Research Papers

An In Vivo Ovine Model of Bone Tissue Alterations in Simulated Microgravity Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
Benjamin C. Gadomski, Kirk C. McGilvray, Kevin K. Haussler

Orthopaedic Research Center,
Department of Mechanical Engineering
and School of Biomedical Engineering,
Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO 80523

Jeremiah T. Easley, Ross H. Palmer

Surgical Research Laboratory,
Department of Clinical Sciences,
Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO 80523

E. J. Ehrhart

Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory,
Department of Clinical Sciences,
Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO 80523

Raymond C. Browning

Physical Activity Energetics/
Mechanics Laboratory,
Department of Health and Exercise Science,
Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO 80523

Brandon G. Santoni

Phillip Speigel Orthopaedic Research Laboratory,
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research
and Education,
Tampa, FL 33637

Christian M. Puttlitz

Associate Department Head for Graduate Studies
Principal Investigator,
Orthopaedic Research Center,
Department of Mechanical Engineering
and School of Biomedical Engineering,
Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO 80523
e-mail: puttlitz@engr.colostate.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Bioengineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. Manuscript received September 4, 2013; final manuscript received October 11, 2013; accepted manuscript posted October 29, 2013; published online February 5, 2014. Editor: Beth Winkelstein.

J Biomech Eng 136(2), 021020 (Feb 05, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: BIO-13-1408; doi: 10.1115/1.4025854 History: Received September 04, 2013; Revised October 11, 2013; Accepted October 29, 2013

