0
Research Papers

Nonlinear Analysis of Human Movement Dynamics Offers New Insights in the Development of Motor Control During Childhood

[+] Author and Article Information
Maria Cristina Bisi

Department of Electrical, Electronic and
Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi,”
University of Bologna,
Viale Risorgimento 2,
Bologna 40126, Italy
e-mail: mariacristina.bisi@unibo.it

Paola Tamburini, Giulia Pacini Panebianco, Rita Stagni

Department of Electrical, Electronic and
Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi,”
University of Bologna,
Viale Risorgimento 2,
Bologna 40126, Italy

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received January 25, 2018; final manuscript received July 13, 2018; published online August 20, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Giuseppe Vairo.

J Biomech Eng 140(11), 111002 (Aug 20, 2018) (5 pages) Paper No: BIO-18-1051; doi: 10.1115/1.4040939 History: Received January 25, 2018; Revised July 13, 2018

When aiming at assessing motor control development, natural walking (NW), and tandem walking (TW) are two locomotor tasks that allow analyzing different characteristics of motor control performance. NW is the reference locomotor task, expected to become more and more automatic with age. TW is a nonparadigmatic task used in clinics to highlight eventual impairments and to evaluate how a child deals with a new challenging motor experience. This work aims at investigating motor development in school-aged children, by assessing quantitatively their performance during TW and NW. Eighty children (6–10 years) participated in the study. Trunk acceleration data and nonlinear measures (recurrence quantification analysis (RQA), and multiscale entropy (MSE)) were used to characterize trunk postural control and motor complexity. The results were analyzed with respect to age and standard clinical assessment of TW (number of correct consecutive steps), by means of Spearman correlation coefficients. RQA and MSE allowed highlighting age-related changes in both postural control of the trunk and motor complexity, while classic standard assessment of TW resulted uniformly distributed in the different age groups. The present results suggest this quantitative approach as relevant when assessing the motor development in schoolchildren and complementary to standard clinical tests.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Hadders-Algra, M. , 2010, “Variation and Variability: Key Words in Human Motor Development,” Phys. Ther., 90(12), pp. 1823–1837. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bisi, M. C. , and Stagni, R. , 2016, “Complexity of Human Gait Pattern at Different Ages Assessed Using Multiscale Entropy: From Development to Decline,” Gait Posture, 47, pp. 37–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ivanenko, Y. P. , Dominici, N. , Cappellini, G. , Dan, B. , Cheron, G. , and Lacquaniti, F. , 2004, “Development of Pendulum Mechanism and Kinematic Coordination From the First Unsupported Steps in Toddlers,” J. Exp. Biol., 207(21), pp. 3797–3810. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Martelli, S. , Taddei, F. , Cappello, A. , van Sint Jan, S. , Leardini, A. , and Viceconti, M. , 2011, “Effect of Sub-Optimal Neuromotor Control on the Hip Joint Load During Level Walking,” J. Biomech., 44(9), pp. 1716–1721. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sanders, R. D. , and Gillig, P. M. , 2010, “Gait and Its Assessment in Psychiatry,” Psychiatry Edgmont, 7(7), pp. 38–43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922365/
Bisi, M. C. , and Stagni, R. , 2018, “Changes of Human Movement Complexity During Maturation: Quantitative Assessment Using Multiscale Entropy,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 21(4), pp. 325–331. [CrossRef]
Ortega, J. D. , and Farley, C. T. , 2005, “Minimizing Center of Mass Vertical Movement Increases Metabolic Cost in Walking,” J. Appl. Physiol., 99(6), pp. 2099–2107. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gordon, K. E. , Ferris, D. P. , and Kuo, A. D. , 2009, “Metabolic and Mechanical Energy Costs of Reducing Vertical Center of Mass Movement During Gait,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 90(1), pp. 136–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cavagna, G. A. , Thys, H. , and Zamboni, A. , 1976, “The Sources of External Work in Level Walking and Running,” J. Physiol., 262(3), pp. 639–657. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Perry, J. , and Burnfield, J. M. , 2010, Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, SLACK, New York.
