0
Research Papers

Remote Determination of Time-Dependent Stiffness of Surface-Degrading-Polymer Scaffolds Via Synchrotron-Based Imaging

[+] Author and Article Information
N. K. Bawolin

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
College of Engineering,
University of Saskatchewan,
Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada

X. B. Chen

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
College of Engineering,
University of Saskatchewan,
Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada;
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
College of Engineering,
University of Saskatchewan,
Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada

Manuscript received April 18, 2016; final manuscript received January 26, 2017; published online March 2, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Sean S. Kohles.

J Biomech Eng 139(4), 041004 (Mar 02, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: BIO-16-1156; doi: 10.1115/1.4036021 History: Received April 18, 2016; Revised January 26, 2017

Surface-degrading polymers have been widely used to fabricate scaffolds with the mechanical properties appropriate for tissue regeneration/repair. During their surface degradation, the material properties of polymers remain approximately unchanged, but the scaffold geometry and thus mechanical properties vary with time. This paper presents a novel method to determine the time-dependent mechanical properties, particularly stiffness, of scaffolds from the geometric changes captured by synchrotron-based imaging, with the help of finite element analysis (FEA). Three-dimensional (3D) tissue scaffolds were fabricated from surface-degrading polymers, and during their degradation, the tissue scaffolds were imaged via the synchrotron-based imaging to characterize their changing geometry. On this basis, the stiffness behavior of scaffolds was estimated from the FEA, and the results obtained were compared to the direct measurements of scaffold stiffness from the load–displacement material testing. The comparison illustrates that the Young's moduli estimated from the FEA and characterized geometry are in agreement with the ones of direct measurements. The developed method of estimating the mechanical behavior was also demonstrated effective with a nondegrading scaffold that displays the nonlinear stress–strain behavior. The in vivo monitoring of Young's modulus by morphology characterization also suggests the feasibility of characterizing experimentally the difference between in vivo and in vitro surface degradation of tissue engineering constructs.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Little, C. J. , Bawolin, N. K. , and Chen, X. B. , 2011, “ Mechanical Properties of Natural Cartilage and Tissue Engineered Constructs,” Tissue Eng. Part B: Reviews, 17(4), pp. 213–227. [CrossRef]
Sun, H. , Zhu, F. , Hu, Q. , and Krebsbach, P. H. , 2014, “ Controlling Stem Cell-Mediated Bone Regeneration Through Tailored Mechanical Properties of Collagen Scaffolds,” Biomaterials, 35(4), pp. 1176–1184. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nama, J. , Johnson, J. , Lannutti, J. , and Agarwal, A. , 2011, “ Modulation of Embryonic Mesenchymal Progenitor Cell Differentiation Via Control Over Pure Mechanical Modulus in Electrospun Nanofibers,” Acta Biomater., 7(4), pp. 1516–1524. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Olubamiji, A. D. , Izadifar, Z. , Si, J. , Cooper, D. , Eames, F. , and Chen, X. B. , 2016, “ Modulating Mechanical Behaviour of 3D-Printed Cartilage-Mimetic PCL Scaffolds: Influence of Molecular Weight and Pore Geometry,” Biofabrication, 8(2), p. 025020. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
You, F. , Wu, X. , and Chen, X. B. , 2017, “ 3D Printing of Alginate/Gelatin Hydrogel Scaffolds and Their Mechanical-Property Characterization,” Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater., 66(6), pp. 299–306. [CrossRef]
Bawolin, N. K. , Li, M. G. , Chen, X. B. , and Zhang, W. J. , 2010, “ Modeling Material-Degradation-Induced Elastic Property of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 132(11), p. 111001. [CrossRef]
Bawolin, N. K. , Zhang, W. J. , and Chen, X. B. , 2010, “ A Brief Review of the Modelling of the Time Dependent Mechanical Properties of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds,” J. Biomimetics Biomater. Tissue Eng., 6, pp. 19–33. [CrossRef]
Freier, T. , Kunze, C. , Nischan, C. , Kramer, S. , Sternberg, K. , Sa, M. , Hopt, U. T. , and Schmitz, K. P. , 2002, “ In Vitro and In Vivo Degradation Studies for Development of a Biodegradable Patch Based on Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate),” Biomaterials, 23(13), pp. 2649–2657. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kenley, R. A. , Lee, M. O. , Mahoney, T. R. , and Sanders, L. M. , 1987, “ Poly(Lactide-co-Glycolide) Decomposition Kinetics In Vivo and In Vitro,” Macromolecules, 20(10), pp. 2398–2403. [CrossRef]
