Differences in Trabecular Microarchitecture and Simplified Boundary Conditions Limit the Accuracy of QCT-based Finite Element Models of Vertebral Failure

[+] Author and Article Information
Amira I Hussein

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, 110 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215

Daniel Louzeiro

Dept of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States

Ginu U Unnikrishnan

Dept of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States

Elise F. Morgan

Dept of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4038609 History: Received August 17, 2017; Revised November 20, 2017


Vertebral fractures are common in the elderly, but efforts to reduce their incidence have been hampered by incomplete understanding of the failure processes that are involved. This study's goal was to elucidate failure processes in the lumbar vertebra and to assess the accuracy of quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-based finite element (FE) simulations of these processes. Following QCT scanning, spine segments (n=27) consisting of L1 with adjacent intervertebral discs and neighboring endplates of T12 and L2 were compressed axially in a stepwise manner. A micro-computed tomography scan was performed at each loading step. The resulting time-lapse series of images was analyzed using digital volume correlation (DVC) to quantify deformations throughout the vertebral body. While some diversity among vertebrae was observed in how these deformations progressed, common features were large strains that developed progressively in the superior third and, concomitantly, in the mid-transverse plane, in a manner that was associated with spatial variations in microstructural parameters such as connectivity density. Results of FE simulations corresponded qualitatively to the measured failure patterns when boundary conditions were derived from DVC displacements at the endplate. However, quantitative correspondence was often poor, particularly when boundary conditions were simplified to uniform compressive loading. These findings suggest that variations in trabecular microstructure are one cause of the differences in failure patterns among vertebrae and that both lack of incorporation of these variations into QCT-based FE models and oversimplification of boundary conditions limit the accuracy of these models in simulating vertebral failure.

Copyright (c) 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.






Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In