0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Modeling Modulus Reduction in Bovine Trabecular Bone Damaged in Compression

[+] Author and Article Information
T. L. Arthur Moore

Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School–Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215

L. J. Gibson

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

J Biomech Eng 123(6), 613-622 (Jun 07, 2001) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1407828 History: Received August 29, 2000; Revised June 07, 2001
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Keaveny,  T. M., Wachtel,  E. F., Guo,  X. E., and Hayes,  W. C., 1994, “Mechanical Behavior of Damaged Trabecular Bone,” J. Biomech., 27, pp. 1309–1318.
Keaveny,  T. M., Wachtel,  E. F., and Kopperdahl,  D. L., 1999, “Mechanical Behavior of Human Trabecular Bone After Overloading,” J. Biomech., 17, pp. 346–353.
Wachtel,  E. F., and Keaveny,  T. M., 1997, “Dependence of Trabecular Damage on Mechanical Strain,” J. Orthop. Res., 15, pp. 781–787.
Wachtel,  E. F., and Keaveny,  T. M., 1995, “The Dependence of Trabecular Damage on Applied Strain Level for Bovine Trabecular Bone,” Trans. Annu. Meet. — Orthop. Res. Soc., 20, p. 132.
Burr,  D. B., Turner,  C. H., Naick,  P., Forwood,  M. R., Ambrosius,  W., Hasan,  M. S., and Pidaparti,  R., 1998, “Does Microdamage Accumulation Affect the Mechanical Properties of Bone?,” J. Biomech., 31, pp. 337–345.
Yeh,  O. C., and Keaveny,  T. M., 2000, “Roles of Microdamage and Microfracture in the Mechanical Behavior of Trabecular Bone,” Trans. Annu. Meet. — Orthop. Res. Soc., 25, p. 34.
Guo,  X. E., McMahon,  T. A., Keaveny,  T. M., Hayes,  W. C., and Gibson,  L. J., 1994, “Finite Element Modeling of Damage Accumulation in Trabecular Bone Under Cyclic Loading,” J. Biomech., 27, pp. 145–155.
Schaffner,  G., Guo,  X. E., Silva,  M. J., and Gibson,  L. J., 2000, “Modelling Fatigue Damage Accumulation in Two-Dimensional Voronoi Honeycombs,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 42, pp. 645–656.
Silva,  M. J., and Gibson,  L. J., 1997, “Modeling the Mechanical Behavior of Vertebral Trabecular Bone: Effects of Age-Related Changes in Microstructure,” Bone, 21, pp. 191–199.
Silva,  M. J., and Gibson,  L. J., 1997, “The Effects of Non-Periodic Microstructure and Defects on the Compressive Strength of Two-Dimensional Cellular Solids,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 39, pp. 549–563.
Vajjhala,  S., Kraynik,  A. M., and Gibson,  L. J., 2000, “A Cellular Solid Model for Modulus Reduction Due to Resorption of Trabeculae in Bone,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 122, pp. 511–515.
Vajjhalla, S., 1999, “Finite Element Analysis of Voronoi Cellular Solids,” SM Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Taylor,  D., 1998, “Microcrack Growth Parameters for Compact Bone Deduced From Stiffness Variations,” J. Biomech., 31, pp. 587–592.
Budiansky,  B., and O’Connell,  R. J., 1976, “Elastic Moduli of a Cracked Solid,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 12, pp. 81–97.
Arthur Moore, T. L., and Gibson, L. J., 2002, “Microdamage Accumulation in Bovine Trabecular Bone in Uniaxial Compression,” submitted to ASME J. Biomech. Eng..
Fazzalari,  N. L., Forwood,  M. R., Manthey,  B. A., Smith,  K., and Kolesik,  P., 1998, “Three-Dimensional Confocal Images of Microdamage in Cancellous Bone,” Bone, 23, pp. 373–378.
Stauffer, D., and Aharony, A., 1992, Introduction to Percolation Theory, Taylor and Francis, London.
Gibson, L. J., and Ashby, M. F., 1997, Cellular Solids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Grenestedt,  J. L., and Bassinet,  F., 2000, “Influence of Cell Wall Thickness Variations on Elastic Stiffness of Closed Cell Cellular Solids,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 42, pp. 1327–1338.
Yeh,  O. C., and Keaveny,  T. M., 1999, “Biomechanical Effects of Intraspecimen Variations in Trabecular Architecture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study,” Bone, 25, pp. 223–228.
Ashman,  R. B., and Rho,  J. Y., 1998, “Elastic Modulus of Trabecular Bone Material,” J. Biomech., 21, pp. 177–181.
