Research Papers

Characterization of the Frequency and Muscle Responses of the Lumbar and Thoracic Spines of Seated Volunteers During Sinusoidal Whole Body Vibration

[+] Author and Article Information
Hassam A. Baig, Ben A. Bulka

Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pennsylvania,
210 S. 33rd Street,
Room 240 Skirkanich Hall,
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Daniel B. Dorman, Bethany L. Shivers

Injury Biomechanics Branch,
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education,
US Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory,
Building 6901,
Fort Rucker, AL 36362

Valeta C. Chancey

Injury Biomechanics Branch,
US Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory,
Building 6901,
Fort Rucker, AL 36362

Beth A. Winkelstein

Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pennsylvania,
210 S. 33rd Street,
Room 240 Skirkanich Hall,
Philadelphia, PA 19104
e-mail: winkelst@seas.upenn.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received August 31, 2013; final manuscript received May 20, 2014; accepted manuscript posted July 14, 2014; published online August 6, 2014. Editor: Victor H. Barocas.

This material is declared a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

J Biomech Eng 136(10), 101002 (Aug 06, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: BIO-13-1399; doi: 10.1115/1.4027998 History: Received August 31, 2013; Revised May 20, 2014; Accepted July 14, 2014

Whole body vibration has been postulated to contribute to the onset of back pain. However, little is known about the relationship between vibration exposure, the biomechanical response, and the physiological responses of the seated human. The aim of this study was to measure the frequency and corresponding muscle responses of seated male volunteers during whole body vibration exposures along the vertical and anteroposterior directions to define the transmissibility and associated muscle activation responses for relevant whole body vibration exposures. Seated human male volunteers underwent separate whole body vibration exposures in the vertical (Z-direction) and anteroposterior (X-direction) directions using sinusoidal sweeps ranging from 2 to 18 Hz, with a constant amplitude of 0.4 g. For each vibration exposure, the accelerations and displacements of the seat and lumbar and thoracic spines were recorded. In addition, muscle activity in the lumbar and thoracic spines was recorded using electromyography (EMG) and surface electrodes in the lumbar and thoracic region. Transmissibility was determined, and peak transmissibility, displacement, and muscle activity were compared in each of the lumbar and thoracic regions. The peak transmissibility for vertical vibrations occurred at 4 Hz for both the lumbar (1.55 ± 0.34) and thoracic (1.49 ± 0.21) regions. For X-directed seat vibrations, the transmissibility ratio in both spinal regions was highest at 2 Hz but never exceeded a value of 1. The peak muscle response in both spinal regions occurred at frequencies corresponding to the peak transmissibility, regardless of the direction of imposed seat vibration: 4 Hz for the Z-direction and 2–3 Hz for the X-direction. In both vibration directions, spinal displacements occurred primarily in the direction of seat vibration, with little off-axis motion. The occurrence of peak muscle responses at frequencies of peak transmissibility suggests that such frequencies may induce greater muscle activity, leading to muscle fatigue, which could be a contributing mechanism of back pain.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Boshuizen, H., and Hulshof, T. J., 1999, “Effect of Whole Body Vibration on Low Back Pain,” Spine, 24, pp. 2506–2515. [CrossRef]
Nevin, R., and Means, G., 2009, “Pain & Discomfort in Deployed Helicopter Aviators Wearing Body Armor,” Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 80(9), pp. 807–810. [CrossRef]
