0
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | Volume 137 | Issue 3 | research-article
Research Papers

Enhanced Targeted Drug Delivery Through Controlled Release in a Three-Dimensional Vascular Tree

[+] Author and Article Information
Shuang J. Zhu

Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Melbourne,
Parkville,
Victoria 3010, Australia
e-mail: sjzhu@unimelb.edu.au

Eric K. W. Poon, Andrew S. H. Ooi

Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Melbourne,
Parkville,
Victoria 3010, Australia

Stephen Moore

IBM Research Collaboratory,
Victoria Life Sciences Computation Initiative,
The University of Melbourne,
Parkville,
Victoria 3010, Australia

Manuscript received September 4, 2013; final manuscript received October 29, 2014; published online January 29, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Francis Loth.

J Biomech Eng 137(3), 031002 (Mar 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: BIO-13-1410; doi: 10.1115/1.4028965 History: Received September 04, 2013; Revised October 29, 2014; Online January 29, 2015
Article
References
Figures
Tables
Citing Articles

“Controlled particle release and targeting” is a technique using particle release score map (PRSM) and transient particle release score map (TPRSM) via backtracking to determine optimal drug injection locations for achieving an enhanced target efficiency (TE). This paper investigates the possibility of targeting desired locations through an idealized but complex three-dimensional (3D) vascular tree geometry under realistic hemodynamic conditions by imposing a Poiseuille velocity profile and a Womersley velocity profile derived from cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data for steady and pulsatile simulations, respectively. The shear thinning non-Newtonian behavior of blood was accounted for by the Carreau–Yasuda model. One-way coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian particle tracking method was used to record individual drug particle trajectories. Particle size and density showed negligible influence on the particle fates. With the proposed optimal release scoring algorithm, multiple optimal release locations were determined under steady flow conditions, whereas there was one unique optimal release location under pulsatile flow conditions. The initial in silico results appear promising, showing on average 66% TE in the pulsatile simulations, warranting further studies to improve the mathematical model and experimental validation.
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

