Research Papers

Novel Methodology for Characterizing Regional Variations in the Material Properties of Murine Aortas

[+] Author and Article Information
Matthew R. Bersi, Chiara Bellini, Paolo Di Achille, Jay D. Humphrey

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Yale University,
New Haven, CT 06520

Katia Genovese

School of Engineering,
University of Basilicata,
Potenza 85100, Italy

Stéphane Avril

INSERM, U1059,
Saint-Etienne 42000, France;
Ecole Nationale Supérieure des
Mines de Saint-Etienne,
Saint-Etienne F-42023, France

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received October 14, 2015; final manuscript received May 10, 2016; published online June 7, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Jonathan Vande Geest.

J Biomech Eng 138(7), 071005 (Jun 07, 2016) (15 pages) Paper No: BIO-15-1515; doi: 10.1115/1.4033674 History: Received October 14, 2015; Revised May 10, 2016

Many vascular disorders, including aortic aneurysms and dissections, are characterized by localized changes in wall composition and structure. Notwithstanding the importance of histopathologic changes that occur at the microstructural level, macroscopic manifestations ultimately dictate the mechanical functionality and structural integrity of the aortic wall. Understanding structure–function relationships locally is thus critical for gaining increased insight into conditions that render a vessel susceptible to disease or failure. Given the scarcity of human data, mouse models are increasingly useful in this regard. In this paper, we present a novel inverse characterization of regional, nonlinear, anisotropic properties of the murine aorta. Full-field biaxial data are collected using a panoramic-digital image correlation (p-DIC) system. An inverse method, based on the principle of virtual power (PVP), is used to estimate values of material parameters regionally for a microstructurally motivated constitutive relation. We validate our experimental–computational approach by comparing results to those from standard biaxial testing. The results for the nondiseased suprarenal abdominal aorta from apolipoprotein-E null mice reveal material heterogeneities, with significant differences between dorsal and ventral as well as between proximal and distal locations, which may arise in part due to differential perivascular support and localized branches. Overall results were validated for both a membrane and a thick-wall model that delineated medial and adventitial properties. Whereas full-field characterization can be useful in the study of normal arteries, we submit that it will be particularly useful for studying complex lesions such as aneurysms, which can now be pursued with confidence given the present validation.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Humphrey, J. D. , and Holzapfel, G. A. , 2011, “ Mechanics, Mechanobiology, and Modeling of Human Abdominal Aorta and Aneurysms,” J. Biomech., 45(5), pp. 805–814. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Martufi, G. , Gasser, T. C. , Appoo, J. , and Di Martino, E. S. , 2014, “ Mechano-Biology in the Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: A Review and Case Study,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 13(5), pp. 917–928. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Moireau, P. , Xiao, N. , Astorino, M. , Figueroa, C. A. , Chapelle, D. , Taylor, C. A. , and Gerbeau, J. F. , 2012, “ External Tissue Support and Fluid-Structure Simulation in Blood Flows,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 11(1–2), pp. 1–18. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chandra, S. , Jana, A. , Biederman, R. W. , and Doyle, M. , 2013, “ Fluid-Structure Interaction Modeling of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Impact of Patient-Specific Inflow Conditions and Fluid/Solid Coupling,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 135(8), p. 081001. [CrossRef]
Alimohammadi, M. , Sherwood, J. M. , Karimpour, M. , Agu, O. , Balabani, S. , and Díaz-Zuccarini, V. , 2015, “ Aortic Dissection Simulation Models for Clinical Support: Fluid-Structure Interaction vs. Rigid Wall Models,” Biomed. Eng. Online, 14(1), pp. 1–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ferruzzi, J. , Bersi, M. R. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2013, “ Biomechanical Phenotyping of Central Arteries in Health and Disease: Advantages of and Methods for Murine Models,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 41(7), pp. 1311–1330. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bersi, M. R. , Ferruzzi, J. , Eberth, J. F. , Gleason, R. L. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2014, “ Consistent Biomechanical Phenotyping of Common Carotid Arteries From Seven Genetic, Pharmacological, and Surgical Mouse Models,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 42(6), pp. 1207–1223. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gleason, R. L. , Gray, S. P. , Wilson, E. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2004, “ A Multiaxial Computer-Controlled Organ Culture and Biomechanical Device for Mouse Carotid Arteries,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 126(6), pp. 787–795. [CrossRef]