Heino, M., Ketola, R., Makela, P., Makinen, R., Niemela, R., Starak, J., and Partanen, T., 1978, “Work Conditions and Health of Locomotive Engineers,” Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, 4, pp. 3–14. [CrossRef]
Griffin, M. J., 1978, “The Evaluation of Vehicle Vibration and Seats,” Appl. Ergonomics, 9(1), pp. 15–21. [CrossRef]
Whitham, E. M., and Griffin, M. J., 1978, “The Effects of Vibration Frequency and Direction on the Location of Areas of Discomfort Caused by Whole-Body Vibration,” Appl. Ergonomics, 9(4), pp. 231–239. [CrossRef]
Panjabi, M. M., Andersson, G. J., and Jorenus, L., 1986, “In Vivo Measurements of Spinal Column Vibrations,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., 68, pp. 695–702. [CrossRef]
Mansfield, N. J., and Griffin, M. J., 2000, “Non-Linearities in Apparent Mass and Transmissibility During Exposure to Whole-Body Vertical Vibration,” J. Biomech., 33(8), pp. 933–941. [CrossRef]
Smith, S. D., and Kazarian, L. E., 1994, “The Effects of Acceleration on the Mechanical Impedance Response of a Primate Model Exposed to Sinusoidal Vibration,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 22(1), pp. 78–87. [CrossRef]
Holmlund, P., and Lundstrom, R., 2001, “Mechanical Impedance of the Sitting Human Body in Single-Axis Compared to Multi-Axis Whole-Body Vibration Exposure,” Clin. Biomech., 16, pp. S101–S110. [CrossRef]
Nawayesh, N., and Griffin, M. J., 2005, “Non-Linear Dual-Axis Biodynamic Response to Fore-and-Aft Whole Body Vibration,” J. Sound Vib., 282(3–5), pp. 831–862. [CrossRef]
Cardinale, M., and Lim, J., 2003, “Electromyography Activity of Vastus Lateralis Muscle During Whole-Body Vibrations of Different Frequencies,” J. Strength Cond. Res., 17, pp. 621–624. [CrossRef]
Hansson, T., Magnusson, M., and Broman, H., 1991, “Back Muscle Fatigue and Seated Whole Body Vibrations: An Experimental Study in Man,” Clin. Biomech., 6(3), pp. 173–178. [CrossRef]
Cameron, B., Morrison, J., Robinson, D., Vukusic, G. A., Martin, S., Roddan, G., and Albano, J. P., 1996, “Development of a Standard for the Health Hazard Assessment of Mechanical Shock and Repeated Impact in Army Vehicles—Phase 4,” USAARL Contract, Fort Rucker, AL, Report No. CR-96-1.
Alem, N., Hiltz, E., Breaux-Sims, A., and Bumgardner, B., 2004, “Evaluation of New Methodology for Health Hazard Assessment of Repeated Shock in Military Tactical Ground Vehicles,” NATO RTO-Applied Vehicle Technology Symposium, Prague, Czech Republic, Oct., pp. 1–18, Paper No. RTO-AVT-110.
Hinz, B., Seidel, H., Brauer, D., Menzel, G., Bluthner, R., and Erdmann, U., 1988, “Bidimensional Accelerations of Lumbar Vertebrae and Estimation of Internal Spinal Load During Sinusoidal Vertical Whole-Body Vibration: A Pilot Study,” Clin. Biomech., 3(4), pp. 241–248. [CrossRef]
Kitazaki, S., and Griffin, M. J., 1995, “A Data Correction Method for Surface Measurement of Vibration on the Human Body,” J. Biomech., 28(7), pp. 885–890. [CrossRef]
Hinz, B., and Seidel, H., 1987, “The Nonlinearity of Human Body’s Dynamic Response During Sinusoidal Whole Body Vibration,” Ind. Health, 25(4), pp. 169–181. [CrossRef]
Harrah, C. B., and Shoenberger, R. W., 1981, “Effect of Body Supination Angle on Subjective Response to Whole-Body-Vibration,” Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 52, pp. 28–32. [CrossRef]
Zimmermann, C. L., Cook, T. M., and Goel, V. K., 1993, “Effects of Seated Posture on Erector Spinae EMG Activity During Whole Body Vibration,” Ergonomics, 36(6), pp. 667–675. [CrossRef]
Fratini, A., Cesarelli, M., Bifulco, P., and Romano, M., 2009, “Relevance of Motion Artifact in Electromyography Recordings During Vibration Treatment,” J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 19(4), pp. 710–718. [CrossRef]
Ritzmann, R., Kramer, A., Gruber, M., Gollhofer, A., and Taube, W., 2010, “EMG Activity During Whole Body Vibration: Motion Artifacts or Stretch Reflexes?,” Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 110(1), pp. 143–151. [CrossRef]