Microgravity and its inherent reduction in body-weight associated mechanical loading encountered during spaceflight have been shown to produce deleterious effects on important human physiological processes. Rodent hindlimb unloading is the most widely-used ground-based microgravity model. Unfortunately, results from these studies are difficult to translate to the human condition due to major anatomic and physiologic differences between the two species such as bone microarchitecture and healing rates. The use of translatable ovine models to investigate orthopedic-related conditions has become increasingly popular due to similarities in size and skeletal architecture of the two species. Thus, a new translational model of simulated microgravity was developed using common external fixation techniques to shield the metatarsal bone of the ovine hindlimb during normal daily activity over an 8 week period. Bone mineral density, quantified via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, decreased 29.0% (p < 0.001) in the treated metatarsi. Post-sacrifice biomechanical evaluation revealed reduced bending modulus (–25.8%, p < 0.05) and failure load (–27.8%, p < 0.001) following the microgravity treatment. Microcomputed tomography and histology revealed reduced bone volume (–35.9%, p < 0.01), trabecular thickness (–30.9%, p < 0.01), trabecular number (–22.5%, p < 0.05), bone formation rate (–57.7%, p < 0.01), and osteoblast number (–52.5%, p < 0.001), as well as increased osteoclast number (269.1%, p < 0.001) in the treated metatarsi of the microgravity group. No significant alterations occurred for any outcome parameter in the Sham Surgery Group. These data indicate that the external fixation technique utilized in this model was able to effectively unload the metatarsus and induce significant radiographic, biomechanical, and histomorphometric alterations that are known to be induced by spaceflight. Further, these findings demonstrate that the physiologic mechanisms driving bone remodeling in sheep and humans during prolonged periods of unloading (specifically increased osteoclast activity) are more similar than previously utilized models, allowing more comprehensive investigations of microgravity-related bone remodeling as it relates to human spaceflight.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Topics: Bone , Stress
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Giangregorio, L., and Blimkie, C. J., 2002, “Skeletal Adaptations to Alterations in Weight-Bearing Activity: A Comparison of Models of Disuse Osteoporosis,” Sports Med., 32(7), pp. 459–476. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Collet, P., Uebelhart, D., Vico, L., Moro, L., Hartmann, D., Roth, M., and Alexandre, C., 1997, “Effects of 1- and 6-Month Spaceflight on Bone Mass and Biochemistry in Two Humans,” Bone, 20(6), pp. 547–551. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vico, L., Collet, P., Guignandon, A., Lafage-Proust, M. H., Thomas, T., Rehaillia, M., and Alexandre, C., 2000, “Effects of Long-Term Microgravity Exposure on Cancellous and Cortical Weight-Bearing Bones of Cosmonauts,” Lancet, 355(9215), pp. 1607–1611. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Holick, M. F., 1998, “Perspective on the Impact of Weightlessness on Calcium and Bone Metabolism,” Bone, 22(5 Suppl), pp. 105S–111S. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vogel, J. M., 1975, “Bone Mineral Measurement: Skylab Experiment M-078,” Acta Astronaut., 2(1–2), pp. 129–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lang, T. F., 2006, “What Do We Know About Fracture Risk in Long-Duration Spaceflight?,” J. Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interact., 6(4), pp. 319–321.
Keyak, J. H., Kaneko, T. S., Tehranzadeh, J., and Skinner, H. B., 2005, “Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 437, pp. 219–228. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nelson, E. S., Lewandowski, B., Licata, A., and Myers, J. G., 2009, “Development and Validation of a Predictive Bone Fracture Risk Model for Astronauts,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 37(11), pp. 2337–2359. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Abram, A. C., Keller, T. S., and Spengler, D. M., 1988, “The Effects of Simulated Weightlessness on Bone Biomechanical and Biochemical Properties in the Maturing Rat,” J. Biomech., 21(9), pp. 755–767. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Allen, M. R., and Bloomfield, S. A., 2003, “Hindlimb Unloading Has a Greater Effect on Cortical Compared With Cancellous Bone in Mature Female Rats,” J. Appl. Physiol., 94(2), pp. 642–650. [PubMed]
Allen, M. R., Hogan, H. A., and Bloomfield, S. A., 2006, “Differential Bone and Muscle Recovery Following Hindlimb Unloading in Skeletally Mature Male Rats,” J. Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interact., 6(3), pp. 217–225.
Bloomfield, S. A., Allen, M. R., Hogan, H. A., and Delp, M. D., 2002, “Site- and Compartment-Specific Changes in Bone with Hindlimb Unloading in Mature Adult Rats,” Bone, 31(1), pp. 149–157. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dehority, W., Halloran, B. P., Bikle, D. D., Curren, T., Kostenuik, P. J., Wronski, T. J., Shen, Y., Rabkin, B., Bouraoui, A., and Morey-Holton, E., 1999, “Bone and Hormonal Changes Induced by Skeletal Unloading in the Mature Male Rat,” Am. J. Physiol., 276(1 Pt 1), pp. E62–E69. [PubMed]
Matsumoto, T., Nakayama, K., Kodama, Y., Fuse, H., Nakamura, T., and Fukumoto, S., 1998, “Effect of Mechanical Unloading and Reloading on Periosteal Bone Formation and Gene Expression in Tail-Suspended Rapidly Growing Rats,” Bone, 22(5 Suppl), pp. 89S–93S. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Swift, J. M., Nilsson, M. I., Hogan, H. A., Sumner, L. R., and Bloomfield, S. A., 2010, “Simulated Resistance Training During Hindlimb Unloading Abolishes Disuse Bone Loss and Maintains Muscle Strength,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 25(3), pp. 564–574. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Newton, B. I., Cooper, R. C., Gilbert, J. A., Johnson, R. B., and Zardiackas, L. D., 2004, “The Ovariectomized Sheep as a Model for Human Bone Loss,” J. Comp. Pathol., 130(4), pp. 323–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Den Boer, F. C., Patka, P., Bakker, F. C., Wippermann, B. W., Van Lingen, A., Vink, G. Q., Boshuizen, K., and Haarman, H. J., 1999, “New Segmental Long Bone Defect Model in Sheep: Quantitative Analysis of Healing with Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry,” J. Orthop. Res., 17(5), pp. 654–660. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Martini, L., Fini, M., Giavaresi, G., and Giardino, R., 2001, “Sheep Model in Orthopedic Research: A Literature Review,” Comp. Med., 51(4), pp. 292–299. [PubMed]