1
Strebhardt, K., and Ullrich, A., 2008, “Paul Ehrlich's Magic Bullet Concept: 100 Years of Progress,” Nat. Rev. Cancer, 8(6), pp. 473–480. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2
Bae, Y. H., and Park, K., 2011, “Targeted Drug Delivery to Tumors: Myths, Reality and Possibility,” J. Controlled Release, 153(3), pp. 198–205. [CrossRef]
3
Jain, R. K., 1987, “Transport of Molecules Across Tumor Vasculature,” Cancer Metastasis Rev., 6(4), pp. 559–593. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4
Palmer, T. N., Caldecourt, M. A., and Kingaby, R. O., 1984, “Liposomal Drug Delivery in Chronic Ischaemia,” Biochem. Soc. Trans., 12(2), pp. 344–345. [PubMed]
5
Torchilin, V. P., 2000, “Drug Targeting,” Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 11(Supplement 2), pp. S81–S91. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6
Wamsley, A., 2005, “Ligand-Based Targeting Approaches to Drug Delivery,” Design of Controlled Release Drug Delivery Systems, McGraw Hill Professional, New York, pp. 375–403.
7
Ding, L., Samuel, J., MacLean, G. D., Noujaim, A. A., Diener, E., and Longenecker, B. M., 1990, “Effective Drug-Antibody Targeting Using a Novel Monoclonal Antibody Against the Proliferative Compartment of Mammalian Squamous Carcinomas,” Cancer Immunol. Immunother., 32(2), pp. 105–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8
Imura, Y., Stassen, J. M., Kurokawa, T., Iwasa, S., Lijnen, H. R., and Collen, D., 1992, “Thrombolytic and Pharmacokinetic Properties of an Immunoconjugate of Single-Chain Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator (u-PA) and a Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody Against Fibrin and Against u-PA in Baboons,” Blood, 79(9), pp. 2322–2329. [PubMed]
9
Ringsdorf, H., 1975, “Structure and Properties of Pharmacologically Active Polymers,” J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Symp., 51(1), pp. 135–153. [CrossRef]
10
Vitetta, E. S., Krolik, K. A., Miyama-Inaba, M., Cushley, W., and Uhr, J. W., 1983, “Immunotoxins: A New Approach to Cancer Therapy,” Science, 219(4585), pp. 644–650. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11
Torchilin, V. P., and Klibanov, A. L., 1993, “pH-Sensitive Liposomes,” J. Liposome Res., 3(2), pp. 201–255. [CrossRef]
12
Weinstein, J. N., Magin, R. L., Yatvin, M. B., and Zaharko, D., 1979, “Liposomes and Local Hyperthermia: Selective Delivery of Methotrexate to Heated Tumors,” Science, 204(4389), pp. 188–191. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13
Berry, C. C., 2009, “Progress in Functionalization of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Applications in Biomedicine,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 42(22), p. 224003. [CrossRef]
14
Gajjar, S. K., Sailor, G. U., Seth, A. K., and Patel, P. B., 2011, “A Review on Targeted Drug Delivery: Magnetic Drug Delivery System,” J. Pharm. Sci. Bioscientific Res., 1(2), pp. 125–133.
15
McBain, S. C., Yiu, H. H., and Dobson, J., 2008, “Magnetic Nanoparticles for Gene and Drug Delivery,” Int. J. Nanomed., 3(2), pp. 169–180.
16
O'Grady, K., 2009, “Progress in Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedicine,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 42(22), p. 220301. [CrossRef]
17
Pankhurst, Q. A., Connolly, J., Jones, S. K., and Dobson, J., 2003, “Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedicine,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 36(13), pp. R167–R181. [CrossRef]
18
Pankhurst, Q. A., Thanh, N. K. T., Jones, S. K., and Dobson, J., 2009, “Progress in Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedicine,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 42(22), p. 224001. [CrossRef]
19
Roca, A. G., Costo, R., Rebolledo, A. F., Veintemillas-Verdaguer, S., Tartaj, P., Gonzalez-Carreno, T., Morales, M. P., and Serna, C. J., 2009, “Progress in the Preparation of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Applications in Biomedicine,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 42(22), p. 224002. [CrossRef]
20
Kleinstreuer, C., and Zhang, Z., 2003, “Targeted Drug Aerosol Deposition Analysis for a Four-Generation Lung Airway Model With Hemispherical Tumors,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 125(2), pp. 197–206. [CrossRef]
21
Kleinstreuer, C., 2006, Biofluid Dynamics: Principles and Selected Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
22
Kleinstreuer, C., Zhang, Z., and Donohue, J. F., 2008, “Targeted Drug-Aerosol Delivery in the Human Respiratory System,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 10, pp. 195–220. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23
Basciano, C. A., Kleinstreuer, C., Kennedy, A. S., Dezarn, W. A., and Childress, E., 2010, “Computer Modeling of Controlled Microsphere Release and Targeting in a Representative Hepatic Artery System,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 38(5), pp. 1862–1879. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24
Kennedy, A. S., Kleinstreuer, C., Basciano, C. A., and Dezarn, W. A., 2010, “Computer Modeling of Yttrium-90-Microsphere Transport in the Hepatic Arterial Tree to Improve Clinical Outcomes,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys., 76(2), pp. 631–637. [CrossRef]
25
Kleinstreuer, C., Basciano, C. A., Childress, E. M., and Kennedy, A. S., 2012, “A New Catheter for Tumor Targeting With Radioactive Microspheres in Representative Hepatic Artery Systems–Part I: Impact of Catheter Presence on Local Blood Flow and Microsphere Delivery,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 134(5), p. 051004. [CrossRef]
26
Childress, E. M., Kleinstreuer, C., and Kennedy, A. S., 2012, “A New Catheter for Tumor-Targeting With Radioactive Microspheres in Representative Hepatic Artery Systems–Part II: Solid Tumor-Targeting in a Patient-Inspired Hepatic Artery System,” J. Biochem. Toxicol., 134(5), p. 051005.
27