Carter,  D. R., and Hayes,  W. C., 1977, “The Compressive Behavior of Bone as a Two-Phase Porous Structure,” J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. Vol. 59, pp. 954–962.
Ciarelli,  M. J., Goldstein,  S. A., Kuhn,  J. L., Cody,  D. D., and Brown,  M. B., 1991, “Evaluation of Orthogonal Mechanical Properties and Density of Human Trabecular Bone From the Major Metaphyseal Regions With Materials Testing and Computed Tomography,” J. Orthop. Res., 9, pp. 674–682.
Ding,  M., Dalstra,  M., Danielsen,  C. C., Kabel,  J., Hvid,  I., and Linde,  F., 1997, “Age Variations in the Properties of Human Tibial Trabecular Bone,” J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. Vol., 79, pp. 995–1002.
Ducheyne,  P., Heymans,  L., Martens,  M., Aernoudt,  E., de Meester,  P., and Mulier,  J. C., 1977, “The Mechanical Behavior of Intracondylar Cancellous Bone of the Femur at Different Loading Rates,” J. Biomech., 10, pp. 747–762.
Goldstein,  S. A., Goulet,  R., and McCubbrey,  D., 1993, “Measurement and Significance of Three-Dimensional Architecture to the Mechanical Integrity of Trabecular Bone,” Calcif. Tissue Int., 53, pp. S127–S133.
Hvid,  I., Jensen,  N. C., Bunger,  C., Solund,  K., and Djurhuus,  J. C., 1985, “Bone Mineral Assay: Its Relation to the Mechanical Strength of Cancellous Bone,” Eng. Med., 14, pp. 79–83.
Hvid,  I., Bentzen,  S. M., Linde,  F., Mosekilde,  L., and Pongsoipetch,  B., 1989, “X-Ray Quantitative Computed Tomography: The Relations to Physical Properties of Proximal Tibial Trabecular Bone Specimens,” J. Biomech., 22, pp. 837–844.
Rice,  J. C., Cowin,  S. C., and Bowman,  J. A., 1988, “On the Dependence of the Elasticity and Strength of Cancellous Bone on Apparent Density,” J. Biomech., 21, pp. 155–168.
Keaveny,  T. M., and Hayes,  W. C., 1993, “A 20-Year Perspective on the Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 115, pp. 534–542.
Bastawros,  A.-F., Bart-Smith,  H., and Evans,  A. G., 2000, “Experimental Analysis of Deformation Mechanisms in a Closed-Cell Al Alloy Foam,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 48, pp. 301–322.
McCullough,  K. Y. G., Fleck,  N. A., and Ashby,  M. F., 1999, “Uniaxial Stress–Strain Behavior of Aluminum Alloy Foams,” Acta Mater., 47, pp. 2323–2330.
Bart-Smith,  H., Bastawros,  A.-F., Mumm,  D. R., Evans,  A. G., Sypeck,  D. J., and Wadley,  H. N. G., 1998, “Compressive Deformation and Vielding Mechanisms in Cellular Al Alloys Determined Using X-Ray Tomography and Surface Strain Mapping,” Acta Mater., 46, pp. 3583–3592.
Tantillo, M., 1999, “Image-Guided Assessment of Local Bone Failure,” Bachelor of Science Thesis, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Muller,  R., Gerber,  S. C., and Hayes,  W. C., 1998, “Micro-compression: A Novel Technique for the Nondestructive Assessment of Local Bone Failure,” Technol. Health Care, 6, pp. 433–444.
Turner,  C. H., Cowin,  S. C., Rho,  J. Y., Ashman,  R. B., and Rice,  J. C., 1990, “The Fabric Dependence of the Orthotropic Elastic Constants of Cancellous Bone,” J. Biomech., 23, pp. 549–561.
Oden,  Z. M., Sevitelli,  D. M., Hayes,  W. C., and Myers,  E. R., 1998, “The Effect of Trabecular Structure on DXA-Based Predictions of Bovine Bone Failure,” Calcif. Tissue Int., 63, pp. 67–73.
Taylor,  D., and Lee,  T. C., 1998, “Measuring the Shape and Size of Microcracks in Bone,” J. Biomech., 31, pp. 1177–1180.
Fazzalari,  N. L., Forwood,  M. R., Smith,  K., Manthey,  B. A., and Herreen,  P., 1998, “Assessment of Cancellous Bone Quality in Severe Osteoarthrosis: Bone Mineral Density, Mechanics, and Microdamage,” Bone, 22, pp. 381–388.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of trabecular bone, showing different levels of structure. Individual trabeculae may have microcracks or be fractured, reducing their stiffness. A region of trabecular bone may have trabeculae with no damage, with microcracks, or with fractures. As strain increases, the damage is concentrated in a band, indicated by the darker area on the whole specimen view, within the specimen. The model described in the text considers all three scales.
