0
Research Papers

Development of a Single-Degree-of-Freedom Mechanical Model for Predicting Strain-Based Brain Injury Responses

[+] Author and Article Information
Lee F. Gabler

Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Center for Applied Biomechanics,
University of Virginia,
P.O. Box 400237,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4237
e-mail: lfg4dc@virginia.edu

Hamed Joodaki

Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Center for Applied Biomechanics,
University of Virginia,
P.O. Box 400237,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4237
e-mail: hj2vq@eservices.virginia.edu

Jeff R. Crandall

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering,
Center for Applied Biomechanics,
University of Virginia,
P.O. Box 400237,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4237
e-mail: jrc2h@virginia.edu

Matthew B. Panzer

Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Center for Applied Biomechanics,
University of Virginia,
P.O. Box 400237,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4237
e-mail: mbp2q@virginia.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received January 30, 2017; final manuscript received October 23, 2017; published online January 17, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Barclay Morrison.

J Biomech Eng 140(3), 031002 (Jan 17, 2018) (13 pages) Paper No: BIO-17-1035; doi: 10.1115/1.4038357 History: Received January 30, 2017; Revised October 23, 2017

Linking head kinematics to injury risk has been the focus of numerous brain injury criteria. Although many early forms were developed using mechanics principles, recent criteria have been developed using empirical methods based on subsets of head impact data. In this study, a single-degree-of-freedom (sDOF) mechanical analog was developed to parametrically investigate the link between rotational head kinematics and brain deformation. Model efficacy was assessed by comparing the maximum magnitude of displacement to strain-based brain injury predictors from finite element (FE) human head models. A series of idealized rotational pulses covering a broad range of acceleration and velocity magnitudes (0.1–15 krad/s2 and 1–100 rad/s) with durations between 1 and 3000 ms were applied to the mechanical models about each axis of the head. Results show that brain deformation magnitude is governed by three categories of rotational head motion each distinguished by the duration of the pulse relative to the brain's natural period: for short-duration pulses, maximum brain deformation depended primarily on angular velocity magnitude; for long-duration pulses, brain deformation depended primarily on angular acceleration magnitude; and for pulses relatively close to the natural period, brain deformation depended on both velocity and acceleration magnitudes. These results suggest that brain deformation mechanics can be adequately explained by simple mechanical systems, since FE model responses and experimental brain injury tolerances exhibited similar patterns to the sDOF model. Finally, the sDOF model was the best correlate to strain-based responses and highlighted fundamental limitations with existing rotational-based brain injury metrics.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

