Research Papers

Multisegment Kinematics of the Spinal Column: Soft Tissue Artifacts Assessment

[+] Author and Article Information
Sara Mahallati

Institute of Biomaterials
and Biomedical Engineering,
University of Toronto,
164 College Street,
Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada;
Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory,
Lyndhurst Centre,
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute—University Health Network,
520 Sutherland Drive,
Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada
e-mail: sara.mahallati@mail.utoronto.ca

Hossein Rouhani

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
10-368 Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering,
University of Alberta,
Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada

Richard Preuss

School of Physical
and Occupational Therapy,
McGill University,
3630 Promenade Sir-William-Osler,
Montreal, QC H3G 1Y5, Canada;
The Constance Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre
site of the Centre de Recherche
Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation (CRIR),
7005 Boulevard de Maisonneuve Ouest,
Montreal, QC H4B 1T3, Canada

Kei Masani, Milos R. Popovic

Institute of Biomaterials
and Biomedical Engineering,
University of Toronto,
164 College Street,
Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada;
Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory,
Lyndhurst Centre,
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute—University
Health Network,
520 Sutherland Drive,
Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received September 8, 2015; final manuscript received February 16, 2016; published online June 7, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Pasquale Vena.

J Biomech Eng 138(7), 071003 (Jun 07, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: BIO-15-1443; doi: 10.1115/1.4033545 History: Received September 08, 2015; Revised February 16, 2016