Grahic Jump Location
An idealized two-dimensional representation of a single trabecula. The trabecula width b is either thickness t (rod model) or length l (plate model). (a) An idealized undamaged trabecula. (b) The damaged area is outlined to contain the local damage. (c) The damaged area is represented by a new material with a reduced modulus, Ē.
Grahic Jump Location
Each damaged trabecula is replaced by an intact trabecula of the same initial modulus but a new effective thickness, t. The effective thickness, t, is chosen such that the intact trabecula of thickness t has the same stiffness as the damaged trabecula of thickness t0.
Grahic Jump Location
Damage location and depth through the thickness, as measured in the previous companion paper. Damage depth through the thickness is rounded to the nearest 25 percent. Schematic showing damage occurring (a) in the middle of a trabecula (50 percent depth through the thickness) and (b) at one end of a trabecula (25 percent depth through the thickness).
Grahic Jump Location
Trabeculae organized into a cellular solid network: (a) Entire network, showing trabeculae with no damage (black), trabeculae with partial damage (dark gray), and fractured trabeculae with a crack or cracks through the entire thickness (light gray). (b) Fractured trabeculae have been removed from the model. (c) Partially damaged trabeculae have been reduced in thickness. (d) The thickness reduction is averaged over all the remaining trabeculae, to give an average thickness of t̄.
Grahic Jump Location
Plot of modulus reduction versus density fraction reduction 11 for random removal of rodlike struts in an open-cell cellular solid (black). An estimate for the modulus reduction for random removal of platelike struts has also been included; the dashed line indicates the interpolation between the two limits (gray).
Grahic Jump Location
Damage within trabecular bone specimens is localized: (a) Image of a specimen tested to −4.0 percent compressive strain, stained after testing with calcein green. (b) Schematic representation of localized damage.
Grahic Jump Location
Typical stress–strain curve, loaded to a strain of −3.00 percent, then unloaded to zero strain. Initial modulus E0 and secant modulus Esec are shown.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of model predictions with experimentally determined modulus loss. Experimental modulus loss is the secant modulus divided by the initial loading modulus. (a) Closed-cell model based on platelike trabeculae. (b) Open-cell model based on rodlike trabeculae.
Grahic Jump Location
Effects of changes in input variables on the specimen reduced modulus. Closed symbols represent a specimen tested to −4.0 percent strain, with considerable damage. Black diamond represent the closed-cell model (plate); gray squares represent the open-cell model (rod) for the specimen tested to −4.0 percent. A second specimen was tested to −1.1 percent strain, with little damage. The open triangles represent the closed-cell (plate model), and the solid gray line represents the open-cell (rod) model for the specimen loaded to −1.1 percent. Input parameters varied include: (a) reduced modulus due to removal of fractured struts, Estrut_loss/E0, (b) width of the localized damage band, (c) total damaged area in the specimen, Atotal, (d) estimate of depth of damage through the thickness, tdamage/t0, (e) fraction of undamaged struts, f0, and (f ) ratio of middle damage to end damage, plotted on a log scale.
Grahic Jump Location
Effects of changing the distribution of damage on predicted modulus reduction. Black diamonds represent an even distribution of areas; black circles represent all damage concentrated in fractured struts (no partial damage). The error bars cover the range of damage created by different distributions. (a) Rod model. (b) Plate model.
Grahic Jump Location
General form of a beam with a segment missing. The beam may be deformed in bending (rod model) or by axial stretching (plate model).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In