0
Research Papers

Flow-Induced Deformation of Poroelastic Tissues and Gels: A New Perspective on Equilibrium Pressure-Flow-Thickness Relations

[+] Author and Article Information
Thomas M. Quinn

Department of Chemical Engineering,
McGill University Montreal,
Quebec, CanadaH3A 2B2
e-mail: thomas.quinn@mcgill.ca

Contributed by the Bioengineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. Manuscript received July 27, 2012; final manuscript received November 15, 2012; accepted manuscript posted November 29, 2012; published online December 27, 2012. Assoc. Editor: James C. Iatridis.

J Biomech Eng 135(1), 011009 (Dec 27, 2012) (8 pages) Paper No: BIO-12-1326; doi: 10.1115/1.4023095 History: Received July 27, 2012; Revised November 15, 2012; Accepted November 29, 2012

Hydrostatic pressure-driven flows through soft tissues and gels cause deformations of the solid network to occur, due to drag from the flowing fluid. This phenomenon occurs in many contexts including physiological flows and infusions through soft tissues, in mechanically stimulated engineered tissues, and in direct permeation measurements of hydraulic permeability. Existing theoretical descriptions are satisfactory in particular cases, but none provide a description which is easy to generalize for the design and interpretation of permeation experiments involving a range of different boundary conditions and gel properties. Here a theoretical description of flow-induced permeation is developed using a relatively simple approximate constitutive law for strain-dependent permeability and an assumed constant elastic modulus, using dimensionless parameters which emerge naturally. Analytical solutions are obtained for relationships between fundamental variables, such as flow rate and pressure drop, which were not previously available. Guidelines are provided for assuring that direct measurements of hydraulic permeability are performed accurately, and suggestions emerge for alternative measurement protocols. Insights obtained may be applied to interpretation of flow-induced deformation and related phenomena in many contexts.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Johnson, M., and Tarbell, J. M., 2001, “A Biphasic, Anisotropic Model of the Aortic Wall,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 123(1), pp. 52–57. [CrossRef]
McGuire, S., Zaharoff, D., and Yuan, F., 2006, “Nonlinear Dependence of Hydraulic Conductivity on Tissue Deformation During Intratumoral Infusion,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 34(7), pp. 1173–1181. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chen, X., and Sarntinoranont, M., 2007, “Biphasic Finite Element Model of Solute Transport for Direct Infusion Into Nervous Tissue,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 35(12), pp. 2145–2158. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Serpooshan, V., Quinn, T. M., Muja, N., and Nazhat, S. N., 2011, “Characterization and Modelling of a Dense Lamella Formed During Self Compression of Fibrillar Collagen Gels: Implications for Biomimetic Scaffolds,” Soft Matter, 7(6), pp. 2918–2926. [CrossRef]
Raimondi, M. T., Moretti, M., Cioffi, M., Giordano, C., Boschetti, F., Laganà, K., and Pietrabissa, R., 2006, “The Effect of Hydrodynamic Shear on 3D Engineered Chondrocyte Systems Subject to Direct Perfusion,” Biorheology, 43(3–4), pp. 215–222. [PubMed]
Lai, W. M., and Mow, V. C., 1980, “Drag-Induced Compression of Articular Cartilage During a Permeation Experiment,” Biorheology, 17(1–2), pp. 111–123. [PubMed]
Mansour, J. M., and Mow, V. C., 1976, “Permeability of Articular-Cartilage Under Compressive Strain and at High-Pressures,” J. Bone Joint Surg., 58(4), pp. 509–516.
McCutchen, C. W., 1962, “The Frictional Properties of Animal Joints,” Wear, 5(1), pp. 1–17. [CrossRef]
