0
Research Papers

Decreased Elastic Energy Storage, Not Increased Material Stiffness, Characterizes Central Artery Dysfunction in Fibulin-5 Deficiency Independent of Sex

[+] Author and Article Information
J. Ferruzzi, M. R. Bersi, S. Uman

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Malone Engineering Center,
Yale University,
New Haven, CT 06520

H. Yanagisawa

Department of Molecular Biology,
University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center,
Dallas, TX 75390

J. D. Humphrey

Fellow ASME
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Malone Engineering Center,
Yale University,
New Haven, CT 06520
Vascular Biology and Therapeutics Program,
Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT 06510
e-mail: jay.humphrey@yale.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received March 8, 2014; final manuscript received December 18, 2014; published online January 29, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Hai-Chao Han.

J Biomech Eng 137(3), 031007 (Mar 01, 2015) (14 pages) Paper No: BIO-14-1111; doi: 10.1115/1.4029431 History: Received March 08, 2014; Revised December 18, 2014; Online January 29, 2015

Central artery stiffness has emerged over the past 15 years as a clinically significant indicator of cardiovascular function and initiator of disease. Loss of elastic fiber integrity is one of the primary contributors to increased arterial stiffening in aging, hypertension, and related conditions. Elastic fibers consist of an elastin core and multiple glycoproteins; hence defects in any of these constituents can adversely affect arterial wall mechanics. In this paper, we focus on mechanical consequences of the loss of fibulin-5, an elastin-associated glycoprotein involved in elastogenesis. Specifically, we compared the biaxial mechanical properties of five central arteries—the ascending thoracic aorta, descending thoracic aorta, suprarenal abdominal aorta, infrarenal abdominal aorta, and common carotid artery—from male and female wild-type and fibulin-5 deficient mice. Results revealed that, independent of sex, all five regions in the fibulin-5 deficient mice manifested a marked increase in structural stiffness but also a marked decrease in elastic energy storage and typically an increase in energy dissipation, with all differences being most dramatic in the ascending and abdominal aortas. Given that the primary function of large arteries is to store elastic energy during systole and to use this energy during diastole to work on the blood, fibulin-5 deficiency results in a widespread diminishment of central artery function that can have significant effects on hemodynamics and cardiac function.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Yanagisawa, H., and Davis, E. C., 2010, “Unraveling the Mechanism of Elastic Fiber Assembly: The Roles of Short Fibulins,” Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 42(7), pp. 1084–1093. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ramirez, F., and Dietz, H. C., 2007, “Fibrillin-Rich Microfibrils: Structural Determinants of Morphogenetic and Homeostatic Events,” J. Cell. Physiol., 213(2), pp. 326–330. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Huang, J., Davis, E. C., Chapman, S. L., Budatha, M., Marmorstein, L. Y., Word, R. A., and Yanagisawa, H., 2010, “Fibulin-4 Deficiency Results in Ascending Aortic Aneurysms: A Potential Link Between Abnormal Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype and Aneurysm Progression,” Circ. Res., 106(3), pp. 583–592. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nakamura, T., Lozano, P. R., Ikeda, Y., Iwanaga, Y., Hinek, A., Minamisawa, S., Cheng, C.-F., Kobuke, K., Dalton, N., Takada, Y., Tashiro, K., Ross, J., Jr., Honjo, T., and Chien, K. R., 2002, “Fibulin-5/DANCE is Essential for Elastogenesis In Vivo,” Nature, 415(6868), pp. 171–175. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yanagisawa, H., Davis, E. C., Starcher, B. C., Ouchi, T., Yanagisawa, M., Richardson, J. A., and Olson, E. N., 2002, “Fibulin-5 is an Elastin-Binding Protein Essential for Elastic Fibre Development In Vivo,” Nature, 415(6868), pp. 168–171. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yanagisawa, H., Schluterman, M. K., and Brekken, R. A., 2009, “Fibulin-5, an Integrin-Binding Matricellular Protein: Its Function in Development and Disease,” J. Cell Commun. Signalling, 3(3–4), pp. 337–347. [CrossRef]
