Technical Brief

A Geodesics-Based Surface Parameterization to Assess Aneurysm Progression

[+] Author and Article Information
Ly Phan

Design and Technology Solutions,
Intel Corporation (MS RA4-403),
2501 NW 229th,
Hillsboro, OR 97124
e-mail: ly.phan@intel.com

Katherine Courchaine

Biomedical Engineering,
Oregon Health & Science University,
3303 SW Bond Avenue,
M/C CH13B,
Portland, OR 97239
e-mail: courchai@ohsu.edu

Amir Azarbal

Department of Surgery,
Division of Vascular Surgery,
Oregon Health & Science University,
3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road,
Portland, OR 97239
e-mail: azarbala@ohsu.edu

David Vorp

Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
Suite 300 Center for Bioengineering (CNBIO),
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
e-mail: vorp@pitt.edu

Cindy Grimm

Mechanical Engineering,
Oregon State University,
204 Rogers Hall
Corvallis, OR 97331
e-mail: grimmc@onid.orst.edu

Sandra Rugonyi

Biomedical Engineering,
Oregon Health & Science University,
3303 SW Bond Avenue,
M/C CH13B,
Portland, OR 97239
e-mail: rugonyis@ohsu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received March 31, 2015; final manuscript received March 9, 2016; published online April 1, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Thao (Vicky) Nguyen.

J Biomech Eng 138(5), 054503 (Apr 01, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: BIO-15-1136; doi: 10.1115/1.4033082 History: Received March 31, 2015; Revised March 09, 2016