A major challenge in the assessment of intersegmental spinal column angles during trunk motion is the inherent error in recording the movement of bony anatomical landmarks caused by soft tissue artifacts (STAs). This study aims to perform an uncertainty analysis and estimate the typical errors induced by STA into the intersegmental angles of a multisegment spinal column model during trunk bending in different directions by modeling the relative displacement between skin-mounted markers and actual bony landmarks during trunk bending. First, we modeled the maximum displacement of markers relative to the bony landmarks with a multivariate Gaussian distribution. In order to estimate the distribution parameters, we measured these relative displacements on five subjects at maximum trunk bending posture. Then, in order to model the error depending on trunk bending angle, we assumed that the error grows linearly as a function of the bending angle. Second, we applied our error model to the trunk motion measurement of 11 subjects to estimate the corrected trajectories of the bony landmarks and investigate the errors induced into the intersegmental angles of a multisegment spinal column model. For this purpose, the trunk was modeled as a seven-segment rigid-body system described using 23 reflective markers placed on various bony landmarks of the spinal column. Eleven seated subjects performed trunk bending in five directions and the three-dimensional (3D) intersegmental angles during trunk bending were calculated before and after error correction. While STA minimally affected the intersegmental angles in the sagittal plane (<16%), it considerably corrupted the intersegmental angles in the coronal (error ranged from 59% to 551%) and transverse (up to 161%) planes. Therefore, we recommend using the proposed error suppression technique for STA-induced error compensation as a tool to achieve more accurate spinal column kinematics measurements. Particularly, for intersegmental rotations in the coronal and transverse planes that have small range and are highly sensitive to measurement errors, the proposed technique makes the measurement more appropriate for use in clinical decision-making processes.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Scholtes, S. A. , Gombatto, S. P. , and Van Dillen, L. R. , 2009, “ Differences in Lumbopelvic Motion Between People With and People Without Low Back Pain During Two Lower Limb Movement Tests,” Clin. Biomech., 24(1), pp. 7–12. [CrossRef]
Engsberg, J. R. , Bridwell, K. H. , Wagner, J. M. , Uhrich, M. L. , Blanke, K. , and Lenke, L. G. , 2003, “ Gait Changes as the Result of Deformity Reconstruction Surgery in a Group of Adults With Lumbar Scoliosis,” Spine, 28(16), pp. 1836–1843. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Garrido-Castro, J. L. , Medina-Carnicer, R. , Schiottis, R. , Galisteo, A. M. , Collantes-Estevez, E. , and Gonzalez-Navas, C. , 2013, “ Assessment of Spinal Mobility in Ankylosing Spondylitis Using a Video-Based Motion Capture System,” Man. Ther., 17(5), pp. 422–426.
Lan, H. H. , Chen, H. , Kuo, L. , You, J. , Li, W. , and Wu, S. , 2014, “ The Shift of Segmental Contribution Ratio in Patients With Herniated Disc During Cervical Lateral Bending,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disord., 15(1), p. 273. [CrossRef]
Lundgren, P. , Nester, C. , Liu, A. , Arndt, A. , Jones, R. , Stacoff, A. , Wolf, P. , and Lundberg, A. , 2008, “ Invasive In Vivo Measurement of Rear-, Mid- and Forefoot Motion During Walking,” Gait Posture, 28(1), pp. 93–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rozumalski, A. , Schwartz, M. H. , Wervey, R. , Swanson, A. , Dykes, D. C. , and Novacheck, T. , 2008, “ The In Vivo Three-Dimensional Motion of the Human Lumbar Spine During Gait,” Gait Posture, 28(3), pp. 378–384. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Passias, P. G. , Wang, S. , Kozanek, M. , Xia, Q. , Li, W. , Grottkau, B. , Wood, K. B. , and Li, G. , 2011, “ Segmental Lumbar Rotation in Patients With Discogenic Low Back Pain During Functional Weight-Bearing Activities,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol., 93(1), pp. 29–37. [CrossRef]
Zemp, R. , List, R. , Gülay, T. , Elsig, J. P. , Naxera, J. , Taylor, W. R. , and Lorenzetti, S. , 2014, “ Soft Tissue Artefacts of the Human Back: Comparison of the Sagittal Curvature of the Spine Measured Using Skin Markers and an Open Upright MRI,” PLoS One, 9(4), p. e95426. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Konz, R. J. , Fatone, S. , Stine, R. L. , Ganju, A. , Gard, S. A. , and Ondra, S. L. , 2006, “ A Kinematic Model to Assess Spinal Motion During Walking,” Spine, 31(24), pp. E898–E906. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Croce, U. D. , Leardini, A. , Chiari, L. , and Cappozzo, A. , 2005, “ Human Movement Analysis Using Stereophotogrammetry: Part 4: Assessment of Anatomical Landmark Misplacement and Its Effects on Joint Kinematics,” Gait Posture, 21(2), pp. 226–237. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Leardini, A. , Chiari, L. , Croce, U. D. , and Cappozzo, A. , 2005, “ Human Movement Analysis Using Stereophotogrammetry: Part 3: Soft Tissue Artifact Assessment and Compensation,” Gait Posture, 21(2), pp. 212–225. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vette, A. H. , Yoshida, T. , Thrasher, T. A. , Masani, K. , and Popovic, M. R. , 2012, “ A Comprehensive Three-Dimensional Dynamic Model of the Human Head and Trunk for Estimating Lumbar and Cervical Joint Torques and Forces From Upper Body Kinematics,” Med. Eng. Phys., 34(5), pp. 640–649. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rouhani, H. , Mahallati, S. , Preuss, R. , Masani, K. , and Popovic, M. R. , 2015, “ Sensitivity of Intersegmental Angles of the Spinal Column to Errors Due to Marker Misplacement,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 137(7), p. 074502. [CrossRef]
Fuller, J. , Liu, L. J. , Murphy, M. C. , and Mann, R. W. , 1997, “ A Comparison of Lower-Extremity Skeletal Kinematics Measured Using Skin- and Pin- Mounted Markers,” Hum. Mov. Sci., 16(2–3), pp. 219–242. [CrossRef]
