Research Papers

Lessons Learned From Kinematics Research Applied to Medical Device Design

[+] Author and Article Information
Arthur Guy Erdman

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, MN 55455-0150
e-mail: agerdman@umn.edu

Manuscript received August 3, 2017; final manuscript received December 12, 2017; published online January 18, 2018. Editor: Beth A. Winkelstein.

J Biomech Eng 140(2), 021006 (Jan 18, 2018) (15 pages) Paper No: BIO-17-1340; doi: 10.1115/1.4038764 History: Received August 03, 2017; Revised December 12, 2017

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Topics: Design , Kinematics
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Erdman, A. G. , Sandor, G. N. , and Kota, S. , ed., 2001, Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis, 4th ed., Vol. 1, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 665.
Sandor, G. N. , and Erdman, A. G. , 1984, Advanced Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis, Vol. 2, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 670.
Howell, L. L. , 2001, Compliant Mechanisms, Wiley, New York.
Freudenstein, F. , and Sandor, G. N. , 1959, “ Synthesis of Path-Generating Mechanisms by Means of a Programmed Digital Computer,” ASME J. Eng. Ind. Ser. B, 81(2), pp. 159–167.
Freudenstein, F. , and Sandor, G. N. , 1961, “ On the Burmester Points of a Plane,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 28(1), pp. 41–49. [CrossRef]
Bottema, O., 1961, “ Discussion: ‘On the Burmester Points of a Plane' (Freudenstein, Ferdinand, and Sandor, George N., 1961, ASME J. Appl. Mech., 28, pp. 41–49),” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 28(3), pp. 473–474.
Denavit, J. , and Hartenberg, R. S. , 1961, “ Discussion: ‘On the Burmester Points of a Plane' (Freudenstein, Ferdinand, and Sandor, George N., 1961, ASME J. Appl. Mech., 28, pp. 41–49),” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 28(3), p. 474.
Chase, T. R. , Kinzel, G. L. , and Erdman, A. G. , 2013, “ Computer Aided Mechanism Synthesis: A Historical Perspective,” Advances in Mechanisms, Robotics and Design Education and Research (Mechanisms and Machine Science, Vol. 14), V. Kumar, J. Schmiedeler, S. Sreenivasan, and H. J. Su, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 17–33. [CrossRef]
Rubel, A. J. , and Kaufman, R. E. , 1977, “ KINSYN III: A New Human-Engineered System for Interactive Computer-Aided Design of Planar Linkages,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 99(2), pp. 440–448. [CrossRef]
Erdman, A. G. , and Lonn, D. , 1975, “ A Unified Synthesis of Planar Six-Bar Mechanisms Using Burmester Theory,” Fourth World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK, Sept. 8–12. https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/unified-synthesis-of-planar-six-bar-mechanisms-using-burmester-th
Erdman, A. G. , and Gustafson, J. E. , 1977, “LINCAGES: Linkage Interactive Computer Analysis and Graphically Enhanced Synthesis Package,” ASME Paper No. 77-DET-5.
Erdman, A. G. , Ning, Y. , and Byers, B. , 2000, “LINCAGES: Latest Developments and Case Study,” ASME Paper No. DETC2002/MECH-34375.
Erdman, A. G. , 1984, “ The Role of Super Computers in Mechanism Design,” NSF Study on Super Computers in Mechanical Systems, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA.
Erdman, A. , and Riley, D. , 1989, “ Integrating Mechanism Design Software,” Machine Design Magazine, Cleveland, OH, pp. 132–134.
Erdman, A. , 2002, “Multi-Hinged Skate and Methods for Construction of Same,” U.S. Patent No. 6,431,558 B1. http://www.google.ch/patents/US6431558
Buesseler, R. , Hom, D. , and Erdman, A. , 2013, “Fastener Deployment System and Method,” U.S. Patent No. 8387849. https://www.google.com.pg/patents/US8387849
