Abstract

The recently developed general materials failure theory is specialized to the two-dimensional state of plane stress. It takes a form that is virtually no more involved than that of the Mises criterion. Yet it remains applicable to the entire range of materials types and thus retains that generality. The Mises form has absolutely no capability for generality. This plane stress form of the new failure theory reveals the existence of three independent modes and mechanisms of failure, not two, not four, purely three. The Mises criterion has one mode of failure. These three modes of failure are fully examined. It is verified that these modes of failure under plane stress conditions are exactly the same as those operative in the three-dimensional case. The simple plane stress form of the failure theory has major appeal and likely use as a teaching tool to introduce failure and to help de-mystify the vitally important general subject of materials failure.

References

1.
Mohr
,
O.
,
1900
, “
Welche Umstande Bedingen die Elastizitatsgrenze und den Bruch Eines Materials
,”
Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing.
,
44
, pp.
1524
1530
.
2.
Drucker
,
D. C.
, and
Prager
,
W.
,
1952
, “
Soil Mechanics and Plastic Analysis or Limit Design
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
,
10
(
2
), pp.
157
165
.
3.
Christensen
,
R. M.
,
2013
,
The Theory of Materials Failure
,
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford, UK
.
4.
Christensen
,
R. M.
,
2019
, “
The Ductility Number Nd Provides a Rigorous Measure for the Ductility of Material Failure
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
86
(
4
), p.
041001
.
5.
Christensen
,
R. M.
,
2021
, “
Prediction of the Angle of Repose From Materials Failure Theory
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
,
147
(
10
), p.
04021068
.
You do not currently have access to this content.