, P., Jaques Mourad, J., Safar, M., and Laurent, S., 1996, “Remodeling of the Radial Artery in Response to a Chronic Increase in Shear Stress,” Hypertension, 27, pp. 799–803. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Humphrey, J. D., 2008, “Vascular Adaptation and Mechanical Homeostasis at Tissue, Cellular, and Sub-Cellular Levels,” Cell Biochem. Biophys., 50, pp. 73–78. [CrossRef]
Owens, C. D., Wake, N., Kim, J. M., Hentschel, D., Conte, M. S., and Schanzer, A., 2010, “Endothelial Function Predicts Positive Arterial-Venous Fistula Remodeling in Subjects With Stage IV And V Chronic Kidney Disease,” J. Vasc. Access., 11(4), pp. 329–334. [PubMed]
Dixon, B. S., 2006, “Why Don't Fistulas Mature?,” Kidney Int., 70, pp. 1413–1422. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ene-Iordache, B. and Remuzzi, A., 2012, “Disturbed Flow in Radial-Cephalic Arteriovenous Fistulae for Haemodialysis: Low and Oscillating Shear Stress Locates the Sites of Stenosis,” Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 27(1), pp. 358–368. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Carroll, G. T., McGloughlin, T. M., Burke, P. E., Egan, M., Wallis, F., and Walsh, M. T., 2011, “Wall Shear Stresses Remain Elevated in Mature Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Case Study,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 133(2), p. 021003. [CrossRef]
Kharboutly, Z., Deplano, V., Bertrand, E., and Legallais, C., 2010, “Numerical and Experimental Study of Blood Flow Through a Patient-Specific Arteriovenous Fistula Used for Hemodialysis,” Med. Eng. Phys., 32, pp. 111–118. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Leotta, D. F., Primozich, J. F., Beach, K. W., Bergelin, R. O., and Strandness, D. E., Jr., 2001, “Serial Measurement of Cross-Sectional Area in Peripheral Vein Grafts Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 27(1), pp. 61–68. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Leotta, D. F., Primozich, J. F., Beach, K. W., Bergelin, R. O., Zierler, R. E., and Strandness, D. E., Jr., 2003, “Remodeling in Peripheral Vein Graft Revisions: Serial Study With Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging,” J. Vasc. Surg., 37(4), pp. 798–807. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Legget, M. E., Leotta, D. F., Bolson, E. L., McDonald, J. A., Martin, R. W., Li, X. N., Otta, C. M., and Sheehan, F. H., 1998, “System for Quantitative Three-Dimensional Echocardiography of the Left Ventricle Based on a Magnetic-Field Position and Orientation Sensing System,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 45(4), pp. 494–504. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ANSYS, Inc., 2009, “ANSYS®FLUENT® Theory Guide,” Release 12.1 ed., Cannonsburg, PA.
Lee, S.-W., and Steinman, D. A., 2007, “On the Relative Importance of Rheology for Image-Based CFD Models of the Carotid Bifurcation,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 129(2), pp. 273–279. [CrossRef]
Womersley, J. R., 1955, “Method for the Calculation of Velocity, Rate of Flow and Viscous Drag in Arteries When the Pressure Gradient is Known,” J Physiol., 127, pp. 553–563. [PubMed]
Vignon-Clemente, I., Figueroa, C. A., Jansen, K. E., and Taylor, C. A., 2010, “Outflow Boundary Conditions for Three-Dimensional Simulations of Non-Periodic Blood Flow and Pressure Fields in Deformable Arteries,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 13(5), pp. 525–640.
Schwartz, L. B., Purut, C. M., O'Donohoe, M. K., Smith, P. K., Otto Hagan, P., and McCann, R. L., 1991 “Quantitation of Vascular Outflow by Measurement of Impedance,” J. Vasc. Surg., 14(3), pp. 353–363. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Supplementary material provides a description of the numerical scheme as well as numeric values used for the resistance-capacitance boundary conditions.