Filemon, E. , 1972, “ Useful Ranges of Centerpoint Curves for Design of Crank-and-Rocker Linkages,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 7(1), pp. 47–53. [CrossRef]
Buesseler, R. , Hom, D. , and Erdman, A. , 2014, “Fastener Deployment System,” U.S. Patent No. 8636188 B2. https://encrypted.google.com/patents/US8636188
Buesseler, R. , Erdman, A. , and Hom, D. , 2009, “ Novel Stapling Method and Device for Nasal Surgery,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 3(4), p. 041007. [CrossRef]
Oura, M. , Menchaca, H. , Erdman, A. G. , and Buchwald, H. , 2013, “ Surgical Access System for Frugal Bariatric Surgery,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 3(2), p. 020947. [CrossRef]
Buchwald, H. , Erdman, A. , Menchaca, H. , Michajek, V. , and Suguitani, N. , 2015, “Micro-Orifice Surgical Access System,” Regents Of University Of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, U.S. Patent No. 9072501. http://www.google.tl/patents/US20140275801
Grood, E. , Hartfel, M. , Erdman, A. , and Kittur, M. , 1984, “On the Use of Burmester Curves to Explain Attachment Points of the Collateral Ligaments,” Advances in Bioengineering, ASME, New York, pp. 55–56.
Hartfel, M. , Erdman, A. G. , and Rosen, D. , 1985, “Extension of Burmester Theory to Model the Ligament Attachment Sites of the Knee,” Advances in Bioengineering, ASME, New York, pp. 107–108.
Müller, W. , 2015, “ Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Knee,” Sports Injuries, Springer, Berlin, pp. 883–908.
Erdman, A. G. , 2000, “Lens Storage and Folding Apparatus,” Micro Medical Devices, Inc., Calabasas, CA, U.S. Patent No. 6,048,347. https://www.google.tl/patents/US6048347
Erdman, A. G. , 2001, “Lens Storage and Folding Apparatus,” Micro Medical Devices, Inc., Calabasas, CA, U.S. Patent No. 6,228,094. https://encrypted.google.com/patents/US6228094
Root, R. R. , and Ragsdell, K. M. , 1976, “ A Survey of Optimization Methods Applied to the Design of Mechanisms,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 98(3), pp. 1036–1041. [CrossRef]
Riley, D. R. , and Erdman, A. G. , 1981, “ Computer Graphics and Computer Aided Design in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Minnesota,” Comput. Educ., 5(4), pp. 229–243. [CrossRef]
Erdman, A. , Keefe, D. , and Schiestl, R. , 2013, “ Grand Challenge: Applying Regulatory Science and Big Data to Improve the Innovation and Approval Process for Medical Devices,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 60(3), pp. 700–706. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Keefe, D. F. , Sotiropoulos, F. , Interrante, V. , Runesha, H. B. , Coffey, D. , Staker, M. , Lin, C.-L. , Sun, Y. , Borazjani, I. , Le, T. , Rowe, N. , and Erdman, A. , 2010, “ A Process for Design, Verification, Validation, and Manufacture of Medical Devices Using Immersive VR Environments,” ASME J. Med. Dev., 4(4), p. 045002. [CrossRef]
Coffey, D. , Malbraaten, N. , Le, T. B. , Borazjani, I. , Soteropoulos, F. , Erdman, A. , and Keefe, D. , 2012, “ Interactive Slice WIM: Navigating and Interrogating Volume Data Sets Using a Multisurface, Multitouch VR Interface,” IEEE Trans. Visualization Comput. Graph., 18(10), pp. 1614–1626. [CrossRef]
Lin, C.-L. , Coffey, D. , Erdman, A. , and Keefe, D. , 2012, “ A Framework for Medical Devices Design Using CAD Synchronization and Remote High-Performance FEA Computing,” ASME J. Med. Devices, 6(1), p. 017577. [CrossRef]
Coffey, D. , Lin, C.-L. , Erdman, A. , and Keefe, D. , 2013, “ Design by Dragging: An Interface for Creative Forward and Inverse Design With Simulation Ensembles,” IEEE Trans. Visualization Comput. Graph., 19(12), pp. 2783–2791. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Flowchart of the product development process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Selection of Max and Min values of parameters and three instances within a three-dimensional design space