Ferruzzi, J. , Collins, M. J. , Yeh, A. T. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2011, “ Mechanical Assessment of Elastin Integrity in Fibrillin-1-Deficient Carotid Arteries: Implications for Marfan Syndrome,” Cardiovasc. Res., 92(2), pp. 287–295. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genovese, K. , Lee, Y.-U. , Lee, A. Y. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2013, “ An Improved Panoramic Digital Image Correlation Method for Vascular Strain Analysis and Material Characterization,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 27, pp. 132–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genovese, K. , 2009, “ A Video-Optical System for Time-Resolved Whole-Body Measurement on Vascular Segments,” Opt. Lasers Eng., 47(9), pp. 995–1008. [CrossRef]
Van Loon, P. , Klip, W. , and Bradley, E. L. , 1977, “ Length-Force and Volume-Pressure Relationships of Arteries,” Biorheology, 14(4), pp. 181–201. [PubMed]
Kang, T. , Resar, J. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 1995, “ Heat-Induced Changes in the Mechanical Behavior of Passive Coronary Arteries,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 117(1), pp. 86–93. [CrossRef]
Bellini, C. , Ferruzzi, J. , Roccabianca, S. , Di Martino, E. S. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2014, “ A Microstructurally Motivated Model of Arterial Wall Mechanics With Mechanobiological Implications,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 42(3), pp. 488–502. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ferruzzi, J. , Bersi, M. R. , Uman, S. , Yanagisawa, H. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2015, “ Decreased Elastic Energy Storage, Not Increased Material Stiffness, Characterizes Central Artery Dysfunction in Fibulin-5 Deficiency Independent of Sex,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 137(3), p. 031007. [CrossRef]
Humphrey, J. , and Rajagopal, K. , 2002, “ A Constrained Mixture Model for Growth and Remodeling of Soft Tissues,” Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 12(3), pp. 407–430. [CrossRef]
Pierron, F. , and Grédiac, M. , 2012, The Virtual Fields Method: Extracting Constitutive Mechanical Parameters From Full-Field Deformation Measurements, Springer, New York.
Avril, S. , Bonnet, M. , Bretelle, A. S. , Grédiac, M. , Hild, F. , Ienny, P. , Latourte, F. , Lemosse, D. , Pagano, S. , Pagnacco, E. , and Pierron, F. , 2008, “ Overview of Identification Methods of Mechanical Parameters Based on Full-Field Measurements,” Exp. Mech., 48(4), pp. 381–402. [CrossRef]
Avril, S. , Badel, P. , and Duprey, A. , 2010, “ Anisotropic and Hyperelastic Identification of In Vitro Human Arteries From Full-Field Optical Measurements,” J. Biomech., 43(15), pp. 2978–2985. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cuomo, F. , Ferruzzi, J. , Humphrey, J. D. , and Figueroa, C. A. , 2015, “ An Experimental–Computational Study of Catheter Induced Alterations in Pulse Wave Velocity in Anesthetized Mice,” Ann. Biomed. Eng, 43(7), pp. 1555–1570. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antiga, L. , and Steinman, D. A. , 2004, “ Robust and Objective Decomposition and Mapping of Bifurcating Vessels,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 23(6), pp. 704–713. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Baek, S. , Gleason, R. , Rajagopal, K. , and Humphrey, J. , 2007, “ Theory of Small on Large: Potential Utility in Computations of Fluid–Solid Interactions in Arteries,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 196(31–32), pp. 3070–3078. [CrossRef]