CDC, 2016, “Rates of TBI-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths—United States, 2001–2010 | Concussion | Traumatic Brain Injury | CDC Injury Center,” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, accessed June 4, 2016, http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/data/rates.html
U.S. Census Bureau, 2016, “Census.gov,” U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, accessed June 4, 2016, http://www.census.gov/
Taylor, C. A. , Bell, J. M. , Breiding, M. J. , and Xu, L. , 2017, “Traumatic Brain Injury—Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths—United States,” Surveill. Summ., 66(9), pp. 1–16. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/ss/ss6609a1.htm
Santiago, L. A. , Oh, B. C. , Dash, P. K. , Holcomb, J. B. , and Wade, C. E. , 2012, “A Clinical Comparison of Penetrating and Blunt Traumatic Brain Injuries,” Brain Inj., 26(2), pp. 107–125. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Harmon, K. G. , Drezner, J. A. , Gammons, M. , Guskiewicz, K. M. , Halstead, M. , Herring, S. A. , Kutcher, J. S. , Pana, A. , Putukian, M. , and Roberts, W. O. , 2013, “American Medical Society for Sports Medicine Position Statement: Concussion in Sport,” Br. J. Sports Med., 47(1), pp. 15–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
DVBIC, 2016, “DoD Worldwide Numbers for TBI,” Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Silver Spring, MD, accessed Nov. 16, 2016, http://dvbic.dcoe.mil/dod-worldwide-numbers-tbi
CDC, 2016, “Report to Congress on Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Understanding the Public Health Problem Among Current and Former Military Personnel | Concussion | Traumatic Brain Injury | CDC Injury Center,” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, accessed Nov. 16, 2016, http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pubs/congress_military.html
NHTSA, 1996, “NHTSA Final Economic Assessment, FMVSS No. 201, Upper Interior Head Protection,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, Docket No. 1996-1762-0003.
NOCSAE, 2012, “Standard Test Method and Equipment Used in Evaluating the Performance Characteristics of Protective Headgear/Equipment,” National Operating Committee on the Standards for Athletic Equipment, Overland Park, KS, Standard No. ND001-15m17. http://nocsae.org/wp-content/files_mf/1490213565ND00115m17DropTestMethod.pdf
Rowson, S. , Brolinson, G. , Goforth, M. , Dietter, D. , and Duma, S. , 2009, “Linear and Angular Head Acceleration Measurements in Collegiate Football,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 131(6), p. 061016. [CrossRef]
Camarillo, D. B. , Shull, P. B. , Mattson, J. , Shultz, R. , and Garza, D. , 2013, “An Instrumented Mouthguard for Measuring Linear and Angular Head Impact Kinematics in American Football,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 41(9), pp. 1939–1949. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gabler, L. F. , Crandall, J. R. , and Panzer, M. B. , 2016, “Assessment of Kinematic Brain Injury Metrics for Predicting Strain Responses in Diverse Automotive Impact Conditions,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 44(12), pp. 3705–3718. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stalnaker, R. L. , Fogle, J. L. , and McElhaney, J. H. , 1971, “Driving Point Impedance Characteristics of the Head,” J. Biomech., 4(2), pp. 127–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fan, W. R. , 1971, “Internal Head Injury Assessment,” SAE Paper No. 710870.
Brinn, J. , and Staffeld, S. E. , 1970, “Evaluation of Impact Test Accelerations: A Damage Index for the Head and Torso,” SAE Paper No. 700902.
Slattenschek, A. , and Tauffkirchen, W. , 1970, “Critical Evaluation of Assessment Methods for Head Impact Applied in Appraisal of Brain Injury Hazard, in Particular in Head Impact on Windshields,” SAE Paper No. 700426.
Gierke, V. H. E. , 1964, “Transient Acceleration, Vibration and Noise Problems in Space Flight,” Bioastronautics, Karl E . Schaefer , ed., MacMillan, New York, p. 61.
Holbourn, A. H. S. , 1943, “Mechanics of Head Injuries,” Lancet, 242(6267), pp. 438–441. [CrossRef]
Goldsmith, W. , 1972, Biomechanics of Head Injury, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Gadd, C. W. , 1966, “Use of a Weighted-Impulse Criterion for Estimating Injury Hazard,” SAE Paper No. 660793.
Patrick, L. M. , Lissner, H. R. , and Gurdjian, E. S. , 1963, “Survival by Design: Head Protection,” Seventh Stapp Car Crash and Field Demonstration Conference, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 483–499.
Versace, J. , 1971, “A Review of the Severity Index,” SAE Paper No. 710881.
Kimpara, H. , and Iwamoto, M. , 2012, “Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Predictors Based on Angular Accelerations During Impacts,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 40(1), pp. 114–126. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kimpara, H. , Nakahira, Y. , Iwamoto, M. , Rowson, S. , and Duma, S. , 2011, “Head Injury Prediction Methods Based on 6 Degree of Freedom Head Acceleration Measurements During Impact,” Int. J. Automot. Eng., 2(2), pp. 13–19. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsaeijae/2/2/2_20114490/_article
Greenwald, R. M. , Gwin, J. T. , Chu, J. J. , and Crisco, J. J. , 2008, “Head Impact Severity Measures for Evaluating Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Risk Exposure,” Neurosurgery, 62(4), p. 789. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Takhounts, E. G. , Ridella, S. A. , Hasija, V. , Tannous, R. E. , Campbell, J. Q. , Malone, D. , Danelson, K. , Stitzel, J. , Rowson, S. , and Duma, S. , 2008, “Investigation of Traumatic Brain Injuries Using the Next Generation of Simulated Injury Monitor (SIMon) Finite Element Head Model,” Stapp Car Crash J., 52, pp. 1–31. https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjLtsvqg8PXAhXHSCYKHeg4DLEQFgguMAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nhtsa.gov%2FDOT%2FNHTSA%2FNVS%2FBiomechanics%2520%26%2520Trauma%2FSIMon%2FStapp2008%2520Takhounts.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0NkHpBpRQzwayhNLNAPnJb [PubMed]