Lyons, A. S., Sherman, B. P., Puttlitz, C. M., Patel, V. V., Abjornson, C., Turner, A. S., Seim, H. B., III, Burger, E. L., and Lindley, E. M., 2011, “Failure of Resorbable Plates and Screws in an Ovine Model of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion,” Spine J., 11(9), pp. 876–883. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Santoni, B. G., Mcgilvray, K. C., Lyons, A. S., Bansal, M., Turner, A. S., Macgillivray, J. D., Coleman, S. H., and Puttlitz, C. M., 2010, “Biomechanical Analysis of an Ovine Rotator Cuff Repair Via Porous Patch Augmentation in a Chronic Rupture Model,” Am. J. Sports Med., 38(4), pp. 679–686. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hee, C. K., Dines, J. S., Dines, D. M., Roden, C. M., Wisner-Lynch, L. A., Turner, A. S., Mcgilvray, K. C., Lyons, A. S., Puttlitz, C. M., and Santoni, B. G., 2011, “Augmentation of a Rotator Cuff Suture Repair Using rhPDGF-BB and a Type I Bovine Collagen Matrix in an Ovine Model,” Am. J. Sports Med., 39(8), pp. 1630–1639. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Judex, S., Boyd, S., Qin, Y. X., Turner, S., Ye, K., Muller, R., and Rubin, C., 2003, “Adaptations of Trabecular Bone to Low Magnitude Vibrations Result in More Uniform Stress and Strain Under Load,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 31(1), pp. 12–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Claes, L. E., Wilke, H. J., Augat, P., Rubenacker, S., and Margevicius, K. J., 1995, “Effect of Dynamization on Gap Healing of Diaphyseal Fractures Under External Fixation,” Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 10(5), pp. 227–234. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Egermann, M., Goldhahn, J., Holz, R., Schneider, E., and Lill, C. A., 2008, “A Sheep Model for Fracture Treatment in Osteoporosis: Benefits of the Model Versus Animal Welfare,” Lab Anim., 42(4), pp. 453–464. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pearce, A. I., Richards, R. G., Milz, S., Schneider, E., and Pearce, S. G., 2007, “Animal Models for Implant Biomaterial Research in Bone: A Review,” Eur. Cells Mater., 13, pp. 1–10.
Draper, E. R., and Goodship, A. E., 2003, “A Novel Technique for Four-Point Bending of Small Bone Samples With Semi-Automatic Analysis,” J. Biomech., 36(10), pp. 1497–1502. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Santoni, B. G., Womack, W. J., Wheeler, D. L., and Puttlitz, C. M., 2007, “A Mechanical and Computational Investigation on the Effects of Conduit Orientation on the Strength of Massive Bone Allografts,” Bone, 41(5), pp. 769–774. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Leahy, P. D., Smith, B. S., Easton, K. L., Kawcak, C. E., Eickhoff, J. C., Shetye, S. S., and Puttlitz, C. M., 2010, “Correlation of Mechanical Properties Within the Equine Third Metacarpal With Trabecular Bending and Multi-Density Micro-Computed Tomography Data,” Bone, 46(4), pp. 1108–1113. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bouxsein, M. L., Boyd, S. K., Christiansen, B. A., Guldberg, R. E., Jepsen, K. J., and Muller, R., 2010, “Guidelines for Assessment of Bone Microstructure in Rodents Using Micro-Computed Tomography,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 25(7), pp. 1468–1486. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Parfitt, A. M., Drezner, M. K., Glorieux, F. H., Kanis, J. A., Malluche, H., Meunier, P. J., Ott, S. M., and Recker, R. R., 1987, “Bone Histomorphometry: Standardization of Nomenclature, Symbols, and Units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 2(6), pp. 595–610. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dempster, D. W., Compston, J. E., Drezner, M. K., Glorieux, F. H., Kanis, J. A., Malluche, H., Meunier, P. J., Ott, S. M., Recker, R. R., and Parfitt, A. M., 2013, “Standardized Nomenclature, Symbols, and Units for Bone Histomorphometry: A 2012 Update of the Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 28(1), pp. 1–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hardy, R., and Cooper, M. S., 2009, “Bone Loss in Inflammatory Disorders,” J. Endocrinol., 201(3), pp. 309–320. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nonaka, K., Fukuda, S., Aoki, K., Yoshida, T., and Ohya, K., 2006, “Regional Distinctions in Cortical Bone Mineral Density Measured by pQCT Can Predict Alterations in Material Property at the Tibial Diaphysis of the Cynomolgus Monkey,” Bone, 38(2), pp. 265–272. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Basso, N., Jia, Y., Bellows, C. G., and Heersche, J. N., 2005, “The Effect of Reloading on Bone Volume, Osteoblast Number, and Osteoprogenitor Characteristics: Studies in Hind Limb Unloaded Rats,” Bone, 37(3), pp. 370–378. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Basso, N., Bellows, C. G., and Heersche, J. N. M., 2005, “Effect of Simulated Weightlessness on Osteoprogenitor Cell Number and Proliferation in Young and Adult Rats,” Bone, 36(1), pp. 173–183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sessions, N. D., Halloran, B. P., Bikle, D. D., Wronski, T. J., Cone, C. M., and Morey-Holton, E., 1989, “Bone Response to Normal Weight Bearing after a Period of Skeletal Unloading,” Am. J. Physiol., 257(4 Pt 1), pp. E606–E610. [PubMed]
Smith, S. M., Nillen, J. L., Leblanc, A., Lipton, A., Demers, L. M., Lane, H. W., and Leach, C. S., 1998, “Collagen Cross-Link Excretion During Space Flight and Bed Rest,” J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 83(10), pp. 3584–3591. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Oganov, V. S., Rakhmanov, A. S., Novikov, V. E., Zatsepin, S. T., Rodionova, S. S., and Cann, C., 1991, “The State of Human Bone Tissue During Space-Flight,” Acta Astronaut., 23, pp. 129–133. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vico, L., and Alexandre, C., 1992, “Microgravity and Bone Adaptation at the Tissue-Level,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 7, pp. S445–S447. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Histological section of rodent bone demonstrating its lamellar structure and fundamental lack of secondary osteons. (b) A transverse section of mature cortical sheep bone demonstrates numerous secondary osteons. (c) Histological section of human compact bone demonstrating a similar secondary osteonal architecture as ovine bone.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

