Technical Brief

Creating Physiologically Realistic Vertebral Fractures in a Cervine Model

[+] Author and Article Information
Nicole C. Corbiere

Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering,
Clarkson University,
Potsdam, NY 13699

Kathleen A. Lewicki

Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering,
Clarkson University,
Potsdam, NY 13699;
Thayer School of Engineering,
Dartmouth College,
Hanover, NH 03755

Kathleen A. Issen

Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering,
Clarkson University,
Potsdam, NY 13699

Laurel Kuxhaus

Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering,
Clarkson University,
Potsdam, NY 13699
e-mail: lkuxhaus@clarkson.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received October 4, 2013; final manuscript received February 6, 2014; accepted manuscript posted March 6, 2014; published online May 6, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Kristen Billiar.

J Biomech Eng 136(6), 064504 (May 06, 2014) (4 pages) Paper No: BIO-13-1464; doi: 10.1115/1.4027059 History: Received October 04, 2013; Revised February 06, 2014; Accepted March 06, 2014

Approximately 50% of women and 25% of men will have an osteoporosis-related fracture after the age of 50, yet the micromechanical origin of these fractures remains unclear. Preventing these fractures requires an understanding of compression fracture formation in vertebral cancellous bone. The immediate research goal was to create clinically relevant (midvertebral body and endplate) fractures in three-vertebrae motion segments subject to physiologically realistic compressional loading conditions. Six three-vertebrae motion segments (five cervine, one cadaver) were potted to ensure physiologic alignment with the compressive load. A 3D microcomputed tomography (microCT) image of each motion segment was generated. The motion segments were then preconditioned and monotonically compressed until failure, as identified by a notable load drop (48–66% of peak load in this study). A second microCT image was then generated. These three-dimensional images of the cancellous bone structure were inspected after loading to qualitatively identify fracture location and type. The microCT images show that the trabeculae in the cervine specimens are oriented similarly to those in the cadaver specimen. In the cervine specimens, the peak load prior to failure is highest for the L4–L6 motion segment, and decreases for each cranially adjacent motion segment. Three motion segments formed endplate fractures and three formed midvertebral body fractures; these two fracture types correspond to clinically observed fracture modes. Examination of normalized-load versus normalized-displacement curves suggests that the size (e.g., cross-sectional area) of a vertebra is not the only factor in the mechanical response in healthy vertebral specimens. Furthermore, these normalized-load versus normalized-displacement data appear to be grouped by the fracture type. Taken together, these results show that (1) the loading protocol creates fractures that appear physiologically realistic in vertebrae, (2) cervine vertebrae fracture similarly to the cadaver specimen under these loading conditions, and (3) that the prefracture load response may predict the impending fracture mode under the loading conditions used in this study.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


