Technical Briefs

Near Valve Flows and Potential Blood Damage During Closure of a Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve

[+] Author and Article Information
L. H. Herbertson, S. Deutsch

Bioengineering Department,  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

K. B. Manning1

Bioengineering Department,  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802kbm10@psu.edu


Corresponding author.

J Biomech Eng 133(9), 094507 (Oct 14, 2011) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4005167 History: Received December 04, 2010; Revised September 19, 2011; Published October 14, 2011

Blood damage and thrombosis are major complications that are commonly seen in patients with implanted mechanical heart valves. For this in vitro study, we isolated the closing phase of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve to study near valve fluid velocities and stresses. By manipulating the valve housing, we gained optical access to a previously inaccessible region of the flow. Laser Doppler velocimetry and particle image velocimetry were used to characterize the flow regime and help to identify the key design characteristics responsible for high shear and rotational flow. Impact of the closing mechanical leaflet with its rigid housing produced the highest fluid stresses observed during the cardiac cycle. Mean velocities as high as 2.4 m/s were observed at the initial valve impact. The velocities measured at the leaflet tip resulted in sustained shear rates in the range of 1500–3500 s−1 , with peak values on the order of 11,000–23,000 s−1 . Using velocity maps, we identified regurgitation zones near the valve tip and through the central orifice of the valve. Entrained flow from the transvalvular jets and flow shed off the leaflet tip during closure combined to generate a dominant vortex posterior to both leaflets after each valve closing cycle. The strength of the peripheral vortex peaked within 2 ms of the initial impact of the leaflet with the housing and rapidly dissipated thereafter, whereas the vortex near the central orifice continued to grow during the rebound phase of the valve. Rebound of the leaflets played a secondary role in sustaining closure-induced vortices.

Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Mean and peak shear rates were computed across the edge of the leaflet

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

A portion of the valve housing was removed to expose the leaflet tip

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

High speed images of the near valve closing flow and vortices were taken. (a) The closing volume was observed as streaklines. (b) Vortex initiation and (c) growth were identified. (d) The window in the housing enabled optical access to near valve flows.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

A schematic of the LDV experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

The three velocity components, (a) U, (b) V, and (c) W, were plotted on individual axes to study velocity fluctuations and beat-to-beat variations in a point-wise fashion

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Three-dimensional reconstructions of the flow taken 2.65 mm upstream of the leaflet tip (a) at impact, (b) 2 ms after impact, (c) 4 ms after impact, and (d) 9 ms after impact

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Velocity maps of the centerline plane (a) 0.5 ms before impact, (b) 4 ms after impact, during rebound, (c) 10 ms after impact, and (d) as the flow began to dissipate 16 ms after impact

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Centerline velocity profiles generated using PIV (a) at impact, (b) 2 ms after impact, and (c) 4 ms after impact



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In