Mao, H. , Zhang, L. , Jiang, B. , Genthikatti, V. V. , Jin, X. , Zhu, F. , Makwana, R. , Gill, A. , Jandir, G. , Singh, A. , and Yang, K. H. , 2013, “Development of a Finite Element Human Head Model Partially Validated With Thirty Five Experimental Cases,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 135(11), p. 111002. [CrossRef]
Ji, S. , and Zhao, W. , 2014, “A Pre-Computed Brain Response Atlas for Instantaneous Strain Estimation in Contact Sports,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 43(8), pp. 1877–1895. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Takhounts, E. G. , Craig, M. J. , Moorhouse, K. , McFadden, J. , and Hasija, V. , 2013, “Development of Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC),” Stapp Car Crash J., 57, pp. 243–266. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24435734 [PubMed]
SAE International, 1995, “J211/1: Instrumentation for Impact Test: Part 1—Electronic Instrumentation,” SAE International, Warrendale, PA, Standard No. J211/1_199503. http://standards.sae.org/j211/1_199503/
Bandak, F. A. , Zhang, A. X. , Tannous, R. E. , DiMasi, F. , Masiello, P. , and Eppinger, R. H. , 2001, “Simon: A Simulated Injury Monitor; Application to Head Injury Assessment,” SAE Paper No. 2001-06-0222. http://papers.sae.org/2001-06-0222/
Panzer, M. B. , Myers, B. S. , Capehart, B. P. , and Bass, C. R. , 2012, “Development of a Finite Element Model for Blast Brain Injury and the Effects of CSF Cavitation,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 40(7), pp. 1530–1544. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gabler, L. F. , Crandall, J. R. , and Panzer, M. B. , 2016, “Investigating Brain Injury Tolerance in the Sagittal Plane Using a Finite Element Model of the Human Head,” Int. J. Automot. Eng., 7(1), pp. 37–43 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsaeijae/7/1/7_20164082/_article.
Rowson, S. , Duma, S. M. , Beckwith, J. G. , Chu, J. J. , Greenwald, R. M. , Crisco, J. J. , Brolinson, P. G. , Duhaime, A.-C. , McAllister, T. W. , and Maerlender, A. C. , 2012, “Rotational Head Kinematics in Football Impacts: An Injury Risk Function for Concussion,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 40(1), pp. 1–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Payne, P. R. , 1962, “The Dynamics of Human Restraint Systems,” Impact Acceleration Stress: A Symposium, San Antonio, TX, Nov. 27–29, pp. 195–257. https://www.nap.edu/read/20270/chapter/24
Kornhauser, M. , and Lawton, R. W. , 1961, “Impact Tolerance of Mammals,” Planet. Space Sci., 7, pp. 386–394. [CrossRef]
Laksari, K. , Wu, L. C. , Kurt, M. , Kuo, C. , and Camarillo, D. C. , 2015, “Resonance of Human Brain Under Head Acceleration,” J. R. Soc. Interface, 12(108), p. 20150331.
Ommaya, A. K. , and Hirsch, A. E. , 1971, “Tolerances for Cerebral Concussion From Head Impact and Whiplash in Primates,” J. Biomech., 4(1), pp. 13–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Thibault, L. E. , and Gennarelli, T. A. , 1985, “Biomechanics of Diffuse Brain Injuries,” SAE Paper No. 856022. http://papers.sae.org/856022/
Margulies, S. S. , and Thibault, L. E. , 1992, “A Proposed Tolerance Criterion for Diffuse Axonal Injury in Man,” J. Biomech., 25(8), pp. 917–923. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yanaoka, T. , Dokko, Y. , and Takahashi, Y. , 2015, “Investigation on an Injury Criterion Related to Traumatic Brain Injury Primarily Induced by Head Rotation,” SAE Paper No. 2015-01-1439.
Newman, J. A. , Shewchenko, N. , and Welbourne, E. , 2000, “A Proposed New Biomechanical Head Injury Assessment Function: The Maximum Power Index,” Stapp Car Crash J., 44, pp. 215–247. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17458729 [PubMed]
Sullivan, S. , Eucker, S. A. , Gabrieli, D. , Bradfield, C. , Coats, B. , Maltese, M. R. , Lee, J. , Smith, C. , and Margulies, S. S. , 2015, “White Matter Tract-Oriented Deformation Predicts Traumatic Axonal Brain Injury and Reveals Rotational Direction-Specific Vulnerabilities,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 14(4), pp. 877–896. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hernandez, F. , Wu, L. C. , Yip, M. C. , Laksari, K. , Hoffman, A. R. , Lopez, J. R. , Grant, G. A. , Kleiven, S. , and Camarillo, D. B. , 2015, “Six Degree-of-Freedom Measurements of Human Mild Traumatic Brain Injury,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 43(8), pp. 1918–1934. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Elkin, B. S. , and Morrison, B., III , 2007, “Region-Specific Tolerance Criteria for the Living Brain,” Stapp Car Crash J., 51, pp. 127–138. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.327.2763&rep=rep1&type=pdf [PubMed]
Zhao, W. , Cai, Y. , Li, Z. , and Ji, S. , 2017, “Injury Prediction and Vulnerability Assessment Using Strain and Susceptibility Measures of the Deep White Matter,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 16(5), pp. 1–19. [CrossRef]
King, W. , 2013, Human Impact Response: Measurement and Simulation, Springer, New York.
Zhao, W. , and Ji, S. , 2016, “Brain Strain Uncertainty Due to Shape Variation in and Simplification of Head Angular Velocity Profiles,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 16(2), pp. 449–461. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rao, S. S. , and Yap, F. F. , 1995, Mechanical Vibrations, Addison-Wesley, New York. [PubMed] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