NOF, 2013, “National Osteoporosis Foundation—Debuning the Myths, Fast Facts—Fractures.” Available at: http://www.Nof.Org, 2011.
AANS, 2007, “American Association of Neurological Surgeons—Vertebral Compression Fractures.” Available at: http://www.Aans.Org, 2013.
Delmas, P. D., van de Langerijt, L., and Watts, N. B., 2005, “Underdiagnosis of Vertebral Fractures is a Worldwide Problem: The IMPACT Study,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 20(4), pp. 557–563. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rapillard, L., Charlebois, M., and Zysset, P. K., 2006, “Compressive Fatigue Behavior of Human Vertebral Trabecular Bone,” J. Biomech., 39(11), pp. 2133–2139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Keller, T. S., 1994, “Predicting the Compressive Mechanical Behavior of Bone,” J. Biomech., 27(9), pp. 1159–1168. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Race, A., Miller, M. A., and Mann, K. A., 2010, “Novel Methods to Study Functional Loading Micromechanics at the Stem–Cement and Cement-Bone Interface in Cemented Femoral Hip Replacements,” J. Biomech., 43(4), pp. 788–791. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Race, A., Mann, K. A., and Edidin, A. A., 2007, “Mechanics of Bone/PMMA Composite Structures: An in vitro Study of Human Vertebrae,” J. Biomech., 40(5), pp. 1002–1010. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ebbesen, E. N., Thomsen, J. S., and Beck-Nielsen, H., 1999, “Lumbar Vertebral Body Compressive Strength Evaluated by Dual–Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Quantitative Computed Tomography, and Ashing,” Bone, 25(6), pp. 713–724. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kopperdahl, D. L., Pearlman, J. L., and Keaveny, T. M., 2000, “Biomechanical Consequences of an Isolated Overload on the Human Vertebral Body,” J. Orthop. Res., 18(5) pp. 685–690. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Buckley, J. M., Kuo, C. C., and Cheng, L. C., 2009, “Relative Strength of Thoracic Vertebrae in Axial Compression Versus Flexion,” Spine J., 9(6), pp. 478–485. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brown, S. H. M., Gregory, D. E., and McGill, S. M., 2008, “Vertebral End-Plate Fractures as a Result of High Rate Pressure Loading in the Nucleus of the Young Adult Porcine Spine,” J. Biomech., 41(1), pp. 122–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tsai, K., Lin, R., and Chang, G., 1998, “Rate-Related Fatigue Injury of Vertebral Disc Under Axial Cyclic Loading in a Porcine Body-Disc-Body Unit,” Clin. Biomech., 13(Suppl 1), pp. S32–S39. [CrossRef]
Moroney, S. P., Schultz, A. B., and Miller, J. A. A., 1988, “Load-Displacement Properties of Lower Cervical Spine Motion Segments,” J. Biomech., 21(9), pp. 769–779. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nuckley, D. J., and Ching, R. P., 2006, “Developmental Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine: Tension and Compression,” J. Biomech., 39(16), pp. 3045–3054. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rostedt, M., Ekström, L., and Broman, H., 1998, “Axial Stiffness of Human Lumbar Motion Segments, Force Dependence,” J. Biomech., 31(6), pp. 503–509. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stokes, I. A. F., 1988, “Mechanical Function of Facet Joints in the Lumbar Spine,” Clin. Biomech., 3(2), pp. 101–105. [CrossRef]
Boisclair, D., Mac-Thiong, J., and Parent, S., 2011, “Effect of Spinal Level and Loading Conditions on the Production of Vertebral Burst Fractures in a Porcine Model,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 133, p. 094503. [CrossRef]
Smit, T. H., 2002, “The Use of a Quadruped as an in vivo Model for the Study of the Spine—Biomechanical Considerations,” Eur. Spine J., 11, pp. 137–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kumar, N., Kukreti, S., and Ishaque, M., 2000, “Anatomy of Deer Spine and Its Comparison to the Human Spine,” Anat. Rec., 260(2), pp. 189–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Corbiere, N. C., Kafka, O. L., and Issen, K. A., 2013, “Cancellous Bone Fracture Visualization Method,” American Society of Biomechanics 37th Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings, American Society of Biomechanics, ed., Vol. 37, pp. 453–454.
Haddock, S. M., Yeh, O. C., and Mummaneni, P. V., 2004, “Similarity in the Fatigue Behavior of Trabecular Bone Across Site and Species,” J. Biomech., 37(2) pp. 181–187. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Stemper, B. D., Storvik, S. G., and Yoganandan, N., 2011, “A New PMHS Model for Lumbar Spine Injuries During Vertical Acceleration,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 133(8), p. 081002. [CrossRef]
Yoganandan, N., Stemper, B. D., and Pintar, F. A., 2013, “Cervical Spine Injury Biomechanics: Applications for Under Body Blast Loadings in Military Environments,” Clin. Biomech., 28(6), pp. 602–609. [CrossRef]
Ben Amor, I. M., Roughley, P., and Glorieux, F. H., 2013, “Skeletal Clinical Characteristics of Osteogenesis Imperfecta Caused by Haploinsufficiency Mutations in COL1A1,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 28(9), pp. 2001–2007. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Keller, T. S., Harrison, D. E., and Colloca, C. J., 2003, “Prediction of Osteoporotic Spinal Deformity,” Spine, 28(5), pp. 455–462. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gordon, I., 2004, Reproductive Technologies in Farm Animals, CABI Publishing, UK, pp. 339.
Kumar, N., Kukreti, S., and Ishaque, M., 2002, “Functional Anatomy of the Deer Spine: An Appropriate Biomechanical Model for the Human Spine?” Anat. Rec., 266(2), pp. 108–117. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Fracture type and location (indicated by arrows) for each motion segment. (Supplemental material for 3D fly-through videos of each cervine specimen is available under the “Supplemental Data” tab for this paper on the ASME Digital Collection)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Load–displacement curves for all three-vertebra motion segments. Dashed lines indicate endplate fractures and solid lines indicate midvertebral body fractures. The cadaver specimen curve is marked (H).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

MicroCT image of cross-section from (a) cervine L4 lumbar vertebra and (b) cadaver L4 lumbar vertebra

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Load frame fixture with potted specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized-load versus normalized-displacement curves for all vertebral motion segments. Dashed lines indicate endplate fractures and solid lines indicate midvertebral body fractures. The cadaver specimen curve is marked (H).



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In