Childress, E. M., 2013, “Computational Particle Hemodynamics With Applications to Optimal Liver-Tumor Targeting,” Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University, NC.
28
Richards, A. L., Kleinstreuer, C., Kennedy, S., Childress, E., and Buckner, G. D., 2012, “Experimental Microsphere Targeting in a Representative Hepatic Artery System,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 59(1), pp. 198–204. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29
Banerjee, M. K., Datta, A., and Ganguly, R., 2010, “Magnetic Drug Targeting in Partly Occluded Blood Vessels Using Magnetic Microspheres,” ASME J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med., 1(4), p. 041005. [CrossRef]
30
Kenjeres, S., 2008, “Numerical Analysis of Blood Flow in Realistic Arteries Subjected to Strong Non-Uniform Magnetic Fields,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 29(3), pp. 752–764. [CrossRef]
31
Liu, H. D., Wang, S. G., and Xu, W., 2009, “Process Modeling of Ferrofluids Flow for Magnetic Targeting Drug Delivery,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 22(3), pp. 440–445. [CrossRef]
32
Nacev, A., Beni, C., Bruno, O., and Shapiro, B., 2011, “The Behaviors of Ferromagnetic Nano-Particles in and Around Blood Vessels Under Applied Magnetic Fields,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 323(6), pp. 651–668. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33
Cherry, E. M., Maxim, P. G., and Eaton, J. K., 2010, “Particle Size, Magnetic Field, and Blood Velocity Effects on Particle Retention in Magnetic Drug Targeting,” Med. Phys., 37(1), pp. 175–182. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34
Mathieu, J. B., and Martel, S., 2010, “Steering of Aggregating Magnetic Microparticles Using Propulsion Gradients Coils in an MRI Scanner,” Magn. Reson. Med., 63(5), pp. 1336–1345. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35
Moore, S., David, T., Chase, J. G., Arnold, J., and Fink, J., 2006, “3D Models of Blood Flow in the Cerebral Vasculature,” J. Biomech., 39(8), pp. 1454–1463. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36
Zamir, M., 1999, “On Fractal Properties of Arterial Trees,” J. Theor. Biol., 197(4), pp. 517–526. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37
Bui, A., Sutalo, I. D., Manasseh, R., and Liffman, K., 2009, “Dynamics of Pulsatile Flow in Fractal Models of Vascular Branching Networks,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 47(7), pp. 763–772. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38
Olufsen, M. S., 1999, “Structured Tree Outflow Condition for Blood Flow in Larger Systemic Arteries,” Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol., 276(1), pp. H257–H268.
39
Steele, B. N., Olufsen, M. S., and Taylor, C. A., 2007, “Fractal Network Model for Simulating Abdominal and Lower Extremity Blood Flow During Resting and Exercise Conditions,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 10(1), pp. 39–51. [CrossRef]
40
Uylings, H. B. M., 1977, “Optimization of Diameters and Bifurcation Angles in Lung and Vascular Tree Structures,” Bull. Math. Biol., 39(5), pp. 509–520. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41
Kamiya, A., and Togawa, T., 1972, “Optimal Branching Structure of the Vascular Tree,” Bull. Math. Biol., 34(4), pp. 431–438.
42
Schreiner, W., Neumann, M., Neumann, F., Roedler, S. M., End, A., Buxbaum, P., Muller, M. R., and Spieckermann, P., 1994, “The Branching Angles in Computer-Generated Optimized Models of Arterial Trees,” J. Gen. Physiol., 103(6), pp. 975–989. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43
Moore, S., 2008, Computational 3D Modeling of Hemodynamics in the Circle of Willis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
44
Gijsen, F. J., Allanic, E., van de Vosse, F. N., and Janssen, J. D., 1999, “The Influence of the Non-Newtonian Properties of Blood on the Flow in Large Arteries: Unsteady Flow in a 90 Degrees Curved Tube,” J. Biomech., 32(7), pp. 705–713. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45
Gijsen, F. J., van de Vosse, F. N., and Janssen, J. D., 1999, “The Influence of the Non-Newtonian Properties of Blood on the Flow in Large Arteries: Steady Flow in a Carotid Bifurcation Model,” J. Biomech., 32(6), pp. 601–608. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46
Enzmann, D. R., Ross, M. R., Marks, M. P., and Pelc, H. J., 1994, “Blood Flow in Major Cerebral Arteries Measured by Phase-Contrast Cine MR,” Am. J. Neuroradiology, 15(1), pp. 123–129.
47
Moghimi, S. M., Hunter, A. C., and Murray, J. C., 2001, “Long-Circulating and Target-Specific Nanoparticles: Theory to Practice,” Pharm. Rev., 53(2), pp. 283–318.
48
Fang, C., Shi, B., Pei, Y. Y., Hong, M. H., Wu, J., and Chen, H. Z., 2006, “in vivo Tumor Targeting of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha-Loaded Stealth Nanoparticles: Effect of Mepeg Molecular Weight and Particle Size,” Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 27(1), pp. 27–36. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49
Shridhar, G., and Katz, J., 1995, “Drag and Lift Forces on Microscopic Bubbles Entrained by a Vortex,” Phys. Fluids, 7(2), pp. 389–399. [CrossRef]
50
Ettenson, D. S., and Edelman, E. R., 2000, “Local Drug Delivery: An Emerging Approach in the Treatment of Restenosis,” Vasc. Med., 5(2), pp. 97–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51
Tabassum, N., Sofi, A., and Khuroo, T., 2011, “Microneedle Technology: A New Drug Delivery System,” Int. J. Res. Pharm. Biomed. Sci., 2(1), pp. 59–62.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The idealized 3D vascular tree geometry used in the present study showing the definition of the anatomical positions, the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system and key design parameters in the root branch of the tree. The naming convention for the 32 outlet branches is shown in the inferior view for clarity.

