0
Design Innovation Paper

Characterization of a Novel, Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Compatible Rodent Model Spinal Cord Injury Device

[+] Author and Article Information
Tim Bhatnagar

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
International Collaboration
on Repair Discoveries (ICORD),
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
e-mail: tim.bhatnagar@gmail.com

Jie Liu

Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
International Collaboration
on Repair Discoveries (ICORD),
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada

Thomas Oxland

Departments of Orthopaedics and Mechanical Engineering,
University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
International Collaboration on
Repair Discoveries (ICORD),
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received January 27, 2014; final manuscript received April 16, 2014; accepted manuscript posted May 14, 2014; published online June 26, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Barclay Morrison.

J Biomech Eng 136(9), 095001 (Jun 26, 2014) (6 pages) Paper No: BIO-14-1053; doi: 10.1115/1.4027670 History: Received January 27, 2014; Revised April 16, 2014; Accepted May 14, 2014

Rodent models of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) are often used to investigate the effects of injury mechanism, injury speed, and cord displacement magnitude, on the ensuing cascade of biological damage in the cord. However, due to its small size, experimental observations have largely been limited to the gross response of the cord. To properly understand the relationship between mechanical stimulus and biological damage, more information is needed about how the constituent tissues of the cord (i.e., gray and white matter) respond to injurious stimuli. To address this limitation, we developed a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible test apparatus that can impose either a contusion-type or dislocation-type acute cervical SCI in a rodent model and facilitate MR-imaging of the cervical spinal cord in a 7 T MR scanner. In this study, we present the experimental performance parameters of the MR rig. Utilizing cadaveric specimens and static radiographs, we report contusion magnitude accuracy that for a desired 1.8 mm injury, a nominal 1.78 mm injury (SD = 0.12 mm) was achieved. High-speed video analysis was employed to determine the injury speeds for both mechanisms and were found to be 1147 mm/s (SD = 240 mm/s) and 184 mm/s (SD = 101 mm/s) for contusion and dislocation injuries, respectively. Furthermore, we present qualitative pilot data from a cadaveric trial, employing the MR rig, to show the expected results from future studies.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Choo, A. M., Liu, J., Lam, C. K., Dvorak, M., Tetzlaff, W., and Oxland, T. R., 2007, “Contusion, Dislocation, and Distraction: Primary Hemorrhage and Membrane Permeability in Distinct Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Injury,” J. Neurosurg.: Spine, 6(3), pp. 255–266. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fiford, R. J., and Bilston, L. E., 2005, “The Mechanical Properties of Rat Spinal Cord in vitro,” J. Biomech., 38(7), pp. 1509–1515. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Maikos, J. T., and Shreiber, D. I., 2007, “Immediate Damage to the Blood-Spinal Cord Barrier Due to Mechanical Trauma,” J. Neurotrauma, 24(3), pp. 492–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Maikos, J. T., Qian, Z., Metaxas, D., and Shreiber, D. I., 2008, “Finite Element Analysis of Spinal Cord Injury in the Rat,” J. Neurotrauma, 25(7), pp. 795–816. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Choo, A. M., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Dvorak, M., Tetzlaff, W., and Oxland, T. R., 2009, “Modeling Spinal Cord Contusion, Dislocation, and Distraction: Characterization of Vertebral Clamps, Injury Severities, and Node of Ranvier Deformations,” J. Neurosci. Methods, 181(1), pp. 6–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheff, S. W., Rabchevsky, A. G., Fogaccia, I., Main, J. A., and Lumpp, J. E., Jr., 2003, “Experimental Modeling of Spinal Cord Injury: Characterization of a Force-Defined Injury Device,” J. Neurotrauma, 20(2), pp. 179–193. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gruner, J. A., 1992, “A Monitored Contusion Model of Spinal Cord Injury in the Rat,” J. Neurotrauma, 9(2), pp. 123–126. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Noyes, D. H., 1987, “Electromechanical Impactor for Producing Experimental Spinal Cord Injury in Animals,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 25(3), pp. 335–340. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kearney, P. A., Ridella, S. A., Viano, D. C., and Anderson, T. E., 1988, “Interaction of Contact Velocity and Cord Compression in Determining the Severity of Spinal Cord Injury,” J. Neurotrauma, 5(3), pp. 187–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sparrey, C. J., Choo, A. M., Liu, J., Tetzlaff, W., and Oxland, T. R., 2008, “The Distribution of Tissue Damage in the Spinal Cord is Influenced by the Contusion Velocity,” Spine, 33(22), pp. E812–E819. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jin, X., Lee, J. B., Leung, L. Y., Zhang, L., Yang, K. H., and King, A. I., 2006, “Biomechanical Response of the Bovine Pia-Arachnoid Complex to Tensile Loading at Varying Strain-Rates,” Stapp Car Crash J., 50, pp. 637–649.
