0
Review Article

Structure and Management of an Engineering Senior Design Course

[+] Author and Article Information
Martin L. Tanaka

Department of Engineering and Technology,
Western Carolina University,
Cullowhee, NC 28723
e-mail: mtanaka@wcu.edu

Kenneth J. Fischer

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Kansas,
Lawrence, KS 66045

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received November 2, 2015; final manuscript received May 1, 2016; published online June 7, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Kristen Billiar.

J Biomech Eng 138(7), 070802 (Jun 07, 2016) (6 pages) Paper No: BIO-15-1549; doi: 10.1115/1.4033583 History: Received November 02, 2015; Revised May 01, 2016

The design of products and processes is an important area in engineering. Students in engineering schools learn fundamental principles in their courses but often lack an opportunity to apply these methods to real-world problems until their senior year. This article describes important elements that should be incorporated into a senior capstone design course. It includes a description of the general principles used in engineering design and a discussion of why students often have difficulty with application and revert to trial and error methods. The structure of a properly designed capstone course is dissected and its individual components are evaluated. Major components include assessing resources, identifying projects, establishing teams, understanding requirements, developing conceptual designs, creating detailed designs, building prototypes, testing performance, and final presentations. In addition to the course design, team management and effective mentoring are critical to success. This article includes suggested guidelines and tips for effective design team leadership, attention to detail, investment of time, and managing project scope. Furthermore, the importance of understanding business culture, displaying professionalism, and considerations of different types of senior projects is discussed. Through a well-designed course and proper mentoring, students will learn to apply their engineering skills and gain basic business knowledge that will prepare them for entry-level positions in industry.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2015, “ Mechanical Engineers,” U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC, http://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/mechanical-engineers.htm
NSF, 2012, “ National Medal of Science 50th Anniversary—Theodore von Kármán (1881-1963),” National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/medalofscience50/vonkarman.jsp
Oakes, W. C. , Leone, L. L. , Gunn, C. J. , Dilworth, J. , and Gruender, J. L. , 2012, Engineering Your Future: A Brief Introduction to Engineering, Oxford University Press, New York.
Zytner, R. , Donald, J. , Gordon, K. , Clemmer, R. , and Thompson, J. , 2015, “ Using Rubrics in a Capstone Engineering Design Course,” Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference (CEEA15), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, May 31–June 3.
Thigpen, L. , Glakpe, E. , Gomes, G. , and McCloud, T. , 2004, “ A Model for Teaching Multidisciplinary Capstone Design in Mechanical Engineering,” 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE 2004), Howard University, Washington, DC, Oct. 20–23, pp. S2G-1–S2G-6.
Edwards, S. H. , 2014, “ Work-in-Progress: Program Grading and Feedback Generation With Web-CAT,” First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference (L@S '14), Atlanta, GA, Mar. 4–5, pp. 215–216.
Cooper, R. G. , 2008, “ Perspective: The Stage-Gate (R) Idea-to-Launch Process-Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems,” J. Prod. Innovation Manage., 25(3), pp. 213–232. [CrossRef]
Leithold, N. , Haase, H. , and Lautenschläger, A. , 2015, “ Stage-Gate®for SMEs: A Qualitative Study in Germany,” Eur. J. Innovation Manage., 18(2), pp. 130–149. [CrossRef]
Chao, R. O. , Lichtendahl, K. C. , and Grushka-Cockayne, Y. , 2014, “ Incentives in a Stage-Gate Process,” Prod. Oper. Manage., 23(8), pp. 1286–1298. [CrossRef]
Hotaling, N. , Fasse, B. B. , Bost, L. F. , Hermann, C. D. , and Forest, C. R. , 2012, “ A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course,” J. Eng. Educ., 101(4), pp. 630–656. [CrossRef]
Moreno, V. , and Barber, T. , “ Organization and Management of an Industry Sponsored Capstone Senior Design Course,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2014-39296.
Dym, C. L. , 2004, “ Design, Systems, and Engineering Education,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 20(3), pp. 305–312.
Ohland, M. W. , Loughry, M. L. , Woehr, D. J. , Finelli, C. J. , Bullard, L. G. , Felder, R. M. , Layton, R. A. , Pomeranz, H. R. , and Schmucker, D. G. , 2012, “ The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation,” Acad. Manage. Learn. Educ., 11(4), pp. 609–630. [CrossRef]
Graham, M. , Slocum, A. , and Sanehez, R. M. , 2007, “ Teaching High School Students and College Freshmen Product Development by Deterministic Design With PREP,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(7), pp. 677–681. [CrossRef]
Lemons, G. , Carberry, A. , Swan, C. , Rogers, C. , and Jarvin, L. , 2010, “ The Benefits of Model Building in Teaching Engineering Design,” Des. Stud., 31(3), pp. 288–309. [CrossRef]
Bankert, E. A. , and Amdur, R. J. , 2009, Institutional Review Board: Management and Function, Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, MA.
Ward, T. A. , 2013, “ Common Elements of Capstone Projects in the World's Top-Ranked Engineering Universities,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., 38(2), pp. 211–218. [CrossRef]
Niewoehner, R. J. , and Steidle, C. E. , 2009, “ The Loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia: Portaging Leadership Lessons With a Critical Thinking Model,” Eng. Manage. J., 21(1), pp. 9–18. [CrossRef]
Lave, J. , 1982, “ A Comparative Approach to Educational Forms and Learning Processes,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., 13(2), pp. 181–187. [CrossRef]
Bruni, F. , 2015, “ The Myth of Quality Time,” The New York Times, New York, accessed May 9, 2015, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/06/opinion/sunday/frank-bruni-the-myth-of-quality-time.html

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Engineering students testing a functional electrical stimulation bicycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

General structure of a senior design course

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Considerations for good team management and mentoring

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In