TECHNICAL PAPERS: Fluids/Heat/Transport

Finite-Reynolds-Number Effects in Steady, Three-Dimensional Airway Reopening

[+] Author and Article Information
Andrew L. Hazel

School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Matthias Heil

School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKm.heil@maths.man.ac.uk

J Biomech Eng 128(4), 573-578 (Feb 02, 2006) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2206203 History: Received September 12, 2005; Revised February 02, 2006

Motivated by the physiological problem of pulmonary airway reopening, we study the steady propagation of an air finger into a buckled elastic tube, initially filled with viscous fluid. The system is modeled using geometrically non-linear, Kirchhoff-Love shell theory, coupled to the free-surface Navier-Stokes equations. The resulting three-dimensional, fluid-structure-interaction problem is solved numerically by a fully coupled finite element method. Our study focuses on the effects of fluid inertia, which has been neglected in most previous studies. The importance of inertial forces is characterized by the ratio of the Reynolds and capillary numbers, ReCa, a material parameter. Fluid inertia has a significant effect on the system’s behavior, even at relatively small values of ReCa. In particular, compared to the case of zero Reynolds number, fluid inertia causes a significant increase in the pressure required to drive the air finger at a given speed.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Bubble pressure versus capillary number in the absence of fluid inertia (zero Reynolds number) for generic system parameters (ν=0.49,h∕R=1∕20,σ=1,A∞=0.373; see Sec. 2 for parameter definitions). The dashed line is an asymptotic approximation for the behavior on the pushing branch. Inset figures illustrate tube and interface shapes on the two branches (adapted from (10)).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) Bubble pressure versus capillary number for A∞=0.373, σ=1.0 and Re∕Ca=0,1,5,10. The markers show the results for Re∕Ca=10 on a refined mesh (83,000 degrees of freedom). They differ by less than 0.5% from the results at the standard resolution (43,000 degrees of freedom). The dashed line is the result from Hazel and Heil’s (10) asymptotic model for the pushing branch at zero Reynolds number. (b) The total viscous dissipation, Φ, versus capillary number for the same parameter values as in (a).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Interface and wall shapes for Ca=4 and Re∕Ca=0 top, 10 (bottom). Contours of pressure in the planes x1=0 and x2=0 are also shown.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Axial slices in the plane x1=0, showing the airway wall and the air-liquid interface for Re∕Ca=1 (solid lines) and Re∕Ca=0 (dashed lines). (a)A∞=0.373;(b)A∞=0.41; (c)A∞=0.45. In all three cases Ca=6 and σ=1.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Bubble pressure versus dimensionless propagation speed for A∞=0.373, 0.41, 0.45 for σ=1 and (a)Re=0 and (b)Re∕Ca=1

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Transverse cross sections in the plane x3=4 for the same parameter values as in Fig. 5. Solid lines: Re∕Ca=1; dashed lines Re∕Ca=0. The outer lines represent the airway wall, the inner lines the air-liquid interface.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In