Research Papers

A Nonlinear Biphasic Fiber-Reinforced Porohyperviscoelastic Model of Articular Cartilage Incorporating Fiber Reorientation and Dispersion

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Seifzadeh, D. C. D. Oguamanam

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,  Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B2K3, Canada

J. Wang

Faculty of Dentistry,  University of Toronto, 124 Edwards St., Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1G6, Canada

M. Papini

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,  Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B2K3, Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Bioengineering of Skeletal Tissues Teammpapini@ryerson.ca

J Biomech Eng 133(8), 081004 (Sep 06, 2011) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4004832 History: Received March 01, 2011; Accepted August 03, 2011; Posted August 09, 2011; Published September 06, 2011; Online September 06, 2011

A nonlinear biphasic fiber-reinforced porohyperviscoelastic (BFPHVE) model of articular cartilage incorporating fiber reorientation effects during applied load was used to predict the response of ovine articular cartilage at relatively high strains (20%). The constitutive material parameters were determined using a coupled finite element-optimization algorithm that utilized stress relaxation indentation tests at relatively high strains. The proposed model incorporates the strain-hardening, tension-compression, permeability, and finite deformation nonlinearities that inherently exist in cartilage, and accounts for effects associated with fiber dispersion and reorientation and intrinsic viscoelasticity at relatively high strains. A new optimization cost function was used to overcome problems associated with large peak-to-peak differences between the predicted finite element and experimental loads that were due to the large strain levels utilized in the experiments. The optimized material parameters were found to be insensitive to the initial guesses. Using experimental data from the literature, the model was also able to predict both the lateral displacement and reaction force in unconfined compression, and the reaction force in an indentation test with a single set of material parameters. Finally, it was demonstrated that neglecting the effects of fiber reorientation and dispersion resulted in poorer agreement with experiments than when they were considered. There was an indication that the proposed BFPHVE model, which includes the intrinsic viscoelasticity of the nonfibrillar matrix (proteoglycan), might be used to model the behavior of cartilage up to relatively high strains (20%). The maximum percentage error between the indentation force predicted by the FE model using the optimized material parameters and that measured experimentally was 3%.

Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

(a) Vertical displacement applied to the indenter. (b) Reaction force measured on the indenter.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) Approximation of the articular cartilage layer with one and two embedded families of fibers in the superficial and middle zones respectively. θ and κ characterize the mean orientations and the dispersion of the collagen fibers. (b) Example of undeformed finite element model of axisymmetric cartilage indentation. The indenter radius r’ = 0.25 mm, the cartilage radius R = 6 mm, and the thickness h varied in the range 0.41–0.6 mm. The heavy line indicates the boundary between the mesh for the superficial and middle zones.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Measured and FE optimized reaction force using the BFPHVE model for one of the five samples considered in the study. Err1 = 1.2%, Err2 = 1.1%.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Comparison of measured force with that predicted by the BFPHVE model: (a) only considering Err1 = 1.3% [Eq. 7]; (b) only considering Err2 = 1.3% [Eq. 8]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Comparison of predicted cartilage response for nonlinear biphasic fiber-reinforced viscohyperelastic model (i.e., without using fiber reorientation and dispersion) to experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Comparison of normalized (i.e., to the equilibrium value) indentation force measured by DiSilvestro and Suh [14] (r’ = 1.53 mm, h = 1.28 mm, r = 6.12 mm) with that predicted by the BFPHVE model using the optimized-FE material properties

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Comparison of (a) normalized (i.e., to the equilibrium value) reaction force and (b) lateral displacement (h = 1.28 mm, r = 1.5 mm) measured in the unconfined compression tests of DiSilvestro and Suh [14], with corresponding quantities predicted by the BFPHVE model using the same optimized-FE material properties as used in Fig. 5




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In