Research Papers

Analysis of an Early Intervention Tibial Component for Medial Osteoarthritis

[+] Author and Article Information
M. E. Chaudhary

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases,
301 East 17th Street, Suite 1500,
New York, NY 10003;
Department of Chemical and
Biomolecular Engineering,
NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering,
Brooklyn, NY 11201
e-mail: mc3391@nyu.edu

P. S. Walker

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases,
New York, NY
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering,
Brooklyn, NY 11201

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received August 20, 2013; final manuscript received April 5, 2014; accepted manuscript posted April 22, 2014; published online May 7, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Paul Rullkoetter.

J Biomech Eng 136(6), 061008 (May 07, 2014) (5 pages) Paper No: BIO-13-1379; doi: 10.1115/1.4027467 History: Received August 20, 2013; Revised April 05, 2014; Accepted April 22, 2014

Tibial component loosening is an important failure mode in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) which may be due to the 6–8 mm of bone resection required. To address component loosening and fixation, a new early intervention (EI) design is proposed which reverses the traditional material scheme between femoral and tibial components. The EI design consists of a plastic inlay for the distal femur and a thin metal plate for the proximal tibia. With this reversed materials scheme, the EI design requires minimal tibial bone resection compared with traditional UKA. This study investigated, by means of finite element (FE) simulations, the advantages of a thin metal tibial component compared with traditional UKA tibial components, such as an all-plastic inlay or a metal-backed onlay. We hypothesized that an EI tibial component would produce comparable stress, strain, and strain energy density (SED) characteristics to an intact knee and more favorable values than UKA components, due primarily to the preservation of dense cancellous bone near the surface. Indeed, FE results showed that stresses in the supporting bone for an EI design were close to intact, while stresses, strains, and strain energy densities were reduced compared with an all-plastic UKA component. Analyzed parameters were similar for an EI and a metal-backed onlay, but the EI component had the advantage of minimal resection of the stiffest bone.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Insall, J., and Aglietti, P., 1980, “A Five to Seven-Year Follow-Up of Unicondylar Arthroplasty,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 62, pp. 1329–1337. [PubMed]
Swank, M., Stulberg, S. D., Jiganti, J., and Machairas, S., 1993, “The Natural History of Unicompartmental Arthroplasty. An Eight-Year Follow-Up Study With Survivorship Analysis,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 286, pp. 130–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cheng, T., Guoyou, Z., and Zhang, X., 2010, “Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Improve Short-Term Recovery in Total Knee Arthroplasty?,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 468, pp. 1635–1648. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
McAllister, C., and Stepanian, J., 2008, “The Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques on Early Range of Motion after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty,” J. Arthroplasty, 23(1), pp. 10–18. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Khanna, A., Gougoulias, N., LongoU. G., and Maffulli, N., 2009, “Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review,” Orthop. Clin. North Am., 40(4), pp. 479–489. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Borus, T., and Thornhill, T., 2008, “Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg., 16(1), pp. 9–18. [PubMed]
Tanavalee, A., Choi, Y. J., and Trai, A. J., 2005, “Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: Past and Present,” Orthopedics, 28, pp. 1423–1433. [PubMed]
