0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Glenoid Replacement Prostheses: A Comparison of Keeled and Pegged Anchorage Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
D. Lacroix, L. A. Murphy, P. J. Prendergast

Bioengineering Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

J Biomech Eng 122(4), 430-436 (Mar 22, 2000) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1286318 History: Received June 06, 1999; Revised March 22, 2000
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

McCullagh,  P. J. J., 1995, “Biomechanics and Design of Shoulder Arthroplasty,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H, 209, pp. 207–213.
Wirth,  M. A. and Rockwood,  C. A., 1996, “Current Concepts Review: Complications of Total Shoulder Replacement Arthroplasty,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., 78A, pp. 603–616.
Orr,  T. E., Carter,  D. R., and Schurman,  D. J., 1988, “Stress Analysis of Glenoid Component Designs,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 232, pp. 217–224.
Friedman,  R. J., LaBerge,  M., Dooley,  R. L., and O’Hara,  A. L., 1992, “Finite Element Modeling of the Glenoid Component: Effect of Design Parameters on Stress Distribution,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.,1, pp. 261–270.
Orr, T. E., Wong, B. E., Maw, K., Ashmore, W. P., and Mason, M. D., 1997, “The Effect of Component Fixation Design on the Performance of Glenoid Prostheses,” 43rd Meeting ORS, San Francisco, p. 881.
Lacroix,  D. and Prendergast,  P. J., 1997, “Stress Analysis of Glenoid Component Designs for Shoulder Arthroplasty,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H, 211, pp. 467–474.
Stone,  K. D., Grabowski,  J. J., Cofield,  R. H., Morrey,  B. F., and An,  K. A., 1999, “Stress Analyses of Glenoid Components in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.,8, pp. 151–158.
Van der Helm,  F. C. T., 1994, “Analysis of the Kinematic and Dynamic Behaviour of the Shoulder Mechanism,” J. Biomech., 27, pp. 527–550.
Lacroix, D., Prendergast, P. J., Murray, R., McAlinden, S., and D’Arcy, E., 1997, “The Use of Quantitative Computed Tomography to Generate a Finite Element Model of the Scapula Bone,” in: Sustainable Technologies in Manufacturing Industries, J. Monaghan and C. G. Lyons, eds., pp. 257–262.
Frich,  L. H., Jensen,  N. C., Odgaard,  A., Pedersen,  C. M., So̸jbjerg,  J. O., and Dalstra,  M., 1997, “Bone Strength and Material Properties of the Glenoid,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.,6, pp. 97–104.
Mansat,  P., Barea,  C., Hobatho,  M. C., Darmana,  R., and Mansat,  M., 1998, “Anatomic Variation of the Mechanical Properties of the Glenoid,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg.,7, pp. 109–115.
Hvid,  I., Bentzen,  S. M., Linde,  F., Mosekilde,  L., and Pongsoitpetch,  B., 1989, “X-Ray Quantitative Computed Tomography: The Relations to Physical Properties of Proximal Tibial Trabecular Bone Specimens,” J. Biomech., 22, pp. 837–844.
Rice,  J. C., Cowin,  S. C., and Bowman,  J. A., 1988, “On the Dependence of the Elasticity and Strength of Cancellous Bone on Apparent Density,” J. Biomech., 21, pp. 155–168.
Schaffler,  M. B., and Burr,  D. B., 1988, “Stiffness of Compact Bone: Effects of Porosity and Density,” J. Biomech., 21, pp. 13–16.
Frich, L. H., 1994, “Strength and Structure of Glenoidal Bone,” doctoral thesis. Århus University, Denmark.
Dalstra, M., Frich, L. H., and Sneppen, O., 1996, “The Loss of Load-Bearing Capability in Rheumatoid Glenoids (Abstract),” Proc. 10th Conference of the ESB, p. 178.
Williams, P. L., ed., 1995, Gray’s Anatomy, 38th ed., pp. 615–634.
Johnson, K. L., 1985, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 114.
Pearl,  M. L. and Lippitt,  S. B., 1994, “Shoulder Arthroplasty With a Modular Prosthesis,” Tech. Orthopaed.,8, No. 3, pp. 151–162.
Krause,  W., Mathis,  R. S., and Grimes,  L. W., 1988, “Fatigue Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement: S-N, P-N, and P-S-N Data,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 22, pp. 221–244.
Murphy, B. P. and Prendergast, P. J., 2000, “On the Magnitude and Variability of the Fatigue Strength of Acrylic Bone Cement,” Int. J. Fatigue, submitted.
Prendergast,  P. J., 1997, “Finite Element Models in Tissue Mechanics and Orthopaedic Implant Design,” Clin. Biomech.,12, pp. 343–366.
Mallon,  W. J., Brown,  H. R., Vogler,  J. B., and Martinez,  S., 1992, “Radiographic and Geometric Anatomy of the Scapula,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 277, pp. 142–154.
Crawley,  E. O., 1990, “In vivo Tissue Characterization Using Quantitative Computed Tomography: A Review,” J. Med. Eng. Technol., 14, pp. 233–242.
Anglin,  C., Tolhurst,  P., Wyss,  U. P., and Pichora,  D. R., 1999, “Glenoid Cancellous Bone Strength and Modulus,” J. Biomech., 32, pp. 1091–1098.
Dalstra, M., 1993, “Biomechanical Aspects of the Pelvic Bone and Design Criteria for Acetabular Prostheses,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen.
Karduna,  A. R., Williams,  G. R., Iannotti,  J. P., and Williams,  J. L., 1998, “Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Study of the Forces and Strains at the Glenoid Component,” J. Biomech. Eng., 120, pp. 92–99.
Davies,  J. P., Burke,  D. W., O’Connor,  D. O., and Harris,  W. H., 1987, “Comparison of the Fatigue Characteristics of Centrifuged and Uncentrifuged Simplex-P Bone Cement,” J. Orthop. Res., 5, pp. 366–371.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Finite element mesh of the scapula
Grahic Jump Location
Muscle loading on the finite element model of the scapula at 90 deg arm abduction; data from 8
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic representation of the load application on the glenoid surface. The maximum occurs in the superior-anterior quadrant, and the direction of the force is at an angle to the glenoid surface, as shown.
Grahic Jump Location
Exploded views of the insertion of the pegged and keeled prostheses. The cement mantle is shown.
Grahic Jump Location
Magnified deformation plot of the polyethylene pegged components under 90 deg abduction loading shows (a) a view looking directly on the glenoid cavity, (b) the twisting, shearing, and bending orientations; — original position of prostheses; ⋯⋯ deformation of keeled prosthesis; — – deformation of pegged prosthesis
Grahic Jump Location
Cement maximum principal stresses for the normal bone; comparison of designs
Grahic Jump Location
Cement maximum principal stresses for the rheumatoid bone; comparison of designs
Grahic Jump Location
Plots of maximum principal cement stresses for: (a) normal bone and (b) RA bone. View of the anterior side.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) von Mises stresses of the normal bone: (i) the keeled prosthesis, (ii) the pegged prosthesis; (b) von Mises stresses of the rheumatoid bone: (i) the keeled prosthesis, (ii) the pegged prosthesis; A1, A2, B1, and B2 are regions of high stress
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of the regions of high stress, taking account of the reduction of density in bone due to RA. Each bar represents one point at the bone/cement interface. Stress is plotted as ratio of maximum principal stress-to-strength.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In