+The idealized 3D vascular tree geometry used in the present study showing the definition of the anatomical positions, the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system and key design parameters in the root branch of the tree. The naming convention for the 32 outlet branches is shown in the inferior view for clarity.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
The idealized 3D vascular tree geometry used in the present study showing the definition of the anatomical positions, the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system and key design parameters in the root branch of the tree. The naming convention for the 32 outlet branches is shown in the inferior view for clarity.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The mean flowrate and flowrate waveforms used in the steady and pulsatile simulations, respectively. Illustrated are 11 key times within the cardiac cycle where planar particles were released.

+The mean flowrate and flowrate waveforms used in the steady and pulsatile simulations, respectively. Illustrated are 11 key times within the cardiac cycle where planar particles were released.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
The mean flowrate and flowrate waveforms used in the steady and pulsatile simulations, respectively. Illustrated are 11 key times within the cardiac cycle where planar particles were released.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The schematic diagram of the 3D vascular tree geometry viewed from the inlet (see Fig. 1), where branch 12 is the target branch and its direct neighbor is branch 11: (a) left half of the tree branches and (b) right half of the tree branches

+The schematic diagram of the 3D vascular tree geometry viewed from the inlet (see Fig. 1), where branch 12 is the target branch and its direct neighbor is branch 11: (a) left half of the tree branches and (b) right half of the tree branches
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
The schematic diagram of the 3D vascular tree geometry viewed from the inlet (see Fig. 1), where branch 12 is the target branch and its direct neighbor is branch 11: (a) left half of the tree branches and (b) right half of the tree branches
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Instantaneous particle locations throughout the course of a generic steady state simulation at (a) t = 0.01 s, (b) t = 0.08 s, the approximate time at which the fastest moving particles reach the first bifurcation, (c) t = 0.6 s, the approximate time at which the fastest particles exit the domain, and (d) t = 2 s, the end of the simulation at which all particles traveling at the average velocity through the tree should have exited the domain

+Instantaneous particle locations throughout the course of a generic steady state simulation at (a) t = 0.01 s, (b) t = 0.08 s, the approximate time at which the fastest moving particles reach the first bifurcation, (c) t = 0.6 s, the approximate time at which the fastest particles exit the domain, and (d) t = 2 s, the end of the simulation at which all particles traveling at the average velocity through the tree should have exited the domain
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Instantaneous particle locations throughout the course of a generic steady state simulation at (a) t = 0.01 s, (b) t = 0.08 s, the approximate time at which the fastest moving particles reach the first bifurcation, (c) t = 0.6 s, the approximate time at which the fastest particles exit the domain, and (d) t = 2 s, the end of the simulation at which all particles traveling at the average velocity through the tree should have exited the domain
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

PRM of the 65 nm particles, where the gray color represents the particles that remain in the domain at the end of simulations

+PRM of the 65 nm particles, where the gray color represents the particles that remain in the domain at the end of simulations
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
PRM of the 65 nm particles, where the gray color represents the particles that remain in the domain at the end of simulations
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

PRSMs for branch outlet 9–16 as the targets with normalized PDF values between 0 and 1

+PRSMs for branch outlet 9–16 as the targets with normalized PDF values between 0 and 1
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
PRSMs for branch outlet 9–16 as the targets with normalized PDF values between 0 and 1
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

PRMs of the 65 nm particles over one cardiac cycle. Color codes used to indicate individual outlets and particles remain in the domain at the end of simulations are the same as those used in Fig. 5.

+PRMs of the 65 nm particles over one cardiac cycle. Color codes used to indicate individual outlets and particles remain in the domain at the end of simulations are the same as those used in Fig. 5.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
PRMs of the 65 nm particles over one cardiac cycle. Color codes used to indicate individual outlets and particles remain in the domain at the end of simulations are the same as those used in Fig. 5.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

TPRSMs for branch outlet 9–16 as the targets with normalized PDF values between 0 and 1

+TPRSMs for branch outlet 9–16 as the targets with normalized PDF values between 0 and 1
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
TPRSMs for branch outlet 9–16 as the targets with normalized PDF values between 0 and 1

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Completing the Picture
Air Engines> Chapter 11
Modeling and Simulation of 3D Fireworks Based on Particle System
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 4th (ICACTE 2011)
Development of Simulatiom of Pedestrian Uncontrolled Crossing Behavior
International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, 3rd (ICCTD 2011)
Simulation of an Internal Nozzle Flow Using an Euler-Lagrange Method
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
The Growth Behavior of a Particle in an Ambient Flow Field
Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Technologies (MIMT 2010)
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
Sign In