Stålhand, J. , 2009, “ Determination of Human Arterial Wall Parameters From Clinical Data,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 8(2), pp. 141–148. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Smoljkić, M. , Vander Sloten, J. , Segers, P. , and Famaey, N. , 2015, “ Non-Invasive, Energy-Based Assessment of Patient-Specific Material Properties of Arterial Tissue,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 14(5), pp. 1045–1056. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zeinali-Davarani, S. , Raguin, L. G. , Vorp, D. A. , and Baek, S. , 2011, “ Identification of in vivo Material and Geometric Parameters of a Human Aorta: Toward Patient-Specific Modeling of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 10(5), pp. 689–699. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Reeps, C. , Maier, A. , Pelisek, J. , Härtl, F. , Grabher-Meier, V. , Wall, W. A. , Essler, M. , Eckstein, H. H. , and Gee, M. W. , 2013, “ Measuring and Modeling Patient-Specific Distributions of Material Properties in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall,” Biomech. Mode1l. Mechanobiol., 12(4), pp. 717–733. [CrossRef]
Agrawal, V. , Kollimada, S. A. , Byju, A. G. , and Gundiah, N. , 2013, “ Regional Variations in the Nonlinearity and Anisotropy of Bovine Aortic Elastin,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 12(6), pp. 1181–1194. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Horný, L. , Netušil, M. , and Voňavková, T. , 2013, “ Axial Prestretch and Circumferential Distensibility in Biomechanics of Abdominal Aorta,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 13(4), pp. 783–799. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kamenskiy, A. V. , Dzenis, Y. A. , Kazmi, S. A. J. , Pemberton, M. A. , Pipinos, I. I. , Phillips, N. Y. , Herber, K. , Woodford, T. , Bowen, R. E. , Lomneth, C. S. , and MacTaggart, J. N. , 2014, “ Biaxial Mechanical Properties of the Human Thoracic and Abdominal Aorta, Common Carotid, Subclavian, Renal and Common Iliac Arteries,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 13(6), pp. 1341–1359. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tonar, Z. , Kochova, P. , Cimrman, R. , Perktold, J. , and Witter, K. , 2015, “ Segmental Differences in the Orientation of Smooth Muscle Cells in the Tunica Media of Porcine Aortae,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 14(2), pp. 315–332. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ferruzzi, J. , Vorp, D. A. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2011, “ On Constitutive Descriptors of the Biaxial Mechanical Behaviour of Human Abdominal Aorta and Aneurysms,” J. R. Soc. Interface, 8(56), pp. 435–450. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Roccabianca, S. , Figueroa, C. A. , Tellides, G. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2013, “ Quantification of Regional Differences in Aortic Stiffness in the Aging Human,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 29, pp. 618–634. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vande Geest, J. P. , Sacks, M. S. , and Vorp, D. A. , 2004, “ Age Dependency of the Biaxial Biomechanical Behavior of Human Abdominal Aorta,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 126(6), pp. 815–822. [CrossRef]
García-Herrera, C. M. , Celentano, D. J. , Cruchaga, M. A. , Rojo, F. J. , Atienza, J. M. , Guinea, G. V. , and Goicolea, J. M. , 2012, “ Mechanical Characterisation of the Human Thoracic Descending Aorta: Experiments and Modelling,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 15(2), pp. 185–193. [CrossRef]
Genovese, K. , Lee, Y. U. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2011, “ Novel Optical System for In Vitro Quantification of Full Surface Strain Fields in Small Arteries—I: Theory and Design,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 14(3), pp. 213–225. [CrossRef]
Genovese, K. , Lee, Y. U. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2011, “ Novel Optical System for In Vitro Quantification of Full Surface Strain Fields in Small Arteries—II: Correction for Refraction and Illustrative Results,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 14(3), pp. 227–237. [CrossRef]
Holzapfel, G. A. , Gasser, T. C. , and Ogden, R. W. , 2000, “ A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models,” J. Elast., 61(1), pp. 1–48. [CrossRef]
Humphrey, J. D. , 2002, Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues and Organs, Springer, New York.
Han, H. C. , 2007, “ A Biomechanical Model of Artery Buckling,” J. Biomech., 40(16), pp. 3672–3678. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Watton, P. N. , and Hill, N. A. , 2009, “ Evolving Mechanical Properties of a Model of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 8(1), pp. 25–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wilson, J. S. , Baek, S. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2013, “ Parametric Study of Effects of Collagen Turnover on the Natural History of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms,” Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 469(2150), p. 20120556. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Maier, A. , Gee, M. W. , Reeps, C. , Eckstein, H. H. , and Wall, W. A. , 2010, “ Impact of Calcifications on Patient-Specific Wall Stress Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 9(5), pp. 511–521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Roccabianca, S. , Ateshian, G. A. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2014, “ Biomechanical Roles of Medial Pooling of Glycosaminoglycans in Thoracic Aortic Dissection,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 13(1), pp. 13–25. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Overview of the p-DIC system. (a) Components include a syringe pump (1), pressure monitor (2), pressure transducer (3), and tubing (4) for pressure control. A 45 deg conical mirror (5) is located within a specimen bath (6) and mounted atop a small kinematic mount (7) that is attached to a three-axis translational stage (8). An annular light source (9) is used for illumination. The digital camera (10) is mounted vertically above the sample on a rotational stage (11) via a large kinematic mount (12) and custom translational stage (13). Images are acquired and sent to the computer for analysis through a camera link cable (14), and the entire system is placed on a precision optical bench (15). (b) Top-view of 45 deg conical mirror inside of the specimen bath showing the speckle pattern on the measurement surface (1) and the calibration target (2) used for 3D reconstruction. (c) Schematic of the cannulation of a pressure-distended specimen showing different gauge needles, locations of fixed and sliding ends, and methods to pressurize and axially stretch the specimen. (d) Loading protocol used for mechanical testing: for each axial stretch (bold solid line; right scale), the sample underwent two cycles of preconditioning followed by a stepwise increase in pressure from 10 to 140 mmHg in 10 mmHg increments (thin solid line; left scale for pressure).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Spatial distribution of the coefficients of determination. Goodness-of-fit for (a) specimen A and (b) specimen B. Both panels show outputs from a modified branch splitting algorithm to highlight regions of influence due to specimen branches (1–4). The results are shown in both a 3D (left) and 2D (right) representation over the entire surface of each sample. Boundaries of both low mean curvature (solid enclosed regions) and regions of branch influence (dashed ellipses) are overlaid in the 2D representation to show localization with regions of low Rn2*.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Histogram distributions of identified material parameters. The results from the identification procedure are shown for cne (first row), cnm (second row), cnc (third row), cna (fourth row), and βnc (fifth row) for both sample A (S-A, black bars) and sample B (S-B, white bars). All the identified parameters are spatially varying. The results are also shown by region: ventral-top (first column), dorsal-top (second column), ventral-bottom (third column), and dorsal-bottom (fourth column). The gray bars indicate overlapping results for the two samples.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Spatial distribution of strain energy. The strain energy density was computed (Eq. (3)) using the identified material properties over the surface of ((a) and (b)) sample A and ((c) and (d)) sample B. The results are shown for two loaded configurations: ((a) and (c)) P(t) = 80 mmHg at λz(t) = λ0 and ((b) and (d)) P(t) = 140 mmHg at λz(t) = λ0. (e) Histograms show the spatial distributions in each quadrant for both samples (cf. Fig. 3).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Spatial distribution of biaxial material stiffness. The biaxial material stiffness was computed using the identified material parameters over the surface of ((a) and (b)) sample A and ((c) and (d)) sample B. The results are shown for ((a) and (c)) circumferential (C1111) and ((b) and (d)) axial (C2222) stiffness evaluated at a loaded configuration of P(t) = 100 mmHg and λz(t) = λ0. Regions of influence due to branches (dashed lines) are overlaid to show localization near regions of high stiffness. (e) Histograms show spatial distributions in each quadrant for both samples (cf. Fig. 3).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of p-DIC and standard biaxial results. The reconstructed pressure–radius (left) and circumferential stress–stretch (right) behaviors for (a) sample A and (b) sample B were compared to standard biaxial testing results (black circles). Local responses are compared for locations with an R2* value above 0.95 (light-gray) and 0.99 (dark-gray). Comparison is shown only for data collected at λz(t) = λ0, for clarity.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In