0
Research Papers

Development of a Finite Element Human Head Model Partially Validated With Thirty Five Experimental Cases

[+] Author and Article Information
Haojie Mao

e-mail: hmao@wayne.edu

Liying Zhang

e-mail: lzang@wayne.edu
Bioengineering Center,
Wayne State University,
818 West Hancock,
Detroit, MI 48201

Binhui Jiang

Hunan University,
No. 1 Lushanna Road Changsha,
Hunan 410082, China
e-mail: jjhhzz123@163.com

Vinay V. Genthikatti

e-mail: ei5627@wayne.edu

Xin Jin

e-mail: mail.jinxin@gmail.com

Feng Zhu

e-mail: fengzhume@gmail.com

Rahul Makwana

e-mail: rahulmakwana25@gmail.com

Amandeep Gill

e-mail: amandeep171@gmail.com

Gurdeep Jandir

e-mail: gssaini13@gmail.com

Amrinder Singh

e-mail: amrinder703@gmail.com

King H. Yang

e-mail: king.yang@wayne.edu
Bioengineering Center,
Wayne State University,
818 West Hancock,
Detroit, MI 48201

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Bioengineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING. Manuscript received July 19, 2012; final manuscript received June 22, 2013; accepted manuscript posted July 29, 2013; published online September 24, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Barclay Morrison.

J Biomech Eng 135(11), 111002 (Sep 24, 2013) (15 pages) Paper No: BIO-12-1302; doi: 10.1115/1.4025101 History: Received July 19, 2012; Revised June 22, 2013; Accepted July 29, 2013