Grayson, A. C. R. , Voskerician, G. , Lynn, A. , Anderson, J. M. , Cima, M. J. , and Langer, R. , 2004, “ Differential Degradation Rates In Vivo and In Vitro of Biocompatible Poly(Lactic Acid) and Poly(Glycolic Acid) Homo- and Co-Polymers for a Polymeric Drug-Delivery Microchip,” J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Ed., 15(10), pp. 1281–1304. [CrossRef]
Gefen, A. , and Margulies, S. S. , 2004, “ Are In Vivo and In Situ Brain Tissues Mechanically Similar?” J. Biomech., 37(9), pp. 1339–1352. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Artzi1, N. , Oliva, N. , Puron, C. , Shitreet, S. , Artzi, S. , bon Ramos, A. , Groothuis, A. , Sahagian, G. , and Edelman, E. R. , 2011, “ In Vivo and In Vitro Tracking of Erosion in Biodegradable Materials Using Non-Invasive Fluorescence Imaging,” Nat. Mater., 10(9), pp. 704–709. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Goss, B. C. , McGee, K. P. , Ehman, E. C. , Manduca, A. , and Ehman, R. L. , 2006, “ Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Lung: Technical Feasibility,” Magn. Reson. Med., 56(5), pp. 1060–1066. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, Y. S. , Cai, X. , Yao, J. , Xing, W. , Wang, L. V. , and Xia, Y. , 2014, “ Non-Invasive and In Situ Characterization of the Degradation of Biomaterial Scaffolds by Volumetric Photoacoustic Microscopy,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 53(1), pp. 184–188. [CrossRef]
Park, D. W. , Ye, S. H. , Jiang, H. B. , Dutta, D. , Nonaka, K. , Wagner, W. R. , and Kim, K. , 2014, “ In Vivo Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Changes of Tissue Scaffolds by Multi-Modality Imaging,” Biomaterials, 35(27), pp. 7851–7859. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kim, K. , Jeong, C. G. , and Hollister, S. J. , 2008, “ Non-Invasive Monitoring of Tissue Scaffold Degradation Using Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging,” Acta Biomater., 4(4), pp. 783–790. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yu, J. , Takanari, K. , Hong, Y. , Lee, K. W. , Amoroso, N. J. , Wang, Y. , Wagner, W. R. , and Kim, K. , 2013, “ Non-Invasive Characterization of Polyurethane-Based Tissue Constructs in a Rat Abdominal Repair Model Using High Frequency Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging,” Biomaterials, 34(11), pp. 2701–2709. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dutta, D. , Lee, K. W. , Allen, R. A. , Wang, Y. , Brigham, J. C. , and Kim, K. , 2013, “ Non-Invasive Assessment of Elastic Modulus of Arterial Constructs During Cell Culture Using Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., 39(11), pp. 2103–2115. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Niklason, L. E. , Yeh, A. T. , Calle, E. A. , Bai, Y. Q. , Valentín, A. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2010, “ Enabling Tools for Engineering Collagenous Tissues Integrating Bioreactors, Intravital Imaging, and Biomechanical Modeling,” PNAS, 107(8), pp. 3335–3339. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ulum, M. F. , Arafat, A. , Noviana, D. , Yusopa, A. H. , Nasutiona, A. K. , Abdul Kadir, M. R. , and Hermawan, H. , 2014, “ In Vitro and In Vivo Degradation Evaluation of Novel Iron-Bioceramic Composites for Bone Implant Applications,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: C, 36, pp. 336–344. [CrossRef]
Jones, A. C. , Arns, C. H. , Sheppard, A. P. , and Hutmacher, D. W. , 2007, “ Assessment of Bone Ingrowth Into Porous Biomaterials Using MICRO-CT,” Biomaterials, 28(15), pp. 2491–2504. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Saito, E. , Suarez-Gonzalez, D. , Rao, R. R. , Stegemann, J. P. , Murphy, W. L. , and Hollister, S. J. , 2013, “ Use of Micro-Computed Tomography to Nondestructively Characterize Biomineral Coatings on Solid Freeform Fabricated Poly (L-Lactic Acid) and Poly (e-Caprolactone) Scaffolds In Vitro and In Vivo,” Tissue Eng. Part C: Methods, 19(7), pp. 507–517. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Langer, M. , Liu, Y. , Tortelli, F. , Cloetens, P. , Cancedda, R. , and Peyrin, F. , 2010, “ Regularized Phase Tomography Enables Study of Mineralized and Unmineralized Tissue in Porous Bone Scaffold,” J. Microsc., 238(3), pp. 230–239. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zehbe, R. , Riesemeier, H. , Kirkpatrick, C. J. , and Brochhausen, C. , 2012, “ Imaging of Articular Cartilage—Data Matching Using X-Ray Tomography, SEM, FIB Slicing and Conventional Histology,” Micron, 43(10), pp. 1060–1067. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rack, A. , 2011, “ Developments in High-Resolution CT: Studying Bioregeneration by Hard X-Ray Synchrotron-Based Microtomography,” Compr. Biomater., 3, pp. 47–62.