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Potential solutions within a three-dimensional design space

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Kinematic synthesis of linkage mechanisms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

kinsyn 1 was a home-made system user in the loop design system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Potentially the first interactive patient specific medical device designed—a polycentric knee

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The kinsyn III hardware. The human user was utilized as an integral part of the synthesis procedure. The user observed the current state of the design on the CRT screen and input directions for continuing the synthesis by way of a data tablet. (From Ref. [9]; used by permission of ASME.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) Burmester curves representing all ground and moving pivot locations for the four prescribed design positions (square = 1st design position and circles the other three positions). Not shown are the prescribed angular orientations, (b) design map showing regions where viable solutions are according to minimum transmission angle measure, and (c) a blowup of a region of the map shown in (b).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Integration of ICEM CAE kinematics, lincages, and adams, including skeleton diagram of the six-bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Multiple design positions of the six-bar extractor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Six bar solution from lincages animated in ICEM kinematics then used as input into adams

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Maximum stresses in arm shown. Dynamic loads from adams used as boundary conditions in ANSYS.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Natural ankle movement—natural ankle motion in consecutive photographs. One four-bar found to match movement of the joint is included.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Prototype skate boot

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Pistol-shaped fastener deployment hand piece

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Surgical system access mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Reproduced from Grood, E. et al. [22]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Output from the lincages software, depending on which knee position is chosen. A different set of Burmester curves are produced. Two example sets are shown based on different input parameter sets of four prescribed positions.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Reproduced from Ref. [24]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Manual folding of an IOL. The surgeon retrieves the IOL from its container (1) and folds it using both hands (2) and (3). The completely folded IOL (4) is ready for insertion into a cassette.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

(a) The linkage in three positions as it is actuated. The top illustration shows the initial position. (b) Burmester curves for the four prescribed positions. By choosing pivot locations that were near the corners of the lens holder, then the custom mechanism would be created.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

(a) Top and side views of the delivery tube including delivery port. (b) Side and end views of the docked holder/folder and the delivery tube. (c) Docking the holder/folder onto the delivery tube.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

A lincages-generated design map of all available solutions for the specified design positions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Sketch of a proposed virtual environment for preclinical medical device design (2006)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Artist concept of a virtual design environment (Daniel Keefe's Interactive Visualization Lab, University of Minnesota)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

The radar chart (or wheel plot): input parameters are on the left and output measures on the right. The five-sided shape is one instance of a potential design solution. By dragging along each spoke, new solutions are revealed. This set of plots is related to the next two examples.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 27

ATEC vacuum-assisted biopsy device. The inner cutter is both rotated and translated within the outer cannula, causing suspected tissue which has been drawn into the distal aperture in the outer cannula, to be severed from the breast tissue and drawn back into the tissue sample collector.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 28

Virtual design of a vacuum-assisted biopsy tool—schematic of the system showing key variables

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 29

Examples of designing a biopsy needle using direct manipulation via data visualizations. The colored stress fields are the result of a load (see red arrow) at the tip of the needle representing leveraging the needle against the ribs. In forward design, the user drags an edge of the opening window to the right (a). This operation is interpreted as decreasing the window length (b). In inverse design, the user attempts to move a high stress region (the cursor location) away from the corner of the opening window. The user right-clicks on the region (c), and then, the system suggests design alternatives that have the closest distances (determined by calculating the differences between the parameter values and the weighting) from the current one, shown as preview bubbles (enlarged view in circular windows). Each of the preview bubbles shows a magnified view of local stress distribution, which informs where the high stress region can possibly be moved. The user finally moves into the most-right preview bubble to switch to a new design alternative. This design alternative shows that the high stress region has moved away from the window corner (d).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 30

Locating the dry tap: cutting adipose tissue with low cutting speeds. The deformed mesh is shown on the top while the stress distributions are show on the bottom graphic.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 31

Preview bubbles are shown near the dry tap area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 32

An optimal design that removes dry tap



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In