Reynaud, B., and Quinn, T. M., 2006, “Anisotropic Hydraulic Permeability in Compressed Articular Cartilage,” J. Biomech., 39(1), pp. 131–137. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gu, W. Y., Mao, X. G., Foster, R. J., Weidenbaum, M., Mow, V. C., and Rawlins, B. A., 1999, “The Anisotropic Hydraulic Permeability of Human Lumbar Anulus Fibrosus Influence of Age, Degeneration, Direction, and Water Content,” Spine, 24(23), pp. 2449–2455. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Heneghan, P., and Riches, P. E., 2008, “Determination of the Strain-Dependent Hydraulic Permeability of the Compressed Bovine Nucleus Pulposus,” J. Biomech., 41(4), pp. 903–906. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Albro, M. B., Li, R., Banerjee, R. E., Hung, C. T., and Ateshian, G. A., 2010, “Validation of Theoretical Framework Explaining Active Solute Uptake in Dynamically Loaded Porous Media,” J. Biomech., 43(12), pp. 2267–2273. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
McCarty, W. J., and Johnson, M., 2007, “The Hydraulic Conductivity of Matrigel,” Biorheology, 44(5–6), pp. 303–317. [PubMed]
Chin, H., Khayat, C. G., and Quinn, T. M., 2011, “Improved Characterization of Cartilage Mechanical Properties Using a Combination of Stress Relaxation and Creep,” J. Biomech., 44(1), pp. 198–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lai, W. M., Mow, V. C., Sun, D. D., and Ateshian, G. A., 2000, “On the Electric Potentials Inside a Charged Soft Hydrated Biological Tissue: Streaming Potential Versus Diffusion Potential,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 122(4), pp. 336–346. [CrossRef]
Holmes, M. H., and Mow, V. C., 1990, “The Nonlinear Characteristics of Soft Gels and Hydrated Connective Tissues in Ultrafiltration,” J. Biomech., 23(11), pp. 1145–1156. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mow, V. C., and Mansour, J. M., 1977, “The Nonlinear Interaction Between Cartilage Deformation and Interstitial Fluid Flow,” J. Biomech., 10(1), pp. 31–39. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Boschetti, F., Gervaso, F., Pennati, G., Peretti, G. M., Vena, P., and Dubini, G., 2006, “Poroelastic Numerical Modelling of Natural and Engineered Cartilage Based on in vitro Tests,” Biorheology, 43(3–4), pp. 235–247. [PubMed]
Argoubi, M., and Shirazi-Adl, A., 1996, “Poroelastic Creep Response Analysis of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Compression,” J. Biomech., 29(10), pp. 1331–1339. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gu, W. Y., Yao, H., Huang, C. Y., and Cheung, H. S., 2003, “New Insight Into Deformation-Dependent Hydraulic Permeability of Gels and Cartilage, and Dynamic Behavior of Agarose Gels in Confined Compression,” J. Biomech., 36(4), pp. 593–598. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Happel, J., 1959, “Viscous Flow Relative to Arrays of Cylinders,” AIChE J., 5(2), pp. 174–177. [CrossRef]
Quinn, T. M., Dierickx, P., and Grodzinsky, A. J., 2001, “Glycosaminoglycan Network Geometry May Contribute to Anisotropic Hydraulic Permeability in Cartilage Under Compression,” J. Biomech., 34(11), pp. 1483–1490. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Riches, P. E., Dhillon, N., Lotz, J., Woods, A. W., and McNally, D. S., 2002, “The Internal Mechanics of the Intervertebral Disc Under Cyclic Loading,” J. Biomech., 35(9), pp. 1263–1271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I., 1965, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, New York.
Démarteau, O., Pillet, L., Inaebnit, A., Borens, O., and Quinn, T. M., 2006, “Biomechanical Characterization and in vitro Mechanical Injury of Elderly Human Femoral Head Cartilage: Comparison to Adult Bovine Humeral Head Cartilage,” Osteoarth. Cartilage Osteoarth. Res. Soc., 14(6), pp. 589–596. [CrossRef]
Morel, V., and Quinn, T. M., 2004, “Cartilage Injury by Ramp Compression Near the Gel Diffusion Rate,” J. Orthopaed. Res., 22(1), pp. 145–151. [CrossRef]
Ma, S. S., Kassinos, C., and Kassinos, D., 2009, “Direct Simulation of the Limiting Flux: I. Interpretation of the Experimental Results,” J. Membrane Sci., 337, pp. 81–91. [CrossRef]
Wijmans, J. G., Nakao, S., and Smolders, C. A., 1984, “Flux Limitation in Ultrafiltration: Osmotic Pressure Model and Gel Layer Model,” J. Membrane Sci., 20, pp. 115–124. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