Appel, A. , Anastasio, M. A. , and Brey, E. M. , 2011, “ Potential for Imaging Engineered Tissues With X-Ray Phase Contrast,” Tissue Eng. Part B: Reviews, 17(5), pp. 321–330. [CrossRef]
Zhu, N. , Chapman, D. , Cooper, D. , Schreyer, D. J. , and Chen, X. B. , 2011, “ X-Ray Diffraction Enhanced Imaging as a Novel Method to Visualize Low-Density Scaffolds in Soft Tissue Engineering,” Tissue Eng. Part C: Methods, 17(11), pp. 1071–1080. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Izadifar, Z. , Honaramooz, A. , Wiebe, S. , Belev, G. , Chen, X. B. , and Chapman, D. , 2016, “ Low-Dose Phase-Based X-Ray Imaging Techniques for In Situ Soft Tissue Engineering Assessments,” Biomaterials, 82, pp. 151–167. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Olubamiji, A. D. , Izadifar, Z. , Zhu, N. , Chang, T. J. , Chen, X. B. , and Eames, B. F. , 2016, “ Using SR-Inline-PCI-CT to Visualize 3D-Printed Hybrid Constructs for Cartilage Tissue Engineering,” J. Synchrotron Radiat., 23(3), pp. 802–812. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bawolin, N. K. , Dolovich, A. T. , Chen, X. B. , and Zhang, W. J. , 2015, “ Characterization of Mechanical Properties of Tissue Scaffolds by Phase Contrast Imaging and Finite Element Modeling,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 137(8), p. 081004. [CrossRef]
Bawolin, N. , and Chen, X. B. , 2016, “ Synchrotron-Based In Situ Characterization of the Scaffold Mass Loss From Erosion Degradation,” J. Funct. Biomater., 7(3), p. 17. [CrossRef]
Izadifar, Z. , Chang, T. J. , Kulyk, W. , Chen, X. B. , and Eames, B. F. , 2015, “ Analyzing Biological Performance of 3D-Printed, Cell-Impregnated Hybrid Constructs for Cartilage Tissue Engineering,” Tissue Eng. Part C: Methods, 22(3), pp. 173–188. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Z. , Kuijer, R. , Bulstra, S. K. , Grijpma, D. W. , and Feijen, J. , 2006, “ The In Vivo and In Vitro Degradation Behavior of Poly(Trimethylene Carbonate),” Biomaterials, 27(9), pp. 1741–1748. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ibim, S. E. , Uhrich, K. E. , Attawia, M. , Shastri, V. R. , El-Amin, S. F. , Bronson, R. , Langer, R. , and Laurencin, C. T. , 1998, “ Preliminary In Vivo Report on the Osteocompatibility of Poly(Anhydride-co-Imides) Evaluated in a Tibial Model,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 43(4), pp. 374–379. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ibim, S. E. , Uhrich, K. E. , Bronson, R. , El-Amin, S. F. , Langer, R. S. , and Laurencin, C. T. , 1998, “ Poly(Anhydride-co-Imides): In Vivo Biocompatibility in a Rat Model,” Biomaterials, 19(10), pp. 941–951. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Guo, Q. , and Groeninckx, G. , 2001, “ Crystallization Kinetics Poly(e-Caprolactone) in Miscible Thermosetting Polymer Blends of Epoxy Resin and Poly (ε-Caprolactone),” Polymer, 42(21), pp. 8647–8655. [CrossRef]
Berger, H. , Kari, S. , Gabbert, U. , Rodríguez-Ramos, R. , Bravo-Castillero, J. , and Guinovart-Díaz, R. , 2005, “ A Comprehensive Numerical Homogenisation Technique for Calculating Effective Coefficients of Uniaxial Piezoelectric Fibre Composites,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 412(1–2), pp. 53–60. [CrossRef]
Graves-Morris, P. R. , Roberts, D. E. , and Salam, A. , 2000, “ The Epsilon Algorithm and Related Topics,” J. Comput. Appl. Math., 122(1–2), pp. 51–80. [CrossRef]
Croarkin, C. , and Tobias, P. , 2012, NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
Lam, C. X. F. , Savalani, M. M. , Teoh, S. H. , and Hutmacher, D. W. , 2008, “ Dynamics of In Vitro Polymer Degradation of Polycaprolactone-Based Scaffolds: Accelerated Versus Simulated Physiological Conditions,” Biomed. Mater., 3(3), p. 034108. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Scaffold design and coordinate system and (b) picture of the fabricated scaffold

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) DEI image of scaffold and (b) PCI image of scaffold

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Crystallinity of PCL scaffolds versus degradation time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Compressive stress–strain curves of FullCure 720 and PCL bulk materials at a deflection rate of 10 mm/min for three cubelike samples of each biomaterial

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Compressive stress–strain curves of PCL and FullCure720 scaffolds at a deflection rate of 10 mm/min

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Decline in average scaffold strand radius with time from surface degradation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Compared imaging/FEM and empirically measured mechanical characterization of scaffold during surface degradation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Compared imaging/FEM and empirically measured stress–strain behavior characterization of a scaffold

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In