sDOF mechanical system with base excitation used as an analog for brain deformation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Idealized kinematic pulse applied to the FE and sDOF models (a) and the relationship between pulse parameters (u¨m, u˙m, Δt) in the design space (b). Increasing lines of constant pulse duration are indicated by the arrow and dotted lines. Pulse duration is inversely related to the slope of the dotted lines (π/Δt) where ΔtI<ΔtII. Short-duration pulses are indicated by region I: Δt<ΔtI, moderate duration pulses are indicated by region II: ΔtI<Δt<ΔtII (system natural period is located in this region), and long-duration pulses are indicated by region III: ΔtII<Δt.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Design space for numerical simulations (Sec. 2.5) used in the current study. Idealized rotational pulses applied to the sDOF and FE models were constructed using Eqs. (4)(6) for the circular grid points shown above (simulations). Square, triangular, and diamond data points are the directionally dependent (x, y, z) values for u¨m and u˙m, which were taken from the 660 sled, crash, and pendulum tests, and used to define range and distribution of pulses for the parametric study (simulations).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Contour plots showing the relationship between u¨m, u˙m, and δm for various combinations of system parameters (Δtn and ζ) using the sDOF model. Contour lines represent constant levels of δm which were normalized by the maximum value within the surface. The slope of the solid line is inversely related to the system natural period (π/Δtn).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Contour plots showing the relationship between u¨m, u˙m, and strain-based metrics obtained from numerical simulations using GHBMC and SIMon. Contour lines represent constant levels of MPS or CSDM. Directionally dependent (x, y, z) values for u¨m and u˙m were obtained from the sled, crash, and pendulum data and are plotted (circles) to show the location of real-world head impacts relative to the strain contours generated using the idealized pulses. Dotted lines shown on CSDM plots indicate an MPS value of 25% (100th percentile element), which was used as the threshold for the onset of CSDM.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

sDOF model responses fit to the subset of GHBMC simulations for each anatomical direction. The solid and dotted lines indicate unity and ±1 root-mean-square error, respectively. Fitted values for the uniaxial parameters of the directionally dependent sDOF models are listed in Table 3.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Contour plots showing a comparison between the fitted sDOF model responses (top row) to MPS responses determined from FE simulations using GHBMC (bottom row). Solid lines indicate directionally dependent natural periods obtained from sDOF model fits to the uniaxial GHBMC data.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Correlations between existing rotational-based metrics and the sDOF model, and strain-based metrics obtained from GHBMC using the 660 sled, crash, and pendulum tests [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contour plots for several existing kinematic-based metrics and the sDOF model. Contour lines indicate constant metric values which have been normalized by the maximum value within the response surface. For directionally dependent metrics (BrIC, HIP, RVCI, and sDOF), only a single direction is shown.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In