Maikos, J. T., Elias, R. A., and Shreiber, D. I., 2008, “Mechanical Properties of Dura Mater From the Rat Brain and Spinal Cord,” J. Neurotrauma, 25(1), pp. 38–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ozawa, H., Matsumoto, T., Ohashi, T., Sato, M., and Kokubun, S., 2004, “Mechanical Properties and Function of the Spinal Pia Mater,” J. Neurosurg.: Spine, 1(1), pp. 122–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ichihara, K., Taguchi, T., Shimada, Y., Sakuramoto, I., Kawano, S., and Kawai, S., 2001, “Gray Matter of the Bovine Cervical Spinal Cord is Mechanically More Rigid and Fragile Than the White Matter,” J. Neurotrauma, 18(3), pp. 361–367. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ichihara, K., Taguchi, T., Sakuramoto, I., Kawano, S., and Kawai, S., 2003, “Mechanism of the Spinal Cord Injury and the Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: New Approach Based on the Mechanical Features of the Spinal Cord White and Gray Matter,” J. Neurosurgery, 99(3), pp. 278–285. [CrossRef]
Ozawa, H., Matsumoto, T., Ohashi, T., Sato, M., and Kokubun, S., 2001, “Comparison of Spinal Cord Gray Matter and White Matter Softness: Measurement by Pipette Aspiration Method,” J. Neurosurg., 95(2), pp. 221–224. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Greaves, C. Y., Gadala, M. S., and Oxland, T. R., 2008, “A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model of the Cervical Spine With Spinal Cord: An Investigation of Three Injury Mechanisms,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 36(3), pp. 396–405. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Russell, C. M., Choo, A. M., Tetzlaff, W., Chung, T. E., and Oxland, T. R., 2012, “Maximum Principal Strain Correlates With Spinal Cord Tissue Damage in Contusion and Dislocation Injuries in the Rat Cervical Spine,” J. Neurotrauma, 29(8), pp. 1574–1585. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bilston, L. E., and Thibeault, L. E., 1996, “The Mechanical Properties of the Human Spinal Cord in vitro,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 24, pp. 67–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cheng, S., Clarke, E. C., and Bilston, L. E., 2008, “Rheological Properties of the Tissues of the Central Nervous System: A Review,” Med. Eng. Phys., 30, pp. 1318–1337. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sparrey, C. J., and Keaveny, T. M., 2011, “Compression Behavior of Porcine Spinal Cord White Matter,” J. Biomech., 44, pp. 1078–1082. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sparrey, C. J., Manley, G. T., and Keaveny, T. M., 2009, “Effects of White, Grey, and Pia Mater Properties on Tissue Level Stresses and Strains in the Compressed Spinal Cord,” J. Neurotrauma, 26(4), pp. 585–595. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cheran, S., Shanmuganathan, K., Zhuo, J., Mirvis, S. E., Aarabi, B., Alexander, M. T., and Gullapalli, R. P., 2011, “Correlation of MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters With ASIA Motor Scores in Hemorrhagic and Nonhemorrhagic Acute Spinal Cord Injury,” J. Neurotrauma, 28(9), pp. 1881–1892. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fehlings, M. G., Cadotte, D. W., and Fehlings, L. N., 2011, “A Series of Systematic Reviews on the Treatment of Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Foundation for Best Medical Practice,” J. Neurotrauma, 28(8), pp. 1329–1333. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Parashari, U. C., Khanduri, S., Bhadury, S., Kohli, N., Parihar, A., Singh, R., Srivastava, R. N., and Upadhyay, D., 2011, “Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of MRI in Spinal Trauma, its Comparison and Correlation With Clinical Profile and Neurological Outcome, According to ASIA Impairment Scale,” J. Craniovertebr. Junction Spine, 2(1), pp. 17–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ellingson, B. M., Schmit, B. D., and Kurpad, S. N., 2010, “Lesion Growth and Degeneration Patterns Measured Using Diffusion Tensor 9.4-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rat Spinal Cord Injury,” J. Neurosurg.: Spine, 13(2), pp. 181–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gonzalez-Lara, L. E., Xu, X., Hofstretova, K., Pniak, A., Brown, A., and Foster, P. J., 2009, “In vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spinal Cord Injury in the Mouse,” J. Neurotrauma, 26(5), pp. 753–762. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kim, J. H., Loy, D. N., Wang, Q., Budde, M. D., Schmidt, R. E., Trinkaus, K., and Song, S. K., 2010, “Diffusion Tensor Imaging at 3 Hours After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Predicts Long-Term Locomotor Recovery,” J. Neurotrauma, 27(3), pp. 587–598. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kozlowski, P., Raj, D., Liu, J., Lam, C., Yung, A. C., and Tetzlaff, W., 2008, “Characterizing White Matter Damage in Rat Spinal Cord With Quantitative MRI and Histology,” J. Neurotrauma, 25(6), pp. 653–676. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yung, A. C., and Kozlowski, P., 2007, “Signal-to-Noise Ratio Comparison of Phased-Array vs. Implantable Coil for Rat Spinal Cord MRI,” Magn. Reson. Imaging, 25(8), pp. 1215–1221. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kurtz, S. M., and Devine, J. N., 2007, “PEEK Biomaterials in Trauma, Orthopedic, and Spinal Implants,” Biomaterials, 28(32), pp. 4845–4869. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The novel MR rig. (a) For MR image acquisition, the specimen is loaded into the MR rig and is placed at the center of the bore of the MR scanner—represented by the cylindrical cut-away. The “air line” (blue) supplies the pneumatic actuator (dark gray) with pressurized air from outside the MR scanner. The red box outlines the portion of the MR rig shown in (b) and (c); (b) the MR rig contusion configuration with clamps attached to the cervical spine of a specimen; (c) the MR rig dislocation configuration with clamps attached to the cervical spine of a specimen.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Custom designed spinal clamps to facilitate SCI. (a) Custom contusion injury clamps; (b) one set of the pair of identical, custom dislocation clamps that are used to create a dislocation injury.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic diagram of the contusion injury. (a) The contusion clamps attach rigidly to the cervical spine and the laminectomy at C5/6 is centered beneath the contusion impactor, which is driven into the dorsal surface of the spinal cord by the pneumatic actuator (dark gray); (b) the contusion clamps attach to vertebrae C4–C7 via the lateral notches of the spine.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic diagram of the dislocation setup. (a) The caudal clamp mount links the caudal dislocation clamp (attached to C6–C7) to the actuating piston. The piston travel length (i.e., the dislocation magnitude—2.5 mm) is limited by the insertion of a spacing block (brown), between the caudal assembly and the pneumatic actuator (dark gray). The red box highlights the cervical spine linked to the apparatus; (b) actuation of the piston causes the caudal assembly to dorsally translate, relative to the fixed cranial assembly, until the spacing block prevents further motion; (c) a detailed view of the imposed dislocation injury with the cranial clamps (red) fixed and anatomical directions indicated: D—dorsal, V—ventral, C—caudal, Cr—cranial.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Sample static X-ray images to determine contusion injury displacement magnitude. (a) The dorsoventral (DV) diameter of the spinal canal is measured (shown in red) and used as an approximate DV-diameter of the spinal cord; (b) the 2 mm spherical impactor is used as a gauge-length for pixel-mm measurement conversion; (c) once the contusion injury is actuated, a final X-ray is used to determine the remaining distance between the tip of the spherical impactor and the ventral wall of the spinal canal.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Measurement of dislocation injury (DL) displacement using HS video. The displacement of the caudal set of clamps is tracked (left, initial position; right, final position—2.5 mm), and the average speed is determined by dividing the displacement by the time required to complete the injury (∼13.6 ms). The cranial (“Cr”) and caudal (“Ca”) directions are indicated.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Injury speeds as a function of actuator inlet pressure. (a) Regression analysis of the contusion injury impact speed against actuator inlet pressure shows a relationship over a wide pressure range [R12 (black); 21–88 psi] but no discernible relationship within the experimental pressure range [R22 (red); 78–88 psi]; (b) the same analysis for average dislocation injury speed against actuator inlet pressure indicated that within the pressure ranges specified, the change in inlet pressure did not have a predictable effect on the injury speeds.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Sample images using the MR rig—pre-injury. The MR rig facilitates imaging of the in vivo rodent spinal cord, with differentiation between the white and the gray matter of the cord. Sample cross-sectional slices are shown from different parts of the cord along the intended injury area (marked by the white, solid line in the sagittal view image).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Sample images using the MR rig—during injury. The 2.5 mm dislocation injury is easily visualized in the sagittal view. The representative cross-sectional slices (taken from the same levels as in the pre-injury scan) clearly show local deformation of the white and gray matter due to the dislocation injury.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In