Technical Brief

Experimental Measurement of the Static Coefficient of Friction at the Ti–Ti Taper Connection in Total Hip Arthroplasty

[+] Author and Article Information
T. Bitter

Orthopaedic Research Laboratory,
Radboud University Medical Centre,
Geert grooteplein-zuid 10 (547),
Nijmegen 6500 HB,
The Netherlands
e-mail: Thom.Bitter@radboudumc.nl

I. Khan

Biomet UK Healthcare Ltd,
Murdock Road,
Dorcan Industrial Estate,
Swindon SN3 5HY, UK
e-mail: Imran.khan@biomet.com

T. Marriott

Biomet UK Healthcare Ltd,
Murdock Road,
Dorcan Industrial Estate,
Swindon SN3 5HY, UK
e-mail: Tim.marriott@biomet.com

B. W. Schreurs

Department of Orthopaedics,
Radboud University Medical Centre,
Nijmegen 6500 HB,
The Netherlands
e-mail: Wim.schreurs@radboudumc.nl

N. Verdonschot

Orthopaedic Research Laboratory,
Radboud University Medical Centre,
Geert grooteplein-zuid 10 (547),
Nijmegen 6500 HB,
The Netherlands
e-mail: Nico.Verdonschot@radboudumc.nl

D. Janssen

Orthopaedic Research Laboratory,
Radboud University Medical Centre,
Geert grooteplein-zuid 10 (547),
Nijmegen 6500 HB,
The Netherlands
e-mail: Dennis.Janssen@radboudumc.nl

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received July 9, 2015; final manuscript received December 23, 2015; published online January 29, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Michael Detamore.

J Biomech Eng 138(3), 034505 (Jan 29, 2016) (5 pages) Paper No: BIO-15-1339; doi: 10.1115/1.4032446 History: Received July 09, 2015; Revised December 23, 2015