Manal, K. , McClay, I. , Richards, J. , Galinat, B. , and Stanhope, S. , 2002, “ Knee Moment Profiles During Walking: Errors Due to Soft Tissue Movement of the Shank and the Influence of the Reference Coordinate System,” Gait Posture, 15(1), pp. 10–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Reinschmidt, C. , van den Bogert, A. J. , Lundberg, A. , Nigg, B. M. , Murphy, N. , Stacoff, A. , and Stano, A. , 1997, “ Tibiofemoral and Tibiocalcaneal Motion During Walking: External vs. Skeletal Markers,” Gait Posture, 6(2), pp. 98–109. [CrossRef]
Tranberg, R. , and Karlsson, D. , 1998, “ The Relative Skin Movement of the Foot: A 2D Roentgen Photogrammetry Study,” Clin. Biomech., 13(1), pp. 71–76. [CrossRef]
Taylor, W. R. , Ehrig, R. M. , Duda, G. N. , Schell, H. , Seebeck, P. , and Heller, M. O. , 2005, “ On the Influence of Soft Tissue Coverage in the Determination of Bone Kinematics Using Skin Markers,” J. Orthop. Res., 23(4), pp. 726–734. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Okita, N. , Meyers, S. A. , Challis, J. H. , and Sharkey, N. A. , 2009, “ An Objective Evaluation of a Segmented Foot Model,” Gait Posture, 30(1), pp. 27–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Matsui, K. , Shimada, K. , and Andrew, P. D. , 2006, “ Deviation of Skin Marker From Bone Target During Movement of the Scapula,” J. Orthop. Sci., 11(2), pp. 180–184. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mörl, F. , and Blickhan, R. , 2006, “ Three-Dimensional Relation of Skin Markers to Lumbar Vertebrae of Healthy Subjects in Different Postures Measured by Open MRI,” Eur. Spine J., 15(6), pp. 742–751. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cappozzo, A. , Catani, F. , Leardini, A. , Benedetti, M. G. , and Croce, U. D. , 1996, “ Position and Orientation in Space of Bones During Movement: Experimental Artefacts,” Clin. Biomech., 11(2), pp. 90–100. [CrossRef]
Stagni, R. , Fantozzi, S. , Cappello, A. , and Leardini, A. , 2005, “ Quantification of Soft Tissue Artefact in Motion Analysis by Combining 3D Fluoroscopy and Stereophotogrammetry: A Study on Two Subjects,” Clin. Biomech., 20(3), pp. 320–329. [CrossRef]
Cappello, A. , Stagni, R. , Fantozzi, S. , and Leardini, A. , 2005, “ Soft Tissue Artifact Compensation in Knee Kinematics by Double Anatomical Landmark Calibration: Performance of a Novel Method During Selected Motor Tasks,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 52(6), pp. 992–998. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cappello, A. , Cappozzo, A. , La Palombara, P. F. , Lucchetti, L. , and Leardini, A. , 1997, “ Multiple Anatomical Landmark Calibration for Optimal Bone Pose Estimation,” Hum. Mov. Sci., 16(2), pp. 259–274. [CrossRef]
Preuss, R. A. , and Popovic, M. R. , 2010, “ Three-Dimensional Spine Kinematics During Multidirectional, Target-Directed Trunk Movement in Sitting,” J. Electromyography Kinesiology, 20(5), pp. 823–832. [CrossRef]
Wu, G. , and Cavanagh, P. R. , 1995, “ ISB Recommendations for Standardization in the Reporting of Kinematic Data,” J. Biomech., 28(10), pp. 1257–1261. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wu, G. , Siegler, S. , Allard, P. , Kirtley, C. , Leardini, A. , and Rosenbaum, D. S. , 2002, “ ISB Recommendation on Definitions of Joint Coordinate System of Various Joints for the Reporting of Human Joint Motion—Part I: Ankle, Hip, and Spine,” J. Biomech., 35(4), pp. 543–548. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Grood, E. , and Suntay, W. , 1983, “ A Joint Coordinate System for the Clinical Description of Three-Dimensional Motions: Application to the Knee,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 105(2), pp. 136–144. [CrossRef]
Besier, T. F. , Sturnieks, D. L. , Alderson, J. A. , and Lloyd, D. G. , 2003, “ Repeatability of Gait Data Using a Functional Hip Joint Centre and a Mean Helical Knee Axis,” J. Biomech., 36(8), pp. 1159–1168. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cerveri, P. , Pedotti, A. , and Ferrigno, G. , 2005, “ Kinematical Models to Reduce the Effect of Skin Artifacts on Marker-Based Human Motion Estimation,” J. Biomech., 38(11), pp. 2228–2236. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schwartz, M. H. , Trost, J. P. , and Wervey, R. A. , 2004, “ Measurement and Management of Errors in Quantitative Gait Data,” Gait Posture, 20(2), pp. 196–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Double-static bony landmark calibration procedure: A representative triad of bony landmarks (denoted by  b1,2,3) for each segment was palpated. These locations were marked (denoted by  m1,2,3) in both upright sitting and maximum bending posture. The skin-mounted marker displacement with respect to the underlying bony landmark (denoted by MaxDb−m), hence, would be the difference in the two marked locations. This procedure is repeated for all bony landmarks.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Flowchart diagram of modeling the relative movement between skin-mounted markers and the underlying bony landmarks and applying it to the recorded marker trajectories to compensate for errors due to STAs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The multisegment model of the spinal column (a) placement of five targets for bending in five directions: Left (L), AL, anterior (A), AR, right (R). (b) The bending task to reach each target was such that the trunk made a 45 deg angle with respect to the upright sitting posture.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Kinematic model of the seven-segment spinal column model. Segments superior (rostral) to inferior (caudal): UT, MUT, MLT, LT, UL, LL, and SC segments. The bony anatomical landmarks in each segment were: (i) seventh cervical vertebra (C7), (ii) third thoracic vertebra (T3), (iii) sixth thoracic vertebra (T6), (iv) ninth thoracic vertebra (T9), (v) 12th thoracic vertebra (T12), (vi) third lumbar vertebra (L3), (vii) first sacral vertebra (S1) which is approximately the midpoint between and the left and right IC, and (viii) the midpoint between the left and right PSISs.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In