This study is aimed to develop a high quality, extensively validated finite element (FE) human head model for enhanced head injury prediction and prevention. The geometry of the model was based on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging scans of an adult male who has the average height and weight of an American. A feature-based multiblock technique was adopted to develop hexahedral brain meshes including the cerebrum, cerebellum, brainstem, corpus callosum, ventricles, and thalamus. Conventional meshing methods were used to create the bridging veins, cerebrospinal fluid, skull, facial bones, flesh, skin, and membranes—including falx, tentorium, pia, arachnoid, and dura. The head model has 270,552 elements in total. Thirty five loading cases were selected from a range of experimental head impacts to check the robustness of the model predictions based on responses including the brain pressure, relative skull-brain motion, skull response, and facial response. The brain pressure was validated against intracranial pressure data reported by Nahum et al. (1977, “Intracranial Pressure Dynamics During Head Impact,” Proc. 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 770922) and Trosseille et al. (1992, “Development of a F.E.M. of the Human Head According to a Specific Test Protocol,” Proc. 36th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 922527). The brain motion was validated against brain displacements under sagittal, coronal, and horizontal blunt impacts performed by Hardy et al. (2001, “Investigation of Head Injury Mechanisms Using Neutral Density Technology and High-Speed Biplanar X-Ray,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 45, pp. 337–368; and 2007, “A Study of the Response of the Human Cadaver Head to Impact,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 51, pp. 17–80). The facial bone responses were validated under nasal impact (Nyquist et al. 1986, “Facial Impact Tolerance and Response,” Proc. 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 861896), zygoma and maxilla impact (Allsop et al. 1988, “Facial Impact Response – A Comparison of the Hybrid III Dummy and Human Cadaver,” Proc. 32nd Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 881719)]. The skull bones were validated under frontal angled impact, vertical impact, and occipital impact (Yoganandan et al. 1995, “Biomechanics of Skull Fracture,” J Neurotrauma, 12(4), pp. 659–668) and frontal horizontal impact (Hodgson et al. 1970, “Fracture Behavior of the Skull Frontal Bone Against Cylindrical Surfaces,” 14th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE International, Warrendale, PA). The FE head model was further used to study injury mechanisms and tolerances for brain contusion (Nahum et al. 1976, “An Experimental Model for Closed Head Impact Injury,” 20th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE International, Warrendale, PA). Studies from 35 loading cases demonstrated that the FE head model could predict head responses which were comparable to experimental measurements in terms of pattern, peak values, or time histories. Furthermore, tissue-level injury tolerances were proposed. A maximum principal strain of 0.42% was adopted for skull cortical layer fracture and maximum principal stress of 20 MPa was used for skull diploë layer fracture. Additionally, a plastic strain threshold of 1.2% was used for facial bone fracture. For brain contusion, 277 kPa of brain pressure was calculated from reconstruction of one contusion case.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Topics: Pressure , Brain
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Ward, C. C., and Thompson, R. B., 1975, “The Development of a Detailed Finite Element Brain Model,” 19th Stapp Car Crash Conference, San Diego, CA, SAE Technical Paper No. 751163.
Yang, K. H., Mao, H., Wagner, C., Zhu, F., Chou, C. C., and King, A. I., 2011, “Modeling of the Brain for Injury Prevention,” Neural Tissue Biomechanics, L. E.Bilston, ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Kleiven, S., and Hardy, W. N., 2002, “Correlation of an FE Model of the Human Head With Local Brain Motion–Consequences for Injury Prediction,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 46, pp. 123–144. [PubMed]
Takhounts, E. G., Ridella, S. A., Hasija, V., Tannous, R. E., Campbell, J. Q., Malone, D., Danelson, K., Stitzel, J., Rowson, S., and Duma, S., 2008, “Investigation of Traumatic Brain Injuries Using The Next Generation of Simulated Injury Monitor (SIMon) Finite Element Head Model,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 52, pp. 1–31. [PubMed]
Zhang, L., Yang, K. H., Dwarampudi, R., Omori, K., Li, T., Chang, K., Hardy, W. N., Khalil, T. B., and King, A. I., 2001, “Recent Advances in Brain Injury Research: A New Human Head Model Development and Validation,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 45, pp. 369–394. [PubMed]
Willinger, R., Kang, H. S., and Diaw, B., 1999, “Three-Dimensional Human Head Finite-Element Model Validation Against Two Experimental Impacts,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 27(3), pp. 403–410. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hardy, W. N., Mason, M. J., Foster, C. D., Shah, C. S., Kopacz, J. M., Yang, K. H., King, A. I., Bishop, J., Bey, M., Anderst, W., and Tashman, S., 2007, “A Study of the Response of the Human Cadaver Head to Impact,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 51, pp. 17–80. [PubMed]
Hardy, W. N., Foster, C. D., Mason, M. J., Yang, K. H., King, A. I., and Tashman, S., 2001, “Investigation of Head Injury Mechanisms Using Neutral Density Technology and High-Speed Biplanar X-Ray,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 45, pp. 337–368. [PubMed]
Gayzik, F. S., Moreno, D. P., Geer, C. P., Wuertzer, S. D., Martin, R. S., and Stitzel, J. D., 2011, “Development of a Full Body CAD Dataset for Computational Modeling: A Multi-Modality Approach,” Annals Biomed, Eng., 39(10), pp. 2568–2583. [CrossRef]