Zierler, B. K., Kirkman, T. R., Kraiss, L. W., Reiss, W. G., Horn, J. R., Bauer, L. A., Clowes, A. W., and Kohler, T. R., 1992, “Accuracy of Duplex Scanning for Measurement of Arterial Volume Flow,” J. Vasc. Surg., 16(4), pp. 520–526. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lee, S.-W., Antiga, L., and Steinman, D. A., 2009, “Correlations Among Indicators of Disturbed Flow at the Normal Carotid Bifurcation,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 131(6), p. 061013. [CrossRef]
Ene-Iordache, B., Mosconi, L., Antiga, L., Bruno, S., and Anghileri, A., 2003, “Radial Artery Remodeling in Response to Shear Stress Increase Within Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis Access,” Endothelium, 10, pp. 95–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wong, V., Ward, R., Taylor, J., Selvakumar, S., How, T. V., and Bakran, A., 1996, “Factors Associated With Early Failure of Arteriovenous Fistulae for Haemodyialysis Access,” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg., 12, pp. 207–213. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Krishnamoorthy, M. K., Banerjee, R. K., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Roy, A. S., Khoury, S. F., Arend, L. J., Rudich, S., and Roy-Chaudhury, P., 2008, “Hemodynamic Wall Shear Stress Profiles Influence the Magnitude and Pattern of Stenosis in a Pig AV Fistula,” Kidney Int., 74, pp. 1410–1419. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Phares, D. J., Smedley, G. T., and Flagan, R. D., 2000, “The Wall Shear Stress Produced by the Normal Impingement of a Jet on a Flat Surface,” J. Fluid Mech., 418, pp. 351–375. [CrossRef]
Ene-Iordache, B., Mosconi, L., Remuzzi, G., and Remuzzi, A., 2001, “Computational Fluid Dynamics of a Vascular Access Case for Hemodialysis,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 123(3), pp. 284–293. [CrossRef]
Dammers, R., Tordoir, J. H. M., Kooman, J. P., Welten, R., Hameleers, J. M. M., Kitslaar, P., and Hoeks, A. P. G., 2005, “The Effect of Flow Changes on the Arterial System Proximal to an Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis,” Ultrasound Med Biol, 31(10), pp. 1327–1333. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Huynh, T. N., Chacko, B. K., Teng, X., Brott, B. C., Allon, M., Kelpke, S. S., Thompson, J. A., Patel, R. P., and Anayiotos, A. S., 2007, “Effects of Venous Needle Turbulence During Ex Vivo Hemodialysis on Endothelial Morphology and Nitric Oxide Formation,” J. Biomech., 40, pp. 2158–2166. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Basile, C., Ruggieri, G., Vernaglione, L., Montanaro, A., and Giordano, R., 2004, “The Natural History of Autogenous Radio-Cephalic Wrist Arteriovenous Fistulas of Haemodialysis Patients: A Prospective Obervational Study,” Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 19, pp. 1231–1236. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jiang, Z., Wu, L., Miller, B. L., Goldman, D. R., Fernandez, C. M., Abouhamze, Z. S., Ozaki, C. K., and Berceli, S. A., 2003, “A Novel Vein Graft Model: Adaption to Differential Flow Environments,” Am. J. Physiol: Heart Circ. Physiol., 286, pp. 240–245. [CrossRef]
Meyerson, S. L., Skelly, C. L., Curi, M. A., Shakur, U. M., Vosicky, J. E., Glagov, S., Christen, T., Gabbiani, G., and Schwartz, L. B., 2001, “The Effects of Extremely Low Shear Stress on Cellular Proliferation and Neointimal Thickening in the Failing Bypass Graft,” J. Vasc. Surg., 34(1), pp. 90–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ben Driss, A., Bennessiano, J., Poitevin, P., Levy, B. I., and Baptiste Michel, J., 1997, “Arterial Expansive Remodeling Induced by High Flow Rates,” Am. J. Physiol., 272(2), pp. H851–H858. [PubMed]
Tronc, F., Mallat, Z., Lehoux, S., Wassef, M., Esposito, B., and Tedugui, A., 2000, “Role of Matrix Matalloproteinases in Blood Flow-Induced Arterial Enlargement,” Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol., 20, pp. e120–e126. [CrossRef]
Valentín, A., Cardamone, L., Baek, S., and Humphrey, J. D., 2009, “Complementary Vasoactivity and Matrix Remodelling in Arterial Adaptations to Altered Flow and Pressure,” J. R. Soc., Interface, 6, pp. 293–306. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Space- and time-averaged shear (Eq. (3)) in Pa at 5 mm increments along the length of the proximal vein of all four patients. The data point of shear for patient no. 4 located at a distance of 2.5 mm is not shown on the scale but is equal to 12.9 Pa.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Three-dimensional ultrasound reconstructions of the four fistulae with the lumen colored by time-averaged wall shear stress (Eq. (3)) in Pa. (a), (b), (c), and (d) Reconstructions from patients 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The view in each subfigure is shown from the skin toward the fistula. The bar labeled 20 mm shows the relative size of each figure.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Streamwise blood velocity versus time for two cardiac cycles. The time history is taken from a point in the venous outflow of patient 1 about 5 mm downstream of the anastomosis in the center of the vessel. (a) The raw time-signal. (b) The time signal with the 5 cycle phase-averaged velocity removed. The inset shows the phase of the arterial inflow.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Visualization of transitional flow vortices using the Q-criterion for patient no. 1 at (a) peak systole, and (b) end diastole. The value of Q is 0.5 when normalized by the mean centerline velocity and radius of the proximal artery.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Shear stress duty factor DF distribution on the lumen for patient no. 1 using a threshold shear of 15 Pa. The bar labeled 20 mm shows the relative size. The large values of the duty factor in the proximal artery are due to the vessel curvature which produces a strong secondary helical flow. The large value of the duty factor on the anastomosis is due to the impingement and stagnation point flow.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Normalized highly stressed area Aτ/DA2 when τo=15 Pa in all four patients versus the mean centerline arterial inflow velocity squared U2. The solid line is a least squares regression. The coefficient of determination is 0.96 and p < 0.05.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Space- and- time-averaged shear (Eq. (3)) in Pa at 5 mm increments along the proximal artery and proximal vein of patient 3. The symbols represent the simulated values in the artery (Sim. Art.) and vein (Sim. Vein), while the solid lines are the shear predicted by Poiseuille's law for the artery (Pois. Art.) and vein (Pois. Vein) with the same flow rate and average diameter.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In