Sebik, O., Karacan, I., Cidem, M., and Turker, K. S., 2013, “Rectification of SEMG as a Tool to Demonstrate Synchronous Motor Unit Activity During Vibration,” J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 23(2), pp. 275–284. [CrossRef]
Beck, T. W., Housh, T. J., Johnson, G. O., Weir, J. P., Cramer, J. T., Coburn, J. W., and Malek, M. H., 2005, “The Effects of Interelectrode Distance on Electromyographic Amplitude and Mean Power Frequency During Isokinetic and Isometric Muscle Actions of the Biceps Brachii,” J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 15(5), pp. 482–495. [CrossRef]
Hinz, B., Menzel, G., Bluthner, R., and Seidel, H., 2001, “Transfer Functions as a Basis for the Verification of Models—Variability and Restraints,” Clin. Biomech., 16, pp. S93–S100. [CrossRef]
Weinstein, J., Pope, M., Schmidt, R., and Seroussi, R., 1988, “Neuropharmacological Effects of Vibration on the Dorsal Root Ganglion,” Spine, 13, pp. 521–525. [CrossRef]
Baig, H. A., Guarino, B. B., Lipschutz, D. E., and Winkelstein, B. A., 2013, “Whole Body Vibration Induces Forepaw and Hind Paw Behavioral Sensitivity in the Rat,” J. Orthop. Res., 31, pp. 1739–1744. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic illustrating the experimental setup showing placement of accelerometers, infrared diodes, and EMG electrodes on the lumbar and thoracic regions of the spine and seat pad. The Z-(vertical), X-(anteroposterior), and Y-(lateral) directions, and the seat pad acceleration profile are also indicated.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Representative data from a single subject undergoing a vertical seat vibration at 4 Hz, showing the acceleration signals acquired from the seat and at L4 (lumbar spine) and at T3 (thoracic spine). Also shown are the corresponding EMG signals acquired from that same subject during the MVC and in the lumbar and thoracic spinal regions during the vibration.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The mean transmissibility responses of the lumbar and thoracic spines for Z-direction and X-direction sinusoidal vibration sweeps imposed between 2 and 18 Hz. The transmissibility in the lumbar region in the Z-direction at 3 Hz and 4 Hz and in the X-direction at 2 Hz and 3 Hz is significantly different (#) from all other frequencies but not different from each other. In the thoracic region, the transmissibility in the Z-direction at 2 Hz, 3 Hz, and 4 Hz is significantly different (#) from all other frequencies but not each other. In addition, the transmissibility in the X-direction at 4 Hz in the lumbar region, as well as 2 Hz, 3 Hz, and 4 Hz in the thoracic region are significantly different (*) from all other frequencies.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The mean muscle responses in the lumbar and thoracic regions for the Z-direction and X-direction vibration exposures between 2 and 18 Hz. In both spinal regions, the mean muscle activity at 4 Hz and 5 Hz for the Z-direction vibrations is significantly different (#) from activity at all other frequencies but not different from each other. Similarly, the muscle activity at 2 Hz and 3 Hz for both spinal regions during X-direction vibrations are significantly different from all other frequencies (#) but not different from each other. For an anteroposterior (X-direction) vibration sweep, the muscle response at 4 Hz in the lumbar region also is significantly different (*) from all other frequencies.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The mean peak-to-peak displacements along all directions of the seat and the markers for the lumbar and thoracic regions of the spine for vibrations in the Z-direction and X-direction between 2 and 5 Hz, showing the primary direction of motion is along the corresponding dominant motion of the seat, with laterally directed (Y-axis) motions being the smallest for all exposures




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In