An external fixation unloading technique was utilized to differentially-unload the metatarsal bone of the right hindlimb. A total of four longitudinal connecting rods, four horseshoe rings, and six fixation pins were utilized. In this configuration, approximately 25% of the ground reaction force (GRF) is transmitted through the metatarsal bone (0.25 g) while 75% of the GRF is redirected through the external fixation device.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Ovine hindlimbs were instrumented with orthopedic strain measurement plates and three rosette strain gages for the in vitro strain correlation experiments. (Inset) The central thickness of an orthopedic locking plate was reduced to 0.50 mm and instrumented with a rosette strain gage in order to increase its sensitivity to small strain fluctuations.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The in vivo external fixation relative gravity was quantified by calculating the metatarsus bone strains from the acquired measurement plate strains, transforming the bone and device strains into forces using linearly elastic constitutive relationships, and taking the ratio of force transmitted through the metatarsus to total force transmitted through the system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized temporal DEXA results for the (top) microgravity and (bottom) Sham Group for the 8 week study period. The treated metatarsus displayed an acute rise in BMD after 2 weeks (*p < 0.01) followed by a rapid, linear decline in BMD due to the microgravity treatment with significant alterations in BMD versus baseline values occurring 6 weeks (+ p < 0.01) and 8 weeks (#p < 0.001) postsurgery.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(Top) Four-point bending modulus decreased as a result of microgravity unloading. Groups denoted by like-letters are statistically different from each other: (a) p < 0.05 and (b) p < 0.05. (Bottom) Normalized diametral compression failure load decreased following the microgravity treatment while no changes were evident following the sham treatment: (c) p < 0.001, (d) p < 0.01, and (e) p < 0.01.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a, highlighted) DEXA, μCT, and static histomorphometric analyses were performed in the distal cancellous network of the metatarsus. Three-dimensional μCT reconstructions demonstrated decreased trabecular number, thickness, and bone volume within the cancellous microarchitecture in the (b) microgravity Group treatment metatarsi (highlighted) versus their contralateral (control) metatarsi and those of the (c) Sham Group.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In