0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Glenoid Replacement Prostheses: A Comparison of Keeled and Pegged Anchorage Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
D. Lacroix, L. A. Murphy, P. J. Prendergast

Bioengineering Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

J Biomech Eng 122(4), 430-436 (Mar 22, 2000) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1286318 History: Received June 06, 1999; Revised March 22, 2000
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Finite element mesh of the scapula
Grahic Jump Location
Muscle loading on the finite element model of the scapula at 90 deg arm abduction; data from 8
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic representation of the load application on the glenoid surface. The maximum occurs in the superior-anterior quadrant, and the direction of the force is at an angle to the glenoid surface, as shown.
Grahic Jump Location
Exploded views of the insertion of the pegged and keeled prostheses. The cement mantle is shown.
Grahic Jump Location
Magnified deformation plot of the polyethylene pegged components under 90 deg abduction loading shows (a) a view looking directly on the glenoid cavity, (b) the twisting, shearing, and bending orientations; — original position of prostheses; ⋯⋯ deformation of keeled prosthesis; — – deformation of pegged prosthesis
Grahic Jump Location
Cement maximum principal stresses for the normal bone; comparison of designs
Grahic Jump Location
Cement maximum principal stresses for the rheumatoid bone; comparison of designs
Grahic Jump Location
Plots of maximum principal cement stresses for: (a) normal bone and (b) RA bone. View of the anterior side.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) von Mises stresses of the normal bone: (i) the keeled prosthesis, (ii) the pegged prosthesis; (b) von Mises stresses of the rheumatoid bone: (i) the keeled prosthesis, (ii) the pegged prosthesis; A1, A2, B1, and B2 are regions of high stress
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of the regions of high stress, taking account of the reduction of density in bone due to RA. Each bar represents one point at the bone/cement interface. Stress is plotted as ratio of maximum principal stress-to-strength.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In