Lynnerup, N., Astrup, J. G., and Sejrsen, B., 2005, “Thickness of the Human Cranial Diploe in Relation to Age, Sex and General Body Build,” Head Face Med., 1, p. 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Horgan, T. J., and Gilchrist, M., 2003, “The Creation of Three-Dimensional Finite Element Models for Simulating Head Impact Biomechanics,” IJCrash, 8(4), pp. 353–366.
Kallemeyn, N. A., Tadepalli, S. C., Shivanna, K. H., and Grosland, N. M., 2009, “An Interactive Multiblock Approach to Meshing the Spine,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 95(3), pp. 227–235. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schonning, A., Oommen, B., Ionescu, I., and Conway, T., 2009, “Hexahedral Mesh Development of Free-Formed Geometry: The Human Femur Exemplified,” Comput.-Aided Des., 41(8), pp. 566–572. [CrossRef]
Shivanna, K. H., Tadepalli, S. C., and Grosland, N. M., 2010, “Feature-Based Multiblock Finite Element Mesh Generation,” Comput.-Aided Des., 42, pp. 1108–1116. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
De Santis, G., De Beule, M., Van Canneyt, K., Segers, P., Verdonck, P., and Verhegghe, B., 2011, “Full-Hexahedral Structured Meshing for Image-Based Computational Vascular Modeling,” Med. Eng. Phys., 33(10), pp. 1318–1325. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mao, H., Gao, H., Cao, L., Genthikatti, V., and Yang, K. H., 2013, “Development of High-Quality Hexahedral Human Brain Meshes Using Feature-Based Multi-Block Approach,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 16(3), pp. 271–279. [CrossRef]
Delye, H., Goffin, J., Verschueren, P., Vander Sloten, J., Van der Perre, G., Alaerts, H., Verpoest, I., and Berckmans, D., 2006, “Biomechanical Properties of the Superior Sagittal Sinus-Bridging Vein Complex,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 50, pp. 625–636. [PubMed]
Oka, K., Rhoton, A. L.Jr., Barry, M., and Rodriguez, R., 1985, “Microsurgical Anatomy of the Superficial Veins of the Cerebrum,” Neurosurgery, 17(5), pp. 711–748. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lee, M. C., and Haut, R. C., 1989, “Insensitivity of Tensile Failure Properties of Human Bridging Veins to Strain Rate: Implications in Biomechanics of Subdural Hematoma,” J. Biomech., 22(6–7), pp. 537–542. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Han, H., Tao, W., and Zhang, M., 2007, “The Dural Entrance of Cerebral Bridging Veins Into the Superior Sagittal Sinus: An Anatomical Comparison Between Cadavers and Digital Subtraction Angiography,” Neuroradiology, 49(2), pp. 169–175. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yamashima, T., and Friede, R. L., 1984, “Why do Bridging Veins Rupture Into the Virtual Subdural Space?” J. Neurology, Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 47(2), pp. 121–127. [CrossRef]
Bilston, L. E., 2011, “Brain Tissue Mechanical Properties,” Stud. Mechanobiol. Tissue Eng. Biomater., 3, pp. 11–24. [CrossRef]
Chatelin, S., Constantinesco, A., and Willinger, R., 2010, “Fifty Years of Brain Tissue Mechanical Testing: From In Vitro to In Vivo Investigations,” Biorheology, 47(5–6), pp. 255–276. [PubMed]
McElhaney, J. H., Fogle, J. L., Melvin, J. W., Haynes, R. R., Roberts, V. L., and Alem, N. M., 1970, “Mechanical Properties on Cranial Bone,” J. Biomech., 3(5), pp. 495–511. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wood, J. L., 1971, “Dynamic Response of Human Cranial Bone,” J. Biomech., 4(1), pp. 1–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Melvin, J. W., Robbins, D. H., and Roberts, V. L., 1969, “The Mechanical Properties of the Diploë Layer in the Human Skull in Compression,” Dev. Mech., 5, pp. 811–818.
Jin, X., Ma, C., Zhang, L., Yang, K. H., King, A. I., Dong, G., and Zhang, J., 2007, “Biomechanical Response of the Bovine Pia-Arachnoid Complex to Normal Traction Loading at Varying Strain Rates,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 51, pp. 115–126. [PubMed]
Jin, X., Yang, K. H., and King, A. I., 2010, “Mechanical Properties of Bovine Pia-Arachnoid Complex in Shear,” J. Biomech., 44(3), pp. 467–474. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nahum, A. M., Smith, R., and Ward, C. C., 1977, “Intracranial Pressure Dynamics During Head Impact,” Proc. 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 770922.
Trosseille, X., Tarriere, C., Lavaste, F., Guilon, F., and Domont, A., 1992, “Development of a F.E.M. of the Human Head According to a Specific Test Protocol,” Proc. 36th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 922527.
Yoganandan, N., Pintar, F. A., Sances, A.Jr., Walsh, P. R., Ewing, C. L., Thomas, D. J., and Snyder, R. G., 1995, “Biomechanics of Skull Fracture,” J. Neurotrauma, 12(4), pp. 659–668. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hodgson, V. R., Brinn, J., Thomas, L. M., and Greenberg, S. W., 1970, “Fracture Behavior of the Skull Frontal Bone Against Cylindrical Surfaces,” 14th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.
Nyquist, G. W., Cavanaugh, J. M., Goldberg, S. J., and King, A. I., 1986, “Facial Impact Tolerance and Response.,” Proc. 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 861896.
Allsop, D. L., Warner, C. Y., Wille, M. G., Scheider, D. C., and Nahum, A. M., 1988, “Facial Impact Response—A Comparison of the Hybrid III Dummy and Human Cadaver,” Proc. 32nd Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 881719.
Nahum, A. M., and Smith, R. W., 1976, “An Experimental Model for Closed Head Impact Injury,” 20th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.
Cormier, J., Manoogian, S., Bisplinghoff, J., Rowson, S., Santago, A., McNally, C., Duma, S., and Bolte, J. T., 2011, “The Tolerance of the Frontal Bone to Blunt Impact,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng, 133(2), p. 021004. [CrossRef]