Rho, J. Y., Hobatho, M. C., and Ashman, R. B., 1995, “Relations of Mechanical Properties to Density and CT Numbers in Human Bone,” Med. Eng. Phys., 17(5), pp. 347–355. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gray, H., Taddei, F., Zavatsky, A., Cristofolini, L., and Gill, H., 2008, “Experimental Validation of a Finite Element Model of a Human Cadaveric Tibia,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 130, p. 031016. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y., Ahn, P. B., Fitzpatrick, D. C., Heiner, A., Poggie, R. A., and Brown, T. D., 1999, “Interfacial Frictional Behavior; Cancellous Bone, Cortical Bone, and a Novel Porous Tantalum Biomaterial,” J. Musculoskeletal Res., 3(4), pp. 245–251. [CrossRef]
Tandon, R., 1999, “Net Shaping of Co-Cr-Mo (F-75) via Metal Injection Molding,” Cobalt-Base Alloys for Biomedical Applications, J. A.Disegi, R. L.Kennedy, and R.Pilliar, eds., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 3–10.
Rapperport, D. J., Carter, D. R., and Schurman, D. J., 1987, “Contact Finite Element Stress Analysis of Porous Ingrowth Acetabular Cup Implantation, Ingrowth, and Loosening,” J. Orthop. Res., 5(4), pp. 548–561. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shanbhag, A. S., Hasselman, C. T., and Rubash, H. E., 1996, “Technique for Generating Submicrometer Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Particles,” J. Orthop. Res., 14, pp. 1000–1004. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kurtz, S. M., Villarraga, M. L., Herr, M. P., Bergström, J. S., and Rimnac, C. M., 2002, “Thermomechanical Behavior of Virgin and Highly Crosslinked Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Used in Total Joint Replacements,” Biomaterials, 23(17), pp. 3681–3697. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ho, S. P., Carpick, R., Boland, T., and LaBerge, M., 2002, “Nanotribology of Cocr-UHMWPE TJR Prosthesis Using Atomic Force Microscopy,” Wear, 253(11–12), pp. 1145–1155. [CrossRef]
Lakes, R. S., 2002, Composite Biomaterials. Biomaterials: Principles and Applications, CRC Press, LLC, Boca Raton, FL, p. 84.
Orr, J. F., Dunne, N. J., and Quinn, Q. C., 2003, “Shrinkage Stresses in Bone Cement,” Biomaterials, 24(17), pp. 2933–2940. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mündermann, A., Dyrby, C. O., D’Lima, D. D., Colwell, C. W., Jr., and Andriacchi, T. P., 2008, “in vivo Knee Loading Characteristics During Activities of Daily Living as Measured by an Instrumented Total Knee Replacement,” J. Orthop. Res., 26(9), pp. 1167–1172. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Argenson, J. A., Komistek, R. D., Aubaniac, J., Dennis, D. A., Northcut, E., Anderson, D., and Agostini, S., 2002, “In Vivo Determination of Knee Kinematics for Subjects Implanted With a Unicompartmental Arthroplasty,” J. Arthroplasty, 17(8), pp. 1049–1054. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Banks, S., Fregly, B., Boniforti, F., Reinschmidt, C., and Romagnoli, S., 2005, “Comparing In Vivo Kinematics of Unicondylar and Bi-Unicondylar Knee Replacements,” Knee, 13, pp. 551–556. [CrossRef]
D’Lima, D. D., Patil, S., Steklov, N., and Colwell, C. W., 2011, “The 2011 ABJS Nicolas Andry Award: 'Lab'-In-A-Knee: in vivo Knee Forces, Kinematics, and Contact Analysis,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 469(10), pp. 2953–2970. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fukubayashi, T., and Kurosawa, H., 1980, “The Contact Area and Distribution Pattern of the Knee,” Acta Orthop. Scand., 51, pp. 871–879. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bell, C., Arno, S., Hadley, S., Campbell, K., BeltranL., RechtM., ShermanO., WalkerP., 2012, “Relative Contacts Between the Medial Meniscus and Exposed Cartilage in the Knee,” 58th Annual Orthopaedic Research Society.
Taylor, M., Tanner, K. E., and Freeman, M. A. R., 1998, “Finite Element Analysis of the Implanted Proximal Tibia: A Relationship Between the Initial Cancellous Bone Stresses and Implant Migration,” J. Biomech., 31, pp. 303–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Huiskes, R., Weinans, H., Grootenboer, H. J., Dalstra, M., Fudala, B., and Sloof, T. J., 1987, “Adaptive Bone-Remodeling Theory Applied to Prosthetic-Design Analysis,” J. Biomech., 20(11–12), pp. 1135–1150. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Simpson, D., Kendrick, B., Dodd, C., Price, A., Gill, H., and Murray, D., 2010, “Load Transfer in the Proximal Tibia Following Implantation With a Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: A Static Snapshot,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H, 225, pp. 521–529. [CrossRef]