One-dimensional fluid flow through a soft tissue block is considered under two situations. (a) In the free surface situation, the tissue is compressed solely by flow-induced deformation due to a steady fluid velocity U in the z direction. This forces it against a rigid, porous support at its downstream surface (where pressure p = 0), while its upstream surface [where pressure p = p(0)] contacts free fluid. (b) In the fixed thickness situation, the tissue is held between two rigid, porous supports at a thickness d less than its uncompressed free-swelling thickness. Flow-induced deformation nevertheless affects its internal strain field.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Relationship between normalized fluid velocity (Pe) and applied pressure (p¯) for the free surface situation. Trends are shown for different strain dependencies of hydraulic permeability characterized by M = 0 (solid line), M = 1 (long-dashed line), and M = 4 (short-dashed line).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Normalized tissue thickness (d¯) and (b) mean permeability (km/kf) versus applied pressure (p¯) for the free surface situation. Trends are shown for different strain dependencies of hydraulic permeability characterized by M = 0 (solid lines), M = 1 (long-dashed lines), and M = 4 (short-dashed lines).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a), (c), and (e) Strain (ε) and (b), (d), and (f) normalized permeability (k/kf) fields for the free surface situation, plotted versus normalized position z/d (note that d depends upon flow rate). Trends are shown for a range of different strain dependencies of hydraulic permeability including (a) and (b) M = 0, (c) and (d) M = 1, and (e) and (f) M = 4. In all cases, results are shown for normalized applied pressures (p¯) of 0.1 (short-dashed lines), 0.3 (long-dashed lines), and 0.5 (solid lines).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Relationship between normalized fluid velocity (Pe) and applied pressure (p¯) for the fixed thickness situation with normalized tissue thicknesses of (a) d¯=0.9, (b) d¯=0.8, and (c) d¯=0.7. Trends are shown for different strain dependencies of hydraulic permeability characterized by M = 0 (solid lines), M = 1 (long-dashed lines), and M = 4 (short-dashed lines). Black dots represent points at which flow-induced deformation reduces tissue thickness to less than the imposed fixed thickness.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Normalized mean permeability (km/kf) versus applied pressure (p¯) for the fixed thickness situation with normalized tissue thicknesses of (a) d¯=0.9, (b) d¯=0.8, and (c) d¯=0.7. Trends are shown for different strain dependencies of hydraulic permeability characterized by M = 0 (solid lines), M = 1 (long-dashed lines), and M = 4 (short-dashed lines). Black dots represent points at which flow-induced deformation reduces tissue thickness to less than the imposed fixed thickness.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a), (c), and (e) Strain (ε) and (b), (d), and (f) normalized permeability (k/kf) fields for the fixed thickness situation, plotted versus normalized position z/d for the case of normalized tissue thickness d¯=0.7. Trends are shown for a range of different strain dependencies of hydraulic permeability including (a) and (b) M = 0, (c) and (d) M = 1, and (e) and (f) M = 4. In all cases, results are shown for normalized applied pressures (p¯) of zero (dotted lines), 0.1 (short-dashed lines), 0.3 (long-dashed lines), and 0.5 (solid lines).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Trends for (a) normalized fluid velocity (Pe), (b) normalized thickness (d¯), (c) normalized mean permeability (km/kf), and (d) normalized mean permeability calculated naively from imposed fixed thickness (kmx/kf) versus normalized applied pressure (p¯) for a transition from the fixed thickness situation to the free surface situation. Black dots represent points at which flow-induced deformation becomes large enough to reduce tissue thickness to less than the fixed thickness imposed at relatively small p¯, inducing the transition as p¯ increases. Trends are shown for different strain dependencies of hydraulic permeability characterized by M = 0 (solid lines), M = 1 (long-dashed lines), and M = 4 (short-dashed lines).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In