0
Research Papers

Rotational Stiffness of American Football Shoes Affects Ankle Biomechanics and Injury Severity

[+] Author and Article Information
Keith D. Button

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratories,
Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: buttonke@msu.edu

Jerrod E. Braman

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratories,
Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: bramanj1@msu.edu

Mark A. Davison

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratories,
Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: daviso29@msu.edu

Feng Wei

Assistant Professor
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratories,
Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: weifeng@msu.edu

Maureen C. Schaeffer

Assistant Professor
College of Human Medicine,
Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: Maureen.Schaefer@rad.msu.edu

Roger C. Haut

University Distinguished Professor
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratories,
Michigan State University,
East Lansing, MI 48824
e-mail: haut@msu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received June 20, 2014; final manuscript received February 20, 2015; published online March 23, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Kenneth Fischer.

J Biomech Eng 137(6), 061004 (Jun 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: BIO-14-1281; doi: 10.1115/1.4029979 History: Received June 20, 2014; Revised February 20, 2015; Online March 23, 2015

While previous studies have investigated the effect of shoe–surface interaction on injury risk, few studies have examined the effect of rotational stiffness of the shoe. The hypothesis of the current study was that ankles externally rotated to failure in shoes with low rotational stiffness would allow more talus eversion than those in shoes with a higher rotational stiffness, resulting in less severe injury. Twelve (six pairs) cadaver lower extremities were externally rotated to gross failure while positioned in 20 deg of pre-eversion and 20 deg of predorsiflexion by fixing the distal end of the foot, axially loading the proximal tibia, and internally rotating the tibia. One ankle in each pair was constrained by an American football shoe with a stiff upper, while the other was constrained by an American football shoe with a flexible upper. Experimental bone motions were input into specimen-specific computational models to examine levels of ligament elongation to help understand mechanisms of ankle joint failure. Ankles in flexible shoes allowed 6.7±2.4 deg of talus eversion during rotation, significantly greater than the 1.7±1.0 deg for ankles in stiff shoes (p = 0.01). The significantly greater eversion in flexible shoes was potentially due to a more natural response of the ankle during rotation, possibly affecting the injuries that were produced. All ankles failed by either medial ankle injury or syndesmotic injury, or a combination of both. Complex (more than one ligament or bone) injuries were noted in 4 of 6 ankles in stiff shoes and 1 of 6 ankles in flexible shoes. Ligament elongations from the computational model validated the experimental injury data. The current study suggested flexibility (or rotational stiffness) of the shoe may play an important role in both the severity of ankle injuries for athletes.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Waterman, B. R., Belmont, P. J., Jr., Cameron, K. L., Svoboda, S. J., Alitz, C. J., and Owens, B. D., 2011, “Risk Factors for Syndesmotic and Medial Ankle Sprain Role of Sex, Sport, and Level of Competition,” Am. J. Sports Med., 39(5), pp. 992–998. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Williams, G. N., Jones, M. H., and Amendola, A., 2007, “Syndesmotic Ankle Sprains in Athletes,” Am. J. Sports Med., 35(7), pp. 1197–1207. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Haraguchi, N., and Armiger, R. S., 2009, “A New Interpretation of the Mechanism of Ankle Fracture,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol., 91A(4), pp. 821–829. [CrossRef]
Laugehansen, N., 1950, “Fractures of the Ankle,” Arch. Surg., 60(5), pp. 957–985. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gerber, J. P., Williams, G. N., Scoville, C. R., Arciero, R. A., and Taylor, D. C., 1998, “Persistent Disability Associated With Ankle Sprains: A Prospective Examination of an Athletic Population,” Foot Ankle Int., 19(10), pp. 653–660. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fallat, L., Grimm, D. J., and Saracco, J. A., 1998, “Sprained Ankle Syndrome: Prevalence and Analysis of 639 Acute Injuries,” J. Foot Ankle Surg., 37(4), pp. 280–285. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Boytim, M. J., Fischer, D. A., and Neumann, L., 1991, “Syndesmotic Ankle Sprains,” Am. J. Sports Med., 19(3), pp. 294–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wolfe, M. W., Uhl, T. L., Mattacola, C. G., and McCluskey, L. C., 2001, “Management of Ankle Sprains,” Am. Fam. Physician, 64(3), pp. 93–104.
Norkus, S. A., and Floyd, R. T., 2001, “The Anatomy and Mechanisms of Syndesmotic Ankle Sprains,” J. Athletic Train., 36(1), pp. 68–73.
Wei, F., Post, J. M., Braman, J. E., Meyer, E. G., Powell, J. W., and Haut, R. C., 2012, “Eversion During External Rotation of the Human Cadaver Foot Produces High Ankle Sprains,” J. Orthop. Res., 30(9), pp. 1423–1429. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dattani, R., Patnaik, S., Kantak, A., Srikanth, B., and Selvan, T. P., 2008, “Injuries to the Tibiofibular Syndesmosis,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. Vol., 90B(4), pp. 405–410. [CrossRef]
Peltz, C. D., Haladik, J. A., Hoffman, S. E., McDonald, M., Ramo, N. L., Divine, G., Nurse, M., and Bey, M. J., 2014, “Effects of Footwear on Three-Dimensional Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joint Motion During Running,” J. Biomech., 47(11), pp. 2647–2653. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bonacci, J., Saunders, P. U., Hicks, A., Rantalainen, T., Vicenzino, B. T., and Spratford, W., 2013, “Running in a Minimalist and Lightweight Shoe is Not the Same as Running Barefoot: A Biomechanical Study,” Br. J. Sports Med., 47(6), pp. 387–392. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Williams, D. S. B., III, Green, D. H., and Wurzinger, B., 2012, “Changes in Lower Extremity Movement and Power Absorption During Forefoot Striking and Barefoot Running,” Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther., 7(5), pp. 525–532. [PubMed]