Speers, R. A. , Ashton-Miller, J. A. , Schultz, A. B. , and Alexander, N. B. , 1998, “Age Differences in Abilities to Perform Tandem Stand and Walk Tasks of Graded Difficulty,” Gait Posture, 7(3), pp. 207–213. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Goddard Blythe, S. , 2014, Neuromotor Immaturity in Children and Adults: The INPP Screening Test for Clinicians and Health Practitioners, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
Huang, H. J. , Kram, R. , and Ahmed, A. A. , 2012, “Reduction of Metabolic Cost During Motor Learning of Arm Reaching Dynamics,” J. Neurosci., 32(6), pp. 2182–2190. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zijlstra, W. , and Hof, A. L. , 1997, “Displacement of the Pelvis During Human Walking: Experimental Data and Model Predictions,” Gait Posture, 6(3), pp. 249–262. [CrossRef]
Bruijn, S. M. , Meijer, O. G. , Beek, P. J. , and van Dieën, J. H. , 2013, “Assessing the Stability of Human Locomotion: A Review of Current Measures,” J. R. Soc. Interface, 10(83), p. 20120999. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tamburini, P. , Storm, F. , Buckley, C. , Bisi, M. C. , Stagni, R. , and Mazzà, C. , 2017, “Moving From Laboratory to Real Life Conditions: Influence on the Assessment of Variability and Stability of Gait,” Gait Posture, 59, pp. 248–252. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sylos Labini, F. , Meli, A. , Ivanenko, Y. P. , and Tufarelli, D. , 2012, “Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Gait in Normal and Hypovestibular Subjects,” Gait Posture, 35(1), pp. 48–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bisi, M. C. , Riva, F. , and Stagni, R. , 2014, “Measures of Gait Stability: Performance on Adults and Toddlers at the Beginning of Independent Walking,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 11, p. 131. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tamburini, P. , Mazzoli, D. , and Stagni, R. , 2018, “Towards an Objective Assessment of Motor Function in Sub-Acute Stroke Patients: Relationship Between Clinical Rating Scales and Instrumental Gait Stability Indexes,” Gait Posture, 59, pp. 58–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Barnett, A. , Henderson, S. E. , and Sugden, D. A. , 2007, Movement Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd ed., Pearson, London.
Cacciari, E. , Milani, S. , Balsamo, A. , Spada, E. , Bona, G. , Cavallo, L. , Cerutti, F. , Gargantini, L. , Greggio, N. , Tonini, G. , and Cicognani, A. , 2006, “Italian Cross-Sectional Growth Charts for Height, Weight and BMI (2 to 20 Yr),” J. Endocrinol. Invest., 29(7), pp. 581–593. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hamacher, D. , Hamacher, D. , Herold, F. , and Schega, L. , 2016, “Effect of Dual Tasks on Gait Variability in Walking to Auditory Cues in Older and Young Individuals,” Exp. Brain Res., 234(12), pp. 3555–3563. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bisi, M. C. , and Stagni, R. , 2016, “Development of Gait Motor Control: What Happens After a Sudden Increase in Height During Adolescence?,” Biomed. Eng. Online, 15(1), p. 47. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Costa, M. , Peng, C.-K. , L. Goldberger, A. , and Hausdorff, J. M. , 2003, “Multiscale Entropy Analysis of Human Gait Dynamics,” Phys. Stat. Mech. Its Appl., 330(1–2), pp. 53–60. [CrossRef]
Richman, J. S. , and Moorman, J. R. , 2000, “Physiological Time-Series Analysis Using Approximate Entropy and Sample Entropy,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 278(6), pp. H2039–H2049. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Riva, F. , Bisi, M. C. , and Stagni, R. , 2014, “Gait Variability and Stability Measures: Minimum Number of Strides and Within-Session Reliability,” Comput. Biol. Med., 50, pp. 9–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lockhart, T. E. , and Liu, J. , 2008, “Differentiating Fall-Prone and Healthy Adults Using Local Dynamic Stability,” Ergonomics, 51(12), pp. 1860–1872. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Webber, C. L. , and Zbilut, J. P. , 1994, “Dynamical Assessment of Physiological Systems and States Using Recurrence Plot Strategies,” J. Appl. Physiol., 76(2), pp. 965–973. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kubo, M. , and Ulrich, B. D. , 2006, “Early Stage of Walking: Development of Control in Mediolateral and Anteroposterior Directions,” J. Mot. Behav., 38(3), pp. 229–237. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Boxplot (median, 25th and 75th percentiles) of TW-competence for each age group

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

TW-competence distribution for male (left) and female (right) participants

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In