The modular taper junction in total hip replacements has been implicated as a possible source of wear. The finite-element (FE) method can be used to study the wear potential at the taper junction. For such simulations it is important to implement representative contact parameters, in order to achieve accurate results. One of the main parameters in FE simulations is the coefficient of friction. However, in current literature, there is quite a wide spread in coefficient of friction values (0.15 − 0.8), which has a significant effect on the outcome of the FE simulations. Therefore, to obtain more accurate results, one should use a coefficient of friction that is determined for the specific material couple being analyzed. In this study, the static coefficient of friction was determined for two types of titanium-on-titanium stem-adaptor couples, using actual cut-outs of the final implants, to ensure that the coefficient of friction was determined consistently for the actual implant material and surface finish characteristics. Two types of tapers were examined, Biomet type-1 and 12/14, where type-1 has a polished surface finish and the 12/14 is a microgrooved system. We found static coefficients of friction of 0.19 and 0.29 for the 12/14 and type-1 stem-adaptor couples, respectively.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Langton, D. , Sidaginamale, R. , Lord, J. K. , Nargol, A. V. F. , and Joyce, T. , 2012, “ Taper Junction Failure in Large-Diameter Metal-on-Metal Bearings,” Bone Jt. Res., 1(4), pp. 56–63. [CrossRef]
Lavigne, M. , Belzile, E. L. , Roy, A. , Morin, F. , Amzica, T. , and Vendittoli, P.-A. , 2011, “ Comparison of Whole-Blood Metal Ion Levels in Four Types of Metal-on-Metal Large-Diameter Femoral Head Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Potential Influence of the Adapter Sleeve,” J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am., 93(Suppl. 2), pp. 128–136. [CrossRef]
Gilbert, J. L. , Buckley, C. A. , and Jacobs, J. J. , 1993, “ in vivo Corrosion of Modular Hip Prosthesis Components in Mixed and Similar Metal Combinations. The Effect of Crevice, Stress, Motion, and Alloy Coupling,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 27(12), pp. 1533–1544. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Delaunay, C. , Petit, I. , Learmonth, I. D. , Oger, P. , and Vendittoli, P. A. , 2010, “ Metal-on-Metal Bearings Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Cobalt and Chromium Ions Release Concern,” Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res., 96(8), pp. 894–904. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Donaldson, F. E. , Coburn, J. C. , and Siegel, K. L. , 2014, “ Total Hip Arthroplasty Head-Neck Contact Mechanics: A Stochastic Investigation of Key Parameters,” J. Biomech., 47(7), pp. 1634–1641. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pennock, A. T. , Schmidt, A. H. , and Bourgeault, C. A. , 2002, “ Morse-Type Tapers,” J. Arthroplasty, 17(6), pp. 773–778. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lavernia, C. J. , Baerga, L. , Barrack, R. L. , Tozakoglou, E. , Cook, S. D. , Lata, L. , and Rossi, M. D. , 2009, “ The Effects of Blood and Fat on Morse Taper Disassembly Forces,” Am. J. Orthop., 38(4), pp. 187–190. [PubMed]
Hothi, H. S. , Whittaker, R. K. , Meswania, J. M. , Blunn, G. , Skinner, J. A. , and Hart, A. J. , 2015, “ Influence of Stem Type on Material Loss at the Metal-on-Metal Pinnacle Taper Junction,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, 229(1), pp. 91–97. [CrossRef]
Munir, S. , Walter, W. L. , and Walsh, W. R. , 2015, “ Variations in the Trunnion Surface Topography Between Different Commercially Available Hip Replacement Stems,” J. Orthop. Res., 33(1), pp. 98–105. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Elkins, J. M. , Callaghan, J. J. , and Brown, T. D. , 2014, “ Stability and Trunnion Wear Potential in Large-Diameter Metal-on-Metal Total Hips: A Finite Element Analysis,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 472(2), pp. 529–542. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shareef, N. , and Levine, D. , 1996, “ Effect of Manufacturing Tolerances on the Micromotion at the Morse Taper Interface in Modular Hip Implants Using the Finite Element Technique,” Biomaterials, 17(6), pp. 623–630. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Baxmann, M. , Jauch, S. Y. , Schilling, C. , Blömer, W. , Grupp, T. M. , and Morlock, M. M. , 2013, “ The Influence of Contact Conditions and Micromotions on the Fretting Behavior of Modular Titanium Alloy Taper Connections,” Med. Eng. Phys., 35(5), pp. 676–683. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, T. , Harrison, N. M. , McDonnell, P. F. , McHugh, P. E. , and Leen, S. B. , 2013, “ Micro-Macro Wear-Fatigue of Modular Hip Implant Taper-Lock Coupling,” J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., 49(1), pp. 2–18. [CrossRef]
Chu, Y. , Elias, J. J. , Duda, G. N. , Frassica, F. J. , and Chao, E. Y. , 2000, “ Stress and Micromotion in the Taper Lock Joint of a Modular Segmental Bone Replacement Prosthesis,” J. Biomech., 33(9), pp. 1175–1179. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tang, C.-B. , Liul, S.-Y. , Zhou, G.-X. , Yu, J.-H. , Zhang, G.-D. , Bao, Y.-D. , and Wang, Q.-J. , 2012, “ Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Three Implant-Abutment Interface Designs,” Int. J. Oral Sci., 4(2), pp. 101–108. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Black, J. , 2005, Biological Performance of Materials: Fundamentals of Biocompatibility, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Parmley, R. O. , 1997, Standard Handbook of Fastening and Joining, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Mary, C. , and Fouvry, S. , 2007, “ Numerical Prediction of Fretting Contact Durability Using Energy Wear Approach: Optimisation of Finite-Element Model,” Wear, 263(1–6), pp. 444–450. [CrossRef]
Abdullah, K. , 2010, “ Study of Factors Affecting Taper Joint Failures in Modular Hip Implant Using Finite Element Modelling,” Modeling Simulation and Optimization: Focus on Application, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp. 121–134.
Swaminathan, V. , and Gilbert, J. L. , 2012, “ Fretting Corrosion of CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V Interfaces,” Biomaterials, 33(22), pp. 5487–5503. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Liu, F. , Leslie, I. , Williams, S. , Fisher, J. , and Jin, Z. , 2008, “ Development of Computational Wear Simulation of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Replacements,” J. Biomech., 41(3), pp. 686–694. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fessler, H. , and Fricker, D. C. , 1989, “ Friction in Femoral Prosthesis and Photoelastic Model Cone Taper Joints,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H., 203(1), pp. 1–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
van Beek, A. , 2006, Advanced Engineering Design, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
Rubenstein, C. , 1956, “ A General Theory of the Surface Friction of Solids,” Proc. Phys. Soc., 69(9), pp. 921–933. [CrossRef]
Swaminathan, V. , and Gilbert, J. L. , 2013, “ Potential and Frequency Effects on Fretting Corrosion of Ti6Al4V and CoCrMo Surfaces,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 101(9), pp. 2602–2612. [CrossRef]
McColl, I. , Ding, J. , and Leen, S. B. , 2004, “ Finite Element Simulation and Experimental Validation of Fretting Wear,” Wear, 256(11–12), pp. 1114–1127. [CrossRef]
Bergmann, G. , Deuretzbacher, G. , Heller, M. , Graichen, F. , Rohlmann, A. , Strauss, J. , and Duda, G. N. , 2001, “ Hip Contact Forces and Gait Patterns From Routine Activities,” J. Biomech., 34(7), pp. 859–871. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Taper types: left type-1, right 12/14

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Cut out parts used in the experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Coefficient of friction for type-1 and 12/14 at different contact pressures (*=p < 0.01)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Ra (average surface roughness) before and after loading, measured using Proscan 2100 noncontact profilometer according to ISO 4288:1996

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Taper profile 12/14 before and after loading, measured using Proscan 2100 noncontact profilometer according to ISO 4288:1996

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

SEM images, left before loading right after loading. Top two rows T1 stem and adaptor, bottom two rows 12/14 stem and adaptor.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In