Morgan, E. F., and Keaveny, T. M., 2001, “Dependence of Yield Strain on Human Trabecular Bone on Anatomic Site,” J. Biomech., 34, pp. 569–577. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Minas, R. J., Day, J. B., and Hardinge, K., 1982, “Kinesiologic and Biomechanical Assessment of the Charnley ‘Load Angle Inlay’ Knee Prosthesis,” Eng. Med., 11(1), pp. 25–32. [CrossRef]
Arastu, M., Vijayaraghavan, J., Chissell, H., Hull, J., Newman, J., and Robison, J., 2009, “Early Failure of a Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Replacement,” Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc., 17(10), pp. 1178–1183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
LisowskiL. A., van den BekeromM. P. J., PilotP., van DijkC. N., LisowskiA. E., 2011, “Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Medium-Term Results of a Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure,” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 19(2): 277–84. [CrossRef]
Small, S. R., Berend, M. E., Ritter, M. D., Buckley, C. A., and Rogge, R. D., 2011, “Metal Backing Significantly Decreases Tibial Strains in a Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Model,” J. Arthroplasty, 26(5), pp. 777–782. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scott, C. E. H., Eaton, M. J., Nutton, R. W., Wade, F., Pankaj, P., and Evans, S., 2013, “Proximal Tibial Strain in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacements,” Bone Joint J., 95B, pp. 1339–1347. [CrossRef]
Saenz, C. L., McGrath, M. S., Marker, D. R., Seyler, T. M., Mont, M. A., and Bonutti, P. M., 2010, “Early Failure of a Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Design With an All-Polyethylene Tibial Component,” Knee, 17, pp. 53–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gladnick, B., Nam, D., Khamaisy, S., Paul, S., and Pearle, A., “Inlay Versus Onlay Tibial Implants in Robotic Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty,” Annual Congress of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty, Palm Beach, FL, Oct. 16–19.
Thompson, M. T., Conditt, M. A., Otto, J. K., and Redish, M., 2010, “The Importance of Good Cement Mantle With an All-Poly Inlay UKA” Transactions of the 56th Annual Meeting—Orthopaedic Research Society, Orthopaedic Research Society.
Hvid, I., and Hansen, S. L., 1985, “Trabecular Bone Strength Patterns at the Proximal Tibial Epiphysis,” J. Orthop. Res., 3(4), pp. 464–472. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hvid, I., 1988, “Trabecular Bone Strength at the Knee,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 227, pp. 210–221. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wong, N., Wei, C. S., Gautam, P., and Walker, P. S., 2012, “Multi-Planar Visualization of Tibial Bone Density Distribution From a Tibial CAT Scan Dataset,” Orthopedics Research Society Annual Meeting, February, 2012.
Arno, S., Maffei, D., Walker, P. S., Schwarzkopf, R., Desai, P., and Steiner, G., 2011, “Retrospective Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty Cases for Visual, Histological and Clinical Eligibility of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties,” J. Arthroplasty, 26(8), pp. 1396–1403. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Five components analyzed: EI 2 mm, EI 2 mm with keel, EI 3 mm, all-plastic UKA, metal-backed UKA. (b) Change in bone density (kg/m3) and elastic modulus (MPa) with resection depths ranging from 2 mm to 8 mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Maximum von Mises stresses for center and offset loading in the anterior–posterior direction. (b) Contour plots of von Mises stresses at the bone interface for cemented components centrally loaded.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Maximum and minimum principal strains for center and offset loading in the anterior–posterior direction. (b) Contour plots of maximum and minimum principal strains at the bone interface for cemented components centrally loaded.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Maximum strain energy densities for center and offset loading in the anterior–posterior direction. (b) Contour plots of strain energy densities within the bone for cemented components centrally loaded.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Contour plots of stresses and strains at the bone interface surface of an EI 3 mm component and EI 2 mm component with keel design




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In