Single-Step Stereolithography of Complex Anatomical Models for Optical Flow Measurements

[+] Author and Article Information
Diane de Zélicourt, Kerem Pekkan, Hiroumi Kitajima, David Frakes, Ajit P. Yoganathan

Cardiovascular Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University School of Medicine, Room 2119 U.A. Whitaker Building, 313 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332-0535

J Biomech Eng 127(1), 204-207 (Mar 08, 2005) (4 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1835367 History: Received April 24, 2004; Revised September 13, 2004; Online March 08, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hopkins,  L. M., Kelly,  J. T., Wexler,  A. S., and Prasad,  A. K., 2000, “Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements in Complex Geometries,” Exp. Fluids, 29, pp. 91–95.
Bale-Glickman,  J., Selby,  K., Saloner,  D., and Savas,  O., 2003, “Experimental Flow Studies in Exact-replica Phantoms of Atheroscerotic Carotid Bifurcations under Steady Input Conditions,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 125, pp. 38–48.
Friedman,  M. H., 1993, “Arteriosclerosis Research Using Vascular Flow Models: From 2-D Branches to Compliant Replicas,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 115, pp. 595–601.
Chong,  C. K., Rowe,  C. S., Sivanesan,  S., Rattray,  A., Black,  R. A., and Shortland,  A. P., 1999, “Computer Aided Design and Fabrication of Models for in vitro Studies of Vascular Fluid Dynamics,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H: J. Eng. Med., 213, pp. 1–4.
Springer, A. M., 1998, “Application of rapid prototyping methods to high-speed wind tunnel testing,” Project 96-21, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Technical Publication 1998-05-01.
Chuk,  R. N., and Thomson,  V. J., 1998, “A Comparison of Rapid Prototyping Techniques used for Wind Tunnel Model Fabrication,” Rapid Prototyping J., 4, pp. 185–196.
de Leval,  M. R., Kilner,  P., Gewillig,  M., and Bull,  C., 1988, “Total Cavopulmonary Connection: A Logical Alternative for Complex Fontan Operations. Experimental Studies and Early Clinical Experience,” J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 96, pp. 682–695.
Ensley,  A., Lynch,  P., Chatimavroudis,  G., Lucas,  C., Sharma,  S., and Yoganathan,  A. P., 1999, “Toward Designing the Optimal Total Cavopulmonary Connection: An in vitro Study,” Ann. Thorac. Surg., 68, pp. 1384–1390.
Frakes,  D., Conrad,  C., Healy,  T., Monaco,  J., Smith,  M., Fogel,  M., Sharma,  S., and Yoganathan,  A. P., 2003, “Application of an Adaptive Control Grid Interpolation Technique to Morphological Vascular Reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 50, pp. 197–206.
Pekkan, K., de Zélicourt, D. A., and Yoganathan, A. P., 2003, “In vitro Flow Visualization of a Post-surgery Total Cavopulmonary Connection Anatomy,” 21st Annual Gallery of Fluid Motion, APS Division of Fluid Dynamics 56th Annual Meeting, movie.
Yedavalli,  R. V., Loth,  F., Yardimci,  A., Pritchard,  W. F., Oshinski,  J. N., Sadler,  L., Charbel,  F., and Alperin,  N., 2001, “Construction of a Physical Model of the Human Carotid Artery based upon in vivo Magnetic Resonance Images,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 123, pp. 372–376.
Kerber,  C. W., Heilman,  C. B., and Zanetti,  P. H., 1989, “Transparent Elastic Arterial Models,” Biorheology, 26, pp. 1041–1049.


Grahic Jump Location
Left: Unstructured computational fluid dynamics grid of the anatomic solid model, the total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC). Right: The corresponding stereolithographic duplicate for DPIV experiments, in two halves. Top-left-corner: Simple idealized planar glass model studied by Ensley et al. 8.
Grahic Jump Location
Model orientation in the SLA machine as the anterior half is being manufactured and recommendations for experimental planning
Grahic Jump Location
PIV was performed using a TSI (TSI Inc, Shoreview, MN) system. To ensure minimum image distortion, the outer surfaces facing the camera and the laser are flat and orthogonal to the acquisition and the laser beam axis, respectively. Seeding the flow with fluorescent particles while cutting off laser light reflections with a color filter further improves PIV quality.
Grahic Jump Location
Assessment of the flow field using flow visualization (left), PIV (middle), and CFD (right) at 1 L/min; inflow split: 60/40 IVC/SVC; outflow split: 30/70 left/right lung. Flow visualization dye is injected from the SVC. Height (h) is measured from model anterior. The CFD simulations were run under the same conditions and assumptions as the experimental setup, namely incompressible, laminar flow with steady inflow conditions, and rigid, but smooth vessel walls.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In