Al-Bsharat, A., Hardy, W. N., Yang, K. H., Khalil, T. B., King, A. I., and Tashman, S., 1999, “Brain/Skull Relative Displacement Magnitude Due to Blunt Head Impact: New Experimental Data and Model,” 43rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 99SC22.
Fice, J. B., Cronin, D. S., and Panzer, M. B., 2011, “Cervical Spine Model to Predict Capsular Ligament Response in Rear Impact,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 39(8), pp. 2152–2162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yue, N., Shin, J., and Untaroiu, C. D., 2011, “Development and Validation of an Occupant Lower Limb Finite Element Model,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2011-01-1128.
Darvish, K. K., and Crandall, J. R., 2001, “Nonlinear Viscoelastic Effects in Oscillatory Shear Deformation of Brain Tissue,” Med. Eng. Phys., 23(9), pp. 633–645. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Elkin, B. S., Ilankovan, A., and Morrison, B., 3rd, 2010, “Age-Dependent Regional Mechanical Properties of the Rat Hippocampus and Cortex,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 132(1), p. 011010. [CrossRef]
Elkin, B. S., Ilankovan, A. I., and Morrison, B., 2011, “A Detailed Viscoelastic Characterization of the P17 and Adult Rat Brain,” J. Neurotrauma, 28(11), pp. 2235–2244. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Franceschini, G., Bigoni, D., Regitnig, P., and Holzapfel, G. A., 2006, “Brain Tissue Deforms Similarly to Filled Elastomers and Follows Consolidation Theory,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 54(12), pp. 2592–2620. [CrossRef]
Hrapko, M., van Dommelen, J. A., Peters, G. W., and Wismans, J. S., 2008, “Characterisation of the Mechanical Behaviour of Brain Tissue in Compression and Shear,” Biorheology, 45(6), pp. 663–676. [PubMed]
Miller, K., and Chinzei, K., 2002, “Mechanical Properties of Brain Tissue in Tension,” J. Biomech., 35(4), pp. 483–490. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nicolle, S., Lounis, M., Willinger, R., and Palierne, J. F., 2005, “Shear Linear Behavior of Brain Tissue Over a Large Frequency Range,” Biorheology, 42(3), pp. 209–223. [PubMed]
Prange, M. T., and Margulies, S. S., 2002, “Regional, Directional, and Age-Dependent Properties of the Brain Undergoing Large Deformation,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 124(2), pp. 244–252. [CrossRef]
Depreitere, B., Van Lierde, C., Sloten, J. V., Van Audekercke, R., Van der Perre, G., Plets, C., and Goffin, J., 2006, “Mechanics of Acute Subdural Hematomas Resulting From Bridging Vein Rupture,” J. Neurosurg., 104(6), pp. 950–956. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Takhounts, E. G., Eppinger, R. H., Campbell, J. Q., Tannous, R. E., Power, E. D., and Shook, L. S., 2003, “On the Development of the SIMon Finite Element Head Model,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 47, pp. 107–133. [PubMed]
Ruan, J. S., Khalil, T. B., and King, A. I., 1993, “Finite Element Modeling Direct Head Impact,” Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper No. 933114.
Ruan, J. S., Khalil, T., and King, A. I., 1991, “Human Head Dynamic Response to Side Impact by Finite Element Modeling,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 113(3), pp. 276–283. [CrossRef]
Ruan, J., and Prasad, P., 2001, “The Effects of Skull Thickness Variations on Human Head Dynamic Impact Responses,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 45, pp. 395–414. [PubMed]
McElhaney, J. H., Hopper, R. H.Jr., Nightingale, R. W., and Myers, B. S., 1995, “Mechanisms of Basilar Skull Fracture,” J. Neurotrauma, 12(4), pp. 669–678. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cloots, R. J., Gervaise, H. M., van Dommelen, J. A., and Geers, M. G., 2008, “Biomechanics of Traumatic Brain Injury: Influences of the Morphologic Heterogeneities of the Cerebral Cortex,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 36(7), pp. 1203–1215. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ho, J., and Kleiven, S., 2009, “Can Sulci Protect The Brain From Traumatic Injury?” J. Biomech., 42(13), pp. 2074–2080. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, L., Bae, J., Hardy, W. N., Monson, K. L., Manley, G. T., Goldsmith, W., Yang, K. H., and King, A. I., 2002, “Computational Study of the Contribution of the Vasculature on the Dynamic Response of the Brain,” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 46, pp. 145–164. [PubMed]
Ho, J., and Kleiven, S., 2007, “Dynamic Response of the Brain With Vasculature: A Three-Dimensional Computational Study,” J. Biomech., 40(13), pp. 3006–3012. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The FE head model. (a) isometric view of the head model with brain exposed; (d) medium sagittal view of the head model; (g) skull and facial bones; (b) 11 bridging veins; (e) falx and tentorium; (h) brain; and (c),(f),(i) brain sectional views in three directions (horizontal, sagittal, and coronal).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Force deflection in nasal impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fracture patterns for nasal impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Force deflection in zygoma impacts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Force deflection in maxilla impacts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Gradient brain pressure during frontal 45 deg angled blunt impact (Nahum et al. 1977; Case 37) and frontal quasi-horizontal impact (Trosseille et al. 1992; MS482_2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of model-predicted brain pressure to experimental data (Trosseille et al. [31])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Brain motion for C383-T3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Fracture pattern predicted by simulations for frontal impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Coup intracranial pressure associated with contusion

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In