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) intervention and surveillance is currently based on maximum transverse diameter, even though it is recognized that this might not be the best strategy. About 10% of patients with small AAA transverse diameters, for whom intervention is not considered, still rupture; while patients with large AAA transverse diameters, for whom intervention would have been recommended, have stable aneurysms that do not rupture. While maximum transverse diameter is easy to measure and track in clinical practice, one of its main drawbacks is that it does not represent the whole AAA and rupture seldom occurs in the region of maximum transverse diameter. By following maximum transverse diameter alone clinicians are missing information on the shape change dynamics of the AAA, and clues that could lead to better patient care. We propose here a method to register AAA surfaces that were obtained from the same patient at different time points. Our registration method could be used to track the local changes of the patient-specific AAA. To achieve registration, our procedure uses a consistent parameterization of the AAA surfaces followed by strain relaxation. The main assumption of our procedure is that growth of the AAA occurs in such a way that surface strains are smoothly distributed, while regions of small and large surface growth can be differentiated. The proposed methodology has the potential to unravel different patterns of AAA growth that could be used to stratify patient risks.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Patel, M. I. , Hardman, D. T. , Fisher, C. M. , and Appleberg, M. , 1995, “ Current Views on the Pathogenesis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms,” J. Am. Coll. Surg., 181, pp. 371–382. [PubMed]
Vorp, D. A. , and Vande Geest, J. P. , 2005, “ Biomechanical Determinants of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture,” Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 25(8), pp. 1558–1566. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cosford, P. A. , Leng, G. C. , and Thomas, J. , 2007, “ Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Collaboration, London, Paper No. CD002945.
Darling, R. C. , Messina, C. R. , Brewster, D. C. , and Ottinger, L. W. , 1977, “ Autopsy Study of Unoperated Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. The Case for Early Resection,” Circulation, 56(3Suppl), pp. 161–164.
Vorp, D. A. , 2007, “ Biomechanics of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm,” J. Biomech., 40(9), pp. 1887–1902. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Raghavan, M. L. , and Vorp, D. A. , 2000, “ Toward a Biomechanical Tool to Evaluate Rupture Potential of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Identification of a Finite Strain Constitutive Model and Evaluation of its Applicability,” J. Biomech., 33(4), pp. 475–482. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vande Geest, J. P. , Di Martino, E. S. , Bohra, A. , Makaroun, M. S. , and Vorp, D. A. , 2006, “ A Biomechanics-Based Rupture Potential Index for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risk Assessment,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1085(1), pp. 11–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Erhart, P. , Hyhlik-Dürr, A. , Geisbüsch, P. , Kotelis, D. , Müller-Eschner, M. , Gasser, T. C. , von Tengg-Kobligk, H. , and Böckler, D. , 2015, “ Finite Element Analysis in Asymptomatic, Symptomatic, and Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: In Search of New Rupture Risk Predictors,” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovascular Surg., 49(3), pp. 239–245. [CrossRef]
Gasser, T. C. , Auer, M. , Labruto, F. , Swedenborg, J. , and Roy, J. , 2010, “ Biomechanical Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Model Complexity Versus Predictability of Finite Element Simulations,” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovascular Surg., 40(2), pp. 176–185. [CrossRef]
Gasser, T. C. , Nchimi, A. , Swedenborg, J. , Roy, J. , Sakalihasan, N. , Böckler, D. , and Hyhlik-Dürr, A. , 2014, “ A Novel Strategy to Translate the Biomechanical Rupture Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms to Their Equivalent Diameter Risk: Method and Retrospective Validation,” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovascular Surg., 47(3), pp. 288–295. [CrossRef]
Polzer, S. , Gasser, T. C. , Swedenborg, J. , and Bursa, J. , 2011, “ The Impact of Intraluminal Thrombus Failure on the Mechanical Stress in the Wall of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms,” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovascular Surg., 41(4), pp. 467–473. [CrossRef]
Boyd, A. J. , Kuhn, D. C. S. , Lozowy, R. J. , and Kulbisky, G. P. , 2015, “ Low Wall Shear Stress Predominates at Sites of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture,” J. Vasc. Surg. (in press).
Fillinger, M. F. , Marra, S. P. , Raghavan, M. L. , and Kennedy, F. E. , 2003, “ Prediction of Rupture Risk in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm During Observation: Wall Stress Versus Diameter,” J. Vasc. Surg., 37(4), pp. 724–732. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cyron, C. J. , Wilson, J. S. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2014 “ Mechanobiological Stability: A New Paradigm to Understand the Enlargement of Aneurysms?,” J. R. Soc. Interface, 11(100), p. 20140680.
Humphrey, J. D. , and Holzapfel, G. A. , 2012, “ Mechanics, Mechanobiology, and Modeling of Human Abdominal Aorta and Aneurysms,” J. Biomech., 45(5), pp. 805–814. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Taber, L. A. , and Humphrey, J. D. , 2001, “ Stress-Modulated Growth, Residual Stress, and Vascular Heterogeneity,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 123(6), pp. 528–535. [CrossRef]
Di Martino, E. S. , Bohra, A. , Vande Geest, J. P. , Gupta, N. , Makaroun, M. S. , and Vorp, D. A. , 2006, “ Biomechanical Properties of Ruptured Versus Electively Repaired Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Tissue,” J. Vasc. Surg., 43(3), pp. 570–576. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Di Martino, E. S. , and Vorp, D. A. , 2003, “ Effect of Variation in Intraluminal Thrombus Constitutive Properties on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 31(7), pp. 804–809. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Doyle, B. J. , Callanan, A. , Grace, P. A. , and Kavanagh, E. G. , 2013, “ On the Influence of Patient-Specific Material Properties in Computational Simulations: A Case Study of a Large Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng., 29(2), pp. 150–164. [CrossRef]
Raghavan, M. L. , Kratzberg, J. , Castro de Tolosa, E. M. , Hanaoka, M. M. , Walker, P. , and da Silva, E. S. , 2006, “ Regional Distribution of Wall Thickness and Failure Properties of Human Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm,” J. Biomech., 39(16), pp. 3010–3016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Phan, L. , Rugonyi, S. , and Grimm, C. , “ Visualization Techniques for the Developing Chicken Heart,” e-print arXiv:abs/1509.08834.
Phan, L. , Grimm, C. , and Rugonyi, S. , 2015, “ Visualization Techniques for the Developing Chicken Heart,” 11th International Symposium in Advances in Visual Computing (ISVC 2015), Las Vegas, NV, Dec. 14–16, pp. 35–44.
Brown, B. J. , and Rusinkiewicz, S. , 2007, “ Global Non-Rigid Alignment of 3-D Scans,” ACM Trans. Graphics, 26(3), pp. 21–30. [CrossRef]
Liu, L. , Chambers, E. W. , Letscher, D. , and Ju, T. , 2010, “ A Simple and Robust Thinning Algorithm on Cell Complexes,” Comput. Graph. Forum, 29(7), pp. 2253–2260. [CrossRef]
Kirsanov, D. , 2004, “ Minimal Discrete Curves and Surfaces,” Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Phan, L. , Knutsen, A. K. , Bayly, P. V. , Rugonyi, S. , and Grimm, C. , 2011, “ Refining Shape Correspondence for Similar Objects Using Strain,” 4th Eurographics Conference on 3D Object Retrieval (3DOR2011), Eurographics Association, Llandudno, UK, Apr. 10, pp. 17–24.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

AAA surface parameterization strategy. The AAA surface parameterization consists of quasi cross-sectional contour curves and longitudinal lines that are discretized using a grid. The surface medial axis is shown in red and reference curve in orange. (a) Quasi cross-sectional contours were generated by intersection of slicing planes with the surface. Each contour is then discretized to generate n equally spaced sampling points. (b) Sampling points were generated on m contours over the entire surface. The grid consists of pki points with i = 1… n, k = 1… m, (c) Connecting the ith sampling points on each contour, the ith longitudinal grid curve is generated. (d) Completed parameterized grid.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Correspondence on the AAA surfaces between times T1 and T2. (a) Sagittal view of patient AAAs. (b) Frontal view of patient AAAs. The correspondence is obtained after parameterization and optimization of the parameterization. The plot shows correspondence of lines, with the reference line for each patient marked with an arrow. Note that longitudinal grid lines follow the global shape of the surfaces, and the reference line is the shortest longitudinal line for each patient.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Principal stretch components λ1 and λ2 on the AAA surfaces at T2 (with respect to T1) for the six patients. The gray scale reflects the minimum and maximum of λ1 and λ2 for each patient.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Relative surface area expansion (λ1 λ2) and surface expansion rates shown on AAA surfaces at time T2. Gray scale reflects the minimum and maximum relative areas, first on an individual basis (individual scale) and then for all patients (common scale).



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In