Meyers, M. C., 2010, “Incidence, Mechanisms, and Severity of Game-Related College Football Injuries on FieldTurf Versus Natural Grass: A 3-Year Prospective Study,” Am. J. Sports Med., 38(4), pp. 687–697. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Villwock, M. R., Meyer, E. G., Powell, J. W., Fouty, A. J., and Haut, R. C., 2009, “Football Playing Surface and Shoe Design Affect Rotational Traction,” Am. J. Sports Med., 37(3), pp. 518–525. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kuhlman, S., Sabick, M., Pfeiffer, R., Cooper, B., and Forhan, J., 2010, “Effect of Loading Condition on the Traction Coefficient Between Shoes and Artificial Turf Surfaces,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part P, 224(P2), pp. 155–165. [CrossRef]
Wei, F., Meyer, E. G., Braman, J. E., Powell, J. W., and Haut, R. C., 2012, “Rotational Stiffness of Football Shoes Influences Talus Motion During External Rotation of the Foot,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 134(4), p. 041002. [CrossRef]
Wei, F., Hunley, S. C., Powell, J. W., and Haut, R. C., 2011, “Development and Validation of a Computational Model to Study the Effect of Foot Constraint on Ankle Injury Due to External Rotation,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 39(2), pp. 756–765. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lundberg, A., Svensson, O. K., Bylund, C., Goldie, I., and Selvik, G., 1989, “Kinematics of the Ankle/Foot Complex—Part 2: Pronation and Supination,” Foot Ankle, 9(5), pp. 248–253. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Button, K. D., Wei, F., Meyer, E. G., and Haut, R. C., 2013, “Specimen-Specific Computational Models of Ankle Sprains Produced in a Laboratory Setting,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 135(4), p. 041001. [CrossRef]
Lin, C. F., Gross, M. T., and Weinhold, P., 2006, “Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries: Anatomy, Biomechanics, Mechanism of Injury, and Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Intervention,” J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 36(6), pp. 372–384. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wu, G., Siegler, S., Allard, P., Kirtley, C., Leardini, A., Rosenbaum, D., Whittle, M., D’Lima, D. D., Cristofolini, L., Witte, H., Schmid, O., and Stokes, H., 2002, “ISB Recommendation on Definitions of Joint Coordinate System of Various Joints for the Reporting of Human Joint Motion—Part 1: Ankle, Hip, and Spine,” J. Biomech., 35(4), pp. 543–548. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Liacouras, P. C., and Waynel, J. S., 2007, “Computational Modeling to Predict Mechanical Function of Joints: Application to the Lower Leg With Simulation of Two Cadaver Studies,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 129(6), pp. 811–817. [CrossRef]
Lundberg, A., Svensson, O. K., Bylund, C., and Selvik, G., 1989, “Kinematics of the Foot/Ankle Complex—Part 3: Influence of Leg Rotation,” Foot Ankle, 9(6), pp. 304–309. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vanlangelaan, E. J., 1983, “A Kinematical Analysis of the Tarsal Joints,” Acta Orthop. Scand., 54(s204), pp. 135–222. [CrossRef]
Harper, M. C., 1992, “Ankle Fracture Classification Systems: A Case for Integration of the Lauge-Hansen and AO-Danis-Weber Schemes,” Foot Ankle, 13(7), pp. 404–407. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kwon, J. Y., Chacko, A. T., Kadzielski, J. J., Appleton, P. T., and Rodriguez, E. K., 2010, “A Novel Methodology for the Study of Injury Mechanism: Ankle Fracture Analysis Using Injury Videos Posted on YouTube.com,” J. Orthop. Trauma, 24(8), pp. 477–482. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wei, F., Braman, J. E., Weaver, B. T., and Haut, R. C., 2011, “Determination of Dynamic Ankle Ligament Strains From a Computational Model Driven by Motion Analysis Based Kinematic Data,” J. Biomech., 44(15), pp. 2636–2641. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dubin, J. C., Comeau, D., McClelland, R. I., Dubin, R. A., and Ferrel, E., 2011, “Lateral and Syndesmotic Ankle Sprain Injuries: A Narrative Literature Review,” J. Chiropractic Med., 10(3), pp. 204–219. [CrossRef]
Delahunt, E., Monaghan, K., and Caulfield, B., 2006, “Altered Neuromuscular Control and Ankle Joint Kinematics During Walking in Subjects With Functional Instability of the Ankle Joint,” Am. J. Sports Med., 34(12), pp. 1970–1976. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hennig, E. M., 2011, “The Influence of Soccer Shoe Design on Player Performance and Injuries,” Res. Sports Med., 19(3), pp. 186–201. [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Posterior view of a neutral (left) and everted foot (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Football shoes used for the current study: Nike Flyposite (a) and Nike Zoom Air (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Football cleat mold made of epoxy resin used to fix the shoe to the testing fixture

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The experiments were performed on a biaxial testing machine with the motions of the talus and tibia tracked by a 5-camera motion capture system. The ankle was placed in 20 deg of pre-eversion and predorsiflexion prior to rotation.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

An example of the torque data from a subfailure (a) and a failure (b) test. The failure occurs when there is a steep drop in torque, as indicated by the arrow.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Lateral (a), posterior (b), and medial (c) views of one of the specimen-specific models in SolidWorks with linear springs representing ligaments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fibular fracture (a), medial malleolus fracture (b), ATiFL avulsion (c), ATiTL avulsion (d), ATiFL tear (e), and ATiTL tear (f)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Representative plot of the ATiFL and ATiTL percent elongation versus tibia rotation in a simulation of the combination ATiFL and ATiTL injury scenario (specimen 2, stiff shoe)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In