0
Technical Brief

Quantification of Parameters of a Phenomenological Constitutive Model of Porcine Tricuspid Valve Leaflets for Simulation Applications

[+] Author and Article Information
Keyvan Amini Khoiy

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Olson Research Center, Room 322/3, 260 South Forge St., Akron, OH 44325
ka67@zips.uakron.edu

Anup Pant

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Olson Research Center, Room 322/3, 260 South Forge St., Akron, OH 44325
adp63@zips.uakron.edu

Rouzbeh Amini

ASME member, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Olson Research Center, Room 301F, 260 South Forge St., Akron, OH 44325
ramini@uakron.edu

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4040126 History: Received September 26, 2017; Revised April 26, 2018

Abstract

The tricuspid valve is a one-way valve on the pulmonary side of the heart, which prevents backflow of blood during ventricular contractions. Development of computational models of the tricuspid valve is important both in understanding the normal valvular function and in the development/improvement of surgical procedures and medical devices. A key step in the development of such models is quantification of the mechanical properties of the tricuspid valve leaflets. In this study, after examining previously measured five-loading-protocol biaxial stress-strain response of porcine tricuspid valves, a phenomenological constitutive framework was chosen to represent this response. The material constants were quantified for all three leaflets, which were shown to be highly anisotropic with average anisotropy indices of less than 0.5 (an anisotropy index value of 1 indicates a perfectly isotropic response, whereas a smaller value of the anisotropy index indicates an anisotropic response). To obtain mean values of material constants, stress-strain responses of the leaflet samples were averaged and then fitted to the constitutive model (average R^2 over 0.9). Since the sample thicknesses were not hugely different, averaging the data using the same tension levels and stress levels produced similar average material constants for each leaflet.

Copyright (c) 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In