Spencer, J. A., Hacker, S. L., Davis, E. C., Mecham, R. P., Knutsen, R. H., Li, D. Y., Gerard, R. D., Richardson, J. A., Olson, E. N., and Yanagisawa, H., 2005, “Altered Vascular Remodeling in Fibulin-5-Deficient Mice Reveals a Role of Fibulin-5 in Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Migration,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102(8), pp. 2946–2951. [CrossRef]
Wan, W., Yanagisawa, H., and Gleason, R. L., Jr., 2010, “Biomechanical and Microstructural Properties of Common Carotid Arteries From Fibulin-5 Null Mice,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 38(12), pp. 3605–3617. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wan, W., and Gleason, R. L., 2013, “Dysfunction in Elastic Fiber Formation in Fibulin-5 Null Mice Abrogates the Evolution in Mechanical Response of Carotid Arteries During Maturation,” Am. J. Physiol.: Heart Circ. Physiol., 304(5), pp. H674–H686. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Boutouyrie, P., Laurent, S., and Briet, M., 2008, “Importance of Arterial Stiffness as Cardiovascular Risk Factor for Future Development of New Type of Drugs,” Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol., 22(3), pp. 241–246. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Adji, A., O'Rourke, M. F., and Namasivayam, M., 2011, “Arterial Stiffness, Its Assessment, Prognostic Value, and Implications for Treatment,” Am. J. Hypertens., 24(1), pp. 5–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Najjar, S. S., Scuteri, A., Shetty, V., Wright, J. G., Muller, D. C., Fleg, J. L., Spurgeon, H. P., Ferrucci, L., and Lakatta, E. G., 2008, “Pulse Wave Velocity is an Independent Predictor of the Longitudinal Increase in Systolic Blood Pressure and of Incident Hypertension in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 51(14), pp. 1377–1383. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, K.-L., Cheng, H.-M., Sung, S.-H., Chuang, S.-Y., Li, C.-H., Spurgeon, H. A., Ting, C.-T., Najjar, S. S., Lakatta, E. G., Yin, F. C. P., Chou, P., and Chen, C.-H., 2010, “Wave Reflection and Arterial Stiffness in the Prediction of 15-Year All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortalities: A Community-Based Study,” Hypertension, 55(3), pp. 799–805. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Agabiti-Rosei, E., Mancia, G., O'Rourke, M. F., Roman, M. J., Safar, M. E., Smulyan, H., Wang, J.-G., Wilkinson, I. B., Williams, B., and Vlachopoulos, C., 2007, “Central Blood Pressure Measurements and Antihypertensive Therapy: A Consensus Document,” Hypertension, 50(1), pp. 154–160. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lakatta, E. G., Wang, M., and Najjar, S. S., 2009, “Arterial Aging and Subclinical Arterial Disease are Fundamentally Intertwined at Macroscopic and Molecular Levels,” Med. Clin. N. Am., 93(3), pp. 583–604. [CrossRef]
Safar, M. E., 2010, “Arterial Aging—Hemodynamic Changes and Therapeutic Options,” Nat. Rev. Cardiol., 7(8), pp. 442–449. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sugawara, J., Hayashi, K., Yokoi, T., and Tanaka, H., 2008, “Age-Associated Elongation of the Ascending Aorta in Adults,” JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging, 1(6), pp. 739–748. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hickson, S. S., Butlin, M., Graves, M., Taviani, V., Avolio, A. P., McEniery, C. M., and Wilkinson, I. B., 2010, “The Relationship of Age With Regional Aortic Stiffness and Diameter,” JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging, 3(12), pp. 1247–1255. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Redheuil, A., Yu, W.-C., Wu, C. O., Mousseaux, E., Cesare, A., de, Yan, R., Kachenoura, N., Bluemke, D., and Lima, J. A. C., 2010, “Reduced Ascending Aortic Strain and Distensibility: Earliest Manifestations of Vascular Aging in Humans,” Hypertension, 55(2), pp. 319–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
O'Rourke, M. F., and Hashimoto, J., 2007, “Mechanical Factors in Arterial Aging: A Clinical Perspective,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 50(1), pp. 1–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lacolley, P., Challande, P., Osborne-Pellegrin, M., and Regnault, V., 2009, “Genetics and Pathophysiology of Arterial Stiffness,” Cardiovasc. Res., 81(4), pp. 637–648. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wagenseil, J. E., and Mecham, R. P., 2012, “Elastin in Large Artery Stiffness and Hypertension,” J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res., 5(3), pp. 264–273. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rachev, A., Greenwald, S., and Shazly, T., 2013, “Are Geometrical and Structural Variations Along the Length of the Aorta Governed by a Principle of ‘Optimal Mechanical Operation’?,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 135(8), p. 081006. [CrossRef]
Roccabianca, S., Figueroa, C. A., Tellides, G., and Humphrey, J. D., 2014, “Quantification of Regional Differences in Aortic Stiffness in the Aging Human,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 29(1), pp. 618–634. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Daugherty, A., Rateri, D., Hong, L., and Balakrishnan, A., 2009, “Measuring Blood Pressure in Mice Using Volume Pressure Recording, a Tail-Cuff Method,” J. Vis. Exp., (27). [CrossRef]
Gleason, R. L., Wilson, E., Humphrey, J. D., and Gray, S. P., 2005, “A Multiaxial Computer-Controlled Organ Culture and Biomechanical Device for Mouse Carotid Arteries,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 126(6), pp. 787–795. [CrossRef]
Ferruzzi, J., Bersi, M. R., and Humphrey, J. D., 2013, “Biomechanical Phenotyping of Central Arteries in Health and Disease: Advantages of and Methods for Murine Models,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 41(7), pp. 1311–1330. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bersi, M. R., Ferruzzi, J., Eberth, J. F., Gleason, R. L., and Humphrey, J. D., 2014, “Consistent Biomechanical Phenotyping of Common Carotid Arteries From Seven Genetic, Pharmacological, and Surgical Mouse Models,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 42(6), pp. 1207–1223. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gleason, R. L., Dye, W. W., Wilson, E., and Humphrey, J. D., 2008, “Quantification of the Mechanical Behavior of Carotid Arteries From Wild-Type, Dystrophin-Deficient, and Sarcoglycan-δ Knockout Mice,” J. Biomech., 41(15), pp. 3213–3218. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Eberth, J. F., Taucer, A. I., Wilson, E., and Humphrey, J. D., 2009, “Mechanics of Carotid Arteries in a Mouse Model of Marfan Syndrome,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 37(6), pp. 1093–1104. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ferruzzi, J., Collins, M. J., Yeh, A. T., and Humphrey, J. D., 2011, “Mechanical Assessment of Elastin Integrity in Fibrillin-1-Deficient Carotid Arteries: Implications for Marfan Syndrome,” Cardiovasc. Res., 92(2), pp. 287–295. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bersi, M. R., Collins, M. J., Wilson, E., and Humphrey, J. D., 2012, “Disparate Changes in the Mechanical Properties of Murine Carotid Arteries and Aorta in Response to Chronic Infusion of Angiotensin-II,” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Sci. Appl. Math., 4(4), pp. 228–240. [CrossRef]
Humphrey, J. D., 2002, Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs, Springer, New York.
Ferruzzi, J., Vorp, D. A., and Humphrey, J. D., 2011, “On Constitutive Descriptors of the Biaxial Mechanical Behaviour of Human Abdominal Aorta and Aneurysms,” J. R. Soc. Interface, 8(56), pp. 435–450. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Baek, S., Gleason, R. L., Rajagopal, K. R., and Humphrey, J. D., 2007, “Theory of Small on Large: Potential Utility in Computations of Fluid–Solid Interactions in Arteries,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 196(31–32), pp. 3070–3078. [CrossRef]
Warriner, R. K., Johnston, K. W., and Cobbold, R. S. C., 2008, “A Viscoelastic Model of Arterial Wall Motion in Pulsatile Flow: Implications for Doppler Ultrasound Clutter Assessment,” Physiol. Meas., 29(2), pp. 157–159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wight, T. N., 1989, “Cell Biology of Arterial Proteoglycans,” Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 9(1), pp. 1–20. [CrossRef]
Merrilees, M. J., Tiang, K. M., and Scott, L., 1987, “Changes in Collagen Fibril Diameters Across Artery Walls Including a Correlation With Glycosaminoglycan Content,” Connect. Tissue Res., 16(3), pp. 237–257. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rezakhaniha, R., Agianniotis, A., Schrauwen, J. T. C., Griffa, A., Sage, D., Bouten, C. V. C., van de Vosse, F. N., Unser, M., and Stergiopulos, N., 2012, “Experimental Investigation of Collagen Waviness and Orientation in the Arterial Adventitia Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 11(3–4), pp. 461–473. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Crawley, M. J., 2012, The R Book, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Arribas, S. M., Hinek, A., and González, M. C., 2006, “Elastic Fibres and Vascular Structure in Hypertension,” Pharmacol. Ther., 111(3), pp. 771–791. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Karnik, S. K., Brooke, B. S., Bayes-Genis, A., Sorensen, L., Wythe, J. D., Schwartz, R. S., Keating, M. T., and Li, D. Y., 2003, “A Critical Role for Elastin Signaling in Vascular Morphogenesis and Disease,” Development, 130(2), pp. 411–423. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Carta, L., Wagenseil, J. E., Knutsen, R. H., Mariko, B., Faury, G., Davis, E. C., Starcher, B., Mecham, R. P., and Ramirez, F., 2009, “Discrete Contributions of Elastic Fiber Components to Arterial Development and Mechanical Compliance,” Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 29(12), pp. 2083–2089. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wagenseil, J. E., Nerurkar, N. L., Knutsen, R. H., Okamoto, R. J., Li, D. Y., and Mecham, R. P., 2005, “Effects of Elastin Haploinsufficiency on the Mechanical Behavior of Mouse Arteries,” Am. J. Physiol.: Heart Circ. Physiol., 289(3), pp. H1209–H1217. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Eberth, J. F., Gresham, V. C., Reddy, A. K., Popovic, N., Wilson, E., and Humphrey, J. D., 2009, “Importance of Pulsatility in Hypertensive Carotid Artery Growth and Remodeling,” J. Hypertens., 27(10), pp. 2010–2021. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Humphrey, J. D., Eberth, J. F., Dye, W. W., and Gleason, R. L., 2009, “Fundamental Role of Axial Stress in Compensatory Adaptations by Arteries,” J. Biomech., 42(1), pp. 1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Truesdell, C., and Noll, W., 2004, The Non-Linear Field Theories of Mechanics, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Eberth, J. F., Cardamone, L., and Humphrey, J. D., 2011, “Evolving Biaxial Mechanical Properties of Mouse Carotid Arteries in Hypertension,” J. Biomech., 44(14), pp. 2532–2537. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Humphrey, J. D., 2008, “Vascular Adaptation and Mechanical Homeostasis at Tissue, Cellular, and Sub-Cellular Levels,” Cell Biochem. Biophys., 50(2), pp. 53–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tanaka, T. T., and Fung, Y.-C., 1974, “Elastic and Inelastic Properties of the Canine Aorta and Their Variation Along the Aortic Tree,” J. Biomech., 7(4), pp. 357–370. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sokolis, D. P., 2007, “Passive Mechanical Properties and Structure of the Aorta: Segmental Analysis,” Acta Physiol., 190(4), pp. 277–289. [CrossRef]
Sokolis, D. P., Boudoulas, H., and Karayannacos, P. E., 2008, “Segmental Differences of Aortic Function and Composition: Clinical Implications,” Hell. J. Cardiol., 49(3), pp. 145–154, available at: [CrossRef] [CrossRef]
Zhao, J., Day, J., Yuan, Z. F., and Gregersen, H., 2002, “Regional Arterial Stress–Strain Distributions Referenced to the Zero-Stress State in the Rat,” Am. J. Physiol.: Heart Circ. Physiol., 282(2), pp. H622–H629. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Guo, X., and Kassab, G. S., 2003, “Variation of Mechanical Properties Along the Length of the Aorta in C57bl/6 Mice,” Am. J. Physiol.: Heart Circ. Physiol., 285(6), pp. H2614–H2622. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Faury, G., Pezet, M., Knutsen, R. H., Boyle, W. A., Heximer, S. P., McLean, S. E., Minkes, R. K., Blumer, K. J., Kovacs, A., Kelly, D. P., Li, D. Y., Starcher, B., and Mecham, R. P., 2003, “Developmental Adaptation of the Mouse Cardiovascular System to Elastin Haploinsufficiency,” J. Clin. Invest., 112(9), pp. 1419–1428. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wagenseil, J. E., and Mecham, R. P., 2009, “Vascular Extracellular Matrix and Arterial Mechanics,” Physiol. Rev., 89(3), pp. 957–989. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Han, H.-C., and Fung, Y.-C., 1995, “Longitudinal Strain of Canine and Porcine Aortas,” J. Biomech., 28(5), pp. 637–641. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Beller, C. J., Labrosse, M. R., Thubrikar, M. J., and Robicsek, F., 2004, “Role of Aortic Root Motion in the Pathogenesis of Aortic Dissection,” Circulation, 109(6), pp. 763–769. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jin, S., Oshinski, J., and Giddens, D. P., 2003, “Effects of Wall Motion and Compliance on Flow Patterns in the Ascending Aorta,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 125(3), pp. 347–354. [CrossRef]
Labrosse, M. R., Gerson, E. R., Veinot, J. P., and Beller, C. J., 2013, “Mechanical Characterization of Human Aortas From Pressurization Testing and a Paradigm Shift for Circumferential Residual Stress,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 17, pp. 44–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Pressure–diameter (P–d) and axial force–length (f–l) data (mean ± SEM) for all 20 groups (cf. Table 2): ATA, DTA, SAA, IAA, and CCA from male (M, black lines), female (F, gray lines), Fbln5+/+ (+/+, dashed lines), and Fbln5−/− (−/−, solid lines) mice. Each curve is the average of n = 5 experimental data sets. The first column shows video images of the central region of representative specimens under in vivo loads to highlight the different sizes. The second column shows P–d responses during inflation tests at the individual preferred values of axial stretch; note the different scales for the abscissas but the similar behaviors. The third column shows f–P responses during inflation tests, with force not changing much with pressurization as expected at the preferred value of axial stretch. Finally, the fourth column shows axial f–l responses during extension tests at 100 mmHg. Note the different scales for the ordinates in both the third and fourth columns, with overall lower forces exhibited by smaller arteries as expected.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Average Cauchy stress–stretch responses calculated for all 20 groups (based on parameters in Table 3) by simulating P–d tests at the individual in vivo axial stretches (cf. Fig. 1). All data plotted using the same scale to facilitate visual comparisons. Notice the regionally consistent leftward shift in circumferential behavior and downward shift in axial behavior for Fbln5−/− (−/−, solid lines) mice relative to Fbln5+/+ (+/+, dashed lines). Results for stress (in kPa) and linearized stiffness (in MPa; see Table 2), the latter of which can be visualized by local tangents based on calculations via Eq. (5), were remarkably similar between males (M—black lines) and females (F—gray lines) in all tested regions.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Average biaxial stiffness (mean ± SEM) in male (M, black bars), female (F, gray bars), Fbln5+/+ (+/+, shaded bars), and Fbln5−/− (−/−, solid bars) mice. (a) Circumferential stiffness of Fbln5−/− arteries was equal to or lower than wild-types. (b) Axial stiffness was similar between genotypes, independent of sex. Numerical values and significant differences with p < 0.05 are reported in Table 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Average iso-energy contours of the stored energy calculated as a function of biaxial stretches W(λθ,λz). Fbln5+/+ are shown in the left column and Fbln5−/− in the right column; males are shown via black lines while females are shown via gray lines. Each panel shows energy levels corresponding to 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 100, 250, and 500 kPa. Filled circles represent in vivo energy values computed at Psys and the individual in vivo axial stretches.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Average energy storage and in vivo axial stretch (mean ± SEM) from male (M, black bars), female (F, gray bars), Fbln5+/+ (+/+, shaded bars), and Fbln5−/− (−/−, solid bars) mice. (a) Energy stored at individual Psys and in vivo axial stretches (cf. Fig. 4) was significantly higher in wild-type versus fibulin-5 deficient arteries for each region, independent of sex. (b) in vivo axial stretch ratio was consistently higher in wild-type arteries. Sex differences were observed in Fbln5+/+ IAAs (increased in females) and Fbln5−/− DTAs (decreased in females). Numerical values and significant differences with p < 0.05 are reported in Table 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Microstructural composition of male Fbln5+/+ and Fbln5−/− arteries. (a) VVG-stained cross sections of central arteries from wild-type and fibulin-5 deficient animals. Note the generalized elastin (black) fragmentation and the loss of laminae waviness in the IAA and CCA of Fbln5−/− arteries. (b) MOV- and MTC-stained cross sections of ATAs showing collagen (blue in MTC), smooth muscle cytoplasm (red in MTC), and GAGs/PGs (blue–green in MOV). See on-line version for color. (c) and (d) Regional composition of Fbln5+/+ and Fbln5−/− arteries, respectively. Numerical values and significant differences with p < 0.05 are reported in Table 4.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Structure–function relationship for Fbln5+/+ and Fbln5−/− arteries showing the uniform loss of functionality due to fibulin-5 deficiency. (a) Systolic stored energy is consistently decreased in Fbln5−/− arteries. (b) EDR is consistently